The Nani
New Member
No, you’re talking about Van de Beek.I'm talking about the big chances created by him. He created only 9 big chances.
Indirectly. Again.
No, you’re talking about Van de Beek.I'm talking about the big chances created by him. He created only 9 big chances.
Harsh.I think Bruno may have shagged his missus because he is his number 1 hater on here
I think Bruno may have shagged his missus because he is his number 1 hater on here
I watched him all season. Over 50 games. I can assure you that is absolute bs. He could have had at least 25 assists this season alone just on the chances he created for his teammates who missed.I'm talking about the big chances created by him. He created only 9 big chances.
Trust me I can tell. You are more on the Felix camp.
I will be honest, I don't want him here. I just don't see it with him. I always tend to trust my instinct. I don't hate him though.
Nope. Van de Beek created 7 big chances as a SS. While he was deployed as a no 8 in the previous season, he created 11 big chances whereas Bruno Fernandes only created 9 big chances despite the fact that he's his team's set pieces taker.No, you’re talking about Van de Beek.
Indirectly. Again.
Didn't mean it in a bad wayHarsh.
However he can shag mine if he signs for us
If you say so.Trust me I can tell. You are more on the Felix camp.
Which is fine everyone has there own opinion but trust me he has made more then 9 big chances this season.
I have seen over 50 games of his this season so yes I would like to think I am pretty reliable.If you say so.
Thank you for that.@SportingCP96 is very reliable when it comes to Portuguese football imo . I watched him a bit myself this year and I also think he is great . For me I would prefer Bruno to Felix but I certainly didnt watch him as much as @SportingCP96 .
Where do you get that number from?I'm talking about the big chances created by him. He created only 9 big chances.
On sofascore. I'm only talking about his Portuguese league exploit, not Europa League because his team played against some weak teams such as Qarabag, vosqlak etc.Where do you get that number from?
1) Some noodle and tractor sponsorships to be signed on priorityThis guy is what we need here, and I can't see what the hold up is. Come on Woodward, get your finger out.
Do you have a link to where you can find those numbers on Sofascore? Or how they define «big chances»? Or even how they compare to others than Felix? Felix played for a team that scored more than 100 goals. Sporting scored approx 70.On sofascore. I'm only talking about his Portuguese league exploit, not Europa League because his team played against some weak teams such as Qarabag, vosqlak etc.
You can check on sofascore. Felix created 12 big chances for his team mates whereas Bruno created 9 big chances. I don't know how it was calculated.Do you have a link to where you can find those numbers on Sofascore? Or how they define «big chances»? Or even how they compare to others than Felix? Felix played for a team that scored more than 100 goals. Sporting scored approx 70.
It actually look like Bruno both had most assists and key passes from open play. Your argument therefor looks a bit flawed.
I did not find it in there...You can check on sofascore. Felix created 12 big chances for his team mates whereas Bruno created 9 big chances. I don't know how it was calculated.
Found it.I did not find it in there...
When you consider the other stats it sounds wrong, irrelevant or like a misunderstanding. Would therefor be interesting to look into the numbers.
Its not. But someone wanted it to be.What is this big chance created? How can a player made more assists than the number of big chances, is an actual assist of the goal not considered big chance? Why is it so important?
Bruno, Chiesa and Cancelo. One can dreamPut him in Mata/Lingard role, a floating RW who drift inside, then get a flying attacking rightback. We'll be in for a treat.
Tbf, I don't anything about those three, but their names sound like a flair attacking player. Get them!Bruno, Chiesa and Cancelo. One can dream
Eek, that sounds horrible. As someone who's watched him a fair bit, I'm confident he'd be as big of a problem there as Mata, Mkhi and Kagawa were when deployed out wide. Like them, and the reason I didn't want either Mata of Mkhi when initially linked, he's too lightweight.Put him in Mata/Lingard role, a floating RW who drift inside, then get a flying attacking rightback. We'll be in for a treat.
Kagawa was playing under Sir Alex. It was as function as a team you could have. Mata was Chelsea's best payer for a season or two, before he lost his mojo by being so nice of a person.Eek, that sounds horrible. As someone who's watched him a fair bit, I'm confident he'd be as big of a problem there as Mata, Mkhi and Kagawa were when deployed out wide. Like them, and the reason I didn't want either Mata of Mkhi when initially linked, he's too lightweight.
Maybe he'd work if we had someone like Poch as a manager who gets the team as a whole to function together, but we're a team who rely on individuals to come up with something out of nothing and, like the aforementioned players, I see him struggling here as a result. Regardless of the position he'd be played in, honestly.
The Portugal games in the Euro Nations cup, whilst not a huge sample, showed that he is far better through the middle and even better if he can drift around as he can find pockets of space well. When he played out wide he was restricted to crossing and never came in position to shoot, which was a huge waste.From the little I’ve seen of him - we’d be stupid to play him wide.
Midfield 3, his ability to hit a ball from distance will come in handy. Bruno, Pogba (if we can keep him), and someone who can pass the ball from deep sounds a good midfield.
Lot's of good goalscorer/playmaker playing out as floating wide player and being successful. Neymar with Barca, Eriksen with Spurs, Ozil with Madrid, Iniesta with Spain 2008-20014 (while SPain won everything there that could've been won), and Hazard with Chelsea (except last season).As shown vs Switzerland putting him out wide is useless you're resitwciitng him to to see far less of the ball and restricting him from floating around the 18 yard box where and loose ball that falls his way is a 60% chance he bangs it in. Football is simple guys if you have a guy who banged in 34 goals from midfield playing down the middle....play him down the middle.
Obviously but not ever situation is similar. Every single player you named is completely different.Lot's of good goalscorer/playmaker playing out as floating wide player and being successful. Neymar with Barca, Eriksen with Spurs, Ozil with Madrid, Iniesta with Spain 2008-20014 (while SPain won everything there that could've been won), and Hazard with Chelsea (except last season).
Football is not a rigid formation.
Yes i can confirm.According to Ed Woodward's Facebook profile, he reached agreement with Sporting Lisbon for Bruno on 9th June.
Can someone confirm if it's really Ed's fb account ?
So, Bruno is ours?Yes i can confirm.
Yes. The Amsterdam flight has taken a detour and is now scheduled to land in Lisbon as we speak. Ed is preparing for a double announcementSo, Bruno is ours?