Our new approach to signings - for or against?

KevinJoh

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
459
It looks to me that Ole want to change the dressing room atmosphere, and on pitch attitude, more than to bring new stars that will bring more problems in already bad atmosphere. The problem with the team is that you can't sell deadwood, and even bigger that you can't have short term success. So, bringing young lads with a space to grow and be much better in a 2-3 years, is a good sign. One top player per window, and fixing holes in the team (RB, RW, CM) with players with right attitude is probably better than to gamble with stars that probably won't deliver. Look at Alexis, or Pogba, or Lukaku, or Mata. All brought some quality, but not what you expected for the money invested. On the other hand look at Fred or Lindelof who are from abroad, and needed one year at least to adapt. Not sure we have that one year now, so I guess, Ole wants kids from the league that won't need a year to adapt to PL. Not sure if the choice of the players is the right one (James, Longstaff, Rice,...), we will see if scouts did their job, but the direction is OK for me. Certainly, it is better bet than bringing players like Rodriguez or Dybala, that won't guarantee anything and would be paid in gold so you can't sell them later.
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
Our new approach is youth but, as others have noted, it's not exactly world class youth talent. It seems to be buy young promising players in the hope they can be developed in to world class talent.

I don't have a huge problem with that approach but what it tells me is that a) We've given up on competing for the title anytime soon b) it's a buy low sell high business policy c) The kind of signings we're making aren't the kind of signings that will help us attract bigger, more established players to our ranks d) it's a punt at best, there's no gaurantee Ole/our coaching staff we'll be able to improve the players we've bought so 2-3 years from now we could still be in the same position we are today - a squad full of players who are not Utd quality

There is no real plan at our club, we are seriously paying for the lack of movement in appointing a DoF
 

Shaidabdullah Hussain

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
340
Location
A pretty Sikh United fan
We’ve been heavily linked with De Ligt, Fernandes and Ben Yedder.

Forgive me If I’m wrong but they’re about as British as Sam Allardyce is Vietnamese, no?

Several of them may move to other clubs due to wanting champions league football, which we are crucially lacking. Saying we are only looking at British players out of some xenophobic agenda is an odd narrative IMO
 

SapperBRed75

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
257
Location
Where's the DOF?
Too early to say. Bringing in young,
promising players is positive but more to do in recruitment, building a balanced, driven team and then coaching them into an effective system.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,722
Who of our current established British players are good enough to play for this club?

I'd argue that Young, Smalling, Jones and Lingard are not. We're all talking about the clear out we need but you also need to meet homegrown quotas so we have to sign British players to allow us get rid of the deadweight.

Longstaff is getting stupid abuse on the board all week from people who've seen feck all of him. James is rapid, direct and will look to make the runs behind defenders that Martial won't or Lingard/Mata can't. When players like Fernandinho and Bernardo at City, or Henderson and Milner at Liverpool, are so important to successful sides, I can't understand how people don't recognise the need for the right characters and personalities rather than just always wanting the fanciest, most expensive flavour of the month available.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,202
There is nothing to suggest we are only buying British players. We are linked to some, we are also linked to players from other nationalities. The only thing that looks certain is that we no longer are looking for any short term fixes and look to be planning for a long term future.
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
Says a lot about where we are when a mid-table Championship player is seen as a the kind of player were desperate for.
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,746
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
I agree with going for young ambitious players, but from any nationality
The one thing I like about signing young British players is if they work out, chances are you won't have to worry about them having their head turned else where. Players like James and AWB wouldn't have grown up dreaming of playing for Real Madrid or Barca. They will see United as the pinnical of football and likely be with us for years to come, as long as they are good enough. Mean while, signing young foreign players may like at United as a stepping stone before making their dream move to another European giant. Imagine if CR7 was English. He would likely still be playing at United to this day...
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
The one thing I like about signing young British players is if they work out, chances are you won't have to worry about them having their head turned else where. Players like James and AWB wouldn't have grown up dreaming of playing for Real Madrid or Barca. They will see United as the pinnical of football and likely be with us for years to come, as long as they are good enough. Mean while, signing young foreign players may like at United as a stepping stone before making their dream move to another European giant. Imagine if CR7 was English. He would likely still be playing at United to this day...
True but the flip side of that is England doesn't produce CR7s.
 

RedNed77

New Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
2,658
Hmm. So if the plan is to buy young, raw, fast, inexperienced at EPL level, affordable players from a certain region not known for its flair/skill/joga-bonito, but they play fast & direct, with great attitude & professionalism, giving their all on the pitch, & place 7th you will be ok with it?
I'm curious as to how you ended up a United fan TBH.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
95,940
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
So far so good I'd say but ultimately how our team will shape up at the start of the season and how we'll play will be the determining factors for me.
 

Von Mistelroum

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
4,030
I've no issues with buying the best young British talent, but the speed of our recruitment is painful and everything seems amateurish . It also feels a bit like specifically recruiting based on nationality is going to mean not going for the best players we could reasonably afford. I recall when Ole was at a certain other English club, he recruited pretty poorly and I'm thinking we might be looking to consolidate mid table at this rate...
 

Eric's Seagull

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
3,707
Location
4-4-2: The Flat One
Would be happy to buy British players, as long as they are decent, hungry players, who want to play for club rather than than players who come here just for money. Although I understand the premium we would pay for young British players.

I think the important thing is to have players who really want to play for the club and would give anything to wear this shirt and it doesn't matter if they are British or foreign as long as they have the desire to play for us.

One advantage with signing British players is that they are already acclimatised to the country where as if we bought someone from abroad it might take them a certain amount of time to adjust or worse they might not adjust at all due to things like weather or they may find they just don't like the country after they move here etc
 
Last edited:

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,228
We’ve been heavily linked with De Ligt, Fernandes and Ben Yedder.

Forgive me If I’m wrong but they’re about as British as Sam Allardyce is Vietnamese, no?

Several of them may move to other clubs due to wanting champions league football, which we are crucially lacking. Saying we are only looking at British players out of some xenophobic agenda is an odd narrative IMO
Yeah especially as Ole would love to make Lindelöf, Pogba and DeGea the core of our future side.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
Yea only produce the likes of Beckham, Scholes, Giggs, Lampard, Gerard, Rooney, Ferdinand etc. Who wants any of them though.
Those are most of the best English prospects over a now 27 year span. Trust me I'd love another Co92 but the region isn't producing that kind of player with any sort of regularity to justify concentrating our efforts on it.
 

matt23

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
1,071
Maybe we're targeting young English/British players because of a noticeable improvement in standard of such players - you know, as opposed to Solskjaer being some closet member of the EDL, suddenly deciding he can't stand Johnny foreigner... You never know.
 

limerickcitykid

There once was a kid from Toronto...
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
14,058
Location
East end / Oot and aboot
Those are most of the best English prospects over a now 27 year span. Trust me I'd love another Co92 but the region isn't producing that kind of player with any sort of regularity to justify concentrating our efforts on it.
The region has just won every youth tournament out there and completely dominated the youth Champions League so yes they are clearly producing.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,641
They're not meant to. We need fresh squad options too.



Is the window shut?



Who says Alderweireld wants to join? Buying Longstaff wouldn't mean we're not buying a centre back.



Again, the window isn't shut and if we're getting rid of dead wood there's not going to be a que of buyers. Valencia is gone, we're obviously willing to listen to offers for Darmian & Rojo, Sanchez would be off if anyone would pay him.
How do we need fresh squad options? We need better players to improve our first 11.
 

Web of Bissaka

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
8,553
Location
Losing to Comeback Winning!
For not against.

For -- sort-of Promising Youngsters.
Against -- only British, no other nationality.

Fresh and youth players are always welcome. Characters/personality of the player has to be considered though, as does how promising are their talents. I don't care about nationality but I find targeting young British players to be reasonable = British (and Irish) players are most probably more likely to stay than players from other nationality who may be more easily leaving and engineer a move to other top clubs especially other leagues. Obviously not every players mind. The younger they are at a club, maybe the "loyalty" factor will come into play (I mean looking at many examples among the top clubs eg. United, Liverpool, Spurs, except the few big profile players who are pushed out of the club) and the longer they will stay with the club. I think if a player stay with the club ever since they're young and/or through the youth, may have similar loyalty effects.

Players Ratio ?
Maybe better to have a rough ratio of 7 (British-Irish): 3 (Other Nationalities), well idk I mean we did got a lot of awesome different nationality players (legends even). Should never ignore promising youngsters from different nationalities or we will miss out plenty of potential gems. Better ratio maybe 8 BI : 2 ON, or, 6 BI : 4 ON.

No problem with the 'transfer-in' approach.
The problems are with the 'transfer-out' approach/handling -- if the British players are not working out, quickly remove 'em and replace with another one. Have to always make sure the squad is always freshen up with the British-Irish players being quality players. Quality matters the most. This club should not be a charity.
 

Keefy18

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
2,653
To me (if this is true), it is a a shocking recruitment policy for a club that's supported all over the world. (I'm not sure what's the right term in English for how I see this - nationalistic? Xenophobic? Exclusive?)

Not to mention I think it makes no financial sense. Sancho? Will cost 100m over. Maguire? 80m. Rice? 60m. Maddison & Brooks will cost lots more than AWB too. I mean 9 game Longstaff is valued in excess of 25m! In general, foreign players from outside epl will cost you less wages-wise & in transfer fees.
Don't believe its xenophobic at all, just that we've always had a strong British / English spine at times of success. As a club we are steeped in sentimentality and tradition, that's what we are.

As for financial sense, we've spent mind boggling sums on foreign imports as well. Pogba a world record, Martial a record for a teenager, Lukaku in the top 5 most expensive PL transfers.

Money in football has just gone insane, so buying homegrown or foreign makes little difference I feel.
 

jackal&hyde

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
4,220
I've read reports about this supposed Brexit like approach, but as of right now, i am very happy with the business done. British or not, AWB was an outstanding player last season and James is a gamble but does seem to posses phenomenal pace and we didn't break the bank for him.

I am slightly worried of the links with ridiculously overpriced players like Maguire, Rice or Maddison for whom i think there are better options but at the same time we are also linked with Bruno Fernandes. So at the end of the day we will have to wait and see.

Wouldn't mind Sancho for 90-100mil, but Maguire for more then 50 gives me a bad feeling. Time will tell.

EDIT: Also, last season at times we had in the starting 11 Young, Smalling, Jones, Shaw, Mctominay, Lingard and Rashford. We have plenty of a British core, they just aren't very good players most of them.
 

Zlatattack

New Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
7,374
It's just paper talk. Nobody is buying exclusively British players.

AWB had a great season, probably one of the best right backs in the league, we're desperate for a right back. If we can get premier league proven - it's only a benefit.

James is one for the future i assume. Clearly Giggs felt he was a decent player and put in a good word too. He's seen him train - this is how these things go. Remember how good Dele Alli looked when MK Dons kicked our ass? Spurs took a risk and it's paid off for them. Longstaff would probably be a similar risk. It might fall flat, but we did spunk money on plenty of established international players who were also risks. Fred, Darmian, Depay - could have been excellent for us, turns out they weren't. Sometimes even sure fire things don't work out.

We wanted Sancho - he doesn't want to leave. We want De Ligt, he's holding out for the best possible offer. When you have no CL football, an inexperienced manager, talk of instability in the club hierarchy, no titles in 6 years, you have to cast your net wider. We won't always win against the big clubs who are our usual competition for signings. We need to take a few risks now.
 

Tango80

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
363
I like it.

People are moaning that this means we've given up on winning the title for the next couple of seasons. This is not a bad thing at all. Buying players with the indication of winning the title in the next couple of seasons is exactly where we've gone wrong, we've tried to cut corners.

In fact, I'd go as far as say that the business done so far this summer indicates more of a plan than the last three summers have combined. I'll support Man Utd but at the minute I struggle to name a favourite player because I don't particularly like any of them. I'd quite like that to change over anything.
 

RedCurry

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Messages
4,686
The two players we’ve actually signed, I like their profile.

A bunch of other players though, I am really not sure. The likes of Longstaff, Ben Yedder have been linked with us but I feel like we might be taking one too many gambles in the same transfer window.
 

Rista

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,283
People are moaning that this means we've given up on winning the title for the next couple of seasons. This is not a bad thing at all. Buying players with the indication of winning the title in the next couple of seasons is exactly where we've gone wrong, we've tried to cut corners.
How is it not a bad thing? Throwing money at the best possible players they could acquire along with getting the best manager possible is what got City where they are today. We just spent money poorly and had some questionable managerial appointments. It doesn't mean the entire approach is wrong and that we should aim to challenge in 5 years time.
 

baskinginthesun

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
1,105
He's left out the foreign players we've been linked with as well. As well as the youth team foreign guy that has been signed.
Yeah, that Spanish player from Sociedad, I think. I thought we also signed some youth team player from the Dutch league, iirc.
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,746
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
True but the flip side of that is England doesn't produce CR7s.
Nobody does. There is only one CR7. But there are plenty of talented players out there. Do you think the young up and coming Spanish players dream of a move to Old Trafford or Real Madrid/Barca??? A player like James and AWB on the other hand, more likely than not, will want to stay here as long as they can...
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,853
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
As long as they are good enough who cares which nation they are from? I also feel like there has been a real quality increase when it comes to the current young English player generation. So I guess if there ever was a time to buy young English players to create the core of the team it's now.
 

manesh

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
18
Buying James could be a bit of genius.
Not because he will be a world beater (Which he may be one day) but because it should motivate the established dead wood a choice:
Pull socks up and start delivering or be replaced by a championship player who has talent but not a sure fire success.

Sorry if this has been said before, but I like the policy of buy them young and mould the team.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,541
Supports
Mejbri
The one thing I've got against this buying home-grown players or players used to the Prem is that they cost 2x 3x what they'd cost if they were playing in any other league. So the "operating in an inflated market" is pretty much our own choice.
 

Dve

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,908
From the looks of things, we're seemingly changing our mindset on who we target & bring into the club.

AWB, Dan James already done.
Links to Longstaff, Rice, Maddison, Brooks, Maguire, Sancho.

Young, Jones, Shaw & soon Rashford on new contracts. No sign of Smalling or Lingard getting the boot soon either.

(Mostly)
Young, British & Hungry seems to be the new policy.

To me (if this is true), it is a a shocking recruitment policy for a club that's supported all over the world. (I'm not sure what's the right term in English for how I see this - nationalistic? Xenophobic? Exclusive?)

Not to mention I think it makes no financial sense. Sancho? Will cost 100m over. Maguire? 80m. Rice? 60m. Maddison & Brooks will cost lots more than AWB too. I mean 9 game Longstaff is valued in excess of 25m! In general, foreign players from outside epl will cost you less wages-wise & in transfer fees.

Anyway, how do you feel about this new approach. For or against?

Edit: apologies for using the term xenophobia. I meant a disregard for Meritocracy instead
Some would call that cherry picking.

Koulibaly, Olmo, Yedder, Fernandes, Diop, Aubameyang, Rakitic etc.

Though, Solskjær himself has mentioned his preferences for more "home" ground players.

I hope this is because: There´s greater chance that a British player, coming to Manchester United when young, will stay at United for a long time and become a real club player. While a Portuguese, e.g. will have that bound to Southern European leagues and nice weather.

And I hope it´s not because: Solskjær wants to copy the 90-ties.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,018
Regardless of nationality, ive seen us follow the pattern of the arsenal and liverpool sides of about 2005-2017.

Bloated with mediocre/poor mercenaries who dont identify with the club and lack either the skill to improve or the desire to perform.

We always had tenacity and work-rate under Ferguson. And the players that didn't have that had star quality (berbatov springs to mind). The problem with many of our recent big buys is they arrive here thinking they are the bollocks and then stop performing. Sanchez, di maria, mikhtaryan, falcao, fred, matic all look/looked like dross out there. There must be a reason behind that sharp decline and i think it must be mentality.

Then Theres also been a problem with the development of younger players - shaw took a while, januzaj, rafael, depay, amongst others, all discarded.

And then theres the players we shouldnt have signed - rojo, darmian, schneiderlin etc.

So i am on board with this policy - players who have potential, desire, want to improve. Its a long term project. No good signing any more players who only have a couple of seasons left in them
 

Spiersey

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,385
Location
United Kingdom.
Supports
Chelsea
I don’t understand the obsession with going after English talent. Does it stem from united having a British core when Ole was at the club? Surely he’s clever enough to know that the fact they were British was pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme of things and the fact that they were all World Class players was much more important.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
Why would anyone have a problem with targeting British players? The history of the club is built by British/homegrown talent, I feel it'd be a step in the right direction when it comes to getting our identity back.

Whether or not the players that we've been linked with are good enough remains to be seen though.
Just off the top of my head, from RECENT history:
Cristiano Ronaldo, Tevez, Berbatov, RVN, RVP, Evra, Vidic, and Cantona all played an important part in building that history. If you want to look at our history from 30 or 40 years ago and say that back then all players were British/homegrown then that may be the case. But football has become much more globalized since then, and the Premier League more so. Now, it’s not uncommon for any Premier League club to buy players from Brazil, Netherlands, France, or just about anywhere. We shouldn’t tie one of our hands behind our back and say we will only consider buying English or British talent.
 

IAN HEALY

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
17
Ole has said he want guys with the right attitude. Fair enough, what manager wouldn't but he inherited a team with a few players of questionable attitude and we havent seen any of those guys moved on yet.

Buying British covers a wide spectrum. Are we getting younger versions of Smalling, Jones and Young who should all able been shown the door by now, or are we getting A-List British talent. I feel buying Maguire gives us more of the same. Above average talent without radically upgrading a major problem area in the centre of defence. if we have limited funds why are we buying British players as they always carry a bigger price tag ?
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
Yes, I agree with buying young players. But these players need to have some experience.
James, and Wan Bissaka don't have experience of playing in the premiership or Europe.
The players we should be going for should be young but proven players like Ndombele, Partey, Lo Celso, etc.