marktan
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2017
- Messages
- 6,907
Maguire + £30m? Sign me up.Sancho would be at least £100m so good luck.
Maguire + £30m? Sign me up.Sancho would be at least £100m so good luck.
What do you mean you'd rather sign one than the other? as if signing Maguire has anything to do with Sancho.I'd rather sign Sancho than Maguire...score one more than the opposition!
Yes, I'd rather sign Sancho, than sign Maguire.What do you mean you'd rather sign one than the other? as if signing Maguire has anything to do with Sancho.
But it's not gonna make a difference, they have no relation to each other, signing Maguire wouldn't mean not signing Sancho.Yes, I'd rather sign Sancho, than sign Maguire.
Do we have unlimited budget?But it's not gonna make a difference, they have no relation to each other, signing Maguire wouldn't mean not signing Sancho.
It's not worth continuing this discussion, it's been done to death. If we sign a player it's because we're financially able to do so without hampering our other plans, if we couldn't then we'd walk away from the deal.Do we have unlimited budget?
Ok. Thanks for the clarification. I didn't realise this till you just confirmed.But it's not gonna make a difference, they have no relation to each other, signing Maguire wouldn't mean not signing Sancho.
Stupid comments warrant stupid answers.Ok. Thanks for the clarification. I didn't realise this till you just confirmed.
Clearly you're not intelligent enough to understand the comment I made. Not your fault.Stupid comments warrant stupid answers.
Agreed, plus I think we need someone like James who can come off the bench and make a big impact on tired legs.We still desperately need a RW. I reckon James will be on the left to compete with martial.
What makes you think 70 m will land Chisea.Any of Sancho, Chiesa, Pepe or Dembele would be great.
I prefer to pay 70m for Pepe/Chiesa than 70m for Maguire.
This one will be next summer, if it happens. Liverpool, City and Chelsea will likely be in the mix for him no doubt.Can we assume if we were to get Dybala and maybe even Fernandes as well we can put a nail in this one indefinitely?
You don’t do that to top talents like Sancho. City have ridiculous options in attack. No reason why we can’t have the same.Can we assume if we were to get Dybala and maybe even Fernandes as well we can put a nail in this one indefinitely?
Dybala is better centrally, and Fernandes plays more in the middle of the park too. None of them is a specialist on the right.Can we assume if we were to get Dybala and maybe even Fernandes as well we can put a nail in this one indefinitely?
Dybala would be to replace Lukaku and Fernandes more as an AM rather then part of the front 3, so i would say no.Can we assume if we were to get Dybala and maybe even Fernandes as well we can put a nail in this one indefinitely?
Why weren't they in for him this summer?This one will be next summer, if it happens. Liverpool, City and Chelsea will likely be in the mix for him no doubt.
According to a journalist with ties close with Sanchos camp, he had agreed to the move, prior to our end of season collapse. Everything that came after that put him off, he apparently wants to move to a stable club where he'll be a first team starter, since we didn't get CL and we haven't got our shop in order then he won't move to us until that happens.Why weren't they in for him this summer?
Our right side still needs reinforced,
Ok I'll pick on this one, I agree with what you say but realistically Dybala is a 10/support striker rather than an out and out no 9 so I can only see him working in a 4-2-3-1 (central in the 3) or a 4-4-2 diamond (where he's one of the 2) I really don't see how in either formation you fit Dybala + Fernandes + Sancho (unless Fernandes is a Pogba replacement then I guess it may work)Dybala is better centrally, and Fernandes plays more in the middle of the park too. None of them is a specialist on the right.
There is every reason for him to move at this stage. Firstly he will be playing regularly in the biggest club in England, secondly he will test himself in the hardest league in the world and lastly he will double or triple his wages.I reckon that a few clubs made contact and Dortmund basically told them pay *insert silly fee here* or get stuffed. Their squad is in a much better place than last year to compete for the title and they'll make it very hard for Bayern to get away. Sancho is playing excellently with them and has achieved everything apart from a title really - managed to become an England/Dortmund regular so there isn't any reason for him to move at this stage. It's a matter of when and not if he will move and I think it's going to be next summer. He will give them another year at least.
Its called a squad that can compete on all frontsIf we persist with the 4-2-3-1 with Pogba deep, Bruno in the central 3 and Dybala floating from the right, I can’t see how we would get Sancho.
Arrogant little shite.According to a journalist with ties close with Sanchos camp, he had agreed to the move, prior to our end of season collapse. Everything that came after that put him off, he apparently wants to move to a stable club where he'll be a first team starter, since we didn't get CL and we haven't got our shop in order then he won't move to us until that happens.
I think Chelsea will get him next summer unfortunately, especially if they get top 4.
1. City are the biggest club in England right now in terms of player attractiveness.There is every reason for him to move at this stage. Firstly he will be playing regularly in the biggest club in England, secondly he will test himself in the hardest league in the world and lastly he will double or triple his wages.
Based on he said, she said you're calling him that? Harsh. And even if it was true, wouldn't you be the same if you were a player?Arrogant little shite.
He can stay away if that’s the case. Silver spoon and all that without wanting to fight a causeAccording to a journalist with ties close with Sanchos camp, he had agreed to the move, prior to our end of season collapse. Everything that came after that put him off, he apparently wants to move to a stable club where he'll be a first team starter, since we didn't get CL and we haven't got our shop in order then he won't move to us until that happens.
I think Chelsea will get him next summer unfortunately, especially if they get top 4.
You can't blame him for that. He's got little to lose by staying put for a season and deciding then.He can stay away if that’s the case. Silver spoon and all that without wanting to fight a cause
What, wanting to go to a team who will play you and provide a good working environment when you already have both those things at your current club? Just sounds like a sensible career choice to me, he's still learning plenty in Germany so he's no need to rush into anything.Arrogant little shite.
Martial?Ok I've figured it out 4-3-3
-------------De Gea-------------
AWB---Lindelof---Maguire?---Shaw
-Fernandes-McTominay-Pogba-
Sancho------Dybala------Rashford
Sorted
sancho, dybala, martial and rashford all competing for the 3 places. just what you want. there's a lot of interchanging between those 4 too.Martial?
This was my first thought and fear.Can we assume if we were to get Dybala and maybe even Fernandes as well we can put a nail in this one indefinitely?
Ok I've figured it out 4-3-3
-------------De Gea-------------
AWB---Lindelof---Maguire?---Shaw
-Fernandes-McTominay-Pogba-
Sancho------Dybala------Rashford
Sorted