Zlatan 7
We've got bush!
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 11,765
Makes a mockery of football and celebrations
By enforcing the rules?Makes a mockery of football and celebrations
Well, today, we will have to choose between correct decisions and this. Without var this goal would have been accepted. At the same time, it's really messing with the game.Makes a mockery of football and celebrations
Rules are rulesNot sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
YepBy enforcing the rules?
how can that be an awful call - he used his arm to steer the ball towards a teammate ?Not sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
Why's that?Not sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
Precisely. If anything, VAR worked go correctly enforce the rule. The rule is what’s fecked perhaps.Blame the handball rule, not VAR
Assist with the hand... that is against the rules.Not sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
Only if it leads to a goal, but yeah.Why's that?
There are new rules this year. No matter the context, if the ball touches the hand of a player, it's a handball.
It was a perfect call. Any handball that leads to a goal is an offence, even accidentally. Disallowing the goal was indisputably the correct decision.Not sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
It's the rule but agree it's awful when it's completely accidental.Not sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
Many will confuse the two, you'll seePrecisely. If anything, VAR worked go correctly enforce the rule. The rule is what’s fecked perhaps.
Your problem is with the rule, not VAR.Not sad to see City suffer, but that was an awful call.
City gained an advantage from a handball correct decision to rule t outWhat a disaster of decision. Ball grazing a hand is not handball. That maybe on the rules but it's stupid.
YesSo do I understand this right if a hand is involved in any way, intentional or unintentional, while a goal is scored it's automatically canceled?
YesSo do I understand this right if a hand is involved in any way, intentional or unintentional, while a goal is scored it's automatically canceled?
I am completely for VAR but I can't understand how they'd rule out a handball like that and then miss the penalty shout from the first half (which was more obvious and intentional).How someone still can be against VAR? Another correct decision which decides winner.
Without var it would be 2 undeserved points more for one team and one deserved point less for another
Rules are rules
how can that be an awful call - he used his arm to steer the ball towards a teammate ?
Apologies for my poor word choice. The new rule is shite. The call was correct in enforcing the way it’s written, but I disagree with the rule if that’s the way it’s going to play out in a game.Why's that?
There are new rules this year. No matter the context, if the ball touches the hand of a player, it's a handball.
Yep. It makes for very clear cut calls at least.So do I understand this right if a hand is involved in any way, intentional or unintentional, while a goal is scored it's automatically canceled?
Tottenham were celbrating loads when that goal was disallowed.Makes a mockery of football and celebrations
I think that's correct. Which is a problem with the new handball rules tbh, it has nothing to do with VAR.So do I understand this right if a hand is involved in any way, intentional or unintentional, while a goal is scored it's automatically canceled?
The issue isn't var, its the rule changes that have come with it. The any touch of an arm is hand ball is shite. And the offside rule should go back to clear daylight to be offside. Still factual but will rule out less goals.How someone still can be against VAR? Another correct decision which decides winner.
Without var it would be 2 undeserved points more for one team and one deserved point less for another
Being in a natural position makes zero difference. If it touches his hand it's a handball.Crazy. Should have been a VAR penalty in the first half not given and if you are going to be that pernickety with it brushing his hand that was in a natural position then surely Laporte should have had a penalty earlier when his wrist was grabbed and held by a spurs player which he went down from.
VAR is a pile of turd with the same old issues we had with normal refs. No consistency.