Massive Spanner
Give Mason Mount a chance!
i'll miss his dogs, they're good bois.
The main reason for Mata's new contract is our lack of characters in dressing room and to play part in De Gea's new contract.I don't mind players like Greenwood, Gomes, Chong getting chances. Forgot about Chong tbh. I don't agree with Mata and Lingard being better. Lingard has contributed to 0 goals in nearly a year, Mata doesn't have legs to play with bit of pace.
Let's see how we get on. Hopefully we won't have any big injury crisis and also our young players will step up.
The times articles says how much we will pay alsoCan someone help me understand this. The times and others saying Inter are paying the majority if his wages and that equates to Inter paying £9 ish mil. And us the rest. That doesn't add up.
£391,000 × 52 = £20,332,000
£9,000,000 ÷ £20,332,000 × 100 = 44.26%
So United are paying 55.74% of his wages?
Sanchez probably took a 25% wage cut for missing Champions League, so I guess his wage is £293,250Can someone help me understand this. The times and others saying Inter are paying the majority if his wages and that equates to Inter paying £9 ish mil. And us the rest. That doesn't add up.
£391,000 × 52 = £20,332,000
£9,000,000 ÷ £20,332,000 × 100 = 44.26%
So United are paying 55.74% of his wages?
From memory, his base salary isn't 391k to get that amount you need to add some bonuses.Can someone help me understand this. The times and others saying Inter are paying the majority if his wages and that equates to Inter paying £9 ish mil. And us the rest. That doesn't add up.
£391,000 × 52 = £20,332,000
£9,000,000 ÷ £20,332,000 × 100 = 44.26%
So United are paying 55.74% of his wages?
His wages is 15 million after it was reduced by 25%. We are paying 6 million, so that's 40%.Can someone help me understand this. The times and others saying Inter are paying the majority if his wages and that equates to Inter paying £9 ish mil. And us the rest. That doesn't add up.
£391,000 × 52 = £20,332,000
£9,000,000 ÷ £20,332,000 × 100 = 44.26%
So United are paying 55.74% of his wages?
His base salary is 391K, on top of that he has multiple bonuses.From memory, his base salary isn't 391k to get that amount you need to add some bonuses.
You could replace Sanchez with a plank of wood.is incredible and meaningless what we did this summer, we are very short upfront and we continue to give away players without replacing them.
100% this. Anyone wanting to still keep him is ignoring how he has been for us and still clinging to the illusion that he will come good. We should get rid at all costs and so this sounds like a great deal as far as I'm concerned. We are very light in attack but keeping Sanchez wont fix that unfortunately, the only difficulty with him and lukaku leaving is that they weren't replaced during the summer when we had ample opportunity to do so.So we've saved nearly ten million notes and got this:
We need to bear in the mind there were no 'good' deals, the damage had been done signing a near-30 declining player on world-class wages. What we've done is the least-worst deal; Alexis gets the chance to put himself in the shop window at nearly a third of the cost to us, without disgruntling our squad. If you have misgivings that a player who could contribute in a threadbare position for us is being given away fair play to you, personally I've given up any hope of Sanchez doing anything positive in a United shirt and getting him closer to the exit door is the main positive of this deal.
Means we will spend big next summerSo we sell Lukaku, Martial is injured, striker options are scarce and what do we do.
Sell another striker. Brilliant.
That's what they say. Hard to believe anything will happenMeans we will spend big next summer
Dunno. Six goals in four years for the Scousers is pretty bad.He is the worst transfer in PL history. Worse than Andy Carroll.
Thats what we thought about this summer.Means we will spend big next summer
Surely his bonuses only apply to playing for us? (eg. 75k every appearance)His base salary is 391K, on top of that he has multiple bonuses.
It was worst for us. Not for Arsenal, not for Barcelona and probably won't be for Inter.Worst signing by any club ever.
Not sure whom to believe, Paul Hirst reported we are paying 40% of the wages, rest by Inter.Surely his bonuses only apply to playing for us? (eg. 75k every appearance)
In Fabrizio Romano's article for The Guardian, he says Inter will pay 175k p/w and we'll pay 215k p/w.
So we're still paying most of his wages. Must've been one hell of a disruption in the dressing room!
I guess it has to do with the italian taxes. I guess he wants the same net salary and with less taxes that means his gross salary could be around £15m. But it's just a guess.Can someone help me understand this. The times and others saying Inter are paying the majority if his wages and that equates to Inter paying £9 ish mil. And us the rest. That doesn't add up.
£391,000 × 52 = £20,332,000
£9,000,000 ÷ £20,332,000 × 100 = 44.26%
So United are paying 55.74% of his wages?
That's true, being able to run just doesn't suit him anymore.maybe our playing style not match him
i still believe he is good player
It didn't happen when he signed for us mate, he was already shite in his final season at Arsenal. Probably a mental issue. Maybe he'll feel like he has something to prove again after getting kicked out by us. Hopefully he does because then we can maybe get our money back on him.Glad we can get the majority of that waste of money off our books. I dont know what happened to him when he signed, or what problems he had with our playing style, but he had to go. Him and Lukaku leaving frees up a large chunk of our wages. Now lets see if we are going to reinvest them.
No, there are 2 worse: Winston Bogarde to Chelsea in 2001, played 11 matches in 4 years whilst on 40k a week and of course Ali Dia to Southampton in 1996 (https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/nov/22/ali-dia-story-20-years-on-southampton-souness).Worst signing by any club ever.
Because we're not paying as much of them as we would be otherwise. If he's not going to play anyway then its no surprise the club would rather save some money.The part I don't like is that we are paying most of his wages. How does this deal even benefit us? Is he that bad for the dressing room atmosphere?
Because he's on something like 425k a week, plus a 75k appearance fee.The worst deal in the history of football keeps getting even worse. How does that even happen ?
I have mixed feelings about this. Massive pressure on Greenwood and Gomes/Chong now. This is not going to end well. They are all one bad game away from getting ripped by social media.
The part I don't like is that we are paying most of his wages. How does this deal even benefit us? Is he that bad for the dressing room atmosphere?
This is the question really. Just think how much of a cock you must be to get loaned out when the club is bereft of players in your position?The worst deal in the history of football keeps getting even worse. How does that even happen ?
I have mixed feelings about this. Massive pressure on Greenwood and Gomes/Chong now. This is not going to end well. They are all one bad game away from getting ripped by social media.
The part I don't like is that we are paying most of his wages. How does this deal even benefit us? Is he that bad for the dressing room atmosphere?
As per Paul Hirst, we are paying 6 million with Inter paying 9.5 million. So that's around 115k per week we are paying. Also there is no loan fee. It's a free loan.Because he's on something like 425k a week, plus a 75k appearance fee.
If we can get Inter to pay us a loan fee + around half his wage, that's a huge saving across the year.
Yes we practically pay 200k for nothing, but it's better than paying the full amount for nothing also.
Have to hope he does really well over there. It's a double edged sword though. If he does well then Ed might decide to bring him back.The only bad thing about this deal is that is not a permament. I hope he will do a much better for Inter and they will buy him next summer.
These savings aren't going anywhere but the Glazers pockets. I wouldn't be surprised if they are plotting behind the scenes to get shot of Pogba too. These 3 gone with no replacements bought would be a great transfer window for the Glazers.Glad we can get the majority of that waste of money off our books. I dont know what happened to him when he signed, or what problems he had with our playing style, but he had to go. Him and Lukaku leaving frees up a large chunk of our wages. Now lets see if we are going to reinvest them.
I see thanks, so a pretty substantial saving. Plus it gets him out the dressing room which can only be a good thing if he's not happy.As per Paul Hirst, we are paying 6 million with Inter paying 9.5 million. So that's around 115k per week we are paying. Also there is no loan fee. It's a free loan.