Why are we dropping the standards for Ole?

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,030
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Almost none of those players seem to have that hunger right now, and when they did previously they performed very well.
There's no guarantee awb and maguire wont turn into pogba martial and lingard. As a matter of pure chance, there's a bigger possibility that the current rotten apple influenced them rather than vice versa.

We have yet to see ole nice guy touch, shoulder around the arms manager is all we need isnt it?
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
I don’t think Woodward could have done worse if he tried, we can’t get rid of the glazers but surely protesting about a failed scruffy gimp every game would pick up some traction.
Match going fans are more likely to protest against Woodward than the manager for sure.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,638
I'm not sure exectly what his record is during that time, but the man you want (Poch) has got to be pretty close to that...
As I’ve said he’s not my top choice but still has 6 wins in the last 16 games in all competitions- or double that.
Actually, I believe that Ole was given the job then out of respect to FC Molde. I don't think it was a coincidence that Ole was given the full time job a week before Molde was set to start their season...
Could be, but the didn’t Molde come out and say that they were really surprised with his appointment ?
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,746
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
But Poch did make it into the CL Final. That has to count for something.
Ole beat PSG - that's his claim to fame, as a manager.
Whatever the case, I have no ire towards the managers or players. It's Woodward who is the root of all these problems. Ever since he took over, we have failed to maintain the standard that was set before his arrival.
Do consider that Jose is a serial winner (winning with every team he joined) and even he gave up in his final season. When an employee with a superb track record wants out, you know things are not right at the club.
David Gill leaving was a big loss...
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
It still blows my mind that people who consider themselves knowledgeable fans are just now wrapping their heads around the idea that the product we currently have on the pitch is in phase 1 (get rid of dead wood/cultural shift) of a multi transfer period/multi season rebuild and never meant to compete in its current form. I've never seen so many deluded fans disconnected from the reality of the shape or direction of this club.
Why do we have to begin at phase I ever 2 or 3 years? It was obvious at the end of last season that Matic’s legs are gone, and we had also lost Fellaini and Herrera. So why weren’t we in with a Rashford level offer for Adrian Rabiot? We also sold Lukaku without bringing in a replacement striker. These problems were there out in the open and VERY easy for anyone to identify. We are the only big club run this way, and it’s a disgrace.

People like to blame Ed for all our failings in the transfer market, but if we want to say Ed is the only one responsible for not replacing our midfielders and replacing Lukaku, then we also have to say OGS is guilty of acute acquiescence. Is that what we want in our manager? Where is the fight?
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
Why do we have to begin at phase I ever 2 or 3 years? It was obvious at the end of last season that Matic’s legs are gone, and we had also lost Fellaini and Herrera. So why weren’t we in with a Rashford level offer for Adrian Rabiot? We also sold Lukaku without bringing in a replacement striker. These problems were there out in the open and VERY easy for anyone to identify. We are the only big club run this way, and it’s a disgrace.

People like to blame Ed for all our failings in the transfer market, but if we want to say Ed is the only one responsible for not replacing our midfielders and replacing Lukaku, then we also have to say OGS is guilty of acute acquiescence. Is that what we want in our manager? Where is the fight?
I think we were in for him with a good offer but when a player of his caliber was available for free , he has a plethora of clubs to choose from and Juve was a safe bet for him.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,440
People like to blame Ed for all our failings in the transfer market, but if we want to say Ed is the only one responsible for not replacing our midfielders and replacing Lukaku, then we also have to say OGS is guilty of acute acquiescence. Is that what we want in our manager? Where is the fight?
I have asked this specific question multiple times, but I'm yet to get an answer. If Ole backers are absolving him of all the blame in regards to our recruitment and squad management last summer, then how will you evaluate his performance over the course of season? Because if the season is a disaster, there's a ready made excuse that it was our board who shredded the squad and it's not good enough.

We've gotten ourselves into a huge mess, I don't expect discussion to be anywhere near civil on United forums because fans (understandably so) will be divided.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
There's no guarantee awb and maguire wont turn into pogba martial and lingard. As a matter of pure chance, there's a bigger possibility that the current rotten apple influenced them rather than vice versa.

We have yet to see ole nice guy touch, shoulder around the arms manager is all we need isnt it?
I would much rather see Ole with a hairdryer if he has one. He also needs to use a hatchet on Lindgard.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
I think we were in for him with a good offer but when a player of his caliber was available for free , he has a plethora of clubs to choose from and Juve was a safe bet for him.
I’m sure a Rashford-level good offer plus the enticement to have the opportunity to form a partnership with Pogba and thus try to get back in the good books of his national team coach would have done it. We weren’t in for him at all. Not English, not the right attitude, etc.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,263
I think it will be naive to sack him now considering the new manager will have nothing to work with(thin squad). It seems like we don't have any expectations from this season. Next season he will add another 3-4 players and the team will be majorly his.

We should stay patient and let him do his job. Its better to suffer for short term if it pays out for long term gains. The team needs serious shake up and next summer we will have funds and wages available given Pogba and DDG will be leaving.

Sacking him now will again undo whatever good he has done. Maybe the new manager would command a new CB and then we will go in circles again and again.
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
I have asked this specific question multiple times, but I'm yet to get an answer. If Ole backers are absolving him of all the blame in regards to our recruitment and squad management last summer, then how will you evaluate his performance over the course of season? Because if the season is a disaster, there's a ready made excuse that it was our board who shredded the squad and it's not good enough.

We've gotten ourselves into a huge mess, I don't expect discussion to be anywhere near civil on United forums because fans (understandably so) will be divided.
A lot of very experienced managers aren’t getting final say on transfers never mind Ole including the much hyped Poch who asked to be called coach not too long ago instead of manager.

Ole’s job is to get the best out of what he has got, that’s what he should be judged on but not after 4 games with a much changed squad.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,263
I’m sure a Rashford-level good offer plus the enticement to have the opportunity to form a partnership with Pogba and thus try to get back in the good books of his national team coach would have done it. We weren’t in for him at all. Not English, not the right attitude, etc.
Why do people act like they were the ones negotiating? How do you know what was happening? Why do you think Rabiot would have given up CL to join us? Just random shite being spouted out with no context
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,440
A lot of very experienced managers aren’t getting final say on transfers never mind Ole including the much hyped Poch who asked to be called coach not too long ago instead of manager.

Ole’s job is to get the best out of what he has got, that’s what he should be judged on but not after 4 games with a much changed squad.
So, where is the ceiling in regards to getting the 'best out of what he has got'? 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th?
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
I have asked this specific question multiple times, but I'm yet to get an answer. If Ole backers are absolving him of all the blame in regards to our recruitment and squad management last summer, then how will you evaluate his performance over the course of season? Because if the season is a disaster, there's a ready made excuse that it was our board who shredded the squad and it's not good enough.

We've gotten ourselves into a huge mess, I don't expect discussion to be anywhere near civil on United forums because fans (understandably so) will be divided.
For me the problem goes much deeper than Ole. There are ex-players and others advising him and championing the new philosophy. Unfortunately, when and if this season goes completely of the rails, it will ONLY be Ole’s head that will roll. But the people who have pushed for this agenda will undermine the next manager.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
I’m sure a Rashford-level good offer plus the enticement to have the opportunity to form a partnership with Pogba and thus try to get back in the good books of his national team coach would have done it. We weren’t in for him at all. Not English, not the right attitude, etc.
He's currently on €250k a week at Juve and i don't think we would have trumped that even if we were interested. It was an easy decision for him. Also not English propaganda is BS as we were talking to Dybala and Eriksen who are definitely not English.
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
So, where is the ceiling in regards to getting the 'best out of what he has got'? 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th?
It won’t just be about where we finish under Ole it will be more about whether it is heading in the right direction or not under him. He’s got to win more games sure but I genuinely think the board know this season isn’t going to see us challenging top 4 and they probably don’t give a damn about europa qualification so it has to be judged as a unique season.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
Why do people act like they were the ones negotiating? How do you know what was happening? Why do you think Rabiot would have given up CL to join us? Just random shite being spouted out with no context
Spouting random shite? What about having a respectful exchange of ideas. Idiot...

If we were in for him as you suggest, then we should have moved for another midfielder target, if we couldn’t get our main target. Either way, not buying a competent midfielder has been negligent on our part.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
He's currently on €250k a week at Juve and i don't think we would have trumped that even if we were interested. It was an easy decision for him. Also not English propaganda is BS as we were talking to Dybala and Eriksen who are definitely not English.
Perhaps, but it was still negligent to leave our midfield so threadbare. We had to bring in a competent midfielder or two.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,472
In regards to their first full season in charge, my expectations have been the same for every manager post Sir Alex.

Finish top 4 and show signs of us progressing into a cohesive team. So, really, it's not isolated to Ole. I think we, as a fanbase, immediately started dropping our standards as soon as we knew Moyes was succeeding Fergie. Like, instantly.

Moyes did neither and, truthfully, I wanted him out as soon as it looked like we were signing Fellaini anyway.

Imo, van Gaal and José (thanks to the Europa) did both in their first seasons so I was happy to go into another season with both. However, early signs in both of their 2nd seasons in regards to our general football were bad so I wanted both out very early on in said seasons. Way before the majority lost hope in both.

Signs aren't looking good for Ole as I still think he should bring CL football back and turn us into a cohesive, modern attacking team - of which neither are looking likely based on his, what, 8 months of being here? I'm still somewhat hopeful in regards to him improving our style, though. Not so much the CL footy, however. He definitely needs at least a CM in January.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
To the OP, I'm personally dropping my standards for Ole. However, it's just a concrete confirmation that the manager is not the problem at United, it is his employers. So until they're out, the like of Ole or any other manager, have no chance.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,263
Spouting random shite? What about having a respectful exchange of ideas. Idiot...

If we were in for him as you suggest, then we should have moved for another midfielder target, if we couldn’t get our main target. Either way, not buying a competent midfielder has been negligent on our part.
Honestly Im not sitting behind a monitor claiming what our transfer committee had planned all along. And I called your post as random shite and aimed nothing against you but feel free to take in whatever sense you wish.

Rabiot playing with Pogba to build up good reputation for the NT? That's as random as one can get. The fact that he can still do it with brilliant performances for Juve and playing in elite competitions. Also its more likely that pogba would leave next season. So again, doesn't make any more sense than a story on the Sun newspaper.

He is the second best player at Juve according to multiple sources so money wasn't an issue.

Agreed with not buying another midfielder. Same goes for CF but then Ole comes out and said that they couldn't find what they wanted. I am not really sure what exactly are the specifics we are looking for if we couldn't find a single forward to buy.
 

Son

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
1,695
Comparing Jose and SAF, always thought it was thing of past and people learnt lessons, looks like some haven't.
Mourinho’s career matches up well to Sir Alex as does a short career like Arigo Sacchi’s for Milan and italy.
Mourinho for a period of time definitely created the stronger sides that reached a higher peak much like Sacchi with Milan. Mourinho’s records are ridiculous it was nasty to play against his best sides. We got him too late but he still was effective here and should be respected.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,304
I dont want him gone...yet

But i do want people to judge him with the same standard they judged jose. 81pts a distant second means nothing. Remember that line? All of a sudden it's a top 8 is fine la, rebuilding takes time.

Edit. Jusr because we have multiple problems at hand doesnt mean we should stick with a non performing manager. We're shit enough with world class manager, having a rookie manager certainly makes things alot harder and it's one of the biggest problems at hand. Structure and culture is a 20 years rebuilding job, but a good manager can at least smoothen the rebuilding.
I judged Jose against my expectation of 6th last season, that was after finishing 2nd. I wasn't 100% Jose out becuase i didn't think anyone else would do much better with the same players. Looks like i wasn't far wrong.
 

JustW

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20
I am still in disbelief and moaning about how we could not get that man Bruno Fernandes to the club. Perfect addition to this otherwise good and young team that we have. Excellent shooting technique from distance (help against teams that sit deep), good creator and runner, surely a massive upgrade on all our current options at number 10 role. Dare I even say better than all our midfielders except Pogba. He is not exceptional at it but he is even a better crosser of the ball and set piece taker than all our players at the moment. I just can’t believe we did not get that guy, a perfect replacement for Herrera.
 

Eriku

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
16,155
Location
Oslo, Norway
Spouting random shite? What about having a respectful exchange of ideas. Idiot...

If we were in for him as you suggest, then we should have moved for another midfielder target, if we couldn’t get our main target. Either way, not buying a competent midfielder has been negligent on our part.
:lol:

Are people trying to be parodies, or what?
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
I am still in disbelief and moaning about how we could not get that man Bruno Fernandes to the club. Perfect addition to this otherwise good and young team that we have. Excellent shooting technique from distance (help against teams that sit deep), good creator and runner, surely a massive upgrade on all our current options at number 10 role. Dare I even say better than all our midfielders except Pogba. He is not exceptional at it but he is even a better crosser of the ball and set piece taker than all our players at the moment. I just can’t believe we did not get that guy, a perfect replacement for Herrera.
There was mass suicide on here when we didn't get Renato Sanchez, Goncalo Guedes, Gelson Martins, Gaitan etc. When we signed Nani he was supposed to be nailed on to be the new Ronaldo. Anderson was the new Scholes. Bebe was the new Eusebio.
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
The barometer of progress for Ole at this stage is wheyher his signings have been successful or not. So far all 3 have fitted like a glove. Compare that to Moyes or Van Gaal where every signing was like something from a horror movie. Mourinho mostly also.

Based on success with spending money, he needs to be trusted with more spending before we can truly judge his progress.
 

Resch

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2011
Messages
682
Location
Salzburg, Austria
Because we have to! We have many holes to fill and they are big. No RW, no real Nr. 10, no elite Nr.9, no worldclass DM. Everyone can see that we miss some real talent and Ole miss it too....
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,712
Because we have to! We have many holes to fill and they are big. No RW, no real Nr. 10, no elite Nr.9, no worldclass DM. Everyone can see that we miss some real talent and Ole miss it too....
So what you're saying is that even if Ole is good enough he can't prove it?

Not a good position to be left in for a top manager, let a alone a rookie like Ole.
 

JustW

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20
A
There was mass suicide on here when we didn't get Renato Sanchez, Goncalo Guedes, Gelson Martins, Gaitan etc. When we signed Nani he was supposed to be nailed on to be the new Ronaldo. Anderson was the new Scholes. Bebe was the new Eusebio.
Ahahahaha...so we are afraid of investing in Portugal import now? Or we need them to show Ronaldo level before taking the risk to buy them? :) but seriously do you really think Bruno Fernandes could not get into our starting 11 at the moment with the players we have ? And we did not really needed those you cited at that time or ended buying someone else. But we needed badly a midfielder this time, even more than a CB, and it was there for everyone to see.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
:lol:

Are people trying to be parodies, or what?
parody
noun
par·o·dy | \ ˈper-ə-dē , ˈpa-rə-\
plural parodies
Definition of parody

1: a literary or musical work in which the style of an author or work is closely imitated for comic effect or in ridicule wrote a hilarious parody of a popular song

2: a feeble or ridiculous imitation a cheesy parody of a classic western
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,440
For me the problem goes much deeper than Ole. There are ex-players and others advising him and championing the new philosophy. Unfortunately, when and if this season goes completely of the rails, it will ONLY be Ole’s head that will roll. But the people who have pushed for this agenda will undermine the next manager.
I expect the ex-boys to stick up for their mates, that's not a problem for me and its somewhat understandable. My only problem is, how would us (fans) judge Ole this season? What is the bare minimum he has to do to keep his job into next season? Our poor summer window have been solely attributed to our boards doing and not Ole. So if we do have a poor season, then how do we cut through this ready made excuse?

It won’t just be about where we finish under Ole it will be more about whether it is heading in the right direction or not under him. He’s got to win more games sure but I genuinely think the board know this season isn’t going to see us challenging top 4 and they probably don’t give a damn about europa qualification so it has to be judged as a unique season.
Once again you're skirting around the question without actually answering it. I mean there has to be a baseline somewhere as to where we finish in the league? Or else how would they evaluate 'heading in right direction'? I mean we go could go full Blackpool/Bournemouth and go extremely attacking but ultimately if that ends up costing points and we finish outside European places, then what?

I mean there has to be some objective criteria by which Ole would be judged in this 'unique season' or is it all intangibles?
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,463
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
Oh wait, just figured this one out.

We aren't dropping the standards for Ole.

The standards already dropped under the previous managers who underperformed. They are where they are.
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
I expect the ex-boys to stick up for their mates, that's not a problem for me and its somewhat understandable. My only problem is, how would us (fans) judge Ole this season? What is the bare minimum he has to do to keep his job into next season? Our poor summer window have been solely attributed to our boards doing and not Ole. So if we do have a poor season, then how do we cut through this ready made excuse?



Once again you're skirting around the question without actually answering it. I mean there has to be a baseline somewhere as to where we finish in the league? Or else how would they evaluate 'heading in right direction'? I mean we go could go full Blackpool/Bournemouth and go extremely attacking but ultimately if that ends up costing points and we finish outside European places, then what?

I mean there has to be some objective criteria by which Ole would be judged in this 'unique season' or is it all intangibles?
Well 6th isn’t an unheard position for the mighty Man Utd in the last 3 years so Id say as long as he is around that area of the table and there are signs of progress, the new signings are working out and a proper plan for the following season that wouldn’t be too shabby.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,440
Well 6th isn’t an unheard position for the mighty Man Utd in the last 3 years so Id say as long as he is around that area of the table and there are signs of progress, the new signings are working out and a proper plan for the following season that wouldn’t be too shabby.
So basically 6th position in PL which got previous 3 managers sacked? But we would deem the season as a success/progress as long his 3 signings work out. I'm ignoring 'around that area of the table', 'signs of progress' 'and a proper plan' since again those are intangibles, and finishing 6th where we finished in the same place last season which was ultimately deemed not good enough would be progress this time around.

Fair enough, at least you gave me an answer up front.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,459
Location
Ireland
Hang on, people actually think we’re going to finish 6th? We’ll finish lower in current form.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,463
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
So basically 6th position in PL which got previous 3 managers sacked? But we would deem the season as a success/progress as long his 3 signings work out. I'm ignoring 'around that area of the table', 'signs of progress' 'and a proper plan' since again those are intangibles, and finishing 6th where we finished in the same place last season which was ultimately deemed not good enough would be progress this time around.

Fair enough, at least you gave me an answer up front.
To be fair, the guy who got sacked for finishing sixth finished second the year before, so there were very clear failures on his part that justified his termination.
 

Eriku

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
16,155
Location
Oslo, Norway
parody
noun
par·o·dy | \ ˈper-ə-dē , ˈpa-rə-\
plural parodies
Definition of parody

1: a literary or musical work in which the style of an author or work is closely imitated for comic effect or in ridicule wrote a hilarious parody of a popular song

2: a feeble or ridiculous imitation a cheesy parody of a classic western
Oh my... I usually refrain from getting into slap-fights with riff-raff online, but for some reason I can't help myself right now.

So you saw a strange word, "parody", googled it, and found a definition that looked like an easy way to make me look like I don't even know the words I'm using. Sorry to break it to ya, words have a lot of different usages, and you've not exactly covered them all there:

parody
[ par-uh-dee ]
noun, plural par·o·dies.

1. a humorous or satirical imitation of a serious piece of literature or writing:his hilarious parody of Hamlet's soliloquy.
2. the genre of literary composition represented by such imitations.
3. a burlesque imitation of a musical composition.
4. any humorous, satirical, or burlesque imitation, as of a person, event, etc.
5. the use in the 16th century of borrowed material in a musical setting of the Mass(parody Mass).
6. a poor or feeble imitation or semblance; travesty:His acting is a parody of his past greatness.
That's dictionary.com. Ask most anybody familiar with the term and they will tell you it's common to use it as meaning an exaggerated representation of something that was meant to be serious.

Muphry's law strikes again.