- signings - this has been commented for numerous times. He strengthened 2 areas on the pitch and left us barebones in others - this is not how you conduct good transfer business. The jury is still out on players like Maguire who we paid over the top. James was low risk Giggs recommendation, yet again seems like is made out to be a master stroke for Ole. If you give him credit for signing some key players you have to criticize him for not strengthening midfield and attack. When the squad is in worse shape than last year and he oversaw 2 transfer windows, whose fault it is?
- 28% win rate since March. Games where we didn't have shot on target. Playing youth because of transfer dealings and not enough cover in certain areas.
- Why wouldn't they be? A manager with high demands will ask a lot more of players like Jones and Lingard. They are getting free pass and collecting fat paychecks. Players like Lingard, Jones, Mata, etc got multiple years of new deals under Ole.
So you praise him for transfer dealings yet completely absolve him of any fault for the threadbare squad? Seriously?
Whichever way you want to carve it up in order to take any credit away from Ole, he made three signings, two of which have been pretty outstanding and Maguire is no doubt going to be a long term top defender for us once we have a settled partner next to him (Tuenzebe is my hope.)
Saying that James was recommended by Giggs is a load of rubbish, do you know how many players will be recommended to a manager at one of the biggest clubs in the world? It's still Ole's job to select the
right player. He get's credit for this signing just like all managers get credit or flack for all signings they make.
All three previous managers made a complete and utter mess of almost every single signing, you could argue Herrera was the only decent-ish signing. Ole made three good signings in one window.
Also this myth that he got rid of too many players and left us threadbare - why would ANY manager do that intentionally? For example the sale of Lukaku, there is nobody that will make me believe that Ole (or any manager) would sell their highest goalscorer unless he was promised a replacement would be secured. This is clearly the fault of Ed. You can blame Ole if you want but it's pointless, like I say nobody trying to turn a club of our size around with the scrutiny we operate under sells their highest goalscorer unless assurances were made from above him. Ole tows the company line and would never say that in front of the cameras to avoid the press storm it creates when a manager says he hasn't been fully backed.
Likewise I believe Ole would have no doubt wanted additions in Midfield, Ed is in charge of making transfers happen. Anybody who believes Ole would have wanted to go into the start of his first full league campaign having to field as many youngsters as we have is deluded. A child on Fifa wouldn't be stupid enough to willingly do such a thing ffs.
Players like Jones and Lingard have sat around and stagnated for the better part of a decade. Blaming those two on Ole is a stretch to say the least. Furthermore, players like Martial, Rashford, Perreira (earlier in the season) have all improved and Martial-Rashford have linked much better. Martial was moved to number 9 under Ole like most here on the CAF have been crying out for over the last few years.
The win rate needs to improve, and will when we have made sufficient additions and are not fielding teenagers and the remaining dross we've hoarded over the last years.
Criticise his win rate, style of play, whatever. But by the same rule of thumb you have to give him credit for positives, not try to undermine them, it serves no purpose other than to run him out of the club when we don't have any real replacement other than Poch and that's not a certainty.