The search for an attacking midfielder!

DarkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Messages
359
Location
wolf den
I am not going to lie I worry how committed Pogba is going to be to Utd for the rest of the season, can't forget that he said in the summer that he was looking for a new challenge. I will support him while he continues to wear the shirt but do still have that nagging doubt about how much he wants to be here.
This is the line that every player that wants a raise will say, no?
 

pmgeorge

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Messages
32
Olmo is probably the only one available in January, but it will not be cheap.
 

Valencia's Left Foot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
562
Supports
Austin FC, USMNT, Three Lions
For what it's worth, I'd be tempted to go for Sancho at #10, with somebody defensively secure next to McTominay in the double pivot of a 4-2-3-1.
Interesting, would be lethal is Sancho were up for it.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,052
We don't need an attacking midfielder right now. Pogba should playe higher up the pitch when he comes back. With him there we'd still have Lingard Pereira Mata and Gomes as bench options. The most important position is a center midfielder. I'd rather have one of our AMs injure than any of Mcctominay or Fred who are the only two center midfielders we have

We can worry about AM once Pogba is sold at last
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,865
Location
England
Interesting stuff mate, they definitely share some similar qualities, both being physically made players with height who have technical ability in spite of the size. I've admittedly seen a lot more of Havertz and I like the versatility of both, but would you say Havertz has the greater hype because he's German and plays in a better league, while Zainolo is Italian and plays in Serie A which hasn't been the league to cherry pick from in recent times?

I think it's been mentioned in ths thread but part of me wonders if we might see Sancho as a #10 option going forward, as he's not a pure winger like James, the issue might be whether he can drop in and help the midfield 2 when needed.
Havertz was playing first team football at 17 for Leverkusen which made him the youngest debutant in the clubs history. And it was natural the hype was gonna build there after.

Zaniolo on the other hand was released by Fiorentina in 2016 and joined Virtus Entella in SerieB and did well at the SerieB club before being spotted by Inter Milan and subsequently joined the Nerazurri in 2017 where he hardly played first team football. Things changed when Roma sold Nainggollan to Inter and signed Zaniolo as part of the deal in 2018 which brought Zaniolo and his talent to the wider European audience.

Sancho definitely does give the vibes that he could play both flanks and even as a #10. His technical ability is superb and has superb awareness/vision/passing in the final third, which makes him a potentially very good option to occupy the role of the #10 IMO.
 

DarkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Messages
359
Location
wolf den
Havertz was playing first team football at 17 for Leverkusen which made him the youngest debutant in the clubs history. And it was natural the hype was gonna build there after.

Zaniolo on the other hand was released by Fiorentina in 2016 and joined Virtus Entella in SerieB and did well at the SerieB club before being spotted by Inter Milan and subsequently joined the Nerazurri in 2017 where he hardly played first team football. Things changed when Roma sold Nainggollan to Inter and signed Zaniolo as part of the deal in 2018 which brought Zaniolo and his talent to the wider European audience.

Sancho definitely does give the vibes that he could play both flanks and even as a #10. His technical ability is superb and has superb awareness/vision/passing in the final third, which makes him a potentially very good option to occupy the role of the #10 IMO.
But how are they physically you would say? to play a #10 in the EPL is to play vs big and strong men, I'm saying this after watching James was just moved of the ball in the Tottenham game.
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,194
Fred was AWOL after getting married, Matic isn't rated by Ole, so how is it untrue? We had no options aside from a few teenagers or Andreas.

We shall see who is right, but the facts don't really back you up. Had Fred been available and showing anywhere his near recent form he'd have been in the side from the off.
Fred was unavailable for the first two pre-season games, that is all. He was used as a sub in the other four pre-season games and then wasn’t selected for the squad at all once the league games started until Pogba was out, where he was put on the bench and Matic started. There was ample opportunity to get him into the side and match fit before he has done - if that had been Solksjaer’s intention, his preference, then it would have happened.

It is abundantly clear that Solskjaer began the season with Pogba and McTominay as his first choice midfield pairing in a 4-2-3-1 - Matic and Fred were both readily available for the opening fixture and throughout the initial run of games. Fred started his first game in the Europa League alongside the other backup/ rotation options.

I’m not sure which facts you find contradictory to this? I’m also not sure in what way we shall ‘see who’s right’ - what happens moving forward doesn’t change how the season started.

The consensus now seems to be that Pogba should/ will play in place of the current starting no.10, with Fred and McTominay maintaining their place in the lineup. I can certainly understand, and wouldn’t disagree with, the ‘should’ at this moment in time. I don’t think it’s a given that that’s how Solskjaer will see it though - it’s all up in the air. He evidently preferred Pogba in the deeper role before the injury trouble but it’s also clear that in his absence Fred has established himself in the team.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,865
Location
England
But how are they physically you would say? to play a #10 in the EPL is to play vs big and strong men, I'm saying this after watching James was just moved of the ball in the Tottenham game.
Physically they're very strong for young players with both standing at 6'2 and 6'3 respectively. Zaniolo in that regard is very strong and physically powerful already so would suit the prem just fine. Havertz wouldn't have any issue in that regard either IMO.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,587
Location
DownUnder
Fred was unavailable for the first two pre-season games, that is all. He was used as a sub in the other four pre-season games and then wasn’t selected for the squad at all once the league games started until Pogba was out, where he was put on the bench and Matic started. There was ample opportunity to get him into the side and match fit before he has done - if that had been Solksjaer’s intention, his preference, then it would have happened.

It is abundantly clear that Solskjaer began the season with Pogba and McTominay as his first choice midfield pairing in a 4-2-3-1 - Matic and Fred were both readily available for the opening fixture and throughout the initial run of games. Fred started his first game in the Europa League alongside the other backup/ rotation options.

I’m not sure which facts you find contradictory to this? I’m also not sure in what way we shall ‘see who’s right’ - what happens moving forward doesn’t change how the season started.

The consensus now seems to be that Pogba should/ will play in place of the current starting no.10, with Fred and McTominay maintaining their place in the lineup. I can certainly understand, and wouldn’t disagree with, the ‘should’ at this moment in time. I don’t think it’s a given that that’s how Solskjaer will see it though - it’s all up in the air. He evidently preferred Pogba in the deeper role before the injury trouble but it’s also clear that in his absence Fred has established himself in the team.
Did you actually read what I was replying to? As yep already covered that part.

Clear to whom? When has he given his opinion? Or when did you ask him. Club were looking to purchase a midfielder, but failed to do so. So i's not clear it's all opinion.

When the manager has the players he wants available and in form, then obviously we end up with his view on how he intends to team to play. Fred missing vital fitness training prior to the summer tour would in my opinion obviously have affected team selections.

It's all opinion until we get to see what happens. As for how he saw United's midfield, we were fully intent on signing a midfielder and for whatever reason failed to do so.
 

DarkRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Messages
359
Location
wolf den
Physically they're very strong for young players with both standing at 6'2 and 6'3 respectively. Zaniolo in that regard is very strong and physically powerful already so would suit the prem just fine. Havertz wouldn't have any issue in that regard either IMO.
and Sancho? he looks kinda light.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,865
Location
England
and Sancho? he looks kinda light.
I think you're possibly over thinking the phyicality aspect in the #10 role. Maddison plays in such a role for Leicester and wouldn't be described as a physically strong player. Talent trumps physicality IMO.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
and Sancho? he looks kinda light.
Sancho doesn't play as a 10, he's a LW/RW.

Anyway his acceleration and balance are his key attributes, doesn't rely on strength.
 

jderbyshire

Has anybody seen my fleshlight?
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
4,175
Yeah it was a pretty underwhelming article from Laure Whitwell in The Athletic.

Basically said the club were desperate for Jan signings and that we are targetting a striker and two midfielders.

But the only two targets mentioned (Maddison and Haaland) are unlikely to move anytime soon.

Didn't say who the other midfielder was.
 

Mark Pawelek

New Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
2,598
Location
Kent, near London
Career injury record: ---------------- Lost ------
Age ------------------- number --- Days -- Matches
30 --- Gareth Bale -------- 27 --- 576 --- 104
28 --- James Rodríguez ---- 26 --- 481 ---- 80
26 --- Paul Pogba ---------- 7 --- 241 ---- 45
27 --- Isco --------------- 11 --- 147 ---- 26
27 --- Christian Eriksen --- 4 ---- 83 ---- 17
25 --- Bruno Fernandes ----- 2 ---- 10 ----- 2


Source: transfermarkt
 

bigeyedfish21

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
31
I'd take Bruno, Maddison, or Grealish. Any one of those three would help us, and are better than what we currently have.
 
Last edited:

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,330
What are people's thoughts on Dwight McNeil, apparently he was rejected by Utd as a kid because they weren't impressed by his set pieces. Personally I was impressed with him against Spurs on Sat and wouldn't see it as another Pogba situation because his career never got off the ground at Utd.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
What are people's thoughts on Dwight McNeil, apparently he was rejected by Utd as a kid because they weren't impressed by his set pieces. Personally I was impressed with him against Spurs on Sat and wouldn't see it as another Pogba situation because his career never got off the ground at Utd.
McNeil is a very good player, he's not the quickest but has enough close control to compensate his movement and good technique in distributing the ball. Also I think it's a shame that David Brooks is injured because when fit he's for me the best young winger in the league. I've been saying Brooks over Sancho for a few months now. Sancho is obviously the better talent but Brooks with the right development will be ridiculous. Brooks / James and Rashford in the forward wide positions is a good balance.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,446
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I actually prefer Pogba deeper than as a 10. Haven’t really enjoyed games where he’s higher up, he doesn’t have the space he needs and loses the ball a lot. His ball retention isn’t great and it’s a position more suited to a player like Odegaard.

Give Pogba the space and he can kill you but in the majority of games many teams won’t do that and that’s why he’s better deeper.
Agreed. Been reading this thread and wondering why people want to push Pogba up. His strengths lie in his passing and breaking from deep. He’s not as good at short quick passing around the edge of the box, he takes too long on the ball and concedes possession too easily.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,052
Agreed. Been reading this thread and wondering why people want to push Pogba up. His strengths lie in his passing and breaking from deep. He’s not as good at short quick passing around the edge of the box, he takes too long on the ball and concedes possession too easily.
I don't know about him playing AM but his best position is definitely higher up the pitch as a left CM. He said it himself and proved it when Ole first came back. He offers goals and assists playing more forward and besides would you rather have Pogba displace Fred and disrupt Fred's growing partnership with Mctominay or should he replace Lingard. Very easy choice for me.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,052
We don't need an attacking midfielder right now since Pogba is coming back. DM or CM should be priority in January. We're already stacked in AM with Pogba Lingard Gomes Mata and Pereira. Now compare that to our DM or CM depth.

Also when i say Pogba should play AM I don't mean as a classic no.10 but more of a free role with Mcctominay and Fred behind him and I'm sure this is what Ole would do as well
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,194
Did you actually read what I was replying to? As yep already covered that part.

Clear to whom? When has he given his opinion? Or when did you ask him. Club were looking to purchase a midfielder, but failed to do so. So i's not clear it's all opinion.

When the manager has the players he wants available and in form, then obviously we end up with his view on how he intends to team to play. Fred missing vital fitness training prior to the summer tour would in my opinion obviously have affected team selections.

It's all opinion until we get to see what happens. As for how he saw United's midfield, we were fully intent on signing a midfielder and for whatever reason failed to do so.
You haven’t covered it at all. Fred was with the rest of the team
We don't need an attacking midfielder right now since Pogba is coming back. DM or CM should be priority in January. We're already stacked in AM with Pogba Lingard Gomes Mata and Pereira. Now compare that to our DM or CM depth.

Also when i say Pogba should play AM I don't mean as a classic no.10 but more of a free role with Mcctominay and Fred behind him and I'm sure this is what Ole would do as well
If that is what Solskjaer would do it would have been done.

Pogba has been playing deeper. Gomes doesn’t play. So it’s more like Lingard, Mata and Pereira for attacking midfield. I would say all of Fred, Pogba and McTominay are better options in the midfield two than any of the three of them are at no.10
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,446
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I don't know about him playing AM but his best position is definitely higher up the pitch as a left CM. He said it himself and proved it when Ole first came back. He offers goals and assists playing more forward and besides would you rather have Pogba displace Fred and disrupt Fred's growing partnership with Mctominay or should he replace Lingard. Very easy choice for me.
As a left sided cm and slightly forward is fine, that’s where he played for Juventus. But as a pure number 10 as being bandied around here I don’t agree with
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,052
You haven’t covered it at all. Fred was with the rest of the team


If that is what Solskjaer would do it would have been done.

Pogba has been playing deeper. Gomes doesn’t play. So it’s more like Lingard, Mata and Pereira for attacking midfield. I would say all of Fred, Pogba and McTominay are better options in the midfield two than any of the three of them are at no.10
You really think Ole prefers Pogba in a deeper role after he personally put him in a free role at first where Pogba played so well in. You really think Ole after seeing Fred and Mcctominay dominate the top 6 he would then replace one of them for Pogba.

Anyways Ole has actually said in a press conference that Pogba's plays his best further up the pitch but that he's also capable of playing in other positions if needed. And right now where Pogba is needed is the AM role. I'd be surprised if Ole doesn't play him there when he returns
 

Adamsk7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
2,699
Haaland, Sancho and one of Havertz/Odergaard/Grealish/Maddison and we are set. We need squad depth - currently I look at our bench and there’s nobody to change things
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,194
You really think Ole prefers Pogba in a deeper role after he personally put him in a free role at first where Pogba played so well in. You really think Ole after seeing Fred and Mcctominay dominate the top 6 he would then replace one of them for Pogba.

Anyways Ole has actually said in a press conference that Pogba's plays his best further up the pitch but that he's also capable of playing in other positions if needed. And right now where Pogba is needed is the AM role. I'd be surprised if Ole doesn't play him there when he returns
I know that Solskjaer chose to play him deeper in midfield from the start of the season when he could have played McTominay and Fred there. That makes it impossible to say with any confidence that Pogba will be brought back in in place of Pereira/ Lingard when he returns from injury. I wouldn’t be surprised either way. Until he actually does play Pogba as the most advanced midfielder, he has to be considered as one of the options deeper in midfield. As things stand, Lingard and Pereira are battling for the no.10 role.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,330
We don't need an attacking midfielder right now since Pogba is coming back. DM or CM should be priority in January. We're already stacked in AM with Pogba Lingard Gomes Mata and Pereira. Now compare that to our DM or CM depth.

Also when i say Pogba should play AM I don't mean as a classic no.10 but more of a free role with Mcctominay and Fred behind him and I'm sure this is what Ole would do as well
Which DM or CM do you think is obtainable in January just out of interest?
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,052
Which DM or CM do you think is obtainable in January just out of interest?
The thing about signing a DM whether it's in the winter or summer is that there are not many world class DMs for any club to sign. Off the top of my head I can mention only Neves, Partey and Ndidi and that's it. The rest are basically just gems or potential eg Berg, Sangare etc.

That said, I'd go for Marc Roca in January. Deep lying playmaker with 36m release clause. Ole has said several times that he doesn't want us to be just a counter attacking team and how we need to keep possession and control games. Roca can help with this.

I'd also be fine with Allan who is a very hard working box to box midfielder. He and Mctominay in a double pivot would work
 

Craig Ward

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
2,117
We don't need an attacking midfielder right now. Pogba should playe higher up the pitch when he comes back. With him there we'd still have Lingard Pereira Mata and Gomes as bench options. The most important position is a center midfielder. I'd rather have one of our AMs injure than any of Mcctominay or Fred who are the only two center midfielders we have

We can worry about AM once Pogba is sold at last
Or we can do some forward planning and look to recruit now. why wait until Pogba is sold to buy? Surely better to get someone in, especially as we lack any real quality in the AM position

We know Pogba is leaving, its a matter of when.

The bench options arent good enough anyway, we need to sign an AM AND a CM as a priority.

Limit the game times of Periera/Lingard/Mata and have some competition/rotation with McTom & Fred.

Matic and Pogba shouldn't come into the thinking of our long term plans at all.

When Pogba is fit, i agree he is the best option as our #10, but he's not a natural 10 really, issue is we lack creativity. He can come back in, but its a stop gap until he's out the door i'm afraid.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,052
Or we can do some forward planning and look to recruit now. why wait until Pogba is sold to buy? Surely better to get someone in, especially as we lack any real quality in the AM position

We know Pogba is leaving, its a matter of when.

The bench options arent good enough anyway, we need to sign an AM AND a CM as a priority.

Limit the game times of Periera/Lingard/Mata and have some competition/rotation with McTom & Fred.

Matic and Pogba shouldn't come into the thinking of our long term plans at all.

When Pogba is fit, i agree he is the best option as our #10, but he's not a natural 10 really, issue is we lack creativity. He can come back in, but its a stop gap until he's out the door i'm afraid.
Yeah I get you but none of the no.10s I'm guessing Maddison or Grealish we're targeting will be available. So we should probably use Pogba as the stop gap in the 10 role. On the other hand there are a some good DMs that could be gotten in January - Allan, Doucoure, Berge, Roca, Bielik, Lobotka, etc
 

Suvvernmanc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
936
We need a dribbler, and someone who can score. Dani Olmo just scored a worldie. What a player he looks