I can't be alone in seeing Woodward and Glazers as essentially one entity, can't imagine either being associated club without the other. Woodward's future is more tied to how the Glazer's plan on maximising their (ahem) 'investment' than anything else:
A) Get back to the top with actual significant investment and management restructure, assuming that failing to do so will surely lead to significant losses in profit (whether that's marketing, sponsorship, TV money etc. etc.) - obviously it already has done, but presumably not in an anticipated, budgeted sort of way.
B) Really worryingly, imo, the United brand will remain profitable for a good while regardless of on-field woes and minimal investment, eventually reaching a point where getting back to the top becomes an absolutely mammoth task and our status as a club changes. Obviously the worst case scenario for fans, but how would this look from a Glazer perspective? Imo this would be similar to Arsenal but without the 'guarantee' of top 4 that they enjoyed for so long and so without that steady CL income.
C) Compare the profitability of option B with how much the club could be sold for short term. Would it better to sell later for less or cash in early on, with the clubs status still (just about) intact and when we're still generally perceived to have ambitions of getting back to the top?
Hopefully C...