I'm not calling the footballers greedy and incompetent. I'm calling out the lack of action from the FA and Government on this. Their fannying about will cause inevitable pandemonium further down the line.Is everyone going to work as normal engaged in greed and incompetence? Footballers are mere mortals. There will be a lot out ill and missing games from now until end of season. Pretending it is untenable that footballers also get ill is a bit silly.
There's also a reason they cut funding and made false promises. That reason has the queen's face on it.My brother's girlfriend works in epidemiology, and claims that there are some studies suggesting that if you cancel sports events that have already been scheduled, the fans still travel, still often gather outside the stadium, and spend the evening crushed together in pubs, moving around the city, using public transport, and potentially having a worse effect on infection rates than they would have if they came, watched the match in the (open air) stadium, then left.
I'm not an expert, and I only had a brief chat with her about it, but it does seem to make a certain amount of common sense. And there is presumably a reason why the government have actively chosen not to postpone sporting events and the like yet despite a strongly worded statement today.
This is what’s happened in the US, postponement should be the initial decision.The most reasonable thing to do is to postpone as opposed to straight up cancelling. Maybe the storm will pass and we can finish in the summer (though this would maybe also mean postponing the euros a year)
Where's the sense? You cancel it now, fans travel to this game sure, but they don't travel to the next one. Don't cancel it now and fans will travel to this game and the next one too. And even now chances are less fans will travel than if they didn't cancel it.My brother's girlfriend works in epidemiology, and claims that there are some studies suggesting that if you cancel sports events that have already been schedules, the fans still travel, still often gather outside the stadium, and spend the evening crushed together in pubs, moving around the city, using public transport, and potentially having a worse effect on infection rates than they would have if they came, watched the match in the (open air) stadium, then left.
I'm not an expert, and I only had a brief chat with her about it, but it does seem to make a certain amount of common sense. And there is presumably a reason why the government have actively chosen not to postpone sporting events and the like yet despite a strongly worded statement today.
the whole world is wrong and you’re right. must feel good huh?It really is though.
That doesn't make any sense. Surely by that logic the correct thing to do would be to let this one go ahead and cancel the one after. Which is kind of what she was saying - events that fans have already planned for potentially do as much damage when cancelled than when allowed to go ahead.Where's the sense? You cancel it now, fans travel to this game sure, but they don't travel to the next one. Don't cancel it now and fans will travel to this game and the next one too. And even now chances are less fans will travel than if they didn't cancel it.
Can they at least do a fecking videoconference, instead of in-person meeting? What century does EPL live in? Their stupidity is infuriating.Wait and see if anyone in the meeting tomorrow has the virus
Well this has not happened in Denmark while the games have been played in front of empty crowds. So not sure if that theory completely holds water in real life. Maybe for a match or two, but if governments actually lead, they will be aware of the danger they're exposing everyone to.My brother's girlfriend works in epidemiology, and claims that there are some studies suggesting that if you cancel sports events that have already been scheduled, the fans still travel, still often gather outside the stadium, and spend the evening crushed together in pubs, moving around the city, using public transport, and potentially having a worse effect on infection rates than they would have if they came, watched the match in the (open air) stadium, then left.
I'm not an expert, and I only had a brief chat with her about it, but it does seem to make a certain amount of common sense. And there is presumably a reason why the government have actively chosen not to postpone sporting events and the like yet despite a strongly worded statement today.
Can we start banning these idiots please?Got a live one here
'potentially'. I don't see as many fans traveling for a cancelled game given the nature of the circumstance, and even if just a small number decide not to travel that's still something.That doesn't make any sense. Surely by that logic the correct thing to do would be to let this one go ahead and cancel the one after. Which is kind of what she was saying - events that fans have already planned for potentially do as much damage when cancelled than when allowed to go ahead.
It really isn’t, «though».It really is though.
It is a theory based on massive statistical studies of multiple real life events, so presumably it does at least to some extent.Well this has not happened in Denmark while the games have been played in front of empty crowds. So not sure if that theory completely holds water in real life.
Why are footballers different then? They should just follow the same protocols.I'm not calling the footballers greedy and incompetent. I'm calling out the lack of action from the FA and Government on this. Their fannying about will cause inevitable pandemonium further down the line.
As for other folks. If you feel fine, then go to work. If you display flu-like symptoms, stay home. I work in a hospital and I'm not in a position to work from home.
What, when he said "people are going to die" ?But Boris Johnson says it will be fine
It's not just the PL that would be losing a tonne of money though, is it? Clubs (and the entire filter effect), sponsors, broadcasters etc. etc. there a lot of hurdles to deal with here and further to that, the PL is the most monied, watched league in the world with more to lose than any other European league.Just cancel everything. Who gives a feck about football when the public health is at stake? Everyone is losing money because of this virus, does the Premier league think they should be an exception?
Aye, me too mate, me too.I’ll gladly wait another 30 years to see Liverpool win the league if it means preventing more people getting infected and maybe even dying. At least suspend it for a couple of weeks.
Here is to 30 more years la.I’ll gladly wait another 30 years to see Liverpool win the league if it means preventing more people getting infected and maybe even dying. At least suspend it for a couple of weeks.
I understand it's probably based in studies, but the World has not seen a pandemic like this since the Spanish Flu - So you can't possibly have a full tested study over how people reacts on such a scale, under these circumstances.It is a theory based on massive statistical studies of multiple real life events, so presumably it does at least to some extent.
30? Pffft, I'd gladly wait 100 years. But I guess I just care more about the public's health than you...I’ll gladly wait another 30 years to see Liverpool win the league if it means preventing more people getting infected and maybe even dying. At least suspend it for a couple of weeks.
True, although its hard to judge the national mood about it at the moment. I run a bookshop, and we've barely even seen a dip in footfall, and customers have spent all day telling me about the foreign holidays they're definitely still going on, work they won't be missing to quarantine themselves etc. Individuals are not good at making good public health decisions - the very existence of anti-vaxers is proof of that.'potentially'. I don't see as many fans traveling for a cancelled game given the nature of the circumstance, and even if just a small number decide not to travel that's still something.
Very true, I concede that.I understand it's probably based in studies, but the World has not seen a pandemic like this since the Spanish Flu - So you can't possibly have a full tested study over how people reacts on such a scale, under these circumstances.
Aye, me too mate, me too.
Seriously who cares? It’s getting massively out of hand. Ridiculous decision by the Premier League not to suspend games before the Arteta announcement.Here is to 30 more years la.
Hahahahahahah
I know mate, 20 fecking points.Seriously who cares? It’s getting massively out of hand. Ridiculous decision by the Premier League not to suspend games before the Arteta announcement.
Well, he was in close contact with several of the Olympiakos players and staff that have passed him at any given point. Any of them could have infected him. It spread through tiny tiny droplets in the air.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You have incorrect information, mate. Let me share some data with you.It's just the fecking flu. Get on with it.
25 actually. But yeah suspend it for two weeks.I know mate, 20 fecking points.
I can understand your reasoning and the argument behind it. The science is very believable, even just using the misinformation floating around this thread alone as an example. But regardless, even if there's a small chance of reducing the flow of human traffic around the country I wish we would just take that chance. If canceling isn't going to make the situation worse but could potentially make it (even a little) better then just cancelTrue, although its hard to judge the national mood about it at the moment. I run a bookshop, and we've barely even seen a dip in footfall, and customers have spent all day telling me about the foreign holidays they're definitely still going on, work they won't be missing to quarantine themselves etc. Individuals are not good at making good public health decisions - the very existence of anti-vaxers is proof of that.
I'm normally all for the interpretation that governments and organisations will always put money before all else. But the government are looking at a potentially 2008-level economic fallout from this pandemic, so the hit to the economy from cancelling the sporting events - even the entire remaining PL season - is a tiny drop in a very big bucket. And yet they have decided not to do it, and made a point of it in their statement. I think that suggests the experts think there is compelling science suggesting now is not a good time to do that.
How were they allowed to play if the owner has tested positive and been in contact with players since? I really am starting to lose faith in humanity.Well, he was in close contact with several of the Olympiakos players and staff that have passed him at any given point. Any of them could have infected him. It spread through tiny tiny droplets in the air.
Olympiakos played Wolverhampton tonight. If I was a betting man, that is the next team to announce a positive test.
It really is this farcical isn't itWhat, when he said "people are going to die" ?