SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
I'm sure I'm reading this wrong, but how has the government ordered 17m antibody tests if they haven't been able to find them and nobody has any?
Hancock: We continue to search for antibody test
Matt Hancock is asked about promises of antibody tests that have yet to emerge - which will show if some has already had the virus.
On Thursday he admitted no working test had been found yet.
Today, Mr Hancock says the government has ordered 17 million, but says he has been "absolutely clear all along we will only use them if they work".
He says no G7 country has found a home antibody test that works yet, "but we continue to search for one".
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
38,712
Location
Cooper Station
Should disperse easily outside, it's more in shops and homes with other people and other confined spaces.
Nah, I'm good. I've always wanted to become a recluse but couldn't afford to. Things are different now with all this furlough business.
 

bonothom

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
843
Agree.

The natural course of a virus is to survive as long as possible with a preferred route of becoming more infectious but less lethal. SARS was an exception. People seem to think it'll get both more infectious AND lethal, which is counter-intuitive in itself.
Precisely, a virus does not want to kill the host. It will lose lethality over time. Figures being quoted suggest 10 million Infections worldwide, that puts it at 0.5 cfr.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
Nah, I'm good. I've always wanted to become a recluse but couldn't afford to. Things are different now with all this furlough business.
United fans have been forced into doing this for the last few years already :D
 

AllezLesDiables

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
1,805
I can't tell you what the science is, that's my point, I'm not remotely qualified to argue it.

What I can say is that from various bits and pieces I've read it appears different measures have different impacts at different times, different measures react to other measures and different measures have their own negative secondary effects which have to be countered. Which means that in order to judge the best time to implement a given measure (neither too early nor too late to be its most effective) you have to judge it in relation to more factors than I could conveniently list. So when you ask "why not a week earlier", that's why. Or maybe it isn't. Neither of us are qualified to say or second guess, really. I'm not even in a position to judge how accurate those bits and pieces I read actually are. And even people who are qualified may well have differing opinions as that tends to be how science and medicine works.

What we can do though is compare it to the consensus approach of other countries and the recommendations of expert bodies like the WHO, which Ireland has been largely in line with throughout. Beyond that... *shrugs*

As for the north, there may well have been political mistakes in the government's approach. It's not exactly an easy political situation even at the best of times though and if we're looking to point fingers at someone for the divergence in response across the island, most would probably point to the UK government's initial decision to go in a rather atypical direction. The ROI government didn't create the back door that is NI, nor are they the primary government responsible for dictating the direction NI takes.

It's also worth pointing out that every single government will make mistakes, mistakes which will cost lives. They're all hopelessly overmatched and unprepared and trying their best in those circumstances. I don't think our mistakes thus far are particularly out of order or unreasonable relative to what's going on in the rest of the world.
It comes down being able to lead, be honest, and get the citizenry to get in line with directives.

Since I’m not from the UK I can’t speak intelligently. My sense that the UK has been a bit of shambles but its failings pale in comparison to the US where I am from.

The fact that up until a week ago the governor of the state of Georgia didn’t know that the virus could be spread by asymptomatic carriers is beyond shocking. When you compile this with the concept that Florida is still allowing religious groupings as essential goes to show that there is no centralized leadership in the US.

Regarding the death portion of things. The problem with this disease isn’t going to be the disease itself, but it’s ability to cripple a lack of planning.

While this thing is nasty as hell. The bigger problems emerging in the US are the potential deaths due to a lack of medical personnel, medical supplies, beds along with the secondary issues of lack of food, shelter, water.

This doesn’t even delve into the issues of civil unrest once 1/2 the country is out of money or god forbid a second wave this upcoming winter.

This isn’t a case of fear mongering but rather being alert to the catastrophic issues that create even more death and destruction if measures aren’t taken immediately.

This still doesn’t even address the additional Issues that could arise from a hurricane or a major earthquake.

This is why having proper leadership makes a difference because they grasp the terrifying concept that any additional problems could be devastating because the normal protections are gone.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
Watching the daily UK Govt/Medical briefing - as usual, Jonathan Van Tam (medical guy) comes across very well. And he called Peston out t'other day so he gets bonus points for that.

One of the journalists has just asked if there are benefits to wearing a facemask.....

JVT says "a controversial area in 15 years he's been involved"... "on phone today to professor who works with WHO".... "there is no evidence that face masks help"... "The key is social distancing".... "It's frequent in some countries".... "We do not recommend wearing face masks in the UK"

Pretty clear view.
The appropriate face masks prevents inhalation of droplets. Apart from the dispersion aspects which I discussed above, the uncertainty from the biological point of view seems to be as best I can understand it (I have no knowledge of the biology and I am just reading the news) is that the scientists are not sure if a) you can become infected from inhaling the droplets and b) if (a) is true, how significant is it. The stance by JVT seems quite reasonable, at least in terms of the science.

But by saying "we don't recommend it" does risk alienating people because the alternative argument is that if there is a chance you become infected via inhalation of droplets containing the virus, then why not just give the masks anyway and not take the risk. This is not a view I personally hold entirely - I think we should be giving masks to the doctors/nurses/carers only, but others have a different view which is fair enough.
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,246
Thankfully I haven't come across any disturbance or abuse thrown at security guards regarding my shopping experiences during this lockdown but the ones out there that do are absolute selfish,ignorant cnut bags.
I’ve just returned from a trip to Purley Tesco’s and it was one of the best shopping experiences I’ve ever had there!
Security at entrance limiting numbers inside the store which are way lower than usual. Everyone being respectful of the 2m distance and some esprit de corps with the chat with people.
Usually that store is chock full of cnuts and it’s horrible shopping in there. I presume they are still there but behaving themselves?
The security guard at the door was about 6ft10 and 20 stone at a guess so that may have dissuaded anyone from teeing one up
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
WHO thinks covid19 takes 2-14 days to show symptoms (median 5 days ). It's been 10 days since covid19 UK shut down on March 24th.

Is it correct to assume those dying now are largely from pre lock down period. So I guess we can expect daily numbers dead (RIP) to keep same or rising for a week longer, ie before we ‘flatten or lower the curve’.

Two thoughts:

1) What if number keeps rising this time next week?

2) Could Government have enforced total shut down a week earlier? Boris acted fast once Imperial report was published, but surely evidence from China, Italy, Iran would have justified them to act 'on a hunch'?

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,361
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Hmmm, well yes, knobheads will be knobheads, but keep in mind some at least of the ones shouting at the supermarket staff may not be in great shape themselves. There are quite a few people around with "hidden" disabilities - ranging from the minor (that mean they can cope with routine, but not with the lack of it) to the major (that mean they often rely on others to help them maintain that routine, or to manage essential medication or addiction).

A lot of support systems, (particularly informal ones and voluntary services but also GP/public health driven things) are out of action, or not operating in the normal way. Care in the community can be a beautiful thing when it works, but it's also very fragile.
That's a very good point- loads of people must be struggling without their support groups. I guess we all need to be more tolerant.
I saw some of the addiction support groups have moved online, but there seems to be a lot of concerns over the sanctity of group meetings held over Zoom.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,338
Location
South Carolina
@Henrik Larsson and @Suedesi - here's some more detailed info from the American Hospital Association that breakds down what our "intensive care beds" are...

Total Staffed Beds in All U.S. Hospitals
924,107​
Staffed Beds in Community 1 Hospitals
792,417​
Intensive Care Beds 3 in Community Hospitals
Medical-Surgical Intensive Care 4 Beds in Community Hospitals
55,663​
Cardiac Intensive Care 5 Beds in Community Hospitals
15,160​
Neonatal Intensive Care 6 Beds in Community Hospitals
22,721​
Pediatric Intensive Care 7 Beds in Community Hospitals
5,115​
Burn Care 8 Beds in Community Hospitals
1,198​
Other Intensive Care 9 Beds in Community Hospitals
7,419​

edit - source: https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals
 
Last edited:

fergieisold

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
7,122
Location
Saddleworth (home) Manchester (work)
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
21,891
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
The appropriate face masks prevents inhalation of droplets. Apart from the dispersion aspects which I discussed above, the uncertainty from the biological point of view seems to be as best I can understand it (I have no knowledge of the biology and I am just reading the news) is that the scientists are not sure if a) you can become infected from inhaling the droplets and b) if (a) is true, how significant is it. The stance by JVT seems quite reasonable, at least in terms of the science.

But by saying "we don't recommend it" does risk alienating people because the alternative argument is that if there is a chance you become infected via inhalation of droplets containing the virus, then why not just give the masks anyway and not take the risk. This is not a view I personally hold entirely - I think we should be giving masks to the doctors/nurses/carers only, but others have a different view which is fair enough.
I've got no idea, just thought interesting (sic) as question asked as I saw topic on here.

JVT is very calm, precise but that's not a guarantee. Personally, anything that can help NHS staff is good by me... my sister's a Sister (honestly :) ) so would like to minimise her chances of catching if possible.
 

Giggs86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,632
Location
USA
They definitely work to contain the virus when you are infected. The evidence they provide protection from the virus for someone who isn't infected is limited.
The more people wear masks the less chance of the virus spreading.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,338
Location
South Carolina
As I've been saying all along, face masks work, and finally the WHO is coming round to the most obvious fact.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/...-mask-use-general-public-coronavirus/12118042
My wife is wearing a n95, goggles, a hair cover, gloves, a gown, and a plastic fasemask... and she's been trained on how to put them on and take them off to avoid contamination.

Average people wearing just a facemask thinking that will prevent them from catching this virus are fooling themselves. It's about like all the people wearing gloves and then touching things and then touching their faces with the gloves on... or touching things with the gloves on then later touching those same things with the gloves off.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,082
Location
Hollywood CA
Prices are a bit absurd. For N95, a box of 10 masks costs $75. Considering that they are meant to be used only once, it is really very expensive.

I have no idea how much protection cheaper alternatives provide: https://ebay.to/2UCPYs6
I wouldn't bother with the N95s since they are almost all going to get taken down at some point due to the healthcare need. I got 20 regular hospital style masks for 29.99 a couple of days ago. Should last me a couple of months since I don't go out much.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,548
Location
France
So this may well mean that the UK is doing much better than we thought.
At the moment the UK only counts and knows about people that are hospitalized, it's the same story than Italy or France(until this week).
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
If we assume 10% of the global population will catch it and the latest real death estimate of 0.66% is accurate enough, then ~5 million.

10% and 0.66% applied to the US gives 200k deaths in the US which is their hopeful projection, so probably not far off.
Surely not applicable to more population dense, and less developed regions in Africa, Latin America and Asia?
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
I wouldn't bother with the N95s since they are almost all going to get taken down at some point due to the healthcare need. I got 20 regular hospital style masks for 29.99 a couple of days ago. Should last me a couple of months since I don't go out much.
can masks be machine washed and reused?
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Or, you know, they got the appropriate advice from the experts and acted on it accordingly.

One thing that backseat driver Twitter experts don’t get in all of this is that even the people who know considerably more about all of this than they do don’t always agree on everything. It easy to say the pubs should have closed on exactly this day, and schools on exactly this day and so on but those are huge decisions and getting a consensus from everyone involved won’t be easy. Which is further complicated by the day to day changes to scientific consensus, re the infectiousness and lethality of the virus. It’s why so many countries have so many different approaches, despite all of them being guided by legitimate experts who know infinitely more than paddy277575 on Twitter about how and when to introduce Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions in a pandemic.

I’ve been as critical of the UK and US approach as anyone but that’s because they’ve so obviously contradicted themselves with their dramatic changes in approach, as well as their shambolic mixed messages coming from their leader.

In Ireland they’ve been as consistent as possible, despite dealing with curveballs that are completely out of their control, such as global shortages of testing reagents and PPE. They’ve also been pretty clear and precise with their advice, based on the best available evidence at the time. Obviously, with hindsight, there were things they could have done differently but they’ve not done a bad job at all, based on the information and expert advice they had at the time.
You say twitter experts as if they were wrong? Theres been a solid pattern of if you want to know our next move is then just judge what the public opinion is days before.
I dont see what closing the pubs on March 15 instead of March 11 does in the long run to be honest but its all hidden under the banner of following science.
I know its a tough sitiation but theres being in a tough situation and theres pretending we have been proactive when we clearly havent been.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,338
Location
South Carolina
can masks be machine washed and reused?
You would need to check the technical data sheet for the corresponding mask. I think its unlikely but you never know..
I'm sure the ones made of cloth can. The hospital style ones which seem to be made out of something a bit papery probably can't.
https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/01/researchers-show-how-to-decontaminate-reuse-n95-masks/

The team members who came together over the last few weeks scoured hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, and held continuous online meetings to review studies of decontamination methods that have been used on previous viral and bacterial pathogens and then to assess the potential to use these methods on the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.

Their goal was to provide overwhelmed health officials with reliable, pre-digested scientific information about the pros and cons of three decontamination methods should local shortages force a choice between decontamination and reuse or going unmasked.

The three methods involve either heat and humidity; a specific wavelength of light called ultraviolet C (UVC); or treatment with hydrogen peroxide vapors (HPV).

The scientists did not endorse any one method but instead sought to describe the circumstances under which each might be effective against the virus provided rigorous procedures were followed. They concluded, for instance, that devices that rely on heat are effective under specific temperature, humidity and time parameters. With UVC devices, the group advised making sure masks are properly oriented to the light so the entire surface is bathed in sufficient energy. They also found that the HPV method could potentially be used to decontaminate masks in volume – a recommendation that is backed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has already certified certain vendors to offer hydrogen peroxide vapor treatments on a large scale.

They created a website that compiles all n95 decontamination data into 1 place also... https://www.n95decon.org/
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,287
When outdoors most of the time there is motion in the surrounding air for the droplets to disperse them considerably. The stronger the motion (i.e. if it happens to be quite windy), the greater (and faster) the dispersion. The chance of inhaling a stray droplet in a secluded area is therefore very slim. Don't be fooled by the video. I've already explained above, simulations of these processes aren't great. The experiment was interesting, but it seems it was carried out indoor with little to no surrounding air motion, which is usually unrealistic when going outdoors.



You could also use a bar of soap, normally they are a lot cheaper and also, at least for me, last a lot longer.
I needed the hand sanitizer for when i do my shopping. So when i come out of the shop i rub some on.

I have the soap but doubt i need it because i live alone.

A guy on Joe Rogan said it is the foam in soap that kills the virus.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,550
Location
London
My wife is wearing a n95, goggles, a hair cover, gloves, a gown, and a plastic fasemask... and she's been trained on how to put them on and take them off to avoid contamination.

Average people wearing just a facemask thinking that will prevent them from catching this virus are fooling themselves. It's about like all the people wearing gloves and then touching things and then touching their faces with the gloves on... or touching things with the gloves on then later touching those same things with the gloves off.
She's been trained to have close to 100% protection while dealing with infected people. Just putting a mask and gloves obviously won't achieve that, but (almost surely) it will give some protection (especially when we are talking for people who are dealing mostly with non-infected people). And some protection, is better than no protection.

The head doctor of South Korea said that the main difference in the fight they are doing vs the west, is that there everyone uses masks.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,958
They definitely work to contain the virus when you are infected. The evidence they provide protection from the virus for someone who isn't infected is limited.
My wife is wearing a n95, goggles, a hair cover, gloves, a gown, and a plastic fasemask... and she's been trained on how to put them on and take them off to avoid contamination.

Average people wearing just a facemask thinking that will prevent them from catching this virus are fooling themselves. It's about like all the people wearing gloves and then touching things and then touching their faces with the gloves on... or touching things with the gloves on then later touching those same things with the gloves off.


Do explain why the pale blue lines are all countries where most people wear masks.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/01/researchers-show-how-to-decontaminate-reuse-n95-masks/

The team members who came together over the last few weeks scoured hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, and held continuous online meetings to review studies of decontamination methods that have been used on previous viral and bacterial pathogens and then to assess the potential to use these methods on the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.

Their goal was to provide overwhelmed health officials with reliable, pre-digested scientific information about the pros and cons of three decontamination methods should local shortages force a choice between decontamination and reuse or going unmasked.

The three methods involve either heat and humidity; a specific wavelength of light called ultraviolet C (UVC); or treatment with hydrogen peroxide vapors (HPV).

The scientists did not endorse any one method but instead sought to describe the circumstances under which each might be effective against the virus provided rigorous procedures were followed. They concluded, for instance, that devices that rely on heat are effective under specific temperature, humidity and time parameters. With UVC devices, the group advised making sure masks are properly oriented to the light so the entire surface is bathed in sufficient energy. They also found that the HPV method could potentially be used to decontaminate masks in volume – a recommendation that is backed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has already certified certain vendors to offer hydrogen peroxide vapor treatments on a large scale.

They created a website that compiles all n95 decontamination data into 1 place also... https://www.n95decon.org/
It never ceases to amaze what scientists/engineers can do. I think its great news if they can scale up a method which can clean these reusable masks in an industrial setting.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Google are providing location data to track changes in movement between different countries. They have split it up into categories like how many people are going to retail places, transit stations, workplaces etc.

https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/

The UK for comparison is still moving between 10% and 40% more than Italy, especially in parks.
I guess this will be very useful to covid19 hotspot planners. ie: if this data was layered onto infected/died per same area, should show correlation on effective of shut down/Stay at home?
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK


Do explain why the pale blue lines are all countries where most people wear masks.
Look at South Korea. It didn't stop a very large number of deaths before finally peaking.
People have already discussed some issues in Japan earlier in the thread.
Singapore and Hong Kong both have labels of "quanrantine" so you can't say whether it was the masks or the quanrantine that proved most effective.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,548
Location
France
Gah, that's brutal. Seems that in South Carolina the initial incubator for Covid was senior care homes as well.
Today the total counts are 6507 deaths in France, 5091 in hospitals and 1416 care homes.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/01/researchers-show-how-to-decontaminate-reuse-n95-masks/

The team members who came together over the last few weeks scoured hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, and held continuous online meetings to review studies of decontamination methods that have been used on previous viral and bacterial pathogens and then to assess the potential to use these methods on the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.

Their goal was to provide overwhelmed health officials with reliable, pre-digested scientific information about the pros and cons of three decontamination methods should local shortages force a choice between decontamination and reuse or going unmasked.

The three methods involve either heat and humidity; a specific wavelength of light called ultraviolet C (UVC); or treatment with hydrogen peroxide vapors (HPV).

The scientists did not endorse any one method but instead sought to describe the circumstances under which each might be effective against the virus provided rigorous procedures were followed. They concluded, for instance, that devices that rely on heat are effective under specific temperature, humidity and time parameters. With UVC devices, the group advised making sure masks are properly oriented to the light so the entire surface is bathed in sufficient energy. They also found that the HPV method could potentially be used to decontaminate masks in volume – a recommendation that is backed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has already certified certain vendors to offer hydrogen peroxide vapor treatments on a large scale.

They created a website that compiles all n95 decontamination data into 1 place also... https://www.n95decon.org/
Great information. Many thanks!

How you/wife feeling? Hope it's not too bad for you.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,338
Location
South Carolina
She's been trained to have close to 100% protection while dealing with infected people. Just putting a mask and gloves obviously won't achieve that, but (almost surely) it will give some protection (especially when we are talking for people who are dealing mostly with non-infected people). And some protection, is better than no protection.

The head doctor of South Korea said that the main difference in the fight they are doing vs the west, is that there everyone uses masks.
You would need literally everyone wearing them, and then not contaminating things through improper use or wearing them and then contaminating themselves anyway through improperly doing something else.

How many masks would that take? How much other protective equipment to do so properly?


Do explain why the pale blue lines are all countries where most people wear masks.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/26...olds-lesson-defeating-it-demands-persistence/