You are missing the point. It's not about whether it's happening or they can or can't afford him so read this carefully again please.
My post was very clear that of the top teams in PL, only Arsenal is desperate to sign creative player like him to improve their XI. The other teams aren't desperate to sign someone like him at all. If all those top teams have the money, no club will be so desperate to spend crazy on Grealish except Arsenal.
I missed no point, because you claim Arsenal are "desperate for a creative player". I've shown already to you that they aren't, and debunked the links you suggested to this (e.g Coutinho).
That's something we can agree & disagree then.
What language is that?
Yeah I have stopped banging the CDM drum now because absolutely certain that McTominay is going to be covering Matic next season, in regards to LB I think it very much depends on how Shaw returns from this latest injury setback but would like someone with better delivery no doubt about that.
He's a player you named, and Ornstein is the journalist you pointed to as tier one, not me.
I named a player doesn't mean he's the only one, so point still stands here.
Not really. You say Arsenal are crying out for a creative midfielder Like Grealish. I say no chance a player of Grealish value is on their radar, when they have other areas as a priority.
''creative midfielder like Grealish''. My point still stands, it wasn't about they are targeting Grealish.
You clearly missed the point. I never say they can afford him, I put ''if'' for a reason.
Yeah definitely strikes me as having that arrogant swagger to cope with playing for this club, totally agree that £80m is too much and that's why I still could see a £50-55m plus addons deal later in the window. You cannot tell me he isn't tempted by playing alongside those names you mentioned because he wants to further his career whatever he may say in public.
Your point doesn't stand. In the very first post I quoted from you from this thread, you literally said "they will go for him (Grealish) for sure if they have the money".
Do you know the difference between ''they are targeting''' with ''they will go/target him if'' ?
No. You claim it wasn't about them targeting Grealish if they could make the transfer fee, when you clearly said they are desperate for a player like him, and will go for him if they can make the fee.
Then this :
As I said, you need to make up your mind on the matter.
Present tense:
Conditional tense
You need to know the difference between present tense and conditional tense. My point still stands.
Jesus christ. It's so clear you need to go back and learn tenses yourself. You said they'd go for grealish if they had money, then you say you didn't say they'd target grealish.
I said they will target Grealish if they have money. What I don't say is that "they are targeting Grealish". That's two different things.
Ive asked you a few times now for the Ornstein article. Please share.
I think Orny conceded in his next update that he was wrong about Havertz and Chelsea.
So you can have your point but I can't have my point? What about you also please share something to backup your point.
I'd prefer Grealish personally.
He's not going to 'magically' fix anything. But he will play his part in helping out. When ball gets to him at Villa he is often able to break out of the press or win a foul from it. That doesn't mean that it happens that way every time.
You're missing my point, at Villa he doesn't have to deal with it, he rarely, if ever drops to help with the press because Villa is not hell-bent on playing from the back, keeping the ball on the ground.
I think many want him, but there are also those who say don't need him, prefer someone else. Grealish would improve our squad depth. That's the general consensus. Personally I want him to join us.
I want 'em both!Awesome! I'm still holding out hope for this signing.
“My point still stands appears” to be the way they arouse one another.
To even start your day by having a go with someone in Grealish thread, you have some issue.
I did
read my posts. I'm done, he just pasted a video that showed other areas would be a priority anyway. And that Arteta would ideally have to sell before he buys. Case closed, took longer than needed.I'm done. But the saga was:
I did
Also thanks a ton, your Vid completely proves you wrong. He says 1) they are looking to move on center halves (named 2), 2) he is looking to strengthen in midfield and THEN that he'd like a wide player but no such players will leave.
That tells you what his priorities are. fecking hell you just shot yourself in the foot there.
You love making it up aye. He didn’t even say “then’’ at all. Just because he spoke about centre back first before midfield doesn’t mean that indicates priority.They tend to talk about the areas they'd improve in order of priority mate, you should know that when reading articles or listening to podcasts. He's saying what I said, that they need to sell if they want to buy, that he has many areas he'd like to improve, and started with defence, then holding midfield.
The fact is that right now Arsenal is strongly linked with midfielders more than centre back, and they are focussing on Partey for the most part. Next thing you will call Partey is a centre back?
I’m still waiting for you to share you stuffs to backup your point mate.
Lets move on and see how this saga unwinds. Unless @Fracture90 @BenitoSTARR want a private show we can put a full lid on this and see how it unwinds.You are talking to a poster who is obsessed with me mate.
Yo, I'm game, nothing better to do this morning anyway.They tend to talk about the areas they'd improve in order of priority mate, you should know that when reading articles or listening to podcasts. He's saying what I said, that they need to sell if they want to buy, that he has many areas he'd like to improve, and started with defence, then holding midfield.
Partey is a completely different player to Grealish. I agree they need to bolster in holding/box-to-box midielders. But they don't need to improve on creativity anywhere near that. Unless you're suggesting Partey is a creative midfielder
No they don’t, you are not watching the video at all. Ornstein was answering someone question whether they need to sell, he mentioned that they are looking for to ‘’move on from’’ aka “sell” their centre back. He later mentioned midfield because they also looking for to sell Guendouzi but not sure whether they will sell the wide area. That’s the reason why he mentioned centre back first.They tend to talk about the areas they'd improve in order of priority mate, you should know that when reading articles. Partey is a completely different player to Grealish. I agree they need to bolster in holding/box-to-box midielders. But they don't need to improve on creativity anywhere near that.
Unless you're suggesting Partey is a creative midfielder
Nice try to trick someone to suit your argument.