He's a seasoned player and a title winner, his professionalism is highly rated by all the manager's he's worked for. His effort on the pitch is there for all to see and you can extrapolate from there that he's more likely to be a positive influence on the team than a negative/idle one.
No he didn't - Young wanted out when Inter came calling and left midway through the season. Why do you keep ignoring this?
Yeah, Ole signed off on that one.
So being a good pro and playing well as a squad player does matter. Make up your mind.
You literally are. Your initial point came out from Wilian being old and therefore useless. It's as binary as it gets.
Hilarious - I literally pointed to professionalism, work ethic, title winning experience and you go back to your binary mode to try and suggest my sole point is "old = leadership". And then you have the cheek to talk to me about logical thinking. Your entire argument is based on black or white garbage.
"Chelsea don't want him, why should we take him" - It wouldn't be the first mistake Chelsea made with letting go of a player, so not impossible to think Wilian can be a good free transfer for any club to be honest.
"Ole got rid of Young" - I mean soon enough he would have but its obvious Young asked to leave at a time Ole didn't want him to go so your argument collapses there.
"Look at the players Ole wants to bring in" - *see's the Jones example " - "That's a calamity" (!?)
"Matic played himself into form and is a good pro". And you think Wilian isn't a potential good squad option or a good pro? What's this based on?
Curious to know how many Chelsea games you watch to be honest -whilst Wilian is not a player for week in week out, he's consistently a dependable player for a decent performance. And all big clubs need those squad options. Chelsea can let go of him, that doesn't mean he won't be missed if unreplaced, or that he wont go on to add value at another club in a bit/part role.
