That's good to hear - looking forward to watching them this evening.
Spurs Documentary: All or nothing
- Thread starter FootyGirl88
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran hold a long overdue conversation about United's awful league form with 1 win in 7. They discuss a disappointing draw at Bournemouth, a not so disappointing draw against Liverpool and a crushing defeat at Chelsea - Is time nearly over for Erik Ten Hag?
Then in a special second half of the pod, Nik welcomes Natalie ( https://twitter.com/natalie_17) to discuss the fortunes of Manchester United Women as they booked a place in the FA Cup Final after a historic first ever win vs. Chelsea.
Is it just me who is surprised that Levy is always in and around the squad during lunch and stuff?
My impression is that he'd have been a part of negotiations for a player having hardly known them, done the deal and then never interact with them again.
I'd have thought he'd operate in a completely different office.
My impression is that he'd have been a part of negotiations for a player having hardly known them, done the deal and then never interact with them again.
I'd have thought he'd operate in a completely different office.
Rose got some balls Jesus!
Totally, it’s what I keep repeating myself in this thread about. It all seems far too pally, if rose can stomp about saying tell Daniel I’m looking for him. I didn’t expect that.
Got him a loan to Newcastle in the end. There was only one winner there.
Levy has always been like that, he has an open door policy. You have to remember Rose is the oldest serving member of the squad and is known to have a mouth on him, to be fair I doubt he would pass a medical for a permanent transfer, a bit like Lamella.
His point was completely valid though - the results had been really poor & he just wasn't getting a sniff. It was funny how after that the head of recruitment starting chatting about how they are the most together and settled squad in the PL.
Yeah he wasn’t shy in holding back. He proper went for it. Didn’t even flinch. I think even Jose was surprised at his assertiveness.
To be fair he had a point. Rose can’t have played that bad to justify playing a right footed centre back at left back ahead of him. Every player has a bad game.
Last edited:
He barely looked like he's listening, Rose point was fair but Mourinho's mind was definitely already made up. Can't recall seeing Tanganga much since either
Rose does have a point, Rooney said something similar that he would drop players and wouldnt explain why.
I really find it a fascinating watch. Would be interesting to see them respond to corona virus lockdown
You will.
Ive posted i before but Jose telling the physio that Son didnt need an xray because he didnt want one was outrageous.
Spoilers mate. Bloody hell.
He also admitted that he didn't play well when he played. Which gives the manager every reason not to play him.
You were not aware of the global pandemic
Last edited:
Dealing with footballers seems so exhausting. Just watched the Ericksen, Levy and Jose meeting. Ericksen came across so poorly, people trying to explain situations to him and like a kid with no ability to understand other people, instantly with "well that's not my problem", "well it looks easy to me" when people have barely finished speaking.
Seems like he just wanted more cash, really rated himself and was desperate for a move. Now fair enough, but just the attitude stinks of someone surrounded by sycophants and who rarely ever hears "no".
Goes to Inter with a big payday and looks decidedly average.
Seems like he just wanted more cash, really rated himself and was desperate for a move. Now fair enough, but just the attitude stinks of someone surrounded by sycophants and who rarely ever hears "no".
Goes to Inter with a big payday and looks decidedly average.
Last edited:
ERIKSEN! But yes I totally agree, seems to be on the transfer list.
This documentary is great for those wanting a laugh at Spurs' expense but from their point of view this is car crash TV
I think your taking a lot more seriously than us Spurs fans, its basically a narrative to the season and you get to see a little behind the scenes, pretty much like all the rest of Amazon's docs, I haven't heard any Spurs fans knocking it. I certainly don't see the car crash.
I haven't seen it yet but based on that Rose clip I cannot see why anyone would want that kind of thing to be in the public domain, as fascinating it may be I'd be cringing if I were a Spurs fan
Rose is such a diva
Why would you cringe? It's dramatised for effect, its nothing we haven't known about rose for years, he has a big mouth and little to back it up.
I wrote it out with an "e" and then changed!
I guess there's just things I'd prefer to be left to the imagination rather than expose what really goes on behind closed doors. Like I said fascinating viewing just don't see why Spurs would want some of this out there?
Don't worry mate it seems to be a name that causes a lot of problems, I have done the same.
Yeah that was really irresponsible by Jose. He tried to be clever with his words and say it was Son that didn’t want a scan. But you could see he didn’t care what the doctor said, he wanted Son to play and to just brush whatever the problem is under the carpet.
Its no worse than the bullshit that gets peddled in the media, I see it as harmless fun and can get some insight behind the scenes, the physios, management how the squad interacts.
Yeah he came across with a shocking attitude. Thought that was really poor. He was basically not leaving that meeting unless he got his way out in January.
I don’t think it was for more money though as Levy said they would match any offer he got from elsewhere. Plus he would have got a lot more money if he went on a free transfer at end of season.
But I bet they were happy to get rid in hindsight. He clearly didn’t wanna be there.
Just starting the newest 3 episodes. Poor Jose and his dog, he took that hard.
Impressed with Hugo Lloris, sounds fantastic in the dressing room and a leader.
I actually felt sorry for him. It was nice to see the softy in him.
Was pretty funny watching Rose have that stand off with Jose about not playing, when he’d wanted to bring him to United just 18 months before. Would’ve been more money well spent.
Yeah I can see why hes our and Frances captain, sounds good and inspiring
I wonder if mourhino would have dealt with that differently if the cameras were not there and hit the roof, or maybe the cameras gave Rose extra conjones to do it too
I found it hilarious how he bollocked the entire team for not doing enough, moments after his feckup lead to a goal.
Probably both, Rose has been trash for a good few season, injuries probably the cause.
I feel a bit for Rose, mainly on the Milan part funnily enough.
Such a career / life-defining moment coming and going during a really casual lunch in a situation where no one else in the room, Levy included, has a reason to care.
Such a career / life-defining moment coming and going during a really casual lunch in a situation where no one else in the room, Levy included, has a reason to care.
I find the back room discussions regarding transfers and player injuries/fitness most satisfying.
Why do they bleep out cnut but not feck?
Why do they bleep out cnut but not feck?
NO idea but I found this amusing.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/read-what-ofcom-thinks-47-8987533
Arse Mild language, generally of little concern.
Arsehole Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Balls Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Particularly vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact, especially for women.
Bastard Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact. Less problematic when used to refer indirectly to someone who is cruel or nasty.
Beaver Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Beef curtains* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Bellend Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen by some as a childish word often said in jest. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bint Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as potentially derogatory by women, but men also find the word problematic.
Bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bloodclaat* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Among those familiar, seen as vulgar and crude. Strongly disliked by women when meaning discussed.
Bloody Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion, and not usually as a directed insult.
Bollocks Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Not generally offensive but somewhat vulgar when used to refer to testicles. Less problematic when used to mean 'nonsense'.
Bugger Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion when making a mistake. Seen as much stronger when used in a clearly sexual context.
Bullshit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Clunge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Cock Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Cow Mild language, generally of little concern. Commonly viewed as a humorous insult.
Crap Mild language, generally of little concern.
cnut Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Especially distasteful and offensive to women and older participants.
Damn Mild language, generally of little concern.
Dick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Dickhead Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Fanny Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude, particularly by women.
Feck/Effing Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Often seen as humorous. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Flaps Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
feck Strongest language, unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as strong, aggressive and vulgar. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Gash Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Ginger Mild language, generally of little concern. Typically viewed as a humorous insult, however more aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Git Mild language, generally of little concern. Tyically viewed as a humorous insult.
God Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participantswhen used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Goddam Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. Seen as slightly stronger than 'God' because it is more aggressive. Some recognition that this might offend religious people.
Jesus Christ Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participants when used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Knob Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Minge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Minger Mild language, generally of little concern. Viewed as a humorous insult. More unpleasant than offensive. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Motherfecker Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Seen as very aggressive when intended to hurt or offend.
Munter Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Pissed / pissed off Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Neither meaning – drunk or angry – particularly offensive but more problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly.
Prick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Punani Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by those familiar.
Pussy Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Much milder when used to mean weak or ineffectual but still seen as problematic by some.
Shit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Common language used in everyday life but problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly. Concerns about children learning the word.
Snatch Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many.
Sod-off Mild language, generally of little concern.
Son of a bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed..
Tits Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact.
Twat Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Less problematic if describing a rude or obnoxious person, but still potentially offensive.
*An asterisk indicates the words were recognised by less than 40 per cent of the people surveyed by Ofcom.