Sergio Reguilón

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rolaholic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
11,161
I mean I think our tune will change if Luke Shaw gets hurt and we have to rely on Brandon Williams every week.
That's why I really do hope we have alternatives lined up because this season is going to warrant a fair amount of good squad depth given the schedule congestion due to covid.

1 injury to Shaw, which should be expected at this point, and we're back to having that left flank becoming barren moving forward and having Rashford needing to overcompensate
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
If Reguilon joins Spurs it will prove once more how incompetent Woodward and Matt Judge are.
No chance, this will be quite the opposite really!
Why exactly should we develop a player, giving him time in the first team, basically doing all the hard work that Real doesn't want to do, just for them to swoop in and take him back when he (possibly) starts turning into a very very good player?? Sure he could refuse to return, but seeing as he's already said Madrid is his dream and he's desperate to make it there, we definitely needed to steer clear. I'm fully behind Woodward and Judge this time!
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
I mean I think our tune will change if Luke Shaw gets hurt and we have to rely on Brandon Williams every week.
That doesn't mean this was the right option. It wasn't. Why should we develop a player for Madrid? We may have been relatively shit to our standards for the last few years but we aren't small time. Some of you need to get that in your heads.
 

Feed Me

I'm hungry
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
29,319
Location
Midlands, UK
Even for us, this is pretty bad. If Van De Beek stays the only signing, that would be a disaster.
You may as well resign yourself to that outcome now to avoid disappointment once the window closes. I’ve been quite serene about United for a while now. It’s hard to be annoyed when your expectations are zero. In football terms, we have an average squad, average coaches and average administrators. That’s why we hover between 3rd and 7th, aka nowhere.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
Didn't think they'd be so insistent on a buyback after letting Hakimi go without one at a position they were less stocked in but they must still have plans for him in the future I assume maybe after Marcelo retires.

The fact that he's also a Spaniard might have something to do with it
United dont want to pay, that is the truth. The buy back can be negiotiated around by adding 5m or so and there were some indications that can happen but they didn't want to. Buy back is just an excuse for them so they can say we tried
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,557
Who was it that had said all along that United were playing this down and they believed it was a tactic to get Spurs to the table?
 

Rolaholic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
11,161
United dont want to pay, that is the truth. The buy back can be negiotiated around by adding 5m or so and there were some indications that can happen but they didn't want to. Buy back is just an excuse for them so they can say we tried
Who/what are we saving the money for if not for Ole's targets in that case?
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,565
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
If you think about it, this deal with the buyback is pretty much the inverse of a loan with option to buy.

If it goes badly and he doesn’t develop, you’re stuck with him. If it goes well and he becomes a key player you’re going to lose him. We’ve set our profile for hungry young players because we want to benefit from their peak.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,680
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Who was it that had said all along that United were playing this down and they believed it was a tactic to get Spurs to the table?
Apparently, it was David Ornstein. Laurie Whitwell, however, stated that United were involved though not of their own accord; apparently, Reguilon's agents were driving much of the negotiations, and we were happy to get involved in order to potentially get a good deal. Once Madrid started playing hardball and Spurs came in, we pulled out.

I don't think we were ever strongly interested in Reguilon. Rather, it was Reguilon's camp who were strongly interested in their player joining us.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
You may as well resign yourself to that outcome now to avoid disappointment once the window closes. I’ve been quite serene about United for a while now. It’s hard to be annoyed when your expectations are zero. In football terms, we have an average squad, average coaches and average administrators. That’s why we hover between 3rd and 7th, aka nowhere.
Our squad is average but our first XI can hang with most. There are plenty of reasons to be excited about the season if we can add 1 or 2. More needed to properly compete I agree.
 

Class of 63

Sourness
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
9,028
Location
Going through the Desert on a Horse with no Name
We should get together with Spurs to feck Real Madrid over on this, we should buy SR now for £25m with the buy-back clause in place which Real cannot activate until at least 2022, then agree to sell him to Spurs in January for say £30m and he's their player minus the buy-back clause, simples.
 

gorky_utd

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
1,929
Location
India
United dont want to pay, that is the truth. The buy back can be negiotiated around by adding 5m or so and there were some indications that can happen but they didn't want to. Buy back is just an excuse for them so they can say we tried
Interesting thought. But I think your theory will be proven correct if no one else is purchased this summer. If we sign someone like telles then I would say that the buyback was the real issue.
 

Rojofiam

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
3,251
Glad that we decided to walk away because Real insisted on the buy-back clause.

People calling us incompetent because of it :lol:
 

Feed Me

I'm hungry
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
29,319
Location
Midlands, UK
Our squad is average but our first XI can hang with most. There are plenty of reasons to be excited about the season if we can add 1 or 2. More needed to properly compete I agree.
It’s going to be a punishing schedule and you saw what happened to us towards the end of last season. We knew what the weaknesses were and have miserably failed, yet again. It’s not even surprising at this stage.
 

Black Rick

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
36
Test of football knowledge (that I don't possess)-

If a sale is made with a buyback clause, does the player have the right to refuse to move back to their original club even if said buyback clause is activated by them?
 

Eckers99

Michael Corleone says hello
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
6,117
I think can speak for many posters when I say it's a disgrace that we can't sign a truly top player that I wasn't aware of until - and had forgotten since - the Sevilla game. Shambles.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,885
Location
England
There's a number of targets the club could chase and I for one would target someone young with big potential for the role. That potential target would likely cost similar to what Reguillon is touted for, as long as we target said player from outside of our domestic league.

Right now i'm starting to question our strategy in the transfer market because we just don't seem to be decisive in our decision making.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,680
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Test of football knowledge (that I don't possess)-

If a sale is made with a buyback clause, does the player have the right to refuse to move back to their original club even if said buyback clause is activated by them?
The player does have a right to refuse. The contract between the player and the club isn't fully owned by the club (like in American sports leagues); the player has a significant amount of control over it as well. If a player says no to the club triggering a release/buyback clause, then the contract won't break. This would typically be written out into the contract to protect the player, but it's generally understood between football clubs.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,680
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
There's a number of targets the could chase and I for one would target someone young with big potential for the role. That potential target would likely cost similar to what Reguillon is touted for, as long as we target said player from outside of our domestic league.

Right now i'm starting to question our strategy in the transfer market because we just don't seem to be decisive in our decision making.
It sort of feels like the agents are driving our activity more than the other way around. If a player's made available to us by an agent, that's when we start to make moves. Even then, the agents would negotiate on our behalf, which would make our activity even slower.
 

Madridista2000

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
325
Supports
Real Madrid
We should get together with Spurs to feck Real Madrid over on this, we should buy SR now for £25m with the buy-back clause in place which Real cannot activate until at least 2022, then agree to sell him to Spurs in January for say £30m and he's their player minus the buy-back clause, simples.
First of all RM and the people doing these deals are not dumb. So they actually have another clause as well that say something like " right to match" In order to avoid the above scenario.

Why would United and Spurs get together to feck Real? Real-United or Real-Spurs are not league rivals. Does not make sense. It's professional business not kids getting miffed.
 

jesperjaap

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
5,719
Personally, though think very good fee, glad walked away with buyback clause for obvious reasons. I dont see left back as a priority with days left and I also think there are better left backs such as Nuno Mendes anyway.
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
United dont want to pay, that is the truth. The buy back can be negiotiated around by adding 5m or so and there were some indications that can happen but they didn't want to. Buy back is just an excuse for them so they can say we tried
Or, you know, it could be the fact that he's already said that succeeding at Real Madrid is his dream and he's not willing to let go of that, so IF he develops into a world class star, even with no buyback clause, he'd force our hand to accept a Real offer, or just run down his contract and leave for Real on a free.

That's probably the reason we've not gone for him, the fact that his head is, and likely always will be, in Madrid.
 

HabeasC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
3,600
Test of football knowledge (that I don't possess)-

If a sale is made with a buyback clause, does the player have the right to refuse to move back to their original club even if said buyback clause is activated by them?
Would expect so - cannot force the player to play for their old team again (although perhaps the player also contracts to go back to that team after 3 years, subject to negotiation of salary, etc).

Sounds here like the player will want to go back to Real Madrid at some point so the above doesn't really matter.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,641
Spurs might as well just loan him for £5m for 2 seasons. There will literally be no difference. Perhaps Levy and Mourinho are hoping he’ll love Spurs so much he’ll stay. They better hope he hasn’t already watched that documentary then......
From an accounting perspective it does and I’m sure that’s why certain club do transfers in certain ways.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,885
Location
England
Personally, though think very good fee, glad walked away with buyback clause for obvious reasons. I dont see left back as a priority with days left and I also think there are better left backs such as Nuno Mendes anyway.
Nuno Mendes is the one i'd like us to get.
 

Tango80

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
363
Reguilons good going forward but a bit suspect defensively aint he?

With him and Doherty as full backs, Spurs are gonna struggle defensively.
 

Luke1995

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
3,460
Mendy is their first choice LB apparently
I totally forgot that they bought someone to kind of replace Marcelo... wasn't Marcelo their first choice left back for years ? Anyway, don't think United was ever interested in him...
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,680
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Reguilons good going forward but a bit suspect defensively aint he?

With him and Doherty as full backs, Spurs are gonna struggle defensively.
Unless Spurs play a back 3, which they can; Davies at LCB, Davinson Sanchez/Dier at RCB, and Alderweireld/Dier at CB.
 

Luke1995

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
3,460
They spent quite a bit on France's starting LB, Ferland Mendy, just last summer and he's been their first choice since last season.

He had a quality debut season and helped turn what was one of the weakest backlines in recent Real history the season prior into a title winning one so he won't be getting dropped by Zidane anytime soon.

Marcelo goes without saying is a club legend and a Zidane favorite so he'll be in the picture until he has little left. Hence why they're shopping Reguilon who wants first team action instead of being stuck on the bench after proving himself with Sevilla.

If Marcelo ever did want to leave, he'd likely either go back to Brazil or try to join up with his mate Ronaldo in Turin as it's been rumored he's had interest in recently.
This makes an interesting question: Why so few brazilians make the move to the Premier League ?
 

Sea-Cow

Full Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1,583
That doesn't mean this was the right option. It wasn't. Why should we develop a player for Madrid? We may have been relatively shit to our standards for the last few years but we aren't small time. Some of you need to get that in your heads.
I don't mean to be argumentative here but I think if we're worried just about keeping face and our image as "not small time" then we need to be slapped.

We should be concerned about the football next season, and based off what I've seen Spurs just signed a massive upgrade for their LB. But at least we look cool?
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,298
Location
Copenhagen
We would not accept a buy back of €40m? So we would put our nose up to a return on investment of 30 %? And, if RM decided they wanted him back, probably two great years from a fullback?

We have not had a good fullback in several years. I would not mind two good years at all.
 

Black Rick

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
36
The player does have a right to refuse. The contract between the player and the club isn't fully owned by the club (like in American sports leagues); the player has a significant amount of control over it as well. If a player says no to the club triggering a release/buyback clause, then the contract won't break. This would typically be written out into the contract to protect the player, but it's generally understood between football clubs.
Would expect so - cannot force the player to play for their old team again (although perhaps the player also contracts to go back to that team after 3 years, subject to negotiation of salary, etc).

Sounds here like the player will want to go back to Real Madrid at some point so the above doesn't really matter.
Thanks, makes sense although I wasn't sure as sense doesn't always seem to apply within the football world...
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,641
There's a number of targets the club could chase and I for one would target someone young with big potential for the role. That potential target would likely cost similar to what Reguillon is touted for, as long as we target said player from outside of our domestic league.

Right now i'm starting to question our strategy in the transfer market because we just don't seem to be decisive in our decision making.
Our transfer strategy is very simple. We have one main target for positions we require. We get told a price from the selling club and then try to negotiate. They say no, knowing we don’t have any other targets on our radar, are richer than most clubs and have the worst negotiators in world football.

We either:

a) get trumped by another club for not acting swift enough with the transfer.

b) don’t sign the player and then have no other realistic targets or time to obtain someone else as we spent all window targeting one player.

c) sign the player at the original price stated and get the player in so late it takes them weeks to bed them into the team and fully match fit.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,759
We would not accept a buy back of €40m? So we would put our nose up to a return on investment of 30 %? And, if RM decided they wanted him back, probably two great years from a fullback?

We have not had a good fullback in several years. I would not mind two good years at all.
We are not a selling club.

& you say that now, what if he turns out to be world class and then Madrid come sniffing around. You'd be up in arms that Woodward allowed the buy back clause.

Like another poster said above we are building for the future and the future does not mean selling our best players (If Reguillion turns out to be worldie)
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
I don't mean to be argumentative here but I think if we're worried just about keeping face and our image as "not small time" then we need to be slapped.

We should be concerned about the football next season, and based off what I've seen Spurs just signed a massive upgrade for their LB. But at least we look cool?
You clearly don't really get the huge problem with signing a player to develop for RM. We get a good season out of him and he's gone. That's completely pointless. It isn't future proof and it certainly isn't a move you see top clubs ever making.
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,680
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
This makes an interesting question: Why so few brazilians make the move to the Premier League ?
Brazilians have an easier time settling into the Latin countries where the language and cultural barriers aren't as large. Outside of the Latin countries, there are still a decent number of Brazilians who've come into England though most of them aren't bigger names.

Another problem is that the UK work permit laws make it difficult for Brazilians (and South Americans in general) to come to the Premier League at the young age. Continental clubs have an easier time of getting them young.
 

Rolaholic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
11,161
This makes an interesting question: Why so few brazilians make the move to the Premier League ?
I feel like it's more cultural than anything. They're used to a warm tropical climate and a certain kind of cuisine/culture and England is quite different in all those respects.

Of course you have your South Americans who manage to make it home and thrive on the isle but from what I've read in interviews with South American players who came and went, there's quite a bit of culture shock when they get there and not everyone is cut out for it so it's natural that places like Spain, Portugal or Italy would feel a little closer to home and appeal more to them than England if given the choice.

Really depends on the player and their mentality though, it's a big reason why I'll always have a fair bit of respect for the few who do stick around and thrive regardless like your Aguero's and Firmino's even if they play for rivals
 
Status
Not open for further replies.