Ralph Hasenhüttl

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,207
It's funny how fans come here after a last minute win to say Ole schooled him. It's the equivalent of celebrating Ole driving a Lamborghini and racing Hasenhuttl in a Ford Focus - one team is the second or third most expensive in the league with regular spending over the 200m mark a season, the other is made up of PL rejects from bigger clubs, Championship signings, low quality loans and constantly loses their best players to bigger, richer clubs. There is honestly no comparison in terms of squad quality and people are reacting like we just smashed one of the top teams in the league 4-0. Expectations simply have to be higher.
They have Walcott as one of their main players, he has looked finished since his move from Arsenal to Everton 3 years ago. Ole did well yesterday and there was nothing much Hasenhuttl could do with the quality he had.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,621
Location
Sydney
i love that the comments in here are all about Southampton not having the quality all of a sudden

you lot and your hipster managers :lol:
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,647
Come on this is a bit too much.

We have better quality than them but not like a Lambor against a Ford. They had a good midfield and as I said before the match, I really like Fred and McT but I'd take Ward Prowse and Romue over both in a heart beat.

In term of tactic this match, Hassehult should have taken one of their forward off and brought a midfielder on. Especially after 2-1. They were too open in the second half and definitely would have done better with some reinforcement in the midfield.
I honestly don't think it is. Look at their squad at an individual level and think of what you thought of their players pre Hasenhuttl (which is essentially when Ole came in for timeline), I honestly don't think a single player gets into the squad, let alone first team of United. The reason fans are now praising JWP, Romeu, Ings etc is because of the coach. We have a few Soton fans on here who can probably explain this in more depth but JWP, for example, was on the fringes under Hughes and I'm pretty sure he was playing RM but he's been transformed. Add in Southampton consistently losing their best players as far back as I can remember and it's really not that crazy an analogy. Ole unarguably has one of the best squads in the league, I'd argue Hasenhuttl has one of the worst and the thinnest (they were getting relegated when he took over and has hardly spent big since coming in) but his system is so good at getting as much as possible out of that group of players. It's not the prettiest system sometimes but it's functional, tries to be attacking and is generally (as it was against us) competitive against all teams.

The entire point as to why people recognize him as a good coach is precisely because Soton's team is so thin on quality.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
I honestly don't think it is. Look at their squad at an individual level and think of what you thought of their players pre Hasenhuttl (which is essentially when Ole came in for timeline), I honestly don't think a single player gets into the squad, let alone first team of United. The reason fans are now praising JWP, Romeu, Ings etc is because of the coach. We have a few Soton fans on here who can probably explain this in more depth but JWP, for example, was on the fringes under Hughes and I'm pretty sure he was playing RM but he's been transformed. Add in Southampton consistently losing their best players as far back as I can remember and it's really not that crazy an analogy. Ole unarguably has one of the best squads in the league, I'd argue Hasenhuttl has one of the worst and the thinnest (they were getting relegated when he took over and has hardly spent big since coming in) but his system is so good at getting as much as possible out of that group of players. It's not the prettiest system sometimes but it's functional, tries to be attacking and is generally (as it was against us) competitive against all teams.

The entire point as to why people recognize him as a good coach is precisely because Soton's team is so thin on quality.
No I've been rating Ward Prowse very high for a long time. Romeu is a cnut but he's a good mid and every teams would need a cnut on their side sometime, especially in a tough match. Both have been quality for Sou even before Hassehult.

You can read the first pages of the match thread to have an idea of the balance between two teams I think. Ole, to his credit has assembled a decent squad. But imo apart from Bruno is not much above PL quality. We definitely have a better squad than Sou, but not like a Lambo against a Ford. Even for Liverpool or City squad I wouldn't say so. Most PL teams are actually quite decent and the gap between top and middle teams are not big. That's why anyone could beat anybody on their day.
 
Last edited:

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,647
No I've been rating Ward Prowse very high for a long time. Romeu is a cnut but he's a good mid and every teams would need a cnut on their side sometime, especially in a tough match. Both have been quality for Sou even before Hassehult.

You can read the first pages of the match thread to have an idea of the balance between two teams I think. Ole, to his credit has ensembled a decent squad. But imo apart from Bruno is not much above PL quality. We definitely have a better squad than Sou, but not like a Lambo against a Ford. Even for Liverpool or City squad I wouldn't say so.
Even if you have rated JWP for years, you'd be the exception. Look at the thread here on him for example, it's three pages and was pretty much silent until 2017. And then it's mostly fans saying he's average or a FK merchant.

No matter what you think of United, the fact you don't think City or Liverpool's squad is vastly superior to this Soton side individually is baffling.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,729
Location
Ginseng Strip
I don't see what the fuss is tbh. His Southampton team seems to rely on shithousery and kicking their opponents to pieces, along with the odd JWP set piece brilliance. It seems everytime Southampton get a relatively unknown manager that keeps them in the top half of the table, they get praised to the heavens by the footballing hipsters.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
I like him and feel he has potential to succeed at a big club in the future. But over performing managers like him at mid table clubs have a lot of “freedom” which they won’t get at top clubs.
They can afford to play good football without the pressure of winning as many games as possible. When they concede while looking naive it’s ok because they are expected to be naive.
They play once per week and still manage to get exhausted in the 2nd half.
Some nice passing, pressing, incredible amount of fouling and set pieces from their team are enough to get them plaudits.
When they win it’s because of them. When they lose it’s because they don’t have good players.
They can lose 3-2 after leading 2-0 and still celebrate themselves because the other team is celebrating after their comeback.
At the end at big clubs results are the most important aspect. Performances matter but they won’t be remembered without the result.
United played well yesterday, but if the result had stayed 2-0 or even 2-1 to Southampton no one would be celebrating United’s performance.
As I said I like him but over performing with Southampton and succeeding at a big club are completely different challenges.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Even if you have rated JWP for years, you'd be the exception. Look at the thread here on him for example, it's three pages and was pretty much silent until 2017. And then it's mostly fans saying he's average or a FK merchant.

No matter what you think of United, the fact you don't think City or Liverpool's squad is vastly superior to this Soton side individually is baffling.
I don't know about others but for me Ward Prowse has been a very good mid for a long time. He usually doesn't stand out much or do the flashy stuffs but he's a very good hard working mid and his set pieces have always been quality. I wouldn't be surprised if Liverpool buy him soon. I rate him really high for example here:
He's probably the best mid in the world now.

Joking aside. Well Bruno has to play. I'd buy Rice to play as a 6. Then buy Ward Prowse to play as a 8.

Sorry I really like Fred and McT but I don't rate both very high.
And if the squad of Liverpool or City against Sou is like a Lambor and Ford then I would seriously doubt the talent of Klopp. Because last season I think I watched the Sou Liverpool match 1st half and they played Liverpool off the park. It was only because of luck, Sou being incredibly wasteful with their chances and a sheer moment of brilliance from Mane that Liverpool was be able to win.
 
Last edited:

Nani Nana

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
5,656
Supports
Whoever won the game
Southampton FC are well-drilled, punching above their weight through a combination of sound governance and outstanding scouting.

Hasenhuettl is a great manager for them and will secure top 12 like every season.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,238
Supports
Aston Villa
2 goals from 0.46 xG. Quality difference or not he didn't create a single meaningful chance from open play. Nor did Nagelsmann when we played Liepzig. I don't think it's anything to do with the quality of managers I just think we've adapated our game against teams who press like maniacs and have found a way to counter the style.
Really? Just from the highlights in first half Walkers Peters hit the post from just outside the box with deflected shot and then they had terrific counter attack with Djenpo in loads of space which DDG parried and then Armstrong messed up the rebound from decent position.

Second half the attacks ceased, can only remember Adams hitting one just wide but it was all United at that point.

Southampton have scored 9 goals in last 5 games v Man. United so don't think there's a creativity issue. They've also gone to Chelsea and scored 3.

CB options mediocre though, Vestegaard, Stephens, Bednarak. Break through their lines quickly and there will be lax marking in the box.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,238
Supports
Aston Villa
Does Hasenhuttl have many well coached 'attacking patterns of play' which led to beautiful intricate goal chances? It doesn't look like his team knows what its doing in attack apart from having Ward Prowse take all the set pieces.

I don't get what the praise is about.
Lots of good attacking moves v Newcastle in their last home game.


Also played very well in final third in games before v us and Everton.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,267
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
Really? Just from the highlights in first half Walkers Peters hit the post from just outside the box with deflected shot and then they had terrific counter attack with Djenpo in loads of space which DDG parried and then Armstrong messed up the rebound from decent position.

Second half the attacks ceased, can only remember Adams hitting one just wide but it was all United at that point.

Southampton have scored 9 goals in last 5 games v Man. United so don't think there's a creativity issue. They've also gone to Chelsea and scored 3.

CB options mediocre though, Vestegaard, Stephens, Bednarak. Break through their lines quickly and there will be lax marking in the box.
Southampton created very little against us yesterday, surely you are not debating that?
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,427
Does Hasenhuttl have many well coached 'attacking patterns of play' which led to beautiful intricate goal chances? It doesn't look like his team knows what its doing in attack apart from having Ward Prowse take all the set pieces.

I don't get what the praise is about.
Do you watch Southampton? This is a genuine question
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,238
Supports
Aston Villa
Southampton created very little against us yesterday, surely you are not debating that?
They scored twice, hit the post and DDG made decent if regulation save from counter attack all in first 45 minutes. I would say that's a decent outlay from 45 minutes against a probable top 6 opponent.

Newcastle is more a textbook example from recent games of team that does little attacking, scored after 2 minutes with that own goal and then barely had an attack for rest of the game. Everton also only had one shot on target v you which was the goal, Southampton had 5 yesterday.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,582
Really? Just from the highlights in first half Walkers Peters hit the post from just outside the box with deflected shot and then they had terrific counter attack with Djenpo in loads of space which DDG parried and then Armstrong messed up the rebound from decent position.

Second half the attacks ceased, can only remember Adams hitting one just wide but it was all United at that point.

Southampton have scored 9 goals in last 5 games v Man. United so don't think there's a creativity issue. They've also gone to Chelsea and scored 3.

CB options mediocre though, Vestegaard, Stephens, Bednarak. Break through their lines quickly and there will be lax marking in the box.
The shot they hit off the post was very lucky, he shot from an awkward position with 2 defenders between him and the goal. It wasn't a well crafted chance, it was a punt that took a wild deflection, if you're expecting those to go in you're going to be disappointed more often than not. I don't know what their creativity is usually like but 0.46 xG shows you their attacks were low quality and they were incredibly reliant on set pieces.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,647
And if the squad of Liverpool or City against Sou is like a Lambor and Ford then I would seriously doubt the talent of Klopp. Because last season I think I watched the Sou Liverpool match 1st half and they played Liverpool off the park. It was only because of luck, Sou being incredibly wasteful with their chances and a sheer moment of brilliance from Mane that Liverpool was be able to win.
But that is precisely, again, why people rate Hasenhuttl. It's the same as why Klopp at Dortmund was so revered, as was Simeone at Athelti - they were taking lesser quality teams up against a league's dominant team/teams and winning the title. With managers like Hasenhuttl, obviously Soton aren't going to win a title, but they are getting their teams to perform way above the level I think you'd expect with an 'average' manager. The fact he can make it difficult for teams like Liverpool, United, City etc is because of their style - how else would they be competitive in those games when there is such a financial gulf between the teams?

Klopp at Pool is a good example of coaching ability because think of the reputations of players like Mane, Wijnaldum, Henderson, Salah, even VVD who got better (or maybe more accurately were used better) when they joined Liverpool. They were obviously on another level to this current Soton squad but the basic premise of getting a team to function above its level is the same. Then they had that window of Fabinho, Keita and Alisson and went from chasing City to winning the CL and the PL. This is also the same reason why I think a lot of football fans think Pep is overrated (he's a great manager but not the messiah a lot of people used to claim) because he's consistently had the deepest, most expensive and best team on paper and he's not been as dominant as people would have expected.
 

SoCross

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
3,569
They are better off the ball than on it. If they had two quality wide men yesterday, they would have hurt us.

Che Adams was phenomenal yesterday.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
But that is precisely, again, why people rate Hasenhuttl. It's the same as why Klopp at Dortmund was so revered, as was Simeone at Athelti - they were taking lesser quality teams up against a league's dominant team/teams and winning the title. With managers like Hasenhuttl, obviously Soton aren't going to win a title, but they are getting their teams to perform way above the level I think you'd expect with an 'average' manager. The fact he can make it difficult for teams like Liverpool, United, City etc is because of their style - how else would they be competitive in those games when there is such a financial gulf between the teams?

Klopp at Pool is a good example of coaching ability because think of the reputations of players like Mane, Wijnaldum, Henderson, Salah, even VVD who got better (or maybe more accurately were used better) when they joined Liverpool. They were obviously on another level to this current Soton squad but the basic premise of getting a team to function above its level is the same. Then they had that window of Fabinho, Keita and Alisson and went from chasing City to winning the CL and the PL. This is also the same reason why I think a lot of football fans think Pep is overrated (he's a great manager but not the messiah a lot of people used to claim) because he's consistently had the deepest, most expensive and best team on paper and he's not been as dominant as people would have expected.
I didn't say anything about rating Hasenhutl. That's entirely another topic. Which I have pretty much no idea tbh. But based on the last match alone I don't rate him really high. He lost a match after leading 2-0 in the first half.

We were discussing on your comparison of United squad and Sou squad is like a Lambor and a Ford. Which is completely not true imo.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,238
Supports
Aston Villa
The shot they hit off the post was very lucky, he shot from an awkward position with 2 defenders between him and the goal. It wasn't a well crafted chance, it was a punt that took a wild deflection, if you're expecting those to go in you're going to be disappointed more often than not. I don't know what their creativity is usually like but 0.46 xG shows you their attacks were low quality and they were incredibly reliant on set pieces.
I'm not a huge fan of xG really being this massive thing all of a sudden. Of course you can also look at how the set pieces are won aswell. It's not like Saints were just booting the ball up to edge of the box and targetman striker was craftly winning free kick by just collapsing on edge of the box.

They broke through the lines well and think it was Djenpo again who was taken out right on the edge of the box (annoyingly highlights just show FK being taken) so not sure why that's being taken in different context to player running through and being taken out in the box for penalty which has accounted for 2 of Man. United's three goals scored at home in the league this season.

Would also say not sure how many teams would still be attacking Man. United relentlessly at 2 up, majority of teams would sit back in that context so that would reduce attacking output in second half. They just didn't have the right sort of set up to see out the 2-0 on the pitch and you punished them for it.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,267
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
They scored twice, hit the post and DDG made decent if regulation save from counter attack all in first 45 minutes. I would say that's a decent outlay from 45 minutes against a probable top 6 opponent.

Newcastle is more a textbook example from recent games of team that does little attacking, scored after 2 minutes with that own goal and then barely had an attack for rest of the game. Everton also only had one shot on target v you which was the goal, Southampton had 5 yesterday.
I’m sorry, I don’t agree. Creativity is measured in the production of chances, not in the production of goals or posts hit.

Southampton created a few corners, one of which went in, and a freekick outside the box, none ofwhich are particularily great chances (even with WP)nor proof of successful creativity.Walker-Peters got a shot of from an angle by the corner of the box, closely covered by Telles and one more defender behind him, and with De Gea in a good position. It was not a particularily good chance, and it was a lucky deflection with a lucky spin that made it curl towards the post. That can happen, but it’s not much to brag about. The weak covered shot that an injured De Gea palmed askew to whowasit? Who didn’t have time to do much before it crossed the line - if it was United, we’d have complained about that level of productivity and counted ourselves ‘deceptively efficient’ after that half.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
They just didn't have the right sort of set up to see out the 2-0 on the pitch and you punished them for it.
This sounds interesting. Would you elaborate more on this please?

What if he reverted to a low block 433 and tried to hit United on the counter? He got decent defenders, a good midfield and pretty fast forwards I think?
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,238
Supports
Aston Villa
I’m sorry, I don’t agree. Creativity is measured in the production of chances, not in the production of goals or posts hit.

Southampton created a few corners, one of which went in, and a freekick outside the box, none ofwhich are particularily great chances (even with WP)nor proof of successful creativity.Walker-Peters got a shot of from an angle by the corner of the box, closely covered by Telles and one more defender behind him, and with De Gea in a good position. It was not a particularily good chance, and it was a lucky deflection with a lucky spin that made it curl towards the post. That can happen, but it’s not much to brag about. The weak covered shot that an injured De Gea palmed askew to whowasit? Who didn’t have time to do much before it crossed the line - if it was United, we’d have complained about that level of productivity and counted ourselves ‘deceptively efficient’ after that half.
Well that's what happens at Old Trafford so far. 3 league goals scored all season with two of them being penalties. Your game works better away with your front 3 have much more space to run into particularly in the second half.

Southampton aren't actually that good a team at home, only won 5 at home all of last season so that's something you could level as a weak point of Hasenhuttl's gameplan in that they can't impose as well on opponents at home as away where they're frequently excellent.

Currently on 3 home wins out of 5 which is probably their best home run under him so improving in that regard this season.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,238
Supports
Aston Villa
This sounds interesting. Would you elaborate more on this please?

What if he reverted to a low block 433 and tried to hit United on the counter? He got decent defenders, a good midfield and pretty fast forwards I think?
I said it earlier up, he should've just done something extremely basic like put Diallo on at 2 up (he put him on about a minute before Cavani scored the winner). 3rd CM in alongside Romeu and JWP and might've nulified Bruno a bit more who was still drifting into plenty of space centrally which is always dangerous. Armstrong was pretty sloppy on the ball in second half so would've hooked him.

It's nothing left field but I'm sure Mourinho would've done it in that game situation to condense the space.

Just looked back and what he did was double change on 89th minute. What's interesting is he took Walkers Peters off in 89th minute. Look at winner again and Southampton are incredibly slow to get out to Rashford for the winner and he has time to hit in excellent cross. Perhaps if Walkers Peters had stayed on he'd have sensed the danger and closed down quicker given he's an RB.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,429
Do you watch Southampton? This is a genuine question
I watch them on and off, as much as I do any other Premier League team that isn't United.

They are a solid team yes, but so are any midtable Premiership team.
 
Last edited:

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
I said it earlier up, he should've just done something extremely basic like put Diallo on at 2 up (he put him on about a minute before Cavani scored the winner). 3rd CM in alongside Romeu and JWP and might've nulified Bruno a bit more who was still drifting into plenty of space centrally which is always dangerous. Armstrong was pretty sloppy on the ball in second half so would've hooked him.

It's nothing left field but I'm sure Mourinho would've done it in that game situation to condense the space.

Just looked back and what he did was double change on 89th minute. What's interesting is he took Walkers Peters off in 89th minute. Look at winner again and Southampton are incredibly slow to get out to Rashford for the winner and he has time to hit in excellent cross. Perhaps if Walkers Peters had stayed on he'd have sensed the danger and closed down quicker given he's an RB.
Ah I see what you mean now. I mistook 'didn't' with 'couldn't' or 'don't'. Funny me.

I checked your posts in this thread and yeah it was me quoting you on the post you mentioned saying pretty much the same thing :lol:
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,408
Have to love reactionary posts. So we beat Southampton, now Ole is better than RH? RH has a style and improved Southampton 10 fold to where they were previously. Just remember they remain ahead of us in the league at present.

I still watch us and can’t see what Ole is trying to do. Starts with a poor formation which made us very narrow. Rashford playing every single minute of every single game when his form suggest he needs a rest. Cavani should have started after his performance midweek. In the end it was a good result but it’s one game. Too many games this season we are being dominated in general play and games feel very open.
I'm sorry, but where has he improved them to exactly? Southampton have always been an upper midtable club and as far as I can see, that is what they currently are at the moment.

It's a prettier facade than it was under Hughes, I'll grant you that but it's nothing that I hadn't seen before from Poch, Koeman, and Adkins before him. He's got a win % that is barely 1% above Claude Puel's, and is presently a smidge under 39%. What exactly makes you think he'd be qualified to do a job here?

You can watch us and try and work out what Ole's trying to do, while I watch us and enjoy the goals as they go in. The team shape more than did it's job. Southampton scored against the run of play and quickly scored another - both of which were set play goals which didn't require them to outplay us, so again, what are you looking for exactly? We created enough in the first half to have scored 2 before Southampton even ventured in our half and we dominated at least 70 of the 95 minutes. Even in that 15-20 minute period of Southampton pressure we still had enough clear chances to score at least once more. Cavani is 33 years old and should have his workload managed. Martial being taken ill probably forced Ole to play Greenwood, and Rashford had a rest v Leipzig, so he hasn't played every single minute either.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,151
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
Saw the crazy stat of them 2nd top for winning in the first half and second bottom for losing in the second. Clearly has an issue with them struggling to function when teams are going at them in the second half.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,267
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
Well that's what happens at Old Trafford so far. 3 league goals scored all season with two of them being penalties. Your game works better away with your front 3 have much more space to run into particularly in the second half.

Southampton aren't actually that good a team at home, only won 5 at home all of last season so that's something you could level as a weak point of Hasenhuttl's gameplan in that they can't impose as well on opponents at home as away where they're frequently excellent.

Currently on 3 home wins out of 5 which is probably their best home run under him so improving in that regard this season.
I wasn’t commenting on United’s creativity, but Southamptons against United yesterday.

I don’t understand why you keep referring to home and away games under covid, btw, it’s well established that home/away doesn’t work the same way with no audiences.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Saw the crazy stat of them 2nd top for winning in the first half and second bottom for losing in the second. Clearly has an issue with them struggling to function when teams are going at them in the second half.
I don't watch them much but imo it's because they usually press too much in the first half and run out of gas in the second half?

Last match they were obviously out of gas by the last 20'-25' I think.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,151
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
I don't watch them much but imo it's because they usually press too much in the first half and run out of gas in the second half?

Last match they were obviously out of gas by the last 20'-25' I think.
Seems to happen a lot though for them to not spot it or not sort it. Also heard they've lost the most points from winning in the PL over so many games.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Seems to happen a lot though for them to not spot it or not sort it. Also heard they've lost the most points from winning in the PL over so many games.
Tbh it's quite weird for me for Sou to not address this last match.

I was watching and wondering at the same time why they didn't change their approach or bring on a few subs. While obviously their team was out of gas and quite open.

If they had no fresh leg to bring on they could simply revert to a defensive and counter approach by the second half. They lead by two nil, they just needed to defend it. They have a quality midfield, decent defense and fast forwards. It's just too ideal to sit back and counter I think.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,629
His team is known for relentless pressing but yesterday Manutd pressed 190 times vs 126 for Southampton.
 

Terminator

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,928
Created sweet feck all apart from the lucky deflected shot off the post. Deserved nothing at all yesterday, can't believe there is an actual discussion on this.:lol:

If you watched the 90 mins you would know and just watching 'highlights' isn't enough to form an opinion.
 

Client6

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
178
Location
Virtual Stretford End
I like him and feel he has potential to succeed at a big club in the future. But over performing managers like him at mid table clubs have a lot of “freedom” which they won’t get at top clubs.
They can afford to play good football without the pressure of winning as many games as possible. When they concede while looking naive it’s ok because they are expected to be naive.
They play once per week and still manage to get exhausted in the 2nd half.

Some nice passing, pressing, incredible amount of fouling and set pieces from their team are enough to get them plaudits.
When they win it’s because of them. When they lose it’s because they don’t have good players.
They can lose 3-2 after leading 2-0 and still celebrate themselves because the other team is celebrating after their comeback.
At the end at big clubs results are the most important aspect. Performances matter but they won’t be remembered without the result.
United played well yesterday, but if the result had stayed 2-0 or even 2-1 to Southampton no one would be celebrating United’s performance.
As I said I like him but over performing with Southampton and succeeding at a big club are completely different challenges.
One of those rare posts with nuance and perspective - thank you!

David Moyes - a veteran manager, someone who managed a club like Everton for 11 years and finished in top 7 for 8 of those years - struggled at United with a team that had just won the league.

Elite coaches like LVG, Mou cracked under pressure at United.