McFred is the worst midfield 2 of the PL’s top 10 teams

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,119
Stop being so reactionary, we have qualified for the Champions League twice now with the McFred midfield.
Maybe we won’t go onto win the league with the midfield but stop with hyperbolic nonsense
And I'm saying we won't qualify for the CL for a third time if we stick with those two. It's not hyperbolic it's pretty fecking obvious.

But nobody should be caring about competing for the top four 3 seasons in a row, if we're not competing for the league title next season the project has failed. Top four won't be enough in the first place.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,917
Location
Canada
We won't be winning any trophies with either of them being part of our strongest 11 IMO. Fred at least can dribble well, but his passing is garbage. McTominay is a high energy player and very good squad player, but he offers nothing on the ball. You can't have so little quality in midfield. Just can't. Neither are particularly good defensive midfielders either. Just high energy ball winning midfielders who can play it safe and that's it.
 

Mr Anderson

Eats, shoots, leaves
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
24,298
Location
Ireland
I must admit that you are right and I wasn't. It doesn't matter if Fred has better pass completion percentage or generally plays well most of the time if he keeps gifting goals left and right.
Ya it’s his repetitive brain farts, ones that prove very costly - same ones that happen over and over - just makes him a liability. Target him and he will slip up. But it comes down to management too - Ole isn’t playing to our strengths. Playing out form the back and trying to use Fred is a huge mistake. A big portion of the blame is on the coaching side. You see a persistent problem, you fix or bypass it.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,576
Location
india
Based on transfer links and things he has said, Ole seems to have central defence and central midfield confused. It seems far more of a priority for us to have technically strong centre halves who can pass progressively and resist a press, even if they are physically weak, than it is for us to have actual central midfielders with those qualities.

Passing the ball well seems to be given more importance to our defenders than midfielders.
Passing hasn't been a priority in United CMs for over a decade. We scoff at possession football you see.

Schneidelin
Past it Schweinstiger (lol)
Fred
Herrera
Fellaini
Old Matic
Mctominay

Who out of that lot is a gifted passer? Says all that needs to be said about how much this football club prioritises the next passing CM. It's a fecking shame. And here everyone thinks DM is everything. Dm will solve the world. I keep asking where are the playmakers?
 

LuckyScout78

Full Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
996
Like I have said. United is lacking a world class nr.8 Scholes there. Not the creative Carrick cm. But the creative of Paul Scholes. More in the direction of Scholes and Bruno. Not only sit back and spreading the ball. A totally complete top level of nr.8.

There are two internal solutions :
1. Paul Pogba shall reach another Paul...Scholes consistent top level as the nr.8
2. Bruno are more closer to Paul Scholes as nr.8 than Pogba. Beautiful of the physical body. Pogba is bigger and heavier than Scholes. But Bruno is more lightweight, but still has the temperament , energy and drive.

Again, Team United will dominate. Pogba is more suit and you can still use Bruno as nr.10. But in matches where you need more speed in acceleration, top level of intense. It requires a player of those abilities and calibre.

Drop Bruno as nr.8. And go for
Greenwood + Rashford/Cavani on top

Sancho - Bruno - McTom - Rashford + Greenwood- Cavani/Martial.
I have suggested this combination many times.
Paul Pogba is not a natural left winger. Those belongs to natural quick dribbler and skillful players. Bring Pogba back as nr.8. With Bruno as another option . Don’t get stuck with Bruno as nr.10. Sometimes you need Bruno creative from a lot deeper. Then free it to really good CF upfront.

Like Yorke & Cole

Rooney & Berbatov/Van Persie.

Go with two top CFs ;)
 

Robindinho

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
1,044
Location
Lancashire
Forget the top 10, or teams around Europe. How does it compare to the bottom 10?

Aston Villa; Mcginn - Luiz
Wolves; Neves - Moutinho
Palace; Eze - Milivojevic
Southampton; Ward-Prowse - Romeu
Burnley; Westwood - Cork
Newcastle; Shelvey - Willock
Brighton; Bissouma - Groß
Fulham; Lemina - Reed
West Brom; Yokuslu - Gallagher
Sheff Utd; Berge - Norwood

How many would you rather have over our two?

Or, how many of those teams would swap their current pair for McFred? I'd say less than 50% - definitely not Villa, Wolves, Southampton or Brighton.

Depressing. :(
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
When they play together we dont have a midfielder who actually wants to get on and receive the ball and try to dictate play. Pogba can do that but is defensively weak and its still not his speciality. Theres times where Matic does it and other times where hes just poor in general. Fred is more a case of already being open for a pass because he's so deep and then casually keeping the ball moving left or right with the occasional suicide pass or touch into an opponent's attack.

We dont have a Scholes or a Carrick who will have movement and work to get themselves free for a pass and then look to make their own pass count and move the attack forward. Even our newest signing in midfield who doesnt play Van De Beek doesn't want to do this, he wants someone else to do this so he can make forward runs off the ball.
VDB is not really a midfielder, he's a second striker
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,646
VDB is not really a midfielder, he's a second striker
He really isn't and never was. I'd honestly love to see Ole at least try and have us keep the ball better by playing him in the CMs - we're top four now and no one really cares if we finish 2nd or 3rd - we should use Fulham and Wolves to rest a few players and at least give him 90mins back to back. It's crazy how little game time VdB's had.
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,322
Fred and Scott don't pick themselves. Do you think Pep if city are the barometer would continue to play a system that is over reliant on his two weakest players? There are other things Ole could do or even attempt to try. It's Ole that's created this issue by continuing to play them irrespective of its failings as a pair. I actually think he could play VDB in their with either Scott or Fred. I actually think he doesn't use Matic enough....
I don't see your point. You're acting like we have credible options outside of the two. You saw us on Tuesday against Leicester, our youngsters weren't the reason we lost that game.

I really believe Ole went into the season with the project restart duo in mind ( Pogba and Matic). We started the season and realised that Pogba was out of shape ( terrible defensively too) and Matic had slowed down. So we reverted back to Fred and Mctominay. Unless you want him to pull a midfielder from the sky, this is what we have at the moment.
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,322
This is the problem with relying on stats to tell the story or dictate the narrative.
McTominay is a worse passer of the ball, he often struggles to make simple 5-yard passes - that much is true.
Fred on the other hand can make those simple passes and more often than not - does do so (hence his passing % being very high)
However, Fred's sloppy passing or lack of control on the ball often leads to goals conceded or chances created for the other team - I can think of two off the top of my head last night, a couple on the weekend and others in other high profile games such as Leicester in the FA Cup, Milan in Europa and one of the games in the CL. That's without any effort to do the research because I'm sure there are more.

So yes, Fred has better passing %'s however, his mistakes are much more reckless and costly.
Neither of them are good enough for the first XI however, this isn't a defence of McTominay.
Mctominay hides in games. He takes no responsibility and really doesn't domuch to use his size. Fred put himself out there, fails a lot, but by doin so gives us a chance to dominate games. Mctominay ensures that we don't by doing nothing.
 

LoneStar

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
3,558
Well, DVB was supposed to be our midfield addition which would relegate one of McFred to a bench role. But unfortunately that's turned out really bad.

Surely a DM who can defend and pass well should be our priority next season. A DM, a CB partner for Maguire and a RW would lift us up significantly.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,576
Location
india
Well, DVB was supposed to be our midfield addition which would relegate one of McFred to a bench role. But unfortunately that's turned out really bad.

Surely a DM who can defend and pass well should be our priority next season. A DM, a CB partner for Maguire and a RW would lift us up significantly.
I think he was signed as an AM. But either way, what a disaster.
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,973
Mctominay hides in games. He takes no responsibility and really doesn't domuch to use his size. Fred put himself out there, fails a lot, but by doin so gives us a chance to dominate games. Mctominay ensures that we don't by doing nothing.
From a net gain vs net loss perspective - Fred's fails have actively cost us goals. McTominay's hiding costs us an extra man on the pitch.
Would I prefer the midfielder who's passing is so bad it creates chances for the other team? Or the midfielder who fails to have any impact on the game?
I'd take the latter personally, but like I said neither should be in our first XI.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,302
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Passing hasn't been a priority in United CMs for over a decade. We scoff at possession football you see.

Schneidelin
Past it Schweinstiger (lol)
Fred
Herrera
Fellaini
Old Matic
Mctominay

Who out of that lot is a gifted passer? Says all that needs to be said about how much this football club prioritises the next passing CM. It's a fecking shame. And here everyone thinks DM is everything. Dm will solve the world. I keep asking where are the playmakers?
Yup. We need players with play making ability. Only Fred and Matic have been semi reliable at any point and Matic has been pony for years
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,576
Location
india
Yup. We need players with play making ability. Only Fred and Matic have been semi reliable and Matic has been pony for years
But everyone wants a destroyer and Ole is never linked with a passing CM either. Worrying
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,322
From a net gain vs net loss perspective - Fred's fails have actively cost us goals. McTominay's hiding costs us an extra man on the pitch.
Would I prefer the midfielder who's passing is so bad it creates chances for the other team? Or the midfielder who fails to have any impact on the game?
I'd take the latter personally, but like I said neither should be in our first XI.
Not that simple. Fred might cost us 3 goals a season, Mctominay costs us the ability to dominate games. That could mean us scoring 3 or 4 goals, but instead we score 1 or 2 that could lead to a draw or a loss.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,179
Location
La-La-Land
Well, DVB was supposed to be our midfield addition which would relegate one of McFred to a bench role. But unfortunately that's turned out really bad.

Surely a DM who can defend and pass well should be our priority next season. A DM, a CB partner for Maguire and a RW would lift us up significantly.
You can't tell me that he's worse than these 2. At least we could try it out but Ole preferred Mata over him in CM, which was strange too
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,139
Forget the top 10, or teams around Europe. How does it compare to the bottom 10?

Aston Villa; Mcginn - Luiz
Wolves; Neves - Moutinho
Palace; Eze - Milivojevic
Southampton; Ward-Prowse - Romeu
Burnley; Westwood - Cork
Newcastle; Shelvey - Willock
Brighton; Bissouma - Groß
Fulham; Lemina - Reed
West Brom; Yokuslu - Gallagher
Sheff Utd; Berge - Norwood

How many would you rather have over our two?

Or, how many of those teams would swap their current pair for McFred? I'd say less than 50% - definitely not Villa, Wolves, Southampton or Brighton.

Depressing. :(
I'd take McGinn, Ward Prowse and Neves in a heartbeat.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,229
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
But everyone wants a destroyer and Ole is never linked with a passing CM either. Worrying
This is concern.
I'm fully expecting us going into next season with the same midfield options, with McTom and Fred being the go-to starting central base.
How utterly underwhelming that would be.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,302
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
But everyone wants a destroyer and Ole is never linked with a passing CM either. Worrying
You see that’s my problem. In this system it’s a unicorn player we are looking for. A box to box playmaker/creator/destroyer.

I think we need 2 new players. Get Camavinga and Rice and finally give the position the love it deserves.
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,973
Not that simple. Fred might cost us 3 goals a season, Mctominay costs us the ability to dominate games. That could mean us scoring 3 or 4 goals, but instead we score 1 or 2 that could lead to a draw or a loss.
Well if it's not that simple let's take it further. Fred's red card in the CL cost us. Fred's lack of ball control in the FA Cup cost us - that's two competitions right there. His lack of ability on the ball almost cost us in the Europa, if not for Pogba. If I wanted to take the time and really dig in i'm sure I could find some more - for example the game against Villa - their first goal came about because of Fred's 'pass' to McTominay. Now since McTominay reacted and just got a foot on the ball, the stats will register that as a complete pass, however if you watch it with your own eyes you'll see it was terrible control by Fred, it puts McTominay in a terrible position to get pressed and lose the ball, two passes later Villa score.

This is my point about Fred and it's not something which can be summed up by stats, he's just not good enough at what he needs to be good at and is far too erratic.
McTominay is no better but at least he is capable of scoring goals from time to time.
 

r0663664

Worships Man City
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,664
Location
Singapore
Ok, Fred and McTominay isn't top midfielders and would probably won't make it to top teams. Yes, I would sell Fred, I don't think he contribute enough to be part of XI. Passing from the back has always gave me heart attack. I don't know why Ole insists playing out from back. Why???!!!! Against team who press well, just kick it up the field. Pogba and Greenword should be tall enough to win those header. Ole should start using his brain and stop making average look even worst.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,139
Well if it's not that simple let's take it further. Fred's red card in the CL cost us. Fred's lack of ball control in the FA Cup cost us - that's two competitions right there. His lack of ability on the ball almost cost us in the Europa, if not for Pogba. If I wanted to take the time and really dig in i'm sure I could find some more - for example the game against Villa - their first goal came about because of Fred's 'pass' to McTominay. Now since McTominay reacted and just got a foot on the ball, the stats will register that as a complete pass, however if you watch it with your own eyes you'll see it was terrible control by Fred, it puts McTominay in a terrible position to get pressed and lose the ball, two passes later Villa score.

This is my point about Fred and it's not something which can be summed up by stats, he's just not good enough at what he needs to be good at and is far too erratic.
McTominay is no better but at least he is capable of scoring goals from time to time.
Nail on head. Fred has gotten away with a lot of mistakes this season alone. He's not reliable at all.

Might be a good enough starter if we're just happy being where we are, mind.
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,973
Nail on head. Fred has gotten away with a lot of mistakes this season alone. He's not reliable at all.

Might be a good enough starter if we're just happy being where we are, mind.
This is the key point for me. Those who defend McFred have to pinpoint exactly where they believe our ambition lies next season.
If it's another season where we qualify for Champions League, and we make some attempt to reach a final in a cup - then using them as our midfield paring should accomplish that.
If we're serious about challenging City, separating ourselves from the rest of the league & winning a domestic cup - we need to upgrade our midfield, and McFred needs to fall into the second string team.

Chelsea are on our heels and have the capability to sign more players to further improve their squad. Liverpool aren't going to fall away in the same way they did this season.
If we don't improve our squad now, we risk falling behind and losing our momentum.
 

Son

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
1,695
You see that’s my problem. In this system it’s a unicorn player we are looking for. A box to box playmaker/creator/destroyer.

I think we need 2 new players. Get Camavinga and Rice and finally give the position the love it deserves.
This. I actually would rather us bring in those 2 and a central defender at this point than Sancho. We aren’t bad at scoring goals. It’s the other end we have trouble with and actually controlling a game.

I doubt Sancho remedies any of our true problems. It’s not like our team can’t score goals.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,576
Location
india
This is the key point for me. Those who defend McFred have to pinpoint exactly where they believe our ambition lies next season.
If it's another season where we qualify for Champions League, and we make some attempt to reach a final in a cup - then using them as our midfield paring should accomplish that.
If we're serious about challenging City, separating ourselves from the rest of the league & winning a domestic cup - we need to upgrade our midfield, and McFred needs to fall into the second string team.

Chelsea are on our heels and have the capability to sign more players to further improve their squad. Liverpool aren't going to fall away in the same way they did this season.
If we don't improve our squad now, we risk falling behind and losing our momentum.
You hit the nail on the head. Spot on.
 

He'sRaldo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
3,200
Ole is making the same mistake with these two as he did with Lingard and Pereira.

They really should not both be playing week in, week out. In fact, the Donny money should have gone towards someone who can replace them.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
And I'm saying we won't qualify for the CL for a third time if we stick with those two. It's not hyperbolic it's pretty fecking obvious.

But nobody should be caring about competing for the top four 3 seasons in a row, if we're not competing for the league title next season the project has failed. Top four won't be enough in the first place.
Wait, so we've made top 4 twice with them but it's 'pretty fecking obvious' that we won't a third time? That's not making much sense.
 

DSG

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
2,379
Location
A Whale’s Vagina
He really isn't and never was. I'd honestly love to see Ole at least try and have us keep the ball better by playing him in the CMs - we're top four now and no one really cares if we finish 2nd or 3rd - we should use Fulham and Wolves to rest a few players and at least give him 90mins back to back. It's crazy how little game time VdB's had.
well, he’s been shite. 34 appearances and 1400 minutes is not a small body of work. He hasn’t passed the eye test for me either.
 

432JuanMata

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
3,097
Location
Dublin
They often play in big games where we set up to counter attack then have good games and they get classed as good enough, yet them games suit them. Both are good off the ball but are awful on the ball. Fred is better but even then his passing is so hit and miss
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,302
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Rashy for pm made the Fred 50 million well spent thread in January when he was playing great and then the McT and Fred are the worst midfield in the top 10 in march. Shocking the mods let that slide from a newbie. Obvious WUM
 
Last edited:

MU655

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
1,258
Row LabelsTacklesInterceptionsTotal Tackles and Interceptions
Ndidi
4​
2.8​
6.8​
Kante
3.5​
2.5​
6​
Romeu
3.5​
1.6​
5.1​
Neves (24)
2.9​
2.2​
5.1​
Fred
3.1​
1.9​
5​
Allan
3.4​
1.6​
5​
Yokuslu
2.6​
2.3​
4.9​
Mcarthur
3.5​
1.4​
4.9​
Bissouma (24)
3​
1.8​
4.8​
Reed
2.7​
2​
4.7​
Lemina
3​
1.6​
4.6​
Anguissa
2.6​
1.9​
4.5​
Jorginho
2.7​
1.8​
4.5​
Thiago
2.9​
1.5​
4.4​
Phillips
2.6​
1.7​
4.3​
Brownhill
1.4​
2.7​
4.1​
Hojbjerg
2.6​
1.3​
3.9​
Rice (22)
1.9​
2​
3.9​
Gallagher (21)
2.9​
0.9​
3.8​
McTominay
2.1​
1.2​
3.3​

If you are going to stick with one them, it will have to be Fred. Neither are great passers (McTominay being worse), but Fred does contribute far more defensively. And that is the reason you would have either in the team.

I would replace McTominay first because his defensive impact is very low. He is 30th in terms of tackles per 90 and interceptions per 90.
 

rk4utd

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
131
We won’t release the problem of having 2 similarly error prone and lacking in ambition CM - perm 2 from McFred and Matic - until we can rely on our central defenders to step up and contribute in terms of passing AND holding a high line without being constantly scared by a ball over the top. Depressingly I can’t see us addressing this as long as Ole continues to favour Lindelof - with Bailly looking like he’s playing through injury from the 10th minute on in the games he actually plays and then the mediocrity/sick notes that make up the rest of the CD options. With a top notch central defender we then play Pogba and hopefully another top class CM to be brought in - we’ve got lucky to finish 2 or 3 with the combinations we have - and our luck won’t get better as we found out after JM took us to second and we bottled the proper investment in the squad the summer after. It’s always square pegs in round holes - and the square pegs are not always the best so we end up looking disjointed and poorly motivated/coached/lethargic/rank bad in large sections of matches. History shows that the comebacks we’ve enjoyed cannot be repeated ad infinitum long-term - but I can see us going behind just as often next season if the status quo persists.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,119
Wait, so we've made top 4 twice with them but it's 'pretty fecking obvious' that we won't a third time? That's not making much sense.
It really isn't rocket science, is it?

Last season we were terrible and squeaked into top four on the last day. We were rescued by covid and lockdown (and the Bruno factor). This season we're currently 4 points better off than last season, and we'll see if we improve much on that. But our results and quality of football against the other big teams has actually been far, far worse.

This season Liverpool and Chelsea (and Spurs and Arsenal) all had major collapses for varying reasons. That's not going to happen again. They're not all going to keep on having shockers of a season at our convenience.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,646
well, he’s been shite. 34 appearances and 1400 minutes is not a small body of work. He hasn’t passed the eye test for me either.
Regardless of whether you think he's crap or incredible, is it fair to judge a player as you are whose only meaningful minutes come when the second string is out and the rest is 5 min cameos?

I assume you have used Transfermarkt for your stats (and then taken it upon yourself to round 1.36 to 1.4) which is nothing over the course of a season. He has played 90mins twice over the whole season and had 2x45mins stints in the PL despite being available for 32/36 games so far - he was actually decent versus So'ton and then he was chucked on to rest players the other night in a B team. It's not surprising he hasn't passed your 'eye test' because he's on the bench.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,221
Just read Scott
I don't see your point. You're acting like we have credible options outside of the two. You saw us on Tuesday against Leicester, our youngsters weren't the reason we lost that game.

I really believe Ole went into the season with the project restart duo in mind ( Pogba and Matic). We started the season and realised that Pogba was out of shape ( terrible defensively too) and Matic had slowed down. So we reverted back to Fred and Mctominay. Unless you want him to pull a midfielder from the sky, this is what we have at the moment.
First I'll say, I don't think Ole feels like he's stuck with them. He's had occasions to try different things
Row LabelsTacklesInterceptionsTotal Tackles and Interceptions
Ndidi
4​
2.8​
6.8​
Kante
3.5​
2.5​
6​
Romeu
3.5​
1.6​
5.1​
Neves (24)
2.9​
2.2​
5.1​
Fred
3.1​
1.9​
5​
Allan
3.4​
1.6​
5​
Yokuslu
2.6​
2.3​
4.9​
Mcarthur
3.5​
1.4​
4.9​
Bissouma (24)
3​
1.8​
4.8​
Reed
2.7​
2​
4.7​
Lemina
3​
1.6​
4.6​
Anguissa
2.6​
1.9​
4.5​
Jorginho
2.7​
1.8​
4.5​
Thiago
2.9​
1.5​
4.4​
Phillips
2.6​
1.7​
4.3​
Brownhill
1.4​
2.7​
4.1​
Hojbjerg
2.6​
1.3​
3.9​
Rice (22)
1.9​
2​
3.9​
Gallagher (21)
2.9​
0.9​
3.8​
McTominay
2.1​
1.2​
3.3​

If you are going to stick with one them, it will have to be Fred. Neither are great passers (McTominay being worse), but Fred does contribute far more defensively. And that is the reason you would have either in the team.

I would replace McTominay first because his defensive impact is very low. He is 30th in terms of tackles per 90 and interceptions per 90.
It's amazing that people will ignore that table cause it doesn't fit their agenda. Anyone see Rice figures? How does the worst CDM in the league in Fred be so high in the list? Do you think the pressure of playing in the Utd shirt equates to playing in a Leicester, Wolves or Southampton shirt? That's also a factor. You believe what you want, Fred is just this years fans scapegoat. The next level is realistically only Ndidi, the best CDM in the league. That's no disgrace......
 
Last edited:

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,284
Just read Scott


First I'll say, I don't think Ole feels like he's stuck with them. He's had occasions to try different things


It's amazing that people will ignore that table cause it doesn't fit their agenda. Anyone see Rice figures? How does the worst CDM in the league in Fred be so high in the list? Do you think the pressure of playing in the Utd shirt equates to playing in a Leicester, Wolves or Southampton shirt? That's also a factor. You believe what you want, Fred is just this years fans scapegoat. The next level is realistically only Ndidi, the best CDM in the league. That's no disgrace......
Those stats don’t tell you the number of times players just run in behind him while he blindly chases the ball. James McArthur is just below him in that table. Is he a great midfielder?
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,221
Those stats don’t tell you the number of times players just run in behind him while he blindly chases the ball. James McArthur is just below him in that table. Is he a great midfielder?
Doesn't tell you the number of times for the other players either? Great are your words not mine, so you tell me. My view is simple I don't believe Fred is anyway near as bad as people make out. No more, no less. I think Fred will be starting next season and if you lot are Ole in, explain that. You think that Utd couldn't sign 90% of those CDM's for peanuts on that lists? What is Ole seeing that you are not if you lot believe Fred's not good enough?
 

Tyrion

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,194
Location
Ireland
We won't be winning any trophies with either of them being part of our strongest 11 IMO. Fred at least can dribble well, but his passing is garbage. McTominay is a high energy player and very good squad player, but he offers nothing on the ball. You can't have so little quality in midfield. Just can't. Neither are particularly good defensive midfielders either. Just high energy ball winning midfielders who can play it safe and that's it.
Agreed. They're good as squad players but if we're starting with them, we're only hurting ourselves. Holding midfield is the easiest part of our team to improve imo.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,221
Agreed. They're good as squad players but if we're starting with them, we're only hurting ourselves. Holding midfield is the easiest part of our team to improve imo.
With who?