SATA
Full Member
He’s staying now, isn’t he? After all the stupid fuss
He may have been promised all the money plus another 50m or something. Think how many Darmians he could sign with that!?I dont think Conte would agree to come to Spurs if he thought Kane was going to be sold. Just my own opinion.
Jones, Bailey and Andreas to spurs please. That would be a bonus.He may have been promised all the money plus another 50m or something. Think how many Darmians he could sign with that!?
That's up too Kane, not much I can do about that.
If he stays another year it gives us a better shot right? Cavani will be moving on, we’ve probably got other targets this summer and won’t be able to afford them all in one window.He will stay if nobody meets Levy's valuation - until next summer anyway then he will 100% leave because he will only have 2 years left on the contract.
yeah, or you fall behind and don't have a chance? This is once apon a time stuff.If he stays another year it gives us a better shot right? Cavani will be moving on, we’ve probably got other targets this summer and won’t be able to afford them all in one window.
Maybe also give us a chance to put together a really strong season and convince him that if he comes we can be one of the best sides in Europe.
Hey, leave the man's dreams alone! (we'll swoop for Kane next year, when no-one's looking and he's alone inspecting the Dulux paint job on the Spurs' trophy cabinet)yeah, or you fall behind and don't have a chance? This is once apon a time stuff.
We want Haaland over Kane. If we can't get Kane this summer (which we won't) all our focus will be on Haaland next summer I think.If he stays another year it gives us a better shot right? Cavani will be moving on, we’ve probably got other targets this summer and won’t be able to afford them all in one window.
Maybe also give us a chance to put together a really strong season and convince him that if he comes we can be one of the best sides in Europe.
I think people overestimate City's spending power. They have pulled out of deals before because of absurd transfer fees - Magure, Koulibaly etc.If City pay up(they will), he will move.
Eh can't really see United paying +100m for any player, Kane or not.If he stays another year it gives us a better shot right? Cavani will be moving on, we’ve probably got other targets this summer and won’t be able to afford them all in one window.
Maybe also give us a chance to put together a really strong season and convince him that if he comes we can be one of the best sides in Europe.
I think it’s even less likely next summer. He would be 29 when the season starts.Eh can't really see United paying +100m for any player, Kane or not.
Who are these English creative players, Foden/mount is all I got centrally.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Same as I’ve been saying. Think the same question applies at United.
Grealish, Foden and Sancho are rather creative?Who are these English creative players, Foden is all I got.
Grealish and Sancho are wide players though, Kane doesn't really work the channels but he does drop into a false 9 position.Grealish, Foden and Sancho are rather creative?
Lingardinho.Who are these English creative players, Foden/mount is all I got centrally.
Lingardinho.
Sterling?Grealish and Sancho are wide players though, Kane doesn't really work the channels but he does drop into a false 9 position.
Still wide, its been England's problems for decades, no truly creative CM.Sterling?
Well Grealish can play centrally and even technically playing “wide” they both drift. Kane dropping deep condenses their space. If you play Kane you need a runner like Rashford/Sterling for me. I say if you play Kane...obviously you play Kane. Unfortunately Rashford isn’t fit and Sterling is in horrific form.Grealish and Sancho are wide players though.
Grealish played as number 10 all of 3 days ago.Grealish and Sancho are wide players though, Kane doesn't really work the channels but he does drop into a false 9 position.
Sterling can operate centrally when required. Most forward players are effective anywhere across the front line these days - at least to a degree.Still wide, its been England's problems for decades, no truly creative CM.
We had one of the all time greats and played him on the leftStill wide, its been England's problems for decades, no truly creative CM.
Why do we use 28 as a peak? Kane isn't a speed merchant, he wont get slower he has IMO another 4 years at the *peak* of his abilities. Its lazy analysis.Great footballer, poor businessman. Trying to get out of Spurs will be difficult, and at 28, this is his peak. Really dumb decision signing that super long contract.
no one is paying it.Reported currently that Levy wants 150 million, preferably in cash (they have a stadium to pay back after all)
I don't see anyone paying that, tbh. Maybe we will as a panic buy if our other targets fall through.
They have a few players at the right profile of age and experience that they could sell for a decent sum this summer, though. Jesus and Sterling alone could easily fetch them around £100m or so. After that, there's been rumours that Laporte is unhappy, and Mahrez isn't safe from the potential chopping block.I think people overestimate City's spending power. They have pulled out of deals before because of absurd transfer fees - Magure, Koulibaly etc.
Their current record transfer stands at around £60m. We've yet to see them splash out £100+m on a single player, and that's what it will take to get Levy's interest.
I suspect both Haaland and Kane will be forced to stay this summer, which is probably good for us as it stops City/Chelsea getting them. We can focus on other areas (Sancho, CB, CM, RB) and hopefully we can win the race for Haaland next summer.
The club is a shambles from top to bottom right now, I hope Paratici is allowed to put his own stamp on the club, I doubt he will have free reign though.no one is paying it.
Kane has made his bed… let’s see how he reacts.
Levy will drag this out all summer to the detriment of the club. He has a blind spot. He focuses too much on hiking up fees and misses the bigger picture.
Levy is as deluded with his valuation as Dortmund were last year with Sancho.Reported currently that Levy wants 150 million, preferably in cash (they have a stadium to pay back after all)
I don't see anyone paying that, tbh. Maybe we will as a panic buy if our other targets fall through.
That's kind of the point isn't it? He doesn't want to sell this summer. And Dortmund didn't want to sell last summer. So they put an inflated valuation on the player which means either the player stays (good), or is sold for an unreasonably large fee above (silver lining). It's not "delusion", it's business.Levy is as deluded with his valuation as Dortmund were last year with Sancho.
No one is paying that in the Covid era unless it’s a clone of Messi/Rinaldo.
Chelsea are never going to pay that for Haaland and Kane won't leave this summerDoubt it will happen but if Chelsea get Haaland for 150-170m would that prompt City to break policy and spend 150m on Kane. Could see a huge oil club battle take place if this FFP is going or gone now.
Levy doesn’t have blind spots - he’s the longest serving Chairman in the Premier League because he’s extremely good at his job.no one is paying it.
Kane has made his bed… let’s see how he reacts.
Levy will drag this out all summer to the detriment of the club. He has a blind spot. He focuses too much on hiking up fees and misses the bigger picture.
It seems that way, too much money. Like a poster above said though, it is possible we could do a panic move if we fail again with Sancho.Chelsea are never going to pay that for Haaland and Kane won't leave this summer