Fred image 17

Fred Brazil flag

2020-21 Performances


View full 2020-21 profile

5.9 Season Average Rating
Appearances
48
Goals
1
Assists
2
Yellow cards
10
Red cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,251
Nah I don't agree with that. People here didn't know Fred because they didn't watch the Ukrainian league, not because he was a worse player that all of a sudden became good. If I recall, before we signed him he was being scouted by both Pep at City and Barcelona as well. If a player at 24 hasn't shown a good level of talent in a few key areas like passing ability and the usefulness of their passing, I seriously doubt they ever will. McTominay hasn't been a creative player ever at any level, he's not a progressive passer, has never shown the ability to do so, has never showed a great level of technique or anything, so why would he all of a sudden pop up with these attributes after 24? He's not some young player with raw attributes. That would be someone like Garner who has shown the ability on the ball and good passing, both short and long range and incisive passing that you hope he can step up and show it at a big club too.

What I'm saying is that Fred showed his talent at Shakhtar, he hasn't been able to translate is as well or as consistently in the prem, but it doesn't mean that he was a nothing player. Players will still show their levels of talent by a certain age and then build off it. We already know what McTominay is, and he doesn't provide much in the way of passing which is what our midfield needs. So I have no problem writing him off for ever being anything more than a squad player. 24 should be the start of a players prime, but regardless they should have shown their talents long before that.
Neither has Fred but you(and I actually) still value everything else he gives the team and believe it warrants him starting.

Plenty think McTominay is already better, I'm not sure, kind of depends who is in form.

But I don't think it's crazy to say with another four years experience McTominay can get to Fred's current level. There's barely anything in it now.
 
Last edited:

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,009
People only rate McTominay based on feelings, they feel he's better but that isn't reflected in any relevant stats for a central midfielder.
 

criticalanalysis

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
6,034
Do you think everyone extensively studies a players stats when forming an opinion on them?

Everyone rates or doesn't rate every player based on preferences and/or favouritism to some degree, either consciously or subconsciously.

Let's move on as this is turning into a Fred vs Mctominay discussion which wasn't never my point, and to be honest I don't remember even seeing anyone say they think McTominay is better in here. My point again was you can't judge someones entire understanding of football based on their opinion on one player. I don't think that's an outrageous statement that warrant's an in depth off topic discussion.



He definitely does, the opposite is also true though. These performance threads often lead to that sort of thing, players get unfairly criticized and fan boys jump to their defence, back and forth arguments ensue. Fast forward 2-3 years opinions continue to polarize with some underrating a player and others vastly overrating the same player. It gets to the point where anyone who hasn't seen that player play they could be forgiven for assuming the player in question is either a pub player who can't trap a ball or an elite world class monster and one of the best in his position going off their performance thread.
No but those stats are very evidently on show on the pitch, which is why I said 'almost objectively'. It's not like it's a close call in their comparative ability/performances, in which case I could understand 'preference' but otherwise, yes I think it's fair game to question someone's understand of football, if they're going to have a very 'wrong' judgement imo. As for the people, who rate McTominay, there's more there are a few even in this thread but I'm not going to bother to look them up.

Looking @Walrus' post https://www.redcafe.net/threads/fred-2020-21-performances.457042/page-103#post-27461824
I can respect that he has tried to articulate his preference but other than attacking runs/goal threat, the rest of the points are more based on feeling or things that don't matter i.e McT being versatile as a CB when it's not something we require and bar the one or two occassion, he has never been used for us in this manner. Aerial threat/defensive nous is a good quality to have but in every other thing he's inferior to Fred. There's no shame to that because they're in different stages of their career but I cannot accept McTominay > Fred. Just like people who believe Lindelof > Maguire.

As for the last bit of your post, I agree. With forums, you're always going to expect some polarity so for myself, I just accept as is, ignore/move along and only chime in when I feel I have something more unique to say. Lately, it's either been trying to change this narrative that Lindelof is a high level player producing high level performances and/or odd points in various threads like this one.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
No but those stats are very evidently on show on the pitch, which is why I said 'almost objectively'. It's not like it's a close call in their comparative ability/performances, in which case I could understand 'preference' but otherwise, yes I think it's fair game to question someone's understand of football, if they're going to have a very 'wrong' judgement imo. As for the people, who rate McTominay, there's more there are a few even in this thread but I'm not going to bother to look them up.
Not sure how stats show on a pitch to be fair, that's an interesting concept.

Obviously still disagree with the second bolded part. To the point where I find it hard to wrap my head around this idea of making a judgement (assumption basically) on someones entire knowledge of the game of football based on their opinion of one player just because it clashes with your own opinion of said player. Doesn't matter about every other opinion they have on football, how long they have been watching or how knowledgeable they may actually be on the game. No share an opinion on a player that I don't agree with and I'll assume that you understand little about the game. Almost comes across a little arrogant if I'm being honest, especially in this case as while I think Fred is a better player right now there isn't a huge gulf between him and McTominay.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
To provide a different perspective, I prefer McTominay to Fred for a variety of reasons;

  • Age - McTominay is young enough to continue to develop and improve. Fred, at 28 and with a very workhorse-like skillset, is only likely to decline from this point.
  • Homegrown. Sentimentality aside (although I dont see that as a problem either), McTominay counts towards the HG quotas.
  • Physicality. McTominay is an aerial threat as well as good for defending set pieces. Fred is not.
  • Versatility - McTominay can cover at CB. He plays RCB for Scotland. He has also played as a dedicated 6 as well as an 8. Fred cant really play anywhere or any other role than the one we see him in.
  • Skillset. Im surprised seeing people claim that Fred offers more than McTominay. From watching our games this season, McTominay strikes me as offering far more in the attacking third. As well as the obvious metric of goals scored, McTominay is great at driving forward with the ball, like a poor-man's Yaya Toure at times.
Basically I see Fred as an incredibly limited player. I will admit I havent been following the Copa America, but based on his club appearances (which is more valid anyway, frankly), all Fred offers is a general water carrier role. He isnt good on the ball, he isnt good at passing*, he doesnt really provide any attacking threat, and he is prone to defensive errors which have led to goals or big chances for the opponent multiple times. I think McTominay offers a lot that Fred cant, not the other way round. McTominay also has a much higher ceiling, both in terms of potential and in terms of performance level.

I think that either Fred or McTominay would look much better alongside a proper playmaker. Fred has currently got that playing next to Casemiro, so it doesnt surprise me if he is looking better for Brazil than he did for United this season. I suspect if you put McTominay into that role instead, he would equally look great.


*Passing is an interesting one because I have seen the stats and those claiming that Fred is a better passer than McT. I disagree and I dont think the stats paint an accurate picture here, because passing is not a binary thing - its actually a lot more complex than just looking at a pass completion %. You can play a crap pass which leads to the receiver being under massive pressure. You can play a pass to feet/behind a runner rather than into their path, slowing down the attack and losing momentum. Fred is often guilty of these things, but just because the receiver got the ball, it still counts as a completed pass. I remember being so frustrated at Fred throughout the season where his simple passes were constantly being overhit/underhit - still completed passes, but shit ones that are detrimental to the team.
That's a fair point on Fred's passing. He is an effective passer in that he attempts and completes a lot of passes every game. But yeah he isn't a great passer of the ball on a consistent basis. Some games he genuinely has a great game in terms of passing but then in others it's much like you describe. Under and over hit passes that tend to slow our play down. He is a frustrating player as in there somewhere is an excellent midfielder if he could be much more consistent with his passing.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Fred is better midfielder on current level. Stats and eye check prove it. But McTominay can be a better player in the future. He has higher ceiling to reach. Whether he will ever reach it or when he is going to reach it, who knows. May be next season if I compare him to Fletcher since Fletcher started to hit his best at 25 years old. However, currently Fred offers more as he is more mobile in both offensively and defensively, & a better passer. McTominay is only better aerially and his shooting which aspects that I don't look at too much for midfielder.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Not mentioned but he's playing well for Brazil alongside Casemiro while keeping Fabinho out in the process.
Kind of need to keep that clear on here
 

criticalanalysis

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
6,034
Not sure how stats show on a pitch to be fair, that's an interesting concept.

Obviously still disagree with the second bolded part. To the point where I find it hard to wrap my head around this idea of making a judgement (assumption basically) on someones entire knowledge of the game of football based on their opinion of one player just because it clashes with your own opinion of said player. Doesn't matter about every other opinion they have on football, how long they have been watching or how knowledgeable they may actually be on the game. No share an opinion on a player that I don't agree with and I'll assume that you understand little about the game. Almost comes across a little arrogant if I'm being honest, especially in this case as while I think Fred is a better player right now there isn't a huge gulf between him and McTominay.
You're taking the language used in my posts a bit literally. Stats as in passes, pressing involvement, tackles, interceptions, progressive passes, touches etc, which are all on show.

As for the judgement, yes anybody's understanding of the game is fair for critique regardless of whether they rate McToiminay over Fred but probably more so if that is the case because there is a clear gap between them two imo. Also I have repeatedly used the words 'question' and added that someone with the above preference should be adding more context, which can then be explored. Not sure why you're so fixated as if I've made a definitive statement against said people.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,014
Location
Nigeria
Not mentioned but he's playing well for Brazil alongside Casemiro while keeping Fabinho out in the process.
Kind of need to keep that clear on here
Well, while Shaw and Maguire get plenty of praise and credits for their performances with England, Fred who has been doing the same for Brazil keeps flying under the radar.

I don't blame Manchester United fans though, because not many gets to watch the Copa America, and it will show on the general perspective on the three when they return to the club.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,014
Location
Nigeria
Both of our guys do a pretty bad job on the ball at dictating the tempo to how we ideally want to play, as well as progressing it up the pitch. Maguire, Shaw do all the progression for us with passing, while McFred also force Bruno to come deeper and build up from deeper positions compared to when he plays with Pogba in midfield (UtdArena on Twitter did an analysis on this ages ago).
Would love to see what UtdArena did as I'm a big fan of his use of stats, though I can't view Twitter anymore. You should separate Fred and McTominay in that McFred too, because I think it's clouded your judgement a bit in that post.

Maguire, Shaw and FRED are our main routes of ball progression from deep. Across our regular back six, Wan-Bissaka, Lindelof and McTominay are average in that regard. You have excluded Fred from the first trio simply because you are using his name in association with that of McTominay.

What McTominay cannot do should be no business of Fred's and that is why that McFred stuff needs to die. Fred will be accepted for the midfielder he is when his game stops being associated with McTominay's.
 
Last edited:

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
As for the judgement, yes anybody's understanding of the game is fair for critique regardless of whether they rate McToiminay over Fred but probably more so if that is the case because there is a clear gap between them two imo. Also I have repeatedly used the words 'question' and added that someone with the above preference should be adding more context, which can then be explored. Not sure why you're so fixated as if I've made a definitive statement against said people.
Well I know you didn't mate but someone else in this thread basically did which started this discussion. You've at least tried to explain your thinking fair play to you, where others post nonsense and then disappear when someone responds to it.

Of course it's ok to question someone's understanding of football based on one opinion, ie. ''that guy sounds like he doesn't have a clue about football''. It's another thing to make statements proclaiming people who happen to not rate Fred or rate McTominay over him don't understand football. Or words to that effect, which is quite clearly nonsense.
 
Last edited:

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
Not mentioned but he's playing well for Brazil alongside Casemiro while keeping Fabinho out in the process.
Kind of need to keep that clear on here
To be fair there's been about 50-60 mentions of Fabinho over the last few pages. Most of which were about how he's being kept out of the Brazil side by Fred.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
That's my point, nobody had heard of Fred when he was McTominay's age. Given where he was at 24 very few if any would have predicted he'd be at a top club in a few years.

So does it make sense at this point to say McTominay definitely won't make it?

24 compared to 28 is a pretty crucial age gap for a CM.

I'm not saying give McTominay forever but I'd bet he's looking better than Fred was at 24.
An unknown quantity is not the same as a known limited (McTominay) quantity. He may develop but it seems unlikely to me he will get to Freds level.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Not sure how stats show on a pitch to be fair, that's an interesting concept.

Obviously still disagree with the second bolded part. To the point where I find it hard to wrap my head around this idea of making a judgement (assumption basically) on someones entire knowledge of the game of football based on their opinion of one player just because it clashes with your own opinion of said player. Doesn't matter about every other opinion they have on football, how long they have been watching or how knowledgeable they may actually be on the game. No share an opinion on a player that I don't agree with and I'll assume that you understand little about the game. Almost comes across a little arrogant if I'm being honest, especially in this case as while I think Fred is a better player right now there isn't a huge gulf between him and McTominay.
If a defensive midfield bosses the pitch but someone says he's useless it's a fair judgement to at least make this person can't really read that part of football.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
If a defensive midfield bosses the pitch but someone says he's useless it's a fair judgement to at least make this person can't really read that part of football.

Who is this defensive midfielder who bosses the pitch?

And who said he was useless?

I'm genuinely interested because that's not even remotely close to what was being discussed mate. The discussion was about claiming someone doesn't understand football (or at least questioning their understanding) if they happen to rate one player over another.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
What role has he been playing for Brazil? The box to box role?
Yep, hes been covering the ground while Casemiro has been mopping up behind him. He and Neymar reportedly get on very well so that may play into it
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Who is this defensive midfielder who bosses the pitch?

And who said he was useless?

I'm genuinely interested because that's not even remotely close to what was being discussed mate. The discussion was about claiming someone doesn't understand football (or at least questioning their understanding) if they happen to rate one player over another.
It was a hypothetical example. IF someone takes on of carricks top midfield performances and talks about how he was bang average compared to Shaqiri in midfield based on some of his tricks its a fair assessment that person doesn't understand football.
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Yep, hes been covering the ground while Casemiro has been mopping up behind him. He and Neymar reportedly get on very well so that may play into it
I'd like to argue he's been a bit more defensive for Brazil than box to box? I might be wrong I haven't followed every minute of it but he seemed content to sit back whenever I saw. I guess you can't call it a DM either but on the more defensive side of b2b imo.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,809
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
To provide a different perspective, I prefer McTominay to Fred for a variety of reasons;

  • Age - McTominay is young enough to continue to develop and improve. Fred, at 28 and with a very workhorse-like skillset, is only likely to decline from this point.
  • Homegrown. Sentimentality aside (although I dont see that as a problem either), McTominay counts towards the HG quotas.
  • Physicality. McTominay is an aerial threat as well as good for defending set pieces. Fred is not.
  • Versatility - McTominay can cover at CB. He plays RCB for Scotland. He has also played as a dedicated 6 as well as an 8. Fred cant really play anywhere or any other role than the one we see him in.
  • Skillset. Im surprised seeing people claim that Fred offers more than McTominay. From watching our games this season, McTominay strikes me as offering far more in the attacking third. As well as the obvious metric of goals scored, McTominay is great at driving forward with the ball, like a poor-man's Yaya Toure at times.
*Passing is an interesting one because I have seen the stats and those claiming that Fred is a better passer than McT. I disagree and I dont think the stats paint an accurate picture here, because passing is not a binary thing - its actually a lot more complex than just looking at a pass completion %. You can play a crap pass which leads to the receiver being under massive pressure. You can play a pass to feet/behind a runner rather than into their path, slowing down the attack and losing momentum. Fred is often guilty of these things, but just because the receiver got the ball, it still counts as a completed pass. I remember being so frustrated at Fred throughout the season where his simple passes were constantly being overhit/underhit - still completed passes, but shit ones that are detrimental to the team.
The issue is that three of your five points don't actually make any difference on the field at the moment. Age, homegrown and ability to play CB (it's a decent option to have but we never really use it). McTominay is stronger, better in the air, and is a decent goal threat for a midfielder. Three things which are definitely nice bonuses to have, but that's all they are - bonuses. I consider the most important job of the midfield is to give the team control of the game (perhaps you feel otherwise), and Scott is fairly average or even poor in pretty much all the important aspects.
  • Making themselves available to receive the ball. McTominay is downright poor at this, constantly hiding (I don't think it's deliberate but it has the same result) behind opposition players so that he is impossible to pass to. There's a reason he gets on the ball about 20% less than any of our other three midfielders and sometimes has games where he is basically invisible. He just doesn't provide our players an option to pass to which makes it more difficult for us to build anything. Meanwhile Fred is constantly moving around offering himself as an option.
  • Passing. Fred isn't a great passer, and you do touch on a fair criticism that some of his 'completed passes' did actually make it difficult on the recipient. But Fred not only makes more passes, he makes more creative and attacking passes that get us into dangerous positions and creates more chances, makes more longer passes, and he is also more likely to push us forward when we are building the play out from the back. Overall he's attempting to do a lot more with his passes than McTominay does, who (other than the occasional nice diagonal ball to the left wing) tends to play it more safe and basic.
  • Setting the tempo. It wasn't as obvious towards the end of the season as Fred was struggling for form, but normally he is very important for us at speeding up the tempo. Without him we constantly look very pedestrian, just playing it around slowly when we have the ball and sitting off and letting the opposition play when they have it. Fred tends to inject that bit of drive and speed particularly defensively, but also trying to play the ball quickly up through the middle of the park to Bruno when he gets into that bit of space between the opposition midfield and defence. Once again I wouldn't necessarily say he's particularly good at the latter, but he's better than Scott.
  • Pressing and winning the ball back quickly. This is becoming increasingly important in todays game, with almost all top teams trying to harry the opposition and quickly win the ball back high up the pitch. Obviously Fred is one of the best around at this. Scott does have the occasional game where he does it well (normally in a big game - PSG comes to mind), but otherwise he's surprisingly average/poor. He tends to stand off and let the opposition play to their own tempo too much.
These four aspects, alongside protecting the backline in deeper areas where I'd rate them about the same, are probably the most important things for a midfielder to provide IMO. Think of all the top deeper midfielders over the years and they'll almost all be great at three or four of those five things. Maybe the more limited ones will be absolutely amazing at one or two of them.

McTominay does have the occasional two or three games a year where he does step up and show a lot more. Particularly with (as you mentioned) driving forward with the ball and also playing more attacking passes. It seems like he basically decides in those games to force the issue and make things happen himself. If he starts having those games more regularly than maybe things will change (although he would still definitely need somebody next to him acting as the main playmaker), but for now in the majority of the games he's simply not providing enough. Taking those five important aspects that I listed above, there's none that he's even above average.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,809
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Would love to see what UtdArena did as I'm a big fan of his use of stats, though I can't view Twitter anymore. You should separate Fred and McTominay in that McFred too, because I think it's clouded your judgement a bit in that post.
Pretty sure he's talking about the tweet showing that Bruno receives the ball more often and in better positions when he plays with Pogba+Matic in a combo than when he plays with Fred+McTominay in a combo. However once he dug further into it and separated the four players, the difference was really Pogba vs McTominay. Fred and Matic were about the same, while Pogba was a fair bit better (to be expected) and McTominay was a fair bit worse (also to be expected).
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,129
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
The issue is that three of your five points don't actually make any difference on the field at the moment. Age, homegrown and ability to play CB (it's a decent option to have but we never really use it). McTominay is stronger, better in the air, and is a decent goal threat for a midfielder. Three things which are definitely nice bonuses to have, but that's all they are - bonuses. I consider the most important job of the midfield is to give the team control of the game (perhaps you feel otherwise), and Scott is fairly average or even poor in pretty much all the important aspects.
  • Making themselves available to receive the ball. McTominay is downright poor at this, constantly hiding (I don't think it's deliberate but it has the same result) behind opposition players so that he is impossible to pass to. There's a reason he gets on the ball about 20% less than any of our other three midfielders and sometimes has games where he is basically invisible. He just doesn't provide our players an option to pass to which makes it more difficult for us to build anything. Meanwhile Fred is constantly moving around offering himself as an option.
  • Passing. Fred isn't a great passer, and you do touch on a fair criticism that some of his 'completed passes' did actually make it difficult on the recipient. But Fred not only makes more passes, he makes more creative and attacking passes that get us into dangerous positions and creates more chances, makes more longer passes, and he is also more likely to push us forward when we are building the play out from the back. Overall he's attempting to do a lot more with his passes than McTominay does, who (other than the occasional nice diagonal ball to the left wing) tends to play it more safe and basic.
  • Setting the tempo. It wasn't as obvious towards the end of the season as Fred was struggling for form, but normally he is very important for us at speeding up the tempo. Without him we constantly look very pedestrian, just playing it around slowly when we have the ball and sitting off and letting the opposition play when they have it. Fred tends to inject that bit of drive and speed particularly defensively, but also trying to play the ball quickly up through the middle of the park to Bruno when he gets into that bit of space between the opposition midfield and defence. Once again I wouldn't necessarily say he's particularly good at the latter, but he's better than Scott.
  • Pressing and winning the ball back quickly. This is becoming increasingly important in todays game, with almost all top teams trying to harry the opposition and quickly win the ball back high up the pitch. Obviously Fred is one of the best around at this. Scott does have the occasional game where he does it well (normally in a big game - PSG comes to mind), but otherwise he's surprisingly average/poor. He tends to stand off and let the opposition play to their own tempo too much.
These four aspects, alongside protecting the backline in deeper areas where I'd rate them about the same, are probably the most important things for a midfielder to provide IMO. Think of all the top deeper midfielders over the years and they'll almost all be great at three or four of those five things. Maybe the more limited ones will be absolutely amazing at one or two of them.

McTominay does have the occasional two or three games a year where he does step up and show a lot more. Particularly with (as you mentioned) driving forward with the ball and also playing more attacking passes. It seems like he basically decides in those games to force the issue and make things happen himself. If he starts having those games more regularly than maybe things will change (although he would still definitely need somebody next to him acting as the main playmaker), but for now in the majority of the games he's simply not providing enough. Taking those five important aspects that I listed above, there's none that he's even above average.
Pin this to the top of the thread and also note that he compares very favourably statistically to the competition. Often having better stats and games than players the Caf are creaming themselves over. Fabinho being a great example last season. Kante had a similar season to Fred last year. There isn’t this massive difference between them at all. Remember the overrated Kante thread? Then he has a resurgence and all of a sudden he’s the one stop answer to unlocking Pogba in a two until he wasn’t again. It’s a classic case of the grass being greener. It’s a team game and Fred is doing his part. He’s also a massive enabler of our most important player, Bruno.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
It was a hypothetical example. IF someone takes on of carricks top midfield performances and talks about how he was bang average compared to Shaqiri in midfield based on some of his tricks its a fair assessment that person doesn't understand football.
Fair enough, still I wouldn't completely dismiss someone as not understanding football based on one extreme opinion as in your example. Yeah if someone spouted guff like that they might not understand football but they might also just be talking shite.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,014
Location
Nigeria
Pretty sure he's talking about the tweet showing that Bruno receives the ball more often and in better positions when he plays with Pogba+Matic in a combo than when he plays with Fred+McTominay in a combo. However once he dug further into it and separated the four players, the difference was really Pogba vs McTominay. Fred and Matic were about the same, while Pogba was a fair bit better (to be expected) and McTominay was a fair bit worse (also to be expected).
Exactly what I thought. This tendency to associate Fred with McTominay basically due to the amount of times they have played together for us is what hurts Fred's reputation. It is really Fred doing most of the work in midfield and Mctominay doing a terrible job at supporting him. I'm sure Fred will be able to perform so much better when he doesn't have to play with McTominay consistently.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,023
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
Yep, hes been covering the ground while Casemiro has been mopping up behind him. He and Neymar reportedly get on very well so that may play into it
So.. We just need a top DM to unleash him?
Sorry I just came from the Pogba thread. But no jokes really, he is by nature a good b2b midfielder but for sure needs someone competent behind just as much as a driving force in more advanced position.

Exactly what I thought. This tendency to associate Fred with McTominay basically due to the amount of times they have played together for us is what hurts Fred's reputation. It is really Fred doing most of the work in midfield and Mctominay doing a terrible job at supporting him. I'm sure Fred will be able to perform so much better when he doesn't have to play with McTominay consistently.
They are also often called 2 DMs, while in fact neither of them is one. But that's also a reason why they both played so conservative is so many games.


Replacing McTominay will really make a difference. We can do with Fred for another season.
 
Last edited:

criticalanalysis

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
6,034
The issue is that three of your five points don't actually make any difference on the field at the moment. Age, homegrown and ability to play CB (it's a decent option to have but we never really use it). McTominay is stronger, better in the air, and is a decent goal threat for a midfielder. Three things which are definitely nice bonuses to have, but that's all they are - bonuses. I consider the most important job of the midfield is to give the team control of the game (perhaps you feel otherwise), and Scott is fairly average or even poor in pretty much all the important aspects.
  • Making themselves available to receive the ball. McTominay is downright poor at this, constantly hiding (I don't think it's deliberate but it has the same result) behind opposition players so that he is impossible to pass to. There's a reason he gets on the ball about 20% less than any of our other three midfielders and sometimes has games where he is basically invisible. He just doesn't provide our players an option to pass to which makes it more difficult for us to build anything. Meanwhile Fred is constantly moving around offering himself as an option.
  • Passing. Fred isn't a great passer, and you do touch on a fair criticism that some of his 'completed passes' did actually make it difficult on the recipient. But Fred not only makes more passes, he makes more creative and attacking passes that get us into dangerous positions and creates more chances, makes more longer passes, and he is also more likely to push us forward when we are building the play out from the back. Overall he's attempting to do a lot more with his passes than McTominay does, who (other than the occasional nice diagonal ball to the left wing) tends to play it more safe and basic.
  • Setting the tempo. It wasn't as obvious towards the end of the season as Fred was struggling for form, but normally he is very important for us at speeding up the tempo. Without him we constantly look very pedestrian, just playing it around slowly when we have the ball and sitting off and letting the opposition play when they have it. Fred tends to inject that bit of drive and speed particularly defensively, but also trying to play the ball quickly up through the middle of the park to Bruno when he gets into that bit of space between the opposition midfield and defence. Once again I wouldn't necessarily say he's particularly good at the latter, but he's better than Scott.
  • Pressing and winning the ball back quickly. This is becoming increasingly important in todays game, with almost all top teams trying to harry the opposition and quickly win the ball back high up the pitch. Obviously Fred is one of the best around at this. Scott does have the occasional game where he does it well (normally in a big game - PSG comes to mind), but otherwise he's surprisingly average/poor. He tends to stand off and let the opposition play to their own tempo too much.
These four aspects, alongside protecting the backline in deeper areas where I'd rate them about the same, are probably the most important things for a midfielder to provide IMO. Think of all the top deeper midfielders over the years and they'll almost all be great at three or four of those five things. Maybe the more limited ones will be absolutely amazing at one or two of them.

McTominay does have the occasional two or three games a year where he does step up and show a lot more. Particularly with (as you mentioned) driving forward with the ball and also playing more attacking passes. It seems like he basically decides in those games to force the issue and make things happen himself. If he starts having those games more regularly than maybe things will change (although he would still definitely need somebody next to him acting as the main playmaker), but for now in the majority of the games he's simply not providing enough. Taking those five important aspects that I listed above, there's none that he's even above average.
Good summary again. I remember you did a thread breaking down Fred's stats, which show how favourably he compares in most important metrics to every other midfielder.

It's still incredibly people lump them two together or claim the gap isn't that wide. It absolutely is.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
Exactly what I thought. This tendency to associate Fred with McTominay basically due to the amount of times they have played together for us is what hurts Fred's reputation. It is really Fred doing most of the work in midfield and Mctominay doing a terrible job at supporting him. I'm sure Fred will be able to perform so much better when he doesn't have to play with McTominay consistently.
McTominay much like Fred isn't a natural DM, he plays most games beside Fred. They're both asked to play deep but of the two McTominay obviously plays the more conservative and sits back as it makes sense for Fred to play further forward. So it's only natural that McTominay struggles in that role.

Outside of games against top sides where we would be sitting deep, asking them both to break up play and win the ball back to hit teams on the counter. I don't think they make a good combination.

So as much as I agree that Mctominay doesn't compliment Fred and is holding him back. The opposite is also true, I think Scott would perform at a higher level with a top DM behind him.
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,014
Location
Nigeria
McTominay much like Fred isn't a natural DM, he plays most games beside Fred. They're both asked to play deep but of the two McTominay obviously plays the more conservative and sits back as it makes sense for Fred to play further forward. So it's only natural that McTominay struggles in that role.

Outside of games against top sides where we would be sitting deep, asking them both to break up play and win the ball back to hit teams on the counter. I don't think they make a good combination.

So as much as I agree that Mctominay doesn't compliment Fred and is holding him back. The opposite is also true, I think Scott would perform at a higher level with a top DM behind him.
Mctominay's strengths around the opposition's box has never been in doubt, and a midfieder more capable than Fred at holding his own in defence might help him in that aspect, but it isn't going to change much in terms of what he brings to the actual midfied play. On the contrary, I think it increases the chances of his below par contributions in midfied being exposed depending on who the DM is.

The midfieders in a midfied two has to work as a pair. Fred carries McTominay in that midfield, doing more defensive work, and also far more on the ball - in ball retention and ball progression. If Fred is replaced with a better defender that doesn't offer as much with the ball as Fred does, then McTominay would have to take more responsibility on the ball, which he's proven to be incapable of, but this time, with no Fred to cover and do the job for him, and for the team.

I also don't think Fred plays that much further forward than McTominay in our team, and I don't think McTominay plays more conservative than Fred by design. He just doesn't have Fred's range, excels when there is more space, and is happy to pass up responsibility with the ball. Pairing him with another DM won't change much of what he brings in terms of actual midfield play. He doesn't do much next to Fred, he still wouldn't do much next to another midfieders that isn't Fred.
 

Poborsky's hair

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
1,720
Supports
Bohemians 1905
Good summary again. I remember you did a thread breaking down Fred's stats, which show how favourably he compares in most important metrics to every other midfielder.

It's still incredibly people lump them two together or claim the gap isn't that wide. It absolutely is.
At least you can tell a bad poster from a good one and can safely decide whose posts are worth your time reading. Saying McFred is the same like putting Maguire in the same sentence with Lindelof. Of course McFred is not good enough because we need to massively upgrade on McTominay. If we are to upgrade on Fred himself eventually it will have to be a really superb player but so far he's the only type of player out of all midfielders who is keeping it together and is essential for our progressive play. Some people will be shocked when they finally see a proper midfielder next to Fred how much better we are and defensively too because even that McT can't provide being so slow to close down spaces, press and still very bad positioning wise.

Good luck to Fred today, coming to preseason with a trophy will make him even more confident and that's what we need a confident set of players with ability not players who pussy out of challenges like Lindelof or are hiding all game and pass sideways or backwards like Scott.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,023
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
McTominay much like Fred isn't a natural DM, he plays most games beside Fred. They're both asked to play deep but of the two McTominay obviously plays the more conservative and sits back as it makes sense for Fred to play further forward. So it's only natural that McTominay struggles in that role.

Outside of games against top sides where we would be sitting deep, asking them both to break up play and win the ball back to hit teams on the counter. I don't think they make a good combination.

So as much as I agree that Mctominay doesn't compliment Fred and is holding him back. The opposite is also true, I think Scott would perform at a higher level with a top DM behind him.
That's an interesting opinion. Would you play McT ahead of Fred in that b2b role, or is it just something that we could try if absolutely necessary?

McTominay in my eyes is a makeshift central midfielder. He supports Fred well with his work rate and is quite strong, but doesn't really fit midfield role.

Of course any player would play better if his partner was improved upon. The difference is we see it for Fred for NT, while Scotland uses McTominay mostly in back 3 (as far as I've seen) which is where he fits most imo.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
That's an interesting opinion. Would you play McT ahead of Fred in that b2b role, or is it just something that we could try if absolutely necessary?

McTominay in my eyes is a makeshift central midfielder. He supports Fred well with his work rate and is quite strong, but doesn't really fit midfield role.

Of course any player would play better if his partner was improved upon. The difference is we see it for Fred for NT, while Scotland uses McTominay mostly in back 3 (as far as I've seen) which is where he fits most imo.
No if I had to pick one of the two it would be Fred alongside a new DM with McTom as back up. McTominay is still young and could still get much better but I don't see him being a first choice CM in a midfield two long term. I think he'd be more suited to playing in a midfield 3 to be honest.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
5,822
He was really good for us at times last season also. His form nosedived in the last few weeks for some reason, possibly fatigue.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
19,836
Mctominay's strengths around the opposition's box has never been in doubt, and a midfieder more capable than Fred at holding his own in defence might help him in that aspect, but it isn't going to change much in terms of what he brings to the actual midfied play. On the contrary, I think it increases the chances of his below par contributions in midfied being exposed depending on who the DM is.

The midfieders in a midfied two has to work as a pair. Fred carries McTominay in that midfield, doing more defensive work, and also far more on the ball - in ball retention and ball progression. If Fred is replaced with a better defender that doesn't offer as much with the ball as Fred does, then McTominay would have to take more responsibility on the ball, which he's proven to be incapable of, but this time, with no Fred to cover and do the job for him, and for the team.

I also don't think Fred plays that much further forward than McTominay in our team, and I don't think McTominay plays more conservative than Fred by design. He just doesn't have Fred's range, excels when there is more space, and is happy to pass up responsibility with the ball. Pairing him with another DM won't change much of what he brings in terms of actual midfield play. He doesn't do much next to Fred, he still wouldn't do much next to another midfieders that isn't Fred.
I don't think we disagree on much. I think McTominay would be better with a good DM behind him though I still don't see him bossing the midfield or anything. Dont think it would make United a better side though it would allow him more licence to get forward.

For me they don't just work as a pair I agree McTominay doesn't play deeper by design I think he just doesn't really have the confidence to try to dictate play the way Fred tries to do.

I hope if we do get a DM this summer that it will allow Fred to do more of what he's good at. To be honest I don't want him in and around our box receiving the ball under pressure. I'd like to see him further up the pitch.
 

GailSpaceWynand

Yes, I signed up with this name.
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Messages
1,888
The issue is that three of your five points don't actually make any difference on the field at the moment. Age, homegrown and ability to play CB (it's a decent option to have but we never really use it). McTominay is stronger, better in the air, and is a decent goal threat for a midfielder. Three things which are definitely nice bonuses to have, but that's all they are - bonuses. I consider the most important job of the midfield is to give the team control of the game (perhaps you feel otherwise), and Scott is fairly average or even poor in pretty much all the important aspects.
  • Making themselves available to receive the ball. McTominay is downright poor at this, constantly hiding (I don't think it's deliberate but it has the same result) behind opposition players so that he is impossible to pass to. There's a reason he gets on the ball about 20% less than any of our other three midfielders and sometimes has games where he is basically invisible. He just doesn't provide our players an option to pass to which makes it more difficult for us to build anything. Meanwhile Fred is constantly moving around offering himself as an option.
  • Passing. Fred isn't a great passer, and you do touch on a fair criticism that some of his 'completed passes' did actually make it difficult on the recipient. But Fred not only makes more passes, he makes more creative and attacking passes that get us into dangerous positions and creates more chances, makes more longer passes, and he is also more likely to push us forward when we are building the play out from the back. Overall he's attempting to do a lot more with his passes than McTominay does, who (other than the occasional nice diagonal ball to the left wing) tends to play it more safe and basic.
  • Setting the tempo. It wasn't as obvious towards the end of the season as Fred was struggling for form, but normally he is very important for us at speeding up the tempo. Without him we constantly look very pedestrian, just playing it around slowly when we have the ball and sitting off and letting the opposition play when they have it. Fred tends to inject that bit of drive and speed particularly defensively, but also trying to play the ball quickly up through the middle of the park to Bruno when he gets into that bit of space between the opposition midfield and defence. Once again I wouldn't necessarily say he's particularly good at the latter, but he's better than Scott.
  • Pressing and winning the ball back quickly. This is becoming increasingly important in todays game, with almost all top teams trying to harry the opposition and quickly win the ball back high up the pitch. Obviously Fred is one of the best around at this. Scott does have the occasional game where he does it well (normally in a big game - PSG comes to mind), but otherwise he's surprisingly average/poor. He tends to stand off and let the opposition play to their own tempo too much.
These four aspects, alongside protecting the backline in deeper areas where I'd rate them about the same, are probably the most important things for a midfielder to provide IMO. Think of all the top deeper midfielders over the years and they'll almost all be great at three or four of those five things. Maybe the more limited ones will be absolutely amazing at one or two of them.

McTominay does have the occasional two or three games a year where he does step up and show a lot more. Particularly with (as you mentioned) driving forward with the ball and also playing more attacking passes. It seems like he basically decides in those games to force the issue and make things happen himself. If he starts having those games more regularly than maybe things will change (although he would still definitely need somebody next to him acting as the main playmaker), but for now in the majority of the games he's simply not providing enough. Taking those five important aspects that I listed above, there's none that he's even above average.
Exactly on point. McT is useful but only in the big games; seems to raise his game but huge gulf between Fred and McT over an entire season. Fred is more consistent and does more in the middle.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,129
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Ole on the Fredster


"I have to put particular praise to Fred," Ole told us. "I’ve got to say, at the end of the season, he got an injury in the last league game. We thought he wouldn’t make it for the [Europa League] final as he didn’t train the whole week before our own final, and he’s just put his head down and worked really hard.

“He trained the day before the final and came on and played. He’s just played throughout the summer and that’s some going. Some players with that injury wouldn’t be in training football now. He’s been a credit to Manchester United and himself in the way he’s conducted himself.”
 

KennyBurner

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
4,673
Location
ATL

Just need to pair him up with a great midfielder and we can push for the Title. Its pretty obvious right now Mctominay is holding him back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.