mu4c_20le
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 43,544
Reason has nothing to do with it... west ham are skintExactly - £30mil is reasonable
Reason has nothing to do with it... west ham are skintExactly - £30mil is reasonable
Yeah but that comes with the "we can't afford that" and Roman asking them to check what's in that big brown bag behind them that wasn't there 10 minutes ago. Suddenly they have another £30m to spend on the transferIf it was Chelsea, they would somehow be able to sell him for 40m
Yes, cheaper than buying new players, but even so, would Mata have only re-signed because £140k per week was put on the table?Because it's cheaper than buying new players
When WHU value Declan Rice at £100m, but they baulk at £30m for an experienced International attacker, who was the main reason for them getting European football..?20m is a fair price
Yeah that is the best option but sounds very much like they are baulking at our valuationOur best bet to move him on his as a makeweight for Rice.
Does that not say something to you? They’re skintWhen WHU value Declan Rice at £100m, but they baulk at £30m for an experienced International attacker, who was the main reason for them getting European football..?
and deluded...Does that not say something to you? They’re skint
Is the porn, sex toys and lingerie business not doing well?Does that not say something to you? They’re skint
You think that crowd put their own money in?Is the porn, sex toys and lingerie business not doing well?
Well if he leaves then prepare yourself for a laugh. £20m would be an amazing price for someone like Lingard in this climate. I hope we get it but who knows.Hs is an attacking English player who played an important role in WHU getting European football.
Anything less than 20m would be a joke and that's just because he got 1 year left on his contract.
I disagree. I take your point but another way of looking at it is - was outstanding at West Ham, is English, in his prime years, would probably sign a new contract if offered, negating the last year of contract issue, and is an experienced international. I'd say United should be asking at least 20-25m.Well if he leaves then prepare yourself for a laugh. £20m would be an amazing price for someone like Lingard in this climate. I hope we get it but who knows.
28, 1 year left on contract, on huge wages and he's been largely poor and inconsistent for years. And of course Covid.
I'm sure he's recovered by nowWell if he leaves then prepare yourself for a laugh. £20m would be an amazing price for someone like Lingard in this climate. I hope we get it but who knows.
28, 1 year left on contract, on huge wages and he's been largely poor and inconsistent for years. And of course Covid.
We can ask all we want, fact is no team so far are willing to stump up the money we want for him.I disagree. I take your point but another way of looking at it is - was outstanding at West Ham, is English, in his prime years, would probably sign a new contract if offered, negating the last year of contract issue, and is an experienced international. I'd say United should be asking at least 20-25m.
Sorry what?I'm sure he's recovered by now
Over a short period of time, he had a period of form for United like that too back in 2017. In between he didn't play that well so West Ham aren't naive enough to think that's the sort of form he'll produce all the time.I disagree. I take your point but another way of looking at it is - was outstanding at West Ham,
Yes and what benefit does that bring to West Ham or any other club?is English,
He's 29 in a few months.in his prime years,
Well as far as we know no contract has been offered and there's no guarantee that he would sign it. So right now in July 2021 he has less than a year to run on his current deal. Which dramatically reduces his potential value.would probably sign a new contract if offered, negating the last year of contract issue,
Yes and what benefit does that bring to West Ham or any other club?and is an experienced international.
United could ask for £120m the problem is though you have to find someone willing to pay it. As I said £20m would be an amazing deal for United. But if I had to bet on it I suspect it'll be closer to £15m if he goes as West Ham are skint.I'd say United should be asking at least 20-25m.
We should be all over this. Lingard plus 30m should do the trick.Our best bet to move him on his as a makeweight for Rice.
Maddison wouldn't be!Why can't Arsenal just go out and sign James Maddison from Leicester and then Leicester give us £30M for Lingard as his replacement.
Everyone's a winner
I want a fit wife, but that's not happening either.Being reported (the S*n) that he's asked to stay. Surely, even if true, we sell him now. Come on.
If it is true about us playing 2 attacking mids and 1 defensive next season, maybe Ole could use him as a back up for that.Being reported (the S*n) that he's asked to stay. Surely, even if true, we sell him now. Come on.
Over a short period of time, he had a period of form for United like that too back in 2017. In between he didn't play that well so West Ham aren't naive enough to think that's the sort of form he'll produce all the time.
Yes and what benefit does that bring to West Ham or any other club?
He's 29 in a few months.
Well as far as we know no contract has been offered and there's no guarantee that he would sign it. So right now in July 2021 he has less than a year to run on his current deal. Which dramatically reduces his potential value.
Yes and what benefit does that bring to West Ham or any other club?
United could ask for £120m the problem is though you have to find someone willing to pay it. As I said £20m would be an amazing deal for United. But if I had to bet on it I suspect it'll be closer to £15m if he goes as West Ham are skint.
Makeweight for who? We don’t want rice at this club either.Our best bet to move him on his as a makeweight for Rice.
I may be biased but Manchester & Arsenal would be winners but Leicester gets shafted.Why can't Arsenal just go out and sign James Maddison from Leicester and then Leicester give us £30M for Lingard as his replacement.
Everyone's a winner
Would bite their hand off for that.Straight swap Lingard for Trippier would be fair.
Similar ages both 1 year left on their deals.
I disagree that we should agree to disagree!Okay, let's agree to disagree!
Would make too much sense.Straight swap Lingard for Trippier would be fair.
Similar ages both 1 year left on their deals.
The club twitter don’t help themselves do theyTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It it was Chelsea, he would be in half the money he is now. We give extremely high salaries to mediocre players and then wonder why we cannot get rid of them.If it was Chelsea, they would somehow be able to sell him for 40m
100% thisIt it was Chelsea, he would be in half the money he is now. We give extremely high salaries to mediocre players and then wonder why we cannot get rid of them.