amolbhatia50k
Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
1st choice behind BrunoHe would be the first choice for us in midfield if he played for us. Baffling how people on here keep dissing him.
1st choice behind BrunoHe would be the first choice for us in midfield if he played for us. Baffling how people on here keep dissing him.
You think Mount could play in CM with Pogba and Bruno?In CM where we play McFred I mean.
I wouldnt base anything on what these coaches think. What i do know is mount has never payed as well as Lingard did for West Ham. Mind you, i was comparing the before Lingard even went to West Ham.Sounds like a biased statement.
Mount was in the Euro squad and so to say played regularly. Lingard didn’t. Mount plays regular on a team pretty equal to United. Lingard doesn’t. Mount is 22. Lingard is 28.
You think that people here don’t watch him play for Chelsea too?Man if I was to go by the number of times I've actually watched Sancho play (and that's mostly England and the games for United) I'd say he's absolutely bang average too, but I know better than that.
Not sure about the Kante comparison but I'd definitely prefer him deeper for England if he plays. He's an all round good player but shouldn't be keeping any of Sterling, Foden, Grealish, Rashford, Sancho or Greenwood on the bench in an attacking position.I actually think he could be a great 8. Sort of the heir to Kante with added quality. In the positions Chelsea and England use him in he's always going to be underwhelming.
Tbf in the big games that would probably work.yes take off Bruno and put him.
Wouldn't classify Kante as an 8 (he's too limited on the offensive end). Mount on the other hand hasn't displayed the ability to stamp his influence on a midfield the way Kante can in his favorite position.I actually think he could be a great 8. Sort of the heir to Kante with added quality. In the positions Chelsea and England use him in he's always going to be underwhelming.
That's the only possible explanation for the "he's shit" comments. You can't have seen us over the past couple of seasons and actually think that.You think that people here don’t watch him play for Chelsea too?
Not really. People here watch almost every ManUtd game and still divided on Pogba, Rashford, Martial, McTominay, Fred.That's the only possible explanation for the "he's shit" comments. You can't have seen us over the past couple of seasons and actually think that.
Some of those had up and down seasons at least. Mount was literally Chelsea's player of the season in a year we became European Champions.Not really. People here watch almost every ManUtd game and still divided on Pogba, Rashford, Martial, McTominay, Fred.
Tuchel created very good system to accommodate mount and havertz in free roles to maximise their potential and energy.That's the only possible explanation for the "he's shit" comments. You can't have seen us over the past couple of seasons and actually think that.
Oh there are divided opinions on Bruno too.Some of those had up and down seasons at least. Mount was literally Chelsea's player of the season in a year we became European Champions.
It's akin to saying "Bruno is shit", not "Fred is shit".
If "he's a championship player" or "he's shit" are being spouted then those people have no idea what they're talking about either.Oh there are divided opinions on Bruno too.
I agree.If "he's a championship player" or "he's shit" are being spouted then those people have no idea what they're talking about either.
Kante is an 8, his lack of quality offensively doesnt change the position he plays.Wouldn't classify Kante as an 8 (he's too limited on the offensive end). Mount on the other hand hasn't displayed the ability to stamp his influence on a midfield the way Kante can in his favorite position.
I've rated Mount from day one but I still think he has room to evolve. Right now he seems like a jack of all trades player
He'll have one moment of quality once in a while and it will talked up as the greatest thing ever and then casually ghost the next 5 games.I think the issue is he’s talked up by pundits, media and sections of fans like he is a David Silva, Iniesta or something. He looks a very good player but I don’t feel like he has that next level in him. He’s consistent in his performances which is a good thing but I can’t say I’ve seen a game where I’ve thought wow he’s something else.
Dont be silly, you wouldnt put Mount anywhere near the team if you had Bruno.Tbf in the big games that would probably work.
The average supporter can't discern an efficient footballer from an average footballer.If "he's a championship player" or "he's shit" are being spouted then those people have no idea what they're talking about either.
Yep and wont win a cup with Bruno let alone cl.Dont be silly, you wouldnt put Mount anywhere near the team if you had Bruno.
Yeah sure Mount is the single biggest reason why Chelsea won CLYep and wont win a cup with Bruno let alone cl.
Tuchel doesn’t really play risk players from the start though. He selects Mount and Havertz because they understand the team structure, movement and their off the ball responsibilities. Individuals like Pulisic and Ziyech are bench options in the main. You could accuse Tuchel of playing very modern data driven and sterile style of football but it’s obviously very effective. Mount is perhaps the embodiment of this style as a player.The average supporter can't discern an efficient footballer from an average footballer.
Everyone recognises flashy play and every team needs the risk players, but when its first and second touches, transitions, simple passing, pressing, positioning and making the right choices when the risky ball isn't on the average viewer doesn't pay attention and Mount is very strong at these things and every team needs players who hold the side together as well as your Bruno-eque players who can risk the ball and be all about end product.
He did play a big part in fairness, great goal against Porto in the quarters, goal against Real in the semi final and an assist for the winning goal in the final. He made the UEFA CL squad of the season.Yeah sure Mount is the single biggest reason why Chelsea won CL
He played big part, it's not like we are talking about Ronaldo or Messi. Tuchel was awesome and one of the biggest reason for their CL win. They replaced players without missing a beat.He did play a big part in fairness, great goal against Porto in the quarters and an assist for the winning goal in the final. He made the UEFA CL squad of the season.
He’s not Ronaldo or Messi. That much is true.He played big part, it's not like we are talking about Ronaldo or Messi. Tuchel was awesome and one of the biggest reason for their CL win. They replaced players without missing a beat.
Well done.Yep and wont win a cup with Bruno let alone cl.
The problem with the post I quoted is, next we will see Zinchenko > Shaw as one player won PL and other didn't.He’s not Ronaldo or Messi. That much is true.
Since this is a Chelsea thread, and we are using CL wins to prove who is a better player than let's just say Blomqvist > Zola and move on.The problem with the post I quoted is, next we will see Zinchenko > Shaw as one player won PL and other didn't.
I don't think many people would chose Mount over Bruno but Tuchel might because of how he wants his team to play. That's only a guess of course but if you really want to control a game then Bruno isn't the kind of player you'd go for. Ziyech is actually very similar to Bruno in how he plays although not as good.The problem with the post I quoted is, next we will see Zinchenko > Shaw as one player won PL and other didn't.
KdB is also risky player but they control every game. We won't control as we have Ole who prefers direct style. Coaches control the games, I mean their style of play.I don't think many people would chose Mount over Bruno but Tuchel might because of how he wants his team to play. That's only a guess of course but if you really want to control a game then Bruno isn't the kind of player you'd go for. Ziyech is actually very similar to Bruno in how he plays although not as good.
Pulisic and Ziyech would be nowhere near our first XI right now.I don't think many people would chose Mount over Bruno but Tuchel might because of how he wants his team to play. That's only a guess of course but if you really want to control a game then Bruno isn't the kind of player you'd go for. Ziyech is actually very similar to Bruno in how he plays although not as good.
Personally I think both Pulisic and Ziyech would fit in our team quite well.
That's true, some players are so productive that all managers would want them.KdB is also risky player but they control every game. We won't control as we have Ole who prefers direct style. Coaches control the games, I mean their style of play.