Woah. I am quite surprised as many as 150 people think he needs more time.
Ole Sack Watch
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Probably half of them are fans of other clubs?
No chance ole going anywhere until we look like champs league qualification is out of reach. The glazers are only bothered when their cash cow is in in danger of losing money and the Ronnie signing bumped up their profits quite nicely for them to sit tight for at least 5 months yet - they’ve just given a 3 year contract for phelan for example - no chance are they paying him and the rest up on their contracts just yet. Strap in guys - it’s going to be a bumpy ride….
United supporters are saintly wet tissues when compared to the demanding matchgoing fans at Real, Bayern and Barca.
The match going fans opinion doesn't matter either for the board. Only thing that matters is results.
If online noise played a significant factor, Ole would have been gone a long time ago. #OleOut has trended on Twitter after pretty much every defeat over the last 3 years and forums like this are renowned for overreactions. If/when Ole gets the chop, it will be due to performances on the pitch.
Liverpool was the end of the road for Mourinho. Full circle?
You would think so. I asked for any of those 11% to put together a rational argument of why they believe Ole needs more time. Needless to say no one replied.
I’m one of them.more than 10% want to continue as is! Wonder who?
I can’t claim to be a loyal Ole backer as I wanted Poch in a year ago but now that ship has sailed and Ole somewhat turned it around last season, I’d rather just hold out until the summer to see how this season actually goes. It would be a different matter if there was a manager available now who I was confident was the right fit for us given the mess over the last 8 years since Fergie.
Oh, and eye rolls right back at you!
See my post above, hope my rationale is acceptable to you.
Correct, so people claiming to be part of the rationale online muppets or blindly loyal matchgoing support might as well stop with all that.
Last edited:
Genuinely hard to predict. I mean, I know it will happen after Bruce is “thanked” for his years of service, but whether he’ll outlast Ranieri is anyone’s guess. But I wouldn’t put it past him to prove us all wrong and finish 2nd in the league again, as well as getting a runner-up place in Europa. So there.
Ah the rationale of seeing how it goes. Good argument for keeping him. Sounds like Ole's coaching and in game management
He won't quit on United.
It is. Ed Woodward makes all the final decisions on transfers and he is an accountant and the de facto Chief Executive of the club. And his remit is quite transparently first and foremost to put cash in the Glazers' pocket. Anyone who thinks otherwise, or that Ole would go against his wishes in any shape or form, is quite simply not paying attention.
Seeing how it goes due to the landscape of the managerial market as I see it, yes. In my experiences I’ve found that sometimes no decision is the best decision in certain situations.
Who would you bring in to replace Ole right now?
Results obviously don't matter beyond not making top 4
Unless you can provide evidence of Ed Woodward making all the final decisions on transfers, then i'm gonna assume that to be a false claim. His remit without question is to work for the Glazers like his predecessor before him. Peter Moore at Liverpool does the same thing towing the FSG line.
And Ole going against the ownership of the club would be pretty silly when he's been backed with significant funds to shape the squad over the last 2 to 3 years.
Go drop some soap on yourself and come back.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Why not? They should be good stewards of the club and looking at successors.
Protect him? Wtf.
Genuinely so frustrating. Anyone watching the games can see he isn’t the right man. Another pointless top 4 battle. We are going absolutely nowhere with a fantastic squad at our disposal.
They don’t care as long as profits are coming in.
I really hope that’s not the case because if we’re not sounding out potential managers at this point when we’re looking utter shite then we’re in even bigger trouble than I thought.
If performances on the pitch played a significant factor, Ole would have been gone a long time ago.
Ed is literally on the record as saying he signs off the money on transfers. So if he doesn't sign them off, they don't happen. I don't see how much clearer it could be. I mean I could sign Jack Grealish for a million pounds a week to do my gardening but unless someone pays him I have a funny feeling it won't come to much.
He won't quit on anyone so long he is getting paid millions.
You're right, swap 'performances' for 'results' and add in "over a sustained period of time".
So you want to waste another season and this array of talent we have? For what? You want the club to be successful or the manager? Or the manager to be succesful no matter what it costs the club?
I would not mind having five new managers in the next decade if it means we win trophies that keep us relevant rather than become a footnote like Milan. We need to be ruthless. Not indulge in pointless nostalgia. Success breeds success and the same goes with mediocrity which is what has happened at our club.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Delete everything before the comma and replace would with should.
Something different will be very difficult now that players have seemingly downed tools.
Next May.
The club issuing a statement regarding Ole's future is a bad sign for him. They're obligated to say they aren't looking for a new manager because it's highly unethical to do so while they currently have one under their employ. They also have to publicly support the manager so as not to affect the player's performances etc. It's all smoke and mirrors. The ESL move was a disaster for the owners' public image, the last thing they want to do is cause further damage to it by handling this situation poorly.
They were equally supportive of LVG and Jose, if you recall, right up the moment they sacked them.
They were equally supportive of LVG and Jose, if you recall, right up the moment they sacked them.
I've seen posts like this in a few threads. Excuse the ignorance but what are you talking about?
Him signing off on deals is normal and is the job of the CEO at most clubs. But there is numerous reports that he only does that after getting the go ahead from Joel Glazer who controls every aspect of the club when it comes to the money side.
So the above is normal at most big clubs and we can also say the board/CEO at Bayern, Liverpool, Real Madrid, City etc also sign off on the money when it comes to transfers.
they would have never hired him
No, I say you're wrong because you insinuated we wouldn't get cut up with a proper defensive midfielder. And as mentioned earlier, you can throw Kante in our side and we'd still get carved open.
Yes we need a better CM but that's not the reason we're losing so many points.
Chelsea did the same with Lampard but were smart enough to pull the trigger when they did. Bayern the same, albeit to a lesser extent with Kovac. We are several years behind them in the boardroom and a few more on the football pitch.
Relax pal, not sure how you've inferred anything you said in this post from what I said. Pretty simple to understand my position - I don't see an obvious available better alternative that I personally think is worth the potential mess of sacking mid-season. As mentioned, I wanted Poch in this time last year as I thought he was a great fit for us and the timing was good but that was then and this is now.
- Status