Ole in? Some surprising stats that reveal another side to Solskjaer's management performance

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
Some surprising stats that show how Ole compares to the almighty Klopp after 162 games...and lo and behold, the Norwegian has a higher win rate.


 

rimaldo

All about the essence
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
40,852
Supports
arsenal
pfft, everyone knows you can’t draw any proper parallels between managers until 186 games
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,007
Very true. But then look at the next 100 games Klopp managed.... that's the impossible to see massive step up in quality.

And that record is Ole splashing the wong, whereas it's most likely Klopp pre keeper and Van D.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
Does not surprise me.

Doesn’t mean he’s better than Klopp by any measure and nobody has claimed that, ever. Just that he’s done a better job than many people give him credit for.

Like I said it doesn’t mean he’s better but I would have liked to have seen Carraghers face if this stat was trotted out last night on MNF.
 

soapythecat

Full Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
3,727
Location
Glasgow resident these days.
The big context missing in this is quality of football. The whole world could see Liverpool were about to go on to great things - there football was improving constantly.
Unfortunately, I don’t think the Ole In crowd actually watch United, so this stat will give them plenty to get excited about.
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,671
Said it in the other thread but Klopp was getting a lot of stick and calls for the sack as well, after signing VVD they transformed. Can we do that with a midfielder? I doubt it but we can try. Note this a rhetorical question assuming the club is keeping Ole and for those wanting Ole to stay.

I bet there's many a manager with a similar record but never went on to do anything of note, people might forget under Klopp they were bouncing around 8th even, it's just the form and stats you have when up and down the top half.

Liverpool sadly spent the Coutinho money wisely, we have spent our own large amounts of money many times over and come up with nothing.
 
Last edited:

TheMitz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
676
Curious as to how much had Klopp spent after 162 games?
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
33,981
Said it in the other thread but Klopp was getting a lot of stick and calls for the sack as well, after signing VVD they transformed. Can we do that with a midfielder? I doubt it but we can try

I bet there's many a manager with a similar record but never went on to do anything of note, people might forget under Klopp they were bouncing around 8th even, it's just the form and stats you have when up and down the top half.
Yeah but the massive obvious difference is Klopp was a manager who won the Bundesliga twice and made a CL final before joining Liverpool. Ole has genuinely only won a few Norwegian titles. Expecting him to suddenly burst into life as a top manager is just not going to happen
 

MyOnlySolskjaer

Creator of Player Performance threads
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Messages
26,900
Location
Player Performance Threads
Said it in the other thread but Klopp was getting a lot of stick and calls for the sack as well, after signing VVD they transformed. Can we do that with a midfielder? I doubt it but we can try

I bet there's many a manager with a similar record but never went on to do anything of note, people might forget under Klopp they were bouncing around 8th even, it's just the form and stats you have when up and down the top half.
To be fair we’ve given enough backing to him, that certainly isn’t the issue. Surely signing both Varane and Maguire should be equivalent. With all the money spent, he chose to buy a winger over a CM.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
Said it in the other thread but Klopp was getting a lot of stick and calls for the sack as well, after signing VVD they transformed. Can we do that with a midfielder? I doubt it but we can try

I bet there's many a manager with a similar record but never went on to do anything of note, people might forget under Klopp they were bouncing around 8th even, it's just the form and stats you have when up and down the top half.

Liverpool sadly spent the Coutinho money wisely, we have spent our own large amounts of money many times over and come up with nothing.
The difference is everyone knew Liverpool's problems in the defense. Meanwhile United's problem seems to change everything just to excuse Ole. First it was CB, then no it's RW, now now it's the midfield.
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,671
The difference is everyone knew Liverpool's problems in the defense. Meanwhile United's problem seems to change everything just to excuse Ole. First it was CB, then no it's RW, now now it's the midfield.
Yeah I know, it's a rhetorical question really.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
Oh higher win rate that must translate into winning more silverware as well then right? ….right?
At this stage I believe Klopp still was close to 100 games away from winning his first trophy for Liverpool? At least 50.
 

andersj

Nick Powell Expert
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
4,298
Location
Copenhagen
Some surprising stats that show how Ole compares to the almighty Klopp after 162 games...and lo and behold, the Norwegian has a higher win rate.


Rodgers, who Klopp took over for, had a win ratio of 50 %. Mourinho had a win ratio of 58,3 %. In my opinion, that context is quite relevant when looking at those numbers.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
21,924
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
The difference is everyone knew Liverpool's problems in the defense. Meanwhile United's problem seems to change everything just to excuse Ole. First it was CB, then no it's RW, now now it's the midfield.
I think it was always the midfield… I’m more than happy with Varane and Sancho but if we’d had to ‘make do’ with Maguire/Lindelof/Bailly and Rashford/Greenwood/Martial BUT got a top def mid (don’t ask who), I’d have taken that for the balance.

In the same way we could see what a player like Bruno could do (though I didn’t think he‘d do this well), most posters could see the benefits of a top DM in screening the defence
 

Bondi77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
7,276
I don't delve heavily into stats but I would imagine he would be on par with Fergie at the same stage of managing Utd.
 

ShinjiNinja26

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
11,129
Location
Location, Location
At this stage I believe Klopp still was close to 100 games away from winning his first trophy for Liverpool? At least 50.
How did they look as a team though? He completely transformed the way they play and you could clearly see they were building towards something. Once they got to the CL final and lost they came straight back the following season and won it as well as pushing City all the way in the league. They then won the league the season after, constantly on an upward trajectory.
 

Flytan

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,754
Location
United States
The xG data shows that Klopp has always been a much better coach than Ole despite league position finishes.
Careful dude these ole in guys just care about ppg or something. Doesn't matter than klopp has spent a fraction of what ole has or has a pedigree of winning.