Mikel Arteta | Lego Pep watch

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,169
Location
Canada
Some people on here saying Arteta is better than Ole and getting laughed at but a sad fact is Arteta already won the FA cup + community shield with Arsenal, a team with a much worse squad than ours. And I believe he won the FA cup within 6 months of getting hired.

Meanwhile here we are 3 years in with the same man and 0 titles.
I like trophies but to win FA cup while finishing 8th is not good enough. I rather finish 2nd than finish 8th and win a domestic cup.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
5,922
I always said that he was the best manager between him, Ole and Lampard and have been proved right I think. It looks like he's finally built a team that he can trust and understands his tactics.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
This is one big lie that has been going on. Where are you getting that from. Arsenal have spent almost same amount of money as United in past 3 seasons. Stop pretending as if Arteta is working on tight budget.
Arteta has spent about 210m, Solksjaer has spent 410m. Until this summer Arteta had been working on a budget, now that he's had money to spend we're seeing the difference.
Don't call me a liar again, or I'll bring up your 150 posts in this thread that highlight your excellent footballing insight.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,273
Supports
Hannover 96
I don't quite understand this mentality in fans to be honest. Football is a results business AND with respect to Arsenal, it's clear that they're in a rebuilding phase with young players. It seems like Arteta's new signings are doing well so far and there seems to be a togetherness in the squad. What criteria would you be using to upgrade him? It would mean re-evaluating your objectives for either short-term gains or just because you think he isn't good enough. He's in a difficult league with very good managers and teams that he needs to compete against. Why not just give the time he needs?
If you are convinced that someone else would be doing a better job and is available for you, than sign him for that. I really don't see what is so difficult about that idea?

Of course this is his squad and he knows what he wants to do with them, so it is unlikely to find someone better for exactly this squad now, but I don't see why it should be considered impossible?
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
If you are convinced that someone else would be doing a better job and is available for you, than sign him for that. I really don't see what is so difficult about that idea?

Of course this is his squad and he knows what he wants to do with them, so it is unlikely to find someone better for exactly this squad now, but I don't see why it should be considered impossible?
Because it's hard to gauge if someone will be an improvement, unless it's a literal Klopp or Guardiola. You only have to look at the troubles United have faced when it's come to picking managers, it's not an easy decision. Which is why when Arteta is doing a good job there's virtually no reason to sack him.

The board kept faith with him when many supporters and general football fans had long turned against him, because they knew how difficult the job was and that it wasn't going to be an immediate fix. They've backed him with money this summer and he's rejuvenated the squad and now plays a young side and it's looking like everything is going well, why would they sack him now?
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,764
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
I always said that he was the best manager between him, Ole and Lampard and have been proved right I think. It looks like he's finally built a team that he can trust and understands his tactics.
Hang on. You might be proved right in a season or two but there's plenty of time for the wheels to come off the wagon and for them to revert back to type which has been in and around 10th since he came in.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,273
Supports
Hannover 96
Because it's hard to gauge if someone will be an improvement, unless it's a literal Klopp or Guardiola. You only have to look at the troubles United have faced when it's come to picking managers, it's not an easy decision. Which is why when Arteta is doing a good job there's virtually no reason to sack him.

The board kept faith with him when many supporters and general football fans had long turned against him, because they knew how difficult the job was and that it wasn't going to be an immediate fix. They've backed him with money this summer and he's rejuvenated the squad and now plays a young side and it's looking like everything is going well, why would they sack him now?
It is extremely unlikely as I said.

But such a move is not unheard of. For example Mainz once fired their manager two days before the first match of the season, after a quite normal preseason, because the DoF thought he had found a better manager for their Bundesliga team. He promoted their U19 manager Thomas Tuchel.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,086
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Sorry, I just had to do this. How you feel about Arteta now? I often don’t do this, but with How Arsenal are currently playing, it is hard not to.
Their goal difference is zero, and West Ham have scored 10 more goals than them. You made me follow this thread and laugh at you at end of the season when Arsenal finish around 8th position.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
It is extremely unlikely as I said.

But such a move is not unheard of. For example Mainz once fired their manager two days before the first match of the season, after a quite normal preseason, because the DoF thought he had found a better manager for their Bundesliga team. He promoted their U19 manager Thomas Tuchel.
I actually read about that, it seemed kind of insane, didn't he just get promoted, or was promoted a season or two prior?

You're right that it's not impossible, but I honestly think at least relating to Arteta as long as he continues as he's doing he'll be safe. That's not to say there's no pressure, after being backed this summer and now in his second full season, it is important that he shows clear progress. I do think the problems at Arsenal were massively overlooked in this thread when he took over, but now is the time he has to deliver. And I think he will.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,169
Location
Canada
Arteta has spent about 210m, Solksjaer has spent 410m. Until this summer Arteta had been working on a budget, now that he's had money to spend we're seeing the difference.
Don't call me a liar again, or I'll bring up your 150 posts in this thread that highlight your excellent footballing insight.
Ok here you go arsenal and United in last 3 transfer windows including this one:

19-20 United £195m Arsenal £135m (including Martinelli)
20-21 United £75m ( including Pellestri and Amad) Arsenal £72m
21-22 United £133m Arsenal £156m

United in last 3 seasons £408m
Arsenal in last 3 seasons £363m

Difference of £45m which also includes £25m United spent on Amad and Pellestri.

Now if you want to just include last 2 seasons as Arteta's first full window was 20-21

Arsenal in last 2 seasons £228m, United in last 2 seasons £208m. So yes your original statement that Arteta has spent little in comparison to Ole was incorrect. Unless you want to count 3 season for one guy and only transfer from 2 for another. Please note this doesn't include loan fees or wages.

So next time check your facts before posting something. And hey feel free to post my 150 posts that you mentioned because I am sure you are incorrect on that as well.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,646
I always said that he was the best manager between him, Ole and Lampard and have been proved right I think. It looks like he's finally built a team that he can trust and understands his tactics.
I think all three are about as average as I'd expect them to have been
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,492
Meh, it's only a matter of time till Arsenal fall apart again and all their fans call for Artetas head.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
Ok here you go arsenal and United in last 3 transfer windows including this one:

19-20 United £195m Arsenal £135m (including Martinelli)
20-21 United £75m ( including Pellestri and Amad) Arsenal £72m
21-22 United £133m Arsenal £156m

United in last 3 seasons £408m
Arsenal in last 3 seasons £363m

Difference of £45m which also includes £25m United spent on Amad and Pellestri.

Now if you want to just include last 2 seasons as Arteta's first full window was 20-21

Arsenal in last 2 seasons £228m, United in last 2 seasons £208m. So yes your original statement that Arteta has spent little in comparison to Ole was incorrect. Unless you want to count 3 season for one guy and only transfer from 2 for another. Please note this doesn't include loan fees or wages.

So next time check your facts before posting something. And hey feel free to post my 150 posts that you mentioned because I am sure you are incorrect on that as well.
Recheck the post you quoted. I said Arteta had less to spend than Solskjaer, you quoted that so surely you read what I said?
When comparing the job they've both done, you're going to compare how much money they've spent.

So instead of telling me to check my facts, maybe you should learn how to fecking read?

Edit: sorry it was 142 message, all as shit as the one you've just made
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,169
Location
Canada
Recheck the post you quoted. I said Arteta had less to spend than Solskjaer, you quoted that so surely you read what I said?
When comparing the job they've both done, you're going to compare how much money they've spent.

So instead of telling me to check my facts, maybe you should learn how to fecking read?

Edit: sorry it was 142 message, all as shit as the one you've just made
But I just proved to you arteta did not spend far less in the last 2 seasons in comparison to Ole. Not sure what you are arguing here. You accuse me of making shit post when you made incorrect statement. Of course Ole joined a year ahead than Arteta but in his time Arteta have spent huge amount of money which in comparison in last 2 seasons is similar or even more than Ole has spent. Hence I said stop pretending Arteta has worked on limited budget.

And considering you seem so confident of accusing me posting shit, have some balls and reply to the post just like I did rather than speaking from your a** which you are doing.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
But I just proved to you arteta did not spend far less in the last 2 seasons in comparison to Ole. Not sure what you are arguing here. You accuse me of making shit post when you made incorrect statement. Of course Ole joined a year ahead than Arteta but in his time Arteta have spent huge amount of money which in comparison in last 2 seasons is similar or even more than Ole has spent. Hence I said stop pretending Arteta has worked on limited budget.

And considering you seem so confident of accusing me posting shit, have some balls and reply to the post just like I did rather than speaking from your a** which you are doing.
Except you didn't prove anything, I've already shown you that Ole has spent double the amount Arteta has, while having a much larger wage bill and inheriting a much better squad. Ole was given over 200m to spend in his first window, Arteta was given 75m. I never said he was working on a limited budget overall, I just said he'd spent far less than Ole, which is factually true. You jumped in and accused me of lying, either because you completely misread my post or you're just full of shit.

I'm not sure what the bolded even means. I did reply to you? And you're allowed to say ass mate
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,169
Location
Canada
Except you didn't prove anything, I've already shown you that Ole has spent double the amount Arteta has, while having a much larger wage bill and inheriting a much better squad. Ole was given over 200m to spend in his first window, Arteta was given 75m. I never said he was working on a limited budget overall, I just said he'd spent far less than Ole, which is factually true. You jumped in and accused me of lying, either because you completely misread my post or you're just full of shit.

I'm not sure what the bolded even means. I did reply to you? And you're allowed to say ass mate
Clearly you don't read what you write and neither do you read what others write. Anyways trying to be as civil as possible, Ole of course would have spent more than Arteta because he joined a year earlier so it is an unfair comparison on transfer front to count 3 seasons amount for one guy and only 2 seasons. So a natural way to judge is how much each have spent since Arteta's first full window, which is why I gave you last 2 season's amount. Now if you want to count 3 seasons then comparison should be amount spent by Arsenal in last 3 seasons and amount spent by United in last 3 seasons since Ole's first full window, which also I showed you, a mere difference of 45m. That's how you make fair judgement. It's like me saying Ole has spent far less than Pep, yes he has but in the same time since joining Ole has actually spent good amount on players. If you are taking that as a stand alone statement then yesthat is correct factually but if you use that statement to say Arteta should get more leeway because he spent far less than Ole then that is an incorrect statement as both Ole and Arteta have spent huge amount of money and should be judged on that. Arteta last season was a failure and no way finishing 8th can be justified.

And stop accusing people of making 142 shit posts if you cannot back them. If you really want to challenge anyone's opinion then reply to that post rather than making stupid statement that you made 142 shit posts. Hence I said, have some balls and reply to the post that you feel I made a shit post or else just shut up. That's how grown up people act.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
Clearly you don't read what you write and neither do you read what others write. Anyways trying to be as civil as possible, Ole of course would have spent more than Arteta because he joined a year earlier so it is an unfair comparison on transfer front to count 3 seasons amount for one guy and only 2 seasons. So a natural way to judge is how much each have spent since Arteta's first full window, which is why I gave you last 2 season's amount. Now if you want to count 3 seasons then comparison should be amount spent by Arsenal in last 3 seasons and amount spent by United in last 3 seasons since Ole's first full window, which also I showed you, a mere difference of 45m. That's how you make fair judgement. It's like me saying Ole has spent far less than Pep, yes he has but in the same time since joining Ole has actually spent good amount on players. If you are taking that as a stand alone statement then yesthat is correct factually but if you use that statement to say Arteta should get more leeway because he spent far less than Ole then that is an incorrect statement as both Ole and Arteta have spent huge amount of money and should be judged on that. Arteta last season was a failure and no way finishing 8th can be justified.

This is a waste of both our time. I've already explained it to you. My statement was that Arteta had spent less than Solskjaer, a factual comment. Don't talk about civil, you quoted me out of nowhere calling me a liar when it's an objectively true statement.

And stop accusing people of making 142 shit posts if you cannot back them. If you really want to challenge anyone's opinion then reply to that post rather than making stupid statement that you made 142 shit posts. Hence I said, have some balls and reply to the post that you feel I made a shit post or else just shut up. That's how grown up people act.
You talk so much drivel. Next time before you call someone a liar, make sure you actually read what they've said. If you want anything else just pm me, If I'm going to be subjected to this crap at least we can keep it out of this thread.
 

ESR10

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 8, 2021
Messages
91
Supports
Arsenal
Hi, just to stop this nonsense and the comparaisons between Ole and Arteta.

Arsenal plays every week. United every 3 days.

Makes such a difference. Arsenal fan here and I think we should see more quality from Arsenal than what we see for the moment with all the time they have on the training ground. Physically also it’s alarming to see that Lacazette can only play 60 minutes or so… every week. Imagine with mid-week football… he would last 30 minutes per matches?!

It’s a young squad but they surely need to learn thick and fast. It s not only finishing in top 4 the goal this year, it’s being able to sustained the challenge of playing every three days the season after.

So sorry but you cannot compare Arsenal this year to any other team involved with european football.
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,136
Supports
Arsenal
Arsenal is not competing with Man Utd at the moment. We are just trying to be back to top 6 when Man Utd's goal is to fight for title every season with their resource. Arsenal indeed spent large amount of money (in arsenal standard only) to rebuild the squad the past summer, but wage budget is more important for the competitiveness of a club. It is unrealistic to expect a manager to do miracle every season to punch above the weight of the club. Arsenal and Man Utd are not even shopping in the same pool and also same quality of player in transfer window.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,169
Location
Canada
This is a waste of both our time. I've already explained it to you. My statement was that Arteta had spent less than Solskjaer, a factual comment. Don't talk about civil, you quoted me out of nowhere calling me a liar when it's an objectively true statement.



You talk so much drivel. Next time before you call someone a liar, make sure you actually read what they've said. If you want anything else just pm me, If I'm going to be subjected to this crap at least we can keep it out of this thread.
I have better things to do in my life than pm'ing you. I can't teach you to read and write. Anyways I have wasted enough time chatting about Arteta with a swansea fan. Good luck to you.
 

GoonerBear

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Messages
3,054
Supports
Arsenal
Still plenty time for views to flip flop, I reckon views will change again in the next 3 weeks.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,384
This is a waste of both our time. I've already explained it to you. My statement was that Arteta had spent less than Solskjaer, a factual comment. Don't talk about civil, you quoted me out of nowhere calling me a liar when it's an objectively true statement.
To be fair, you said far less to spend
How is far less defined? What is the x amount that makes it far less?
Unless you are talking solely about the first window after taking over?

The taking over a worse squad statement is subject to be argued too as the year ole took over they finished behind arsenal and United had only finished above arsenal once since Fergie retired upto that point. Im sure arsenal also reached the Europa final the year before. And ole in his two full seasons hasn't fibished behind arsenal (even if he is now for the first time)

anyway as most have said, arteta and arsenal have had Dawn's like this before. Let's see by Christmas where they are
 

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
Some people on here saying Arteta is better than Ole and getting laughed at but a sad fact is Arteta already won the FA cup + community shield with Arsenal, a team with a much worse squad than ours. And I believe he won the FA cup within 6 months of getting hired.

Meanwhile here we are 3 years in with the same man and 0 titles.
And Arteta is younger than Zlatan about the age of Ronaldo.

Sokjaer is almost Klopps age.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
To be fair, you said far less to spend
How is far less defined? What is the x amount that makes it far less?
Unless you are talking solely about the first window after taking over?

The taking over a worse squad statement is subject to be argued too as the year ole took over they finished behind arsenal and United had only finished above arsenal once since Fergie retired upto that point. Im sure arsenal also reached the Europa final the year before. And ole in his two full seasons hasn't fibished behind arsenal (even if he is now for the first time)

anyway as most have said, arteta and arsenal have had Dawn's like this before. Let's see by Christmas where they are
As in one has spent 200m, and one has spent 400m. When taking into consideration the jobs both have done, you have to look at the amount of money they've been given to shape the squad to their liking. That's not even taking things like wages into consideration.

It could be argued but they'd be wrong, when comparing the two squads that both inherited no one on here would have gone with the Arsenal squad. They finished 6th because Mourinho had his usual meltdown, they had just finished second the season before, and the season before that had actually won the Europa. I'm not saying the United squad didn't have issues, but it was superior to the Arsenal squad.

I haven't just started arguing his case, I argued when he took over that people were vastly underestimating the difficulty of the job he had, and I argued a year into his tenure that people were righting him off far too quickly, all in this very thread. So it's not about false dawns, it's about seeing the progress he's made with rejuvenating the squad, especially with young players after being given money this summer, moving a lot of players on and settling on a consistent 11.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,408
He’s still a shite manager. Just because we’re crap doesn’t suddenly take away from the fact that he’s also a steaming bag of shite
 

Klopper76

"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
19,835
Location
Victoria, BC
Supports
Liverpool
I keep seeing it mentioned that they're unbeaten for a while now so I looked at their results and who they've played. Their unbeaten run has come against:

Norwich 1-0
Burnley 1-0
Wimbledon 3-0
Spurs 3-1
Brighton 0-0
Palace 2-2
Villa 3-1
Leeds 2-0
Leicester 2-0
Watford 1-0

You can only beat what's in front of you but that's not a bad set of fixtures. They play us next at Anfield so maybe that'll be a better indicator in terms of how they're actually doing.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,408
I keep seeing it mentioned that they're unbeaten for a while now so I looked at their results and who they've played. Their unbeaten run has come against:

Norwich 1-0
Burnley 1-0
Wimbledon 3-0
Spurs 3-1
Brighton 0-0
Palace 2-2
Villa 3-1
Leeds 2-0
Leicester 2-0
Watford 1-0

You can only beat what's in front of you but that's not a bad set of fixtures. They play us next at Anfield so maybe that'll be a better indicator in terms of how they're actually doing.
You’ll drill them till their ears bleed
 

TJ Reid

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
274
Supports
Arsenal
I like trophies but to win FA cup while finishing 8th is not good enough. I rather finish 2nd than finish 8th and win a domestic cup.
I’m not sure you speak for the fans - wouldn’t you enjoy a day out at Wembley with some silverware to show for it?
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
I bet we trounce arsenal 8nil and ole would have gotten another manager sacked :lol:.
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
I’m not sure you speak for the fans - wouldn’t you enjoy a day out at Wembley with some silverware to show for it?
If its a question of finishing 4th with a fa cup or even a league cup compared to finishing 2nd without silverware then i would prefer the former. However, finishing 8th would be a sackable offense unless somehow we won the europa league or champions league also.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,169
Location
Canada
I’m not sure you speak for the fans - wouldn’t you enjoy a day out at Wembley with some silverware to show for it?
Of course I can speak for myself and not on behalf of other fans. I would definitely enjoy a day out seeing my club win a trophy but if you are giving me an option of winning a domestic cup and finishing 8th or finishing 2nd with no trophy, I would choose the latter every single day. I don't think there's anything controversial with that.