Jesse Lingard 'to leave on a free'

AFC NimbleThumb

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,280
Openly hoping for your own team to lose is well… not supporting the team now is it.
Who’s openly hoping we lose in regards to this Lingard scenario though. This Lingard situation isn’t a stick to beat OgS with, it’s another example of how badly he’s managed the squads he’s had.

You’re right openly hoping for the team to lose, isn’t supporting the team. Not sure what relevance that has the yet another example of OgS being bad at his job though.

‘So called United fans’ will always get a feck off from me.
 

Gazautd18

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
3,402
Location
SL1
Just to sum up the absolute state of this club this is the timeline of Lingard:

  1. Plays so badly for United Ole shouts at him from the sidelines (Yes he was actually angry enough to get out of the dugout - assume candycrush app crashed on his ipad)
  2. We loan him to West ham after it's made clear he's not in our plans with the idea of selling him on
  3. He does really well - his stock is at an all time high and it's the perfect time to sell. The loan has worked out perfectly
  4. Ole decides he's done so well that he now wants to keep him
  5. Ole promises Jesse first team football to dissuade him wanting to leave
  6. Ole starts Daniel James a transfer listed winger ahead of Jesse
  7. Ole doesn't give Jesse first team minutes as promised (weeps in VDB)
  8. Club offer Lingard new contract (supposedly on lower terms) after breaking promise of first team football
  9. Offer rightly rejected and Lingard now leaves on a free.
Jesus fecking wept.
Mate.
You forgot the part about us giving him a £100 grand per week contract for 4 years for him to make about 50 odd appearances...
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
13,615
He certainly won't be going on a free in January.
That's the absolute certainty here.
Perhaps, as he’s under contract through the end of the season. But Ole isn’t playing him and he is costing the club 100+k/week, so other than the fact that West Ham is a direct competitor for fourth place, which may in the end be the only reason we don’t let Jesse go in January, there’s no reason to hold onto a player we have no use for.
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Perhaps, as he’s under contract through the end of the season. But Ole isn’t playing him and he is costing the club 100+k/week, so other than the fact that West Ham is a direct competitor for fourth place, which may in the end be the only reason we don’t let Jesse go in January, there’s no reason to hold onto a player we have no use for.
I don't think West Ham are gonna keep this tempo up, but I certainly am not willing to risk it given our manager and own form. If any other club wants him, ship him out.

Why is this club so mismanaged? I mean he should have been sold years ago, no questions asked. Instead we're now letting two players leave next summer for free.
 

Matriac

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
1,478
Perhaps, as he’s under contract through the end of the season. But Ole isn’t playing him and he is costing the club 100+k/week, so other than the fact that West Ham is a direct competitor for fourth place, which may in the end be the only reason we don’t let Jesse go in January, there’s no reason to hold onto a player we have no use for.
Jesse didn't want to go to West Ham in the summer, and is unlikely to want to go there now.

He'll hold out for getting a deal at a bigger club. Free agents often get taken a punt on, especially in a recovering market.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Mad how we mishandled this situation. We could have sold him for 20-30 million in the summer.
 

jimmyb2000

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
772
Location
A
I'd happily pay Lingard to go.....one of the many bluffers that the club has inflicted on itself over the last 10 years since the accounts department has had a say on outgoing transfers. He's a very very very very poor man's Nani
 

Banana Republic

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 16, 2018
Messages
1,272
Jesse will be 29 yrs old in just over 3 weeks time.
If he can get a 3 or 4 year contract elsewhere, it’ll be the best deal he’s likely to ever get from now on.
After that he’ll be seeing out his career at some point.
If he wants game time, he needs to go……..ASAP.
 

Daengophile

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
504
Personally, having watched Lingard's playing time this season, I'm not entirely sure why he hasn't had a lot more game time
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,514
I don't mind Lingard not getting chances, he is a decent player and not better than the first choice options we have. Problem is letting him go for free when we could have made decent money in the summer.

He had brilliant 6 months at West ham, had plenty of clubs interested in him. Ole wanted to keep him which was confirmed by Ole, Moyes and player himself and then Ole didn't even play him. Not sure what exactly is the point. IMO that's a selfish move from Ole, just to have one extra player who is so low in the pecking order.
 

dannyrhinos89

OMG socks and sandals lol!
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
14,384
Who can blame him for leaving this sinking ship, West Ham are currently a much better club and much more attractive prospect for players Which says it all.

good luck to him.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,514
Who can blame him for leaving this sinking ship, West Ham are currently a much better club and much more attractive prospect for players Which says it all.

good luck to him.
Yeah that's nonsense.
 

AbusementPark

Operates the Unfairest Wheel
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
2,595
Location
Belfast
Never matured to be good enough to play reguarly.
More suited for Villa or Newcastle, theres a reason why we didnt try and sign him to a deal long before now. Would have preferred a fee for him but at least itll be a wage off the bill and a space added for someone with some quality.
 

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,755
To be fair, the reason for this is because of the 'quality' of other players we have in his position, his previous rep here has overshadowed his recent form. Although I'd prefer to see the inform players rewarded and put on the team sheet over our so called superstars... t'was never going to happen lets be honest. This outcome is fairly inevitable, I don't think its worth trying to point blame for it anywhere.

Sure we could have made more effort to sell him in the summer, but what's £20mil nowadays? worth that just to have a good player on the bench.
What's the point of 20 Mill players on the bench with a manager scared to use them?
 

united for life

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
2,226
That is all Ole’s fault. Keeping him made lots of sense to me as we need squad depth and I felt lingard’s versatility would provide that cover for bruno and the wingers especially after his performance at west ham. Why isn’t ole playing him is beyond any explanation. Why keep him if he wasn’t in his plans? We could have gotten some decent 20-25M from him. Now; a good player is going for free.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
He should have left this summer.

He was doing great at West Ham, 30m would have been fair and he'd be having a great time in a very good side.

Instead, Ole convinced him he 'had a part to play' :lol:

Ole is proving he just doesn't have the cut throat nature required to squad build effectively. I get he wanted a bigger squad due to covid/injuries but it just doesn't really work like that. We've got so many attacking players, so many good youngsters waiting to push through also.

I understand why Jesse wanted to give it 1 last chance, but realistically he was never going to be get ahead of Fernandes. I hope West Ham will give him another chance.
 

OL29

Full Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
3,601
Location
Manchester
Yes bad man management from Ole and everything but is it okay that he put a photo with another club T shirt whilst he still here?

Could happen under any other manager?

I’m surprised there’s not been much of a reaction to him doing that, he’s got every right to feel hard done by but posting that picture on his Instagram is pretty disrespectful. I remember Pogba being heavily criticised for wearing a Juventus shirt once, but you tend to get more leeway if you’re British from the media and fans.
 

Desert Eagle

Punjabi Dude
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
16,778

I’m surprised there’s not been much of a reaction to him doing that, he’s got every right to feel hard done by but posting that picture on his Instagram is pretty disrespectful. I remember Pogba being heavily criticised for wearing a Juventus shirt once, but you tend to get more leeway if you’re British from the media and fans.
He resposted something off the west ham account. It's not great optics but hey we're in the Ole era. Anything goes.
 

tenpoless

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,176
Location
Fabinho's forehead
The more shocking part, if the reports are true is that Ole decided Lingard was going to be a part of the team early in the transfer window knowing well that he had Donny, Mata, Amad and was about to sign Sancho.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,055
Location
Voted the best city in the world
On a side note, I desperately wanted him sold to reinvest the money into a DM but I think we had difficulty shifting him for any “fee” due to his high wages. I’m not sure what midtable clubs pay their top earners but Lingard is on around £100k per week with us, right? Lingard would have needed to take a pay cut. Going for a free makes more sense if he wants to maintain that wages with a signing on fee etc.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,581
Location
Dublin
I dont know why this is such a big deal- he isnt an elite player so the team are hardly missing out on anything if he goes.

Regarding the money - the dividends the Glazers take from the club are more of an issue than any fee they may have got for him.

I do agree its a piss poor business decision, but it doesnt really matter to the team does it. The money wouldn't have been spent on a player
 

Bowden

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
21
This thread just feels like people want to believe whatever they can to attack Ole. Not even saying this to defend him, but there are conflicting reports and the vast majority seem happy to believe the one that reinforces their view.

I have no idea what's going on, but I think it's best for Jesse to leave if he wants consistent first-team football, something I don't think he was ever going to get this season. Considering Jessie is clearly someone who is 'online' a fair bit and definitely seems to look up what people say about him, the fact he posted that picture on the day multiple reports came out about how he is going to leave seems pretty unprofessional and overall disappointing.

Ultimately if he acts like that I don't want him in the team, even if he has every right to be angry at Ole. Just finding the number of leaks and reports coming out of the club in regard to players really frustrating. Ultimately Ole (or whoever) is responsible for the team overall, but players could also learn to just shut up and get on with their own job.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,013
The more shocking part, if the reports are true is that Ole decided Lingard was going to be a part of the team early in the transfer window knowing well that he had Donny, Mata, Amad and was about to sign Sancho.
And with him starting James against Wolves after signing Ronaldo, I don't think he wanted to sell him either.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
This is just the way football has gone now - if you put a footballer on an X years contract, expect them to fulfill that contract and then leave on a free.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,353
Location
France
I dont know why this is such a big deal- he isnt an elite player so the team are hardly missing out on anything if he goes.

Regarding the money - the dividends the Glazers take from the club are more of an issue than any fee they may have got for him.

I do agree its a piss poor business decision, but it doesnt really matter to the team does it. The money wouldn't have been spent on a player
The dividends going to all shareholders as been at 23.3m at the max and was at 10.7m last year. And beyond that dividends are a normal part of any company that has shareholders, losing valuable assets for nothing isn't normal and is quite obviously a larger issue since the former isn't one.
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,520
No Loans for Lingard or Pogba, Have their belongings removed from the first team changing rooms and make them train alone for the rest of the season. 2 weeks wages fine for any training sessions they miss. I would have implemented this during the summer.
This is one of Oles biggest failures as manager. The guy's just too soft.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,353
Location
France
No Loans for Lingard or Pogba, Have their belongings removed from the first team changing rooms and make them train alone for the rest of the season. 2 weeks wages fine for any training sessions they miss. I would have implemented this during the summer.
This is one of Oles biggest failures as manager. The guy's just too soft.
For respecting their contracts? You do realize that you can't sanction people for no reason and that you open yourself to litigation, on top of an extremely poor reputation within the industry?
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,673
Location
W.Yorks
Jesse didn't want to go to West Ham in the summer, and is unlikely to want to go there now.

He'll hold out for getting a deal at a bigger club. Free agents often get taken a punt on, especially in a recovering market.
How much of that though was on Ole saying he wanted him at part of the squad /he'll be getting games with us?

I think if we made it clear he won't be playing any football with us this season, then he probably would have left.
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,520
For respecting their contracts? You do realize that you can't sanction people for no reason and that you open yourself to litigation, on top of an extremely poor reputation within the industry?
Your way too soft. These players are respecting nothing but their own bank accounts. There's ways around everything, remove them from the clubs Premier league and Champions league squad registration in January. The clubs manager can deem them not in his first team plans. Also they're not young players and not committed to the club so they can't be sent to the U23's to demoralize the youngsters. Therefore the best solution would be to have them train alone.
This used to be done all the time in the good old days when everybody weren't such delicate flowers.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,353
Location
France
Your way too soft. These players are respecting nothing but their own bank accounts. There's ways around everything, remove them from the clubs Premier league and Champions league squad registration in January. The clubs manager can deem them not in his first team plans. Also they're not young players and not committed to the club so they can't be sent to the U23's to demoralize the youngsters. Therefore the best solution would be to have them train alone.
This used to be done all the time in the good old days when everybody weren't such delicate flowers.
Do you realize how daft your suggestion is? You are trying to take a moral high ground in case where the players are respecting the terms of their contract while you suggest that the club should actively punish them because you are not going to get money out of them, you are only suggesting that for money reason, for the bank accounts of the club. It's completely immoral and also illegal in many cases, it's also not something that used to be done all the time either.
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,520
Do you realize how daft your suggestion is? You are trying to take a moral high ground in case where the players are respecting the terms of their contract while you suggest that the club should actively punish them because you are not going to get money out of them, you are only suggesting that for money reason, for the bank accounts of the club. It's completely immoral and also illegal in many cases, it's also not something that used to be done all the time either.
Is that you Mino??
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,622
Who cares. It's not like you'll miss him.
I think it’s more to do with the fact we should have sold him in the summer. It was clear to everyone he wasn’t going to get minutes. Even £10-15m would have been more than enough. Why keep players for the sake of it?
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,353
Location
France
Is that you Mino??
Is that the best you have to answer? Surely you know that sanctioning someone that isn't in breach of a contract, someone that is fulfilling the terms of a contract that you both agreed upon shouldn't lead to punishments?
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,520
Is that the best you have to answer? Surely you know that sanctioning someone that isn't in breach of a contract, someone that is fulfilling the terms of a contract that you both agreed upon shouldn't lead to punishments?
They'd be getting removed from Premier League and Champions League squad registration due to a lack of long term commitment to the club and due to noisy agents unsettling the first team squad. Not for breach of contract. The agent is employed by the player, he can only act on his bosses instruction. A Premier league club can only name a 25 man squad. Players with no commitment to the club should be behind the players who are committed.
Litigate that.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester

I’m surprised there’s not been much of a reaction to him doing that, he’s got every right to feel hard done by but posting that picture on his Instagram is pretty disrespectful. I remember Pogba being heavily criticised for wearing a Juventus shirt once, but you tend to get more leeway if you’re British from the media and fans.
Well, that's certainly an effective way of earning yourself a transfer at the next available opportunity - if not the most respectful.


Is that the best you have to answer? Surely you know that sanctioning someone that isn't in breach of a contract, someone that is fulfilling the terms of a contract that you both agreed upon shouldn't lead to punishments?

Yeah, you can't punish him for this as he's not breached any rules as far as I can tell. I'd be shocked if we ever saw Jesse play for United again after this though.
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,520
Well, that's certainly an effective way of earning yourself a transfer at the next available opportunity - if not the most respectful.





Yeah, you can't punish him for this as he's not breached any rules as far as I can tell. I'd be shocked if we ever saw Jesse play for United again after this though.
It wouldn't be punishment for breaching contract. It would simply be a removal from the Premier League and Champions League squad registration due to no longer being in the managers tactical plans and removed from the first team altogether due to his social media post seriously unsettling the first team squad. ;);)
 

Gavinb33

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,642
Location
Watching the TV or is it watching me
If you think Ole saying in the press Jesse has a part to play before the season was anything other than talking the player up akin to what he did with Sanchez before he went to Inter permanently I don't know what to tell you.

I'd be surprised if Ole has that much a say in transfers out I'd say Jesse, Bailly, Jones and others he'd be open for them to leave but the club want to protect value in the market for some reason I'd guess balance sheets for investor calls won't look good writing off millions in assets.