Neither him being abused as a child or him being an adult abuser are ok, nor did either justify him getting killed by "Kyle". His demise was strictly because he ran after a guy with a loaded weapon.I suppose that makes molesting preteen kids okay
Clearly
Is Kyle Rittenhouse piloting them? I guess you could have said "NPCs" instead, but the mask would have come off a bit too much.
What’s an ‘NPC?’
God, this is enviable.
An adult man anally raped 9 year old children and that is your response?
This thread has really been an eye-opener about certain posters politics
In my mind @Drainy is Kyle Rittenhouse
Well, the people he killed weren't "victims" apparently
It always is with this lot
The black lives matter movement is about the disregard of the social contract when applied to people of colour. If they're breaking the social contract, why shouldn't the people on the other side of the argument.
fecking hell, do you want a white supremacy badge?!
How the feck did work that one out? I'm guessing you're white, so it's just normal for you, you don't see how you're privileged
The white privilege is that he got to trial, whereas a POC wouldn't have lasted the night.
WTF so funny? The quality of posting in the current has gone down the toilet.
You may not appreciate that many abusers were themselves abused, it doesn't make it alright in any way but it has an origin in a previous abuser. Children learn that it can be the only way to gain affection and carry that belief into adulthood. I just prefer not to try to de-humanise these people, not that it has any bearing on his death but his history was being brought up so I explained that there was more to the history.
Thank you, I so enjoy it when a poster is reduced to being abusive, particularly in this instance, you.
90% of abusers were abused. Simple fact is that when you mess up a kid when he's young, you feck him up for life
Different studies produce differing percentages.
I'm a survivor, the amount of survivors I've met really opens your eyes
Okay, feel free to defend the paedophile rapist. You might say you're adding context but we know what you're really doing.
I mean... they were tears of happiness. Not tears of sadness. Of course he was going end up smiling after getting a few minutes to calm down.
I was a foster kid in a house where my best friend was being abused.
You've got it bad.
That you are a survivor, what the hell did you think I meant?
I'm not sure. It just seemed odd phrasing. No worries though, I know you're a good guyThat you are a survivor, what the hell did you think I meant?
I was trying to keep it brief since we seem to be going a bit off topic.
Mate, you know nothing about CSA
The faint hearted don't have the compassion to understand the broken.
That you are a survivor, what the hell did you think I meant?
I consider anyone defending or giving excuses for child rapists as scum.
Headline: Former New York Times reporter Nellie Bowles says editors sat on her damning Kenosha coverage until after the 2020 election
Who is doing that ?
What a webpage that is.
"He'd been abused as a child" @oates
That would speak to him being a broken adult. What is wrong with that ?
Oates included “doesn't make it alright in any way”?
He also said “Neither him being abused as a child or him being an adult abuser are ok”
Sure, if you ignore what’s actually in the replies to you.I'm getting piled on for calling out people who are giving 'context' and excuses for paedophiles.
Your reply was that he was giving "merely adding context"...for what might that be? I literally quoted the word you used
