SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Traub

Full Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
10,236

So this news has triggered predictably frantic virtue signalling on Twitter about racist policies intended to ‘punish’ South Africa. Is there anything to that?

Is it not likely that there was also some delay in South Africa picking up the extent of the rise of this new variant? i.e. South Africa has always been the epicentre and it started to spread to other countries before the variant was identified and notified to the rest of the world.

Not a criticism of South Africa for the great work in identifying this variant, obviously. I doubt they could have done what they did any quicker.

I guess it’s possible that Omicron is behind the recent massive surge in Europe but that seems very unlikely. It would have surely been picked up much sooner.
Not sure where it originated, but the South African cases are probably due to the founders effect - we were close to zero cases until this most recent outbreak.

So it's definitely possible that Omicron simply didn't have to compete with Delta at all, giving it a free run to take over in SA and hence be all of the cases. In Europe though, Delta has a firm grip. I think genome sequencing in Europe is done on c1% of cases, so it's very possible Omicron was effectively a variant of interest in Europe before the SA outbreak, but the SA outbreak has become the epicentre as it can infect everyone here.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,780
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Not sure where it originated, but the South African cases are probably due to the founders effect - we were close to zero cases until this most recent outbreak.

So it's definitely possible that Omicron simply didn't have to compete with Delta at all, giving it a free run to take over in SA and hence be all of the cases. In Europe though, Delta has a firm grip. I think genome sequencing in Europe is done on c1% of cases, so it's very possible Omicron was effectively a variant of interest in Europe before the SA outbreak, but the SA outbreak has become the epicentre as it can infect everyone here.
That’s definitely possible. And, if so, means either one or both of the following are true.

a) Omicron is less transmissible than Delta
b) It evades immunity from prior infection very well but vaccination less well

All pure speculation of course!
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,780
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
By 1920 everybody had either developed immunity or died. Just like Covid will probably always be around in some form but the German chap was right, everybody will either be dead or immune to it.
Definitely. Although there’s an important different between the viruses in that influenza is much less genetically stable (antigenic drift) which makes it harder to vaccinate against but quicker to mutate to less virulent forms.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848

So this news has triggered predictably frantic virtue signalling on Twitter about racist policies intended to ‘punish’ South Africa. Is there anything to that?

Is it not likely that there was also some delay in South Africa picking up the extent of the rise of this new variant? i.e. South Africa has always been the epicentre and it started to spread to other countries before the variant was identified and notified to the rest of the world.

Not a criticism of South Africa for the great work in identifying this variant, obviously. I doubt they could have done what they did any quicker.

I guess it’s possible that Omicron is behind the recent massive surge in Europe but that seems very unlikely. It would have surely been picked up much sooner.
The Kent variant was only identified as a problematic variant in December even though the first test case was captured in September, and the UK only looked at this variant beause of some interesting findings about a similar but different variant in South Africa in November. These things just sit in databases picking up dust until there's a particular real-world trigger that causes them to zoom in on it, we can track thousands of them but we can't thoroughly analyse thousands of them. It's not the kind of thing that jumps out in the data, despite all the talk about it being 50% more transmissible than the last. It was just a coincidental email that made them look.

Soon, his lab was analyzing swabs, shipped on ice by courier overnight. On Dec. 1, he emailed a British scientist, Andrew Rambaut, and asked him to review some of his early findings: a series of strange mutations on the virus’s outer surface.

Dr. de Oliveira, a Brazilian-South African scientist who sports long hair and a surfer vibe, shared his findings at a Dec. 4 meeting of the World Health Organization working group. All took notice because of the variants’ potential to disrupt the vaccine’s effectiveness.

Days later, Dr. de Oliveira recalled, Dr. Rambaut emailed him with a discovery of his own: British scientists had scoured their databases and found a similar but unrelated mutation that appeared linked to a cluster of infections in the county of Kent.

Coming two weeks before Christmas, Dr. de Oliveira immediately thought of the Lunar New Year early in the pandemic, when millions of people in China traveled far and wide for the holiday, some carrying the virus.

“It was crystal clear,” Dr. de Oliveira said in an interview. “These variants will spread nationally, regionally and globally.”

Dr. Rambaut and colleagues released a paper on the variant discovered in Britain on Dec. 19 — the same day that British officials announced new measures. The variant had apparently been circulating undetected as early as September. Dr. Rambaut has since credited the South Africa team with the tip that led to the discovery of the variant surging in Britain.
It doesn't make any sense to descibe South Africa as the country of origin for this variant, IMO. It's just the country of identification. For most big variants we never identify patient zero, and we continually discover it being identified in a completely different region at a much earlier point in the timeline. There's far too many gaps in international sequencing capabilities and far too much lag in genomic sequencing identification to have even a fuzzy picture of how it originated.

I don't think the policies are based on the assumption that South Africa was where it was originated, they're based on the assumption that it's much more prevalent and a much higher risk than in their own countries. That's a perfectly reasonable assumption based on the evidence available at the time. But the WHO have repeatedly said that closing borders is not a particularly effective method at preventing exposure because inevitably it's already in your country before you knew it. That's proven true every time. It's just a political decision.
 
Last edited:

Shakesy

WW Head of Recruiting
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
9,978
Location
Directly under the sun... NOW!
Random personal fact. Spanish flu orphaned my grandmother when she was living in South Africa (her dad was blown up a year earlier, working on the railways) and she had to take a 6 month boat trip all on her own to live with a grand-aunt in Ireland. Aged 11.
That's an incredible coincidence. My grandmother was 2-years-old when she was also orphaned by Spanish Flu.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,596

So this news has triggered predictably frantic virtue signalling on Twitter about racist policies intended to ‘punish’ South Africa. Is there anything to that?

Is it not likely that there was also some delay in South Africa picking up the extent of the rise of this new variant? i.e. South Africa has always been the epicentre and it started to spread to other countries before the variant was identified and notified to the rest of the world.

Not a criticism of South Africa for the great work in identifying this variant, obviously. I doubt they could have done what they did any quicker.

I guess it’s possible that Omicron is behind the recent massive surge in Europe but that seems very unlikely. It would have surely been picked up much sooner.
It isn't possible. Even if it wasn't picked up in time and the chance of that is probably less than 1 in a million, they would be finding hundreds of thousands cases now looking back, not dozens. And well over 50% of all cases would have to be omicron. It is totally impossible.
 
Last edited:

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,069
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,848
Location
Dublin, Ireland

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,780
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
That’s staggering
Wouldn’t worry too much. Same thing happened with delta. You probably remember the headlines about delta making kids much sicker than previous variants. A new variant scares the shit out of everyone and the paediatricians err on the side of caution, admitting not very sick kids for observation.
 

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
Early indications suggest most Omicron coronavirus cases are mild, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has said.

An official, speaking on behalf of the organisation, said there is no evidence to suggest the efficacy of vaccines has been reduced by the new strain - but did say some mutations of the virus indicate an increased risk of quicker transmission.


They added more than 40 different mutations have been identified with the Omicron variant.
 

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
Breaking new on Sky

Early indications suggest most Omicron coronavirus cases are mild, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has said.

An official, speaking on behalf of the organisation, said there is no evidence to suggest the efficacy of vaccines has been reduced by the new strain- but did say some mutations of the virus indicate an increased risk of quicker transmission.


They added more than 40 different mutations have been identified with the Omicron variant.
 

FriedClams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
3,688
Breaking new on Sky

Early indications suggest most Omicron coronavirus cases are mild, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has said.

An official, speaking on behalf of the organisation, said there is no evidence to suggest the efficacy of vaccines has been reduced by the new strain- but did say some mutations of the virus indicate an increased risk of quicker transmission.


They added more than 40 different mutations have been identified with the Omicron variant.
Sounds like a series where Walt JR follows in his daddies footsteps.
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,718
More a question or a theory.

There have been suggestions that these huge mutated versions are created from immunocompromised people (HIV etc) now if the virus is staying in their system for a lot longer then a "healthy" person but it's not killing them does this make it more likely it will become a mild variant with less severe disease.

Makes sense from a logical view to me but was interested if there is actually any science to that or just pure luck.
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
Early indications suggest most Omicron coronavirus cases are mild, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has said.

An official, speaking on behalf of the organisation, said there is no evidence to suggest the efficacy of vaccines has been reduced by the new strain - but did say some mutations of the virus indicate an increased risk of quicker transmission.


They added more than 40 different mutations have been identified with the Omicron variant.
This could turn out to be the end of the pandemic with covid 19 becoming like other coronaviruses with increased transmissibility minus the serious disease i.e. like the common cold/flu. We shall see
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,285
As if on cue:

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has said she thinks it's time for EU member states to consider mandatory vaccinations.

She said such measures were required due to the emergence of the Omicron variant.

"On the one hand we have the virus and the variants, on the other hand we have vaccination and boosters and I want the second part to win," she told reporters in Brussels.

"Not each and everyone can be vaccinated," she acknowledged, but said "the vast majority could".

"Therefore, I think, it is understandable and appropriate to lead this discussion now [on] how we can encourage and potentially think about mandatory vaccination within the European Union," she added.

"This needs discussion. This needs a common approach, but it is a discussion that I think has to be led."

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-59...a781737b70b1571927bf56&pinned_post_type=share
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,780
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
More a question or a theory.

There have been suggestions that these huge mutated versions are created from immunocompromised people (HIV etc) now if the virus is staying in their system for a lot longer then a "healthy" person but it's not killing them does this make it more likely it will become a mild variant with less severe disease.

Makes sense from a logical view to me but was interested if there is actually any science to that or just pure luck.
I know I seem to constantly be a Debbie Downer about all your theories but my understanding is that the severity/mortality is driven mainly by the genotype of the host. If your genetics make you vulnerable to severe disease then you get sick and/dead quite quickly. For the virus to set up shop in an immune compromised host for a long time that person must be genetically resistant to severe disease. However, their impaired immune system means they can’t clear the virus as quickly as “normal” people, so they stay mild/moderately sick for a long time.

This means that a variant which evolves in them without making them very sick could kill a different person quite quickly.

Further complicating things is the fact that what makes people most sick is a kind of overactive immune response. Which an immune suppressed patient would be spared.

tl;dr: Probably not but feck knows really!
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
1,424
Why did the Spanish Flu die out again? I think I read it somewhere, but can't remember...
It didn’t… people died, others gained natural immunity, the virus mutated every year to less deadly forms, although there have been years where it’s been more deadly than the previous year or symptoms have been much stronger.

I think in the late 50s there was a very bad flu season due to a mutation in Asia, then in the late 60s there was the Hong Kong flu which was probably the worse since the Spanish Flu and killed 4m globally, the last very bad mutation was late 00s originating from North America, funnily enough called swine flu and not the USA flu even thou it was H1N1 just like the Spanish Flu, Asian Flu, and Hong Kong Flu..

The flu mutates every year and vaccines are updated every year.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,432
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
However problematic or not the Omicron variant turns out to be, the latest restrictions regarding face coverings are not likely to have the desired effect.

Most of the big supermarkets have already said that they will not be asking their staff to enforce it.
And same for the biggest bus service First Bus.
Disappointing but understandable.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,379
Location
Tameside
However problematic or not the Omicron variant turns out to be, the latest restrictions regarding face coverings are not likely to have the desired effect.

Most of the big supermarkets have already said that they will not be asking their staff to enforce it.
And same for the biggest bus service First Bus.
Disappointing but understandable.
I went in my local sainsburys yesterday lunchtime, and was pleasantly surprised to see easily 95% of people wearing a mask. None of the signage around the shop had changed - it still said it was personal choice.

I went in my local Aldi a couple of hours ago and that percentage was reversed. I was one of three people in there with a mask, and one of those other two was one of those idiots who wear it under their nose!
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,567
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
I went in my local sainsburys yesterday lunchtime, and was pleasantly surprised to see easily 95% of people wearing a mask. None of the signage around the shop had changed - it still said it was personal choice.

I went in my local Aldi a couple of hours ago and that percentage was reversed. I was one of three people in there with a mask, and one of those other two was one of those idiots who wear it under their nose!
Do you live in an afflu… haha I can’t
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,432
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
I went in my local sainsburys yesterday lunchtime, and was pleasantly surprised to see easily 95% of people wearing a mask. None of the signage around the shop had changed - it still said it was personal choice.

I went in my local Aldi a couple of hours ago and that percentage was reversed. I was one of three people in there with a mask, and one of those other two was one of those idiots who wear it under their nose!
Great to hear about those Sainsbury's shoppers.
The wearing of face coverings will vary somewhat.
But what I was disappointed at was the speed and publicity given to those supermarkets and First Bus refusal to enforce the latest requirements.
I mean why publicise it. Why not just say nothing.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,897
Location
Cheshire
However problematic or not the Omicron variant turns out to be, the latest restrictions regarding face coverings are not likely to have the desired effect.
Course it won't, do you genuinely believe shops are the breeding/incubation ground for covid? It's merely a vanity exercise from the government. If they were serious about having an impact then they would be going full on with social distancing and masks in hospitality if it really was something to be concerned rather than this current approach which has no logic to its decision.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
1,424
However problematic or not the Omicron variant turns out to be, the latest restrictions regarding face coverings are not likely to have the desired effect.

Most of the big supermarkets have already said that they will not be asking their staff to enforce it.
And same for the biggest bus service First Bus.
Disappointing but understandable.
What I can see with transports services not enforcing it is huge arguments. Imagine if someone whose not wearing a mask decides to sit next to someone who is wearing one? The one wearing the mask who was sitting there first would have every reason to be annoyed.
 

Penna

Kind Moderator (with a bit of a mean streak)
Staff
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
49,677
Location
Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.
I went in my local sainsburys yesterday lunchtime, and was pleasantly surprised to see easily 95% of people wearing a mask. None of the signage around the shop had changed - it still said it was personal choice.

I went in my local Aldi a couple of hours ago and that percentage was reversed. I was one of three people in there with a mask, and one of those other two was one of those idiots who wear it under their nose!
It shouldn't be a personal choice. Regarding issues of public health, you have to say "you must" sometimes.
 

Traub

Full Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
10,236
Cases are going ballistic in Gauteng. I’ve heard of 9 new cases today of people I know. All vaxxed. For perspective, I probably knew 30 in total during our bad Delta wave.
Having said that, they’re all mild cases - scratchy throat, headaches and body aches.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,245
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
I went in my local sainsburys yesterday lunchtime, and was pleasantly surprised to see easily 95% of people wearing a mask. None of the signage around the shop had changed - it still said it was personal choice.

I went in my local Aldi a couple of hours ago and that percentage was reversed. I was one of three people in there with a mask, and one of those other two was one of those idiots who wear it under their nose!
My local big Asda used to be more or less 100% compliant (and those that didn't were almost all wearing visors). That had tailed off to less than 20% by last week. On Monday (before the rule officially changed) it was already back above 80%.

Yesterday, I was in a big Tesco and I saw no one unmasked. Freak results maybe, but it was encouraging, maybe sometimes it just needs a bit of a kickstart and people can do it. Peer group pressure can be a positive.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,245
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Update from the UK on the possible rise of Omicron cases in the last few days. There's a massive caveat when it comes to looking at the curve though - testing of some samples has been deliberately rerouted to PCR test labs who use the test that sees this dropout effect.

 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
88,929
Location
Centreback
Why did the Spanish Flu die out again? I think I read it somewhere, but can't remember...
A) it didn't and b) it became less of a problem because because many millions died and millions other who supplied go some level of immunity.