Absolute bullshit. Just trying to make a poem to act like what you say has substance.
Ronaldo - Zlatan
Bruno- Mkhitarayan
Maguire - Bailly
Cavani - Lukaku
Varane - Lindelof
VDB - Fred
Sancho - Sanchez
Heaton- Lee Grant
AWB - Diego Dalot
Jose signings that are incomparable-Matic and Pogba
Ole signings that are the same - Amad, Pellestri & Telles.
If you think we were worse off after Ole then that's just delusional.
Using the fact we ended lower than Jose's season to make a statement that we were in a bad state - pretending like managers get sacked after winning titles or something. Pochettino went from a CL final to hardly any points - got sacked. Doesn't mean he left them in a bad state.
There is no doubt that on paper the signings under Ole have been better. There are however two important caveats to that:
1. By all indications after Fergie the manager does not have ultimate power over signings. We do not know how much of the effect was due to Ole, and how much due to other members of transfer committee learning from mistakes from the past. I think it is likely both. So it is fair to give Ole some credit here - but limited, and it is not fair to pin all the blame for him for, say, signing of VdB. But I do not agree with the narrative that he singlehandedly transformed our transfer policy.
2. Our squad is (whilst better on paper) still unbalanced, bloated and built for short-term success:
a) we did not sign many players that are u23 and are close to first eleven (at least squad/rotation players) and look like they could cement their place for a decade if all goes well and relieve next mangers from the need to sign a new player for the position for a long time. Yes, not easy to find them. Yes, for each Ronaldo or Rooney you have Nani or even Anderson. But basically under Ole we singed only Sanco that fits this description now, which is not enough. The likes of Amad or Hannibal are still very far from first team unfortunately.
b) We still have quite a bit of deadwood: 4 senior goalkeepers for some reason, Jones still there, Mata still there, Martial is a fringe player on huge wages.
c) There are quite a few first-team players that are either likely to leave like Pogba, or are close to retirement like Ronaldo and Cavani, or are a question marks like AwB, Maguire. Varane is not young and struggling with injuries. Even Shaw and DDG are question marks long term albeit smaller ones.
d) Central midfield. Nuff said.
Overall, I would not be surprised if we have quite a bit of player turnover over the next 2-3 years. I am therefore having trouble with "laying the foundations" and "did a rebuild job" argument. Yes, due to player quality Ole's successor (s) will have a chance of trophies over the next year or two with better coaches staff and a couple of additions - and might be able to improve some players to reduce the need to splash the cash.
BUT - from what Rangnick said (he did subtly hint at the fact that the squad is unbalanced and bloated) and from what his history suggests - I would expect (and hope) for much more signings of young players for the first ream (which we did not do under Ole bar Sancho), more promotions of youth (which we did not do under Ole bar Greenwood) and sell fringe players on significant wages (which we did under Ole, but not enough - and it remains to be seen if some of the Ole-era signings join the new deadwood list, just like some - initially lauded - Jose and LvG signings did over time. Remember how Ole was praised for summer 2019 transfer window and how questionable it looks now).
TL/DR: Ole deserved some limited credit for improved transfer policy, but no way you can credit him for doing a rebuild, as very likely a new rebuild will still be needed over the next years.