Not even remotely the same. Against Tottenham it was the typical Oleball - no pressing, slow and cumbersome in possession, no real aim. Of course, we were firmly in control in that game, but it was more so because Tottenham couldn't be bothered to play football. I believe I also said that back then. Our football in the first half against Crystal Palace was totally different from that. They legitimately couldn't get the ball out of their own half even though they tried hard to do it. We had a higher tempo than we have ever had under Ole and we looked comfortable in everything we did. There was also a clear aim in our play. You can go rewatch those two games to see that they have almost nothing in common (well, the second half against Crystal Palace not included)
Against Young Boys it was typical Ole football, I agree. But then again it was a second string of players that aren't very good nor have they played with each other. Yes, all fans of this football club want the players and manager to succeed, but certainly not opposition fans. And as far as the Ole fans go, such as yourself, I'm sure you do not want Rangnick to fail, but I'm also sure there's that trace in you that are... let's say... relieved when a bad result comes because you probably feel vindicated. "See, Ole's not at fault, this football club and players are simply not good". And as far as who brought those players, well, It's Woodward's fault. We've seen that after Young Boys when some posters have already made some ridiculous claims how there's nothing new with Rangnick.
The good thing is that eventually the dark cloud called Ole over the club would dissapate and people would move on. I've witnessed this during the Moyesy days. It was the same exact behavior back then from his supporters who blamed everyone under the sun for Moyesy's troubles but not him.