Romelu Lukaku | Chelsea

EtH

Full Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,712
That was a hair diff.

Unfortunately his wet, shiny, bald head had no friction and allowed the ball to skid off it like a mario Kart on a banana skin.

If he had a nice flowing mane or a Fellaini style afro that would have been 3-2.
No amount of hair could’ve remedied the effort just before that. Comedy stuff.
 

Red_Aaron

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2005
Messages
4,303
Location
Dig up stupid!
The perfect example against modern stat obsessed football discussions u - just watch him play. I genuinely believe my 8 year old has a better first touch

To use a classic caf quote 'even if he scores a 100 goals it'd still be the wrong decision'
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
No amount of hair could’ve remedied the effort just before that. Comedy stuff.
It's just nice to see another club making a hugely expensive mistake for once isn't it?

Everybody blamed us for making Lukaku bad. I guess it was just Italian teams couldn't handle his size.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,259
98m on kaku
72m on kepa.

Christ on a fecking bike they know to waste money don't they!
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,465
98m on kaku
72m on kepa.

Christ on a fecking bike they know to waste money don't they!
£60m on Pulisic
£45m on Werner
£72m on Havertz

Before I’m quoted by rabid Chelsea fans, Havertz has been ok as of late, but you all were expecting more for £72m.
 

TenonTen

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2022
Messages
861
Supports
Neutral
The perfect example against modern stat obsessed football discussions u - just watch him play. I genuinely believe my 8 year old has a better first touch

To use a classic caf quote 'even if he scores a 100 goals it'd still be the wrong decision'
Can your 8 year old or even you score goals and win games at the top flight??
Stop disregarding stats, especially when that stat is goals scored.

I'm not Lukaku's biggest fan at all but goals is literally the most important thing in the game and wins you things.

Lukaku got credit because he was a good goalscorer. Not the most well rounded forward but he has a pretty good scoring record throughout his career.

The toughest thing in the game is putting the ball in the back of the net.

I know it's "cool" these days to disregard goals to show "Oh I am a sophisticated Football fan". Goals will always be king. Why is Haaland more in demand than a Foden?

And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,187
Supports
Chelsea
£60m on Pulisic
£45m on Werner
£72m on Havertz

Before I’m quoted by rabid Chelsea fans, Havertz has been ok as of late, but you all were expecting more for £72m.
Rabid Chelsea fan here :lol:

We obviously paid for potential with Havertz (same with Pulisic, and Sancho with you). The idea was never that he should hit the ground running. That would have been fantastic of course, but he was 21. He's coming more and more into his own this season and he's currently in fantastic form.
 

Trex

Full Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Messages
3,041
Location
Nigeria
Can your 8 year old or even you score goals and win games at the top flight??
Stop disregarding stats, especially when that stat is goals scored.

I'm not Lukaku's biggest fan at all but goals is literally the most important thing in the game and wins you things.

Lukaku got credit because he was a good goalscorer. Not the most well rounded forward but he has a pretty good scoring record throughout his career.

The toughest thing in the game is putting the ball in the back of the net.

I know it's "cool" these days to disregard goals to show "Oh I am a sophisticated Football fan". Goals will always be king. Why is Haaland more in demand than a Foden?

And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
You have to consider the eye test, he is the Wan bissaka of forwards, but he carry himself like he is prime Lahm.
Tuchel signing him makes me rate Tuchel less, because no way Pep or Klopp would do same.
 

mctrials23

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,276
And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
Its a weird one because he feels like a bit of an anomaly. If you 100% play to his strengths and build the team around them he will score goals for you but I'm not sure he suits the way a lot of top teams want to play now. Its a little bit like the conundrum with Ronaldo these days. He will score a lot of goals and statistically his numbers are good but its very hard to accurately represent the "damage" a player like that does to the output of the rest of the team.

If a team scores 100 goals with 5 players scoring 20 each vs a team scoring 80 goals and one player gets 35 of them, I would take the former every time. Lukaku negatively affects the other aspects of Chelseas play and they aren't building around him either so they have the worst of both worlds when he plays.

Its almost like clubs look purely at his numbers and decide that he will add goals without considering the cost of those goals on the team and what it means for the rest of the team.

It would be interesting to know how keen Tuchel was on Chelsea spending £100m on him. You have to kind of assume that he was really keen because thats a lot of money and Lukaku isn't exactly a marketing signing like Pogba, Ronaldo, Mbappe etc would be. Just all around a bit odd.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Can your 8 year old or even you score goals and win games at the top flight??
Stop disregarding stats, especially when that stat is goals scored.

I'm not Lukaku's biggest fan at all but goals is literally the most important thing in the game and wins you things.

Lukaku got credit because he was a good goalscorer. Not the most well rounded forward but he has a pretty good scoring record throughout his career.

The toughest thing in the game is putting the ball in the back of the net.

I know it's "cool" these days to disregard goals to show "Oh I am a sophisticated Football fan". Goals will always be king. Why is Haaland more in demand than a Foden?

And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
No, the toughest thing in football is to be a forward competing at the top level who needs to be consistent v top sides as well as lower sides.
Lukaku fails that in every level. Anybody can score goals if you have the talent and are comfortable at the level you’re at. That elite level is rarified air for a reason.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,236
Can your 8 year old or even you score goals and win games at the top flight??
Stop disregarding stats, especially when that stat is goals scored.

I'm not Lukaku's biggest fan at all but goals is literally the most important thing in the game and wins you things.

Lukaku got credit because he was a good goalscorer. Not the most well rounded forward but he has a pretty good scoring record throughout his career.

The toughest thing in the game is putting the ball in the back of the net.

I know it's "cool" these days to disregard goals to show "Oh I am a sophisticated Football fan". Goals will always be king. Why is Haaland more in demand than a Foden?

And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
Trust me, if Foden was available he would be in as much demand as is Haaland
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,506
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
Quote some of the people "still sticking up for him" please, I think I've missed them.
There is literally someone 5-10 posts up who is saying they're on 'scapegoat watch'.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,187
Supports
Chelsea
There is literally someone 5-10 posts up who is saying they're on 'scapegoat watch'.
He just defends him against the OTT criticism. I still think Lukaku is a terrible flop we should never have signed, but reading his posts have in some ways helped me be a little less tunnel visioned when analysing the problems with our attack.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,903
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
It's just nice to see another club making a hugely expensive mistake for once isn't it?

Everybody blamed us for making Lukaku bad. I guess it was just Italian teams couldn't handle his size.
wrong. In Italy they play with more tactical intelligence, where as England is more chaotic. Lukaku is a student of the game so aligns with Italy's superior football
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,465
Rabid Chelsea fan here :lol:

We obviously paid for potential with Havertz (same with Pulisic, and Sancho with you). The idea was never that he should hit the ground running. That would have been fantastic of course, but he was 21. He's coming more and more into his own this season and he's currently in fantastic form.
I think there’s an element of potential but by in large you’d expect them to hit the ground running. Might not be the best example, but we signed Amad Diallo for potential. Sancho, we signed because he was delivering in the BL (as was Havertz), although due to their age there was an element of potential too.

Havertz had a very average to poor first season with you (but wrote himself into Chelsea history getting the goal in the CL). He’s been better this season, but only because he’s playing as a number 9…which itself is only because both Werner and Lukaku have been awful.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
7,847
wrong. In Italy they play with more tactical intelligence, where as England is more chaotic. Lukaku is a student of the game so aligns with Italy's superior football
:lol:
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,013
It's just nice to see another club making a hugely expensive mistake for once isn't it?

Everybody blamed us for making Lukaku bad. I guess it was just Italian teams couldn't handle his size.
That was mostly the case, yes.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,187
Supports
Chelsea
I think there’s an element of potential but by in large you’d expect them to hit the ground running. Might not be the best example, but we signed Amad Diallo for potential. Sancho, we signed because he was delivering in the BL (as was Havertz), although due to their age there was an element of potential too.

Havertz had a very average to poor first season with you (but wrote himself into Chelsea history getting the goal in the CL). He’s been better this season, but only because he’s playing as a number 9…which itself is only because both Werner and Lukaku have been awful.
Fair enough, I guess we just see things differently.

Yeah, Sancho and Havertz have quality right now, but United and Chelsea paid the big money because of the players they think they can become, not the players they were at the time of the purchase. They were 21 with limited experience.

He struggled last season, of course and fell below even the more basic expectations at times (there were some extenuating circumstances that has been rehashed in the Havertz thread many times) but as you say, he found form at the right time last season and wrote himself into Chelsea history and he's been in sparkling form for like 2 months now since the turn of the year.

The whole reason I responded to you was because you included him in a list of wasted money when, from what it sounds like, you don't really believe that yourself.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
wrong. In Italy they play with more tactical intelligence, where as England is more chaotic. Lukaku is a student of the game so aligns with Italy's superior football
True that. If only PL defenders would think more and defend less, it would be a lot easier.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,465
Fair enough, I guess we just see things differently.

Yeah, Sancho and Havertz have quality right now, but United and Chelsea paid the big money because of the players they think they can become, not the players they were at the time of the purchase. They were 21 with limited experience.

He struggled last season, of course and fell below even the more basic expectations at times (there were some extenuating circumstances that has been rehashed in the Havertz thread many times) but as you say, he found form at the right time last season and wrote himself into Chelsea history and he's been in sparkling form for like 2 months now since the turn of the year.

The whole reason I responded to you was because you included him in a list of wasted money when, from what it sounds like, you don't really believe that yourself.
I think 2 months of good form for £72m isn’t money well spent. But having said that, if he continues this on for the rest of his Chelsea career then it’ll look like a bargain. I think out of the list posted earlier, he’s probably the one that has done best (low bar mind you!).
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,187
Supports
Chelsea
I think 2 months of good form for £72m isn’t money well spent. But having said that, if he continues this on for the rest of his Chelsea career then it’ll look like a bargain. I think out of the list posted earlier, he’s probably the one that has done best (low bar mind you!).
You're a hard man to please :lol:

I suppose I fundamentally disagree with labelling something waste of money when they haven't had time to fulfil their potential. No-one in their right mind should label Sancho that 8 months into his United career. Havertz is 18 months into his Chelsea career.
 

Red_Aaron

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2005
Messages
4,303
Location
Dig up stupid!
Can your 8 year old or even you score goals and win games at the top flight??
Stop disregarding stats, especially when that stat is goals scored.

I'm not Lukaku's biggest fan at all but goals is literally the most important thing in the game and wins you things.

Lukaku got credit because he was a good goalscorer. Not the most well rounded forward but he has a pretty good scoring record throughout his career.

The toughest thing in the game is putting the ball in the back of the net.

I know it's "cool" these days to disregard goals to show "Oh I am a sophisticated Football fan". Goals will always be king. Why is Haaland more in demand than a Foden?

And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
The point is goal stats are held up as the be all and end all which simply isn't the case and is a reductive argument. Is havertz a better 'goalscorer' than lukaku? The stats would suggest not however Chelsea are a better team, score more goals as a whole and most importantly win more games with havertz up front over lukaku

lukakus goal stats are also padded by coming about in poorer competitions - especially his international record and his poor record in games against top level teams is often dismissed because the overwhelming stat looks impressive. He has a certain set of skills suited to a certain style and IMHO a certain level of competition

He's welcome to put himself in the company of genuinely great players - top level sportsmen need that kind of mindstate however having watched him week in week during his time at united and indeed at other clubs in England there's no question in my mind he is a (relatively) poor footballer at this level, I wouldn't want him anywhere near my team and I would absolutely pick my son to play over him
 

Flexdegea

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
2,342
Havertz starting to look like the player they paid big for.



Where as Lukaku prob one of the worse big name players I can think of. Would not matter to me how many he scores, he is so limited, can't do the basics right and has no big game or big moment pedigree.


I'm imaging the Chelsea men are having the same feeling I was having watching him play for us :lol:
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,392
Supports
Chelsea
Can your 8 year old or even you score goals and win games at the top flight??
Stop disregarding stats, especially when that stat is goals scored.

I'm not Lukaku's biggest fan at all but goals is literally the most important thing in the game and wins you things.

Lukaku got credit because he was a good goalscorer. Not the most well rounded forward but he has a pretty good scoring record throughout his career.

The toughest thing in the game is putting the ball in the back of the net.

I know it's "cool" these days to disregard goals to show "Oh I am a sophisticated Football fan". Goals will always be king. Why is Haaland more in demand than a Foden?

And before people come at me, I dislike Lukaku but it's pretty clear to see why he was rated and so many clubs have bought him.
Because Haaland has a release clause and Foden is at a club he loves who don't sell their best players, what would be the point of going after him? Would be a waste of time and energy.

Goals don't exist in a vacuum, there's many actions that come before the goalscoring chance and Lukaku and many other poachers are poor at those which is why they cannot hold down places in top teams no matter how much they score.

Yes Lukaku (atleast in the past) slots it home when he gets the chances 9 times out of 10 but there's a reason teams he plays for struggle with chance creation and there's a reason his only major title has come under a manager who had people believing Victor Moses transformed himself into a world class wingback.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
5,938
Supports
Hannover 96
Because Haaland has a release clause and Foden is at a club he loves who don't sell their best players, what would be the point of going after him? Would be a waste of time and energy.

Goals don't exist in a vacuum, there's many actions that come before the goalscoring chance and Lukaku and many other poachers are poor at those which is why they cannot hold down places in top teams no matter how much they score.

Yes Lukaku (atleast in the past) slots it home when he gets the chances 9 times out of 10 but there's a reason teams he plays for struggle with chance creation and there's a reason his only major title has come under a manager who had people believing Victor Moses transformed himself into a world class wingback.
The thing is, that seeing Lukaku as a poacher is totally wrong. It happens because of his body, but when you look at how he scores most of his goals you'll see that he is just a more bulky Timo Werner, but his skills simply aren't that of a poacher.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,392
Supports
Chelsea
The thing is, that seeing Lukaku as a poacher is totally wrong. It happens because of his body, but when you look at how he scores most of his goals you'll see that he is just a more bulky Timo Werner, but his skills simply aren't that of a poacher.
Fair enough but the point remains if he's not scoring there's a very big question mark on what the hell he's bringing to the table, sometimes even when he does net there's question marks on whether it's outweighing the cons (lack of fluidity, pressing and general chance creation). For example the game at home to Brighton this season he got a goal but his lack of workrate was also a big reason Brighton passed it around us for most of the second half.

I don't think there's a comparison with Werner either. Last season despite his horrors infront of goal his pressing, workrate and movement was very useful tactically (its why he carried on playing any game of note).

There was a moment in the second half yesterday where I saw Havertz moving around to try and gain an advantage on the Real defenders while Lukaku stayed in the same position.
 

Markolan

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
842
Location
Italy
Supports
AC Milan
League goals scored by Chelsea's "number 9" players, in the last 15 seasons:

- 2006/07 Khalid Boulahrouz: 0
- 2007/08 Steve Sidwell: 0
- 2008/09 & 2009/10 Franco Di Santo: 0 + 0
- From 2010/11 to 2014/15 Fernando Torres 1 + 6 + 8 + 5 + 0
- 2015/16 Radamel Falcao: 1
- 2017/18 Alvaro Morata 11
- 2018/19 Gonzalo Higuain 5
- 2019/20 & 2020/21 Tammy Abraham 15 + 6
- 2021/22 Romelu Lukaku: 5

Overall goal scored by players who wore the number 9 in the last 15 years: 63; On average: 4,46 goal per season

I just proved it's not his fault but that shirt is cursed and he's clearly victim of it like all the previous "owners".
In any case with his FIVE Premier League goal scored this season Romelu Lukaku has OUTSCORED the previous no.9 Chelsea players (5 > 4,46). Well done Big Rom
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,503
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
£60m on Pulisic
£45m on Werner
£72m on Havertz

Before I’m quoted by rabid Chelsea fans, Havertz has been ok as of late, but you all were expecting more for £72m.
Honestly Havertz would go for that amount right now, the only reason people consider him a disappointment is that everyone expected him to be a 10 when he's a CF.
 

GifLord

Better at GIFs than posts
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
22,898
Location
LALALAND
League goals scored by Chelsea's "number 9" players, in the last 15 seasons:

- 2006/07 Khalid Boulahrouz: 0
- 2007/08 Steve Sidwell: 0
- 2008/09 & 2009/10 Franco Di Santo: 0 + 0
- From 2010/11 to 2014/15 Fernando Torres 1 + 6 + 8 + 5 + 0
- 2015/16 Radamel Falcao: 1
- 2017/18 Alvaro Morata 11
- 2018/19 Gonzalo Higuain 5
- 2019/20 & 2020/21 Tammy Abraham 15 + 6
- 2021/22 Romelu Lukaku: 5

Overall goal scored by players who wore the number 9 in the last 15 years: 63; On average: 4,46 goal per season

I just proved it's not his fault but that shirt is cursed and he's clearly victim of it like all the previous "owners".
In any case with his FIVE Premier League goal scored this season Romelu Lukaku has OUTSCORED the previous no.9 Chelsea players (5 > 4,46). Well done Big Rom
His last season for us was basically the same as it's now at Chelsea. When he starts to cry there's no going back
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,392
Supports
Chelsea
Honestly Havertz would go for that amount right now, the only reason people consider him a disappointment is that everyone expected him to be a 10 when he's a CF.
I never had any doubts with Havertz. I got criticised for pointing it out at the time but his very bad Covid was a mitigating factor as was getting moved from striker to accommodate Lukaku (a mistake Tuchel thankfully appears to be rectifying).

If we leave him alone in that area now we will get an elite forward that I am certain.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,029
I never had any doubts with Havertz. I got criticised for pointing it out at the time but his very bad Covid was a mitigating factor as was getting moved from striker to accommodate Lukaku (a mistake Tuchel thankfully appears to be rectifying).

If we leave him alone in that area now we will get an elite forward that I am certain.
Havertz isn’t going to be elite in my opinion
 

Redlyn

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
3,681
there's no question in my mind he is a (relatively) poor footballer at this level, I wouldn't want him anywhere near my team and I would absolutely pick my son to play over him
In which league does your son play now.