UnofficialDevil
Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
He shouldn't, he's been bloody awful for ages. Lingard seemed to be doing a better job as a modern 10 against Norwich.
What roles?He should and we should test him in different roles. He has talent and we invested a lot in him, there is no point pushing him aside unless someone thinks that he is underperforming on purpose.
Starring Cameron DiazThere's something toxic about Bruno
Starring Cameron Diaz
I'm desperate to see Bruno in a false 9 role for a prolonged spell. His skill set is well-suited to the role - he's clever in and around the box, can shoot from distance, a quick thinker, good finisher on his day, etc. Why are we so reluctant to give it a try?He should and we should test him in different roles. He has talent and we invested a lot in him, there is no point pushing him aside unless someone thinks that he is underperforming on purpose.
Lingard had a worse game than Bruno and has been shocking in pretty much every game for years. Silly post really.He shouldn't, he's been bloody awful for ages. Lingard seemed to be doing a better job as a modern 10 against Norwich.
Wide playmaker like David Silva or Mata used to play, false nine or even if we are extremely innovative as the attacking CM in a 433 with Matic and Mejbri.What roles?
Wide playmaker yes but only because Rashford and Sancho are of form, otherwise they shouldn't be sacrificed for Bruno. False 9 maybe but he misses too many easy chances and can't dribble, so he wouldn't be a very good one. Attacking CM he isn't good at quick short attacking passes.Wide playmaker like David Silva or Mata used to play, false nine or even if we are extremely innovative as the attacking CM in a 433 with Matic and Mejbri.
The point is to find out what we have, what I said applies regardless of the other players form. I don't care about the short term.Wide playmaker yes but only because Rashford and Sancho are of form, otherwise they shouldn't be sacrificed for Bruno. False 9 maybe but he misses too many easy chances and can't dribble, so he wouldn't be a very good one. Attacking CM he isn't good at quick short attacking passes.
In that case, those wide positions belong to Sancho and Rashford, not Bruno. Let's not start messing up the team just to accommodate him.The point is to find out what we have, what I said applies regardless of the other players form. I don't care about the short term.
I would do it for all the players that are supposed to be part of the future. And we should definitely accomodate our talented players, it's a frankly ridiculous idea that we shouldn't or that we should stick to the same failing formula and just change names on a teamsheet.In that case, those wide positions belong to Sancho and Rashford, not Bruno. Let's not start messing up the team just to accommodate him.
Rashford and Sancho are part of the future, and our most talented players. What's ridiculous is having to try Bruno in their positions in hope that he might be good. If he isn't good enough in his proper position, there is no need to experiment and waste time and games, points.I would do it for all the players that are supposed to be part of the future. And we should definitely accomodate our talented players, it's a frankly ridiculous idea that we shouldn't or that we should stick to the same failing formula and just change names on a teamsheet.
If I follow your logic Bruno owns his position. You can close the thread.Rashford and Sancho are part of the future, and our most talented players. What's ridiculous is having to try Bruno in their positions in hope that he might be good. If he isn't good enough in his proper position, there is no need to experiment and waste time and games, points.
Player | Chances created | Chances created from set pieces | Assist | Min played | |
1st | Trent Alexander-Arnold | 77 | 35 | 11 | 2,313 |
2nd | Bruno Fernandes | 77 | 11 | 6 | 2,404 |
3rd | Kevin De Bruyne | 60 | 17 | 3 | 1,615 |
4th | James Ward-Prowse | 59 | 37 | 4 | 2,497 |
5th | Raphinha | 58 | 19 | 3 | 2,341 |
6th | Son Heung-Min | 53 | 23 | 10 | 2,341 |
7th | Mohamed Salah | 53 | 0 | 10 | 2,330 |
8th | Martin Ødegaard | 52 | 9 | 3 | 1,892 |
9th | Bernardo Silva | 51 | 0 | 2 | 2,421 |
10th | Bukayo Saka | 49 | 9 | 5 | 2,145 |
Set-piece chances created? what how many corners he won us? What does that even mean?
Player Chances created Chances created from set pieces Assist Min played 1st Trent Alexander-Arnold 77 35 11 2,313 2nd Bruno Fernandes 77 11 6 2,404 3rd Kevin De Bruyne 60 17 3 1,615 4th James Ward-Prowse 59 37 4 2,497 5th Raphinha 58 19 3 2,341 6th Son Heung-Min 53 23 10 2,341 7th Mohamed Salah 53 0 10 2,330 8th Martin Ødegaard 52 9 3 1,892 9th Bernardo Silva 51 0 2 2,421 10th Bukayo Saka 49 9 5 2,145
Huh? It literally says chances created from set pieces so you would assume it's just that.Set-piece chances created? what how many corners he won us? What does that even mean?
Does a modern 10 just run about a bit? Or is it reasonable to look at least some sort of threat against the might of Norwich?He shouldn't, he's been bloody awful for ages. Lingard seemed to be doing a better job as a modern 10 against Norwich.
What is it with people insisting our best players are "toxic". First Ronaldo and now Bruno.There's something toxic about Bruno