calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
Anyone know what ‘rape culture’ is or an example of it is?
Not sure if it's what he meant, but in my mind is about how you trivialize certain behaviors, like saying "yeah of course she wants it, look at how she's dressed".Anyone know what ‘rape culture’ is or an example of it is?
Anyone know what ‘rape culture’ is or an example of it is?
Throw Brett Kavanaugh in there too. They don't believe sexual assault should be a crime.
I'd forgotten about that. That letter was sickening.Throw Brett Kavanaugh in there too. They don't believe sexual assault should be a crime.
I remember a rape being called "20 minutes of action" in a letter to the judge by Brock Turner's father. It didn't matter to him that his son was caught raping an unconscious woman that he dragged behind a dumpster.
I’m intrigued. I’ve assiduously stayed out of the Amber Heard thread & there’s quite a few nightmare posters in this one.I see a particular poster has gone from being a nightmare in the Amber Heard thread to being a nightmare in this thread
Well, we all know if these promiscuous debauchees weren't out there getting raped and were instead respecting the sanctity of the nuclear family this whole abortion thing would be a minor issue and the daft, feckless women need to be guided in that direction by legislation and being taught to be chaste by those who know better. Or somesuch.Is there even any evidence at all that leading a "promiscuous" lifestyle is any more mentally/ emotionally taxing then being legally married/ settled down with a partner?
Or are some posters just projecting their idea of what makes them content on to others?
I think quite probably the worst post I've seen on here is in this thread.I’m intrigued. I’ve assiduously stayed out of the Amber Heard thread & there’s quite a few nightmare posters in this one.
Don’t doubt it. There have been some doozies.Well, we all know if these promiscuous debauchees weren't out there getting raped and were instead respecting the sanctity of the nuclear family this whole abortion thing would be a minor issue and the daft, feckless women need to be guided in that direction by legislation and being taught to be chaste by those who know better. Or somesuch.
I think quite probably the worst post I've seen on here is in this thread.
You forgot Camp C, the people who have nothing to do on a sunday afternoon so just go for an abortion.The arrogance of some of these views, it's so depressing. To not only believe some of this bile but to also assume the right to legislatively foist it onto everyone else irrespective of the popular opinion, or indeed science.
Genuinely sickening what's happening in the US and also much closer to home, particularly here in NI.
Camp A: it's complicated and therefore up to a point people should be able to choose, ensuring, as much as is possible, the safety of everyone.
Camp B: Na we're right you're wrong and it's going to be our way.
God damned tinder.You forgot Camp C, the people who have nothing to do on a sunday afternoon so just go for an abortion.
I'd love to know how promiscuity leads to long term mental issues and where you learned that.I'm only going to agree with the promiscuity comment. I agree it's bad for mental health to lead a life that way and mostly results in pain and long term mental issues but I think that's not related to abortion.
I'd imagine it's the educated and liberal population more open to hookup culture and as a result they have better access to birth control.
Usually the sort of schools and neighborhoods where girls are getting knocked up at young ages are very low income and lack education. So for abortion I think being 'not promiscuous' doesn't matter but in general I think hookup culture is damaging for sure. Probably a topic for another thread.
I think we'll come to realize it in time like how smoking was seen as a non issue. I think porn will go that way as well where eventually we find out it's harm. But again I think the implications are personal mental health not related to abortions or murder or anything
This is a pretty good point, albeit not really about abortion as you say.If you well and truly don't want a relationship then makes sense to just hook up with someone but in my experience a lot of the times its guys leading women on when they are hopeful it can become more (and I guess vice versa sometimes). Not to mention one party now starts forming feelings and what not. Just so you know my general dislike for Tinder and the like doesn't come from "stop having sex!". I feel there is too much focus on sex and sexual attraction which causes problems especially for those who want a relationship.
I used tinder a fair bit during college but I went to a bar one day and just started chatting to a woman that I no doubt would have swiped left on upon first glance on tinder. The way she talked and presented herself was so much more interesting than how she looked and I would have missed out on that if I was just in a corner of my room on tinder. So I wish people just went out more, talked more, and saw everyone as a whole as well. Again, none of this has to do with abortion but just things I think aren't good for you
Right!?!? How are me and the boys gonna have time for golf now that our wives / girlfriends / hookups aren’t popping down to the Planned Parenthood every weekend?You forgot Camp C, the people who have nothing to do on a sunday afternoon so just go for an abortion.
Becoming more confident than I had been in my early 20s and thus more promiscuous in my 30s was great for my mental health I have to say.Honestly, most of my best memories are about casual sex and promiscuity.
I'm happily married now, but I will definitly advise my children to be young and stupid before getting married.
I assumed it was a man who'd said it before I read the twitter thread. WTF
Last time I heard this shit, it was the idiot male in Missouri.I assumed it was a man who'd said it before I read the twitter thread. WTF
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
From his local maulvi.I'd love to know how promiscuity leads to long term mental issues and where you learned that.
Sentient in this context means response to stimulation. That in no way means there is a functioning brain and connection to the brain at that stage. The former will be 30 weeks at the earliest and the later about 24 weeks at the earliest.Seriously can't believe that Texas has ban on abortion after 6 weeks. Do these pro life nutjobs believe that life begins immediately after a condom breaks or something? Women often don't even know they are pregnant at that point so, it seems unbelievably cruel to force them to carry a baby to term. Also, the earliest point a fetus can be considered sentient is at 18-21 so, I'm okay with reducing the 24 week mark on roe v wade to that point.
Yes but there is at least some merit in arguing that there is some form of life there if there is response to stimulation. Anything before that can simply be considered non living so Texas law make zero sense.Sentient in this context means response to stimulation. That in no way means there is a functioning brain and connection to the brain at that stage. The former will be 30 weeks at the earliest and the later about 24 weeks at the earliest.
Basically.Do these pro life nutjobs believe that life begins immediately after a condom breaks or something?
Reasonable belief of immanent death or great bodily harm is the standard. To yourself or another in all states, damage to property also in Texas.I've also read somewhere that there are laws in some US states where you can effectively murder someone if you believe that they are threatening the life of a third party and this law can be twisted by right wing mobs to stop pregnant women from crossing borders to into blue states at gunpoint in the name of protecting the life of the unborn baby.
Wow. There are just scarier and scarier levels to this.I've also read somewhere that there are laws in some US states where you can effectively murder someone if you believe that they are threatening the life of a third party and this law can be twisted by right wing mobs to stop pregnant women from crossing borders to into blue states at gunpoint in the name of protecting the life of the unborn baby.
Maybe I'm being naive but there isn't anyone stupid enough to think killing the person that has a baby in their womb will somehow save said baby's life, is there?I've also read somewhere that there are laws in some US states where you can effectively murder someone if you believe that they are threatening the life of a third party and this law can be twisted by right wing mobs to stop pregnant women from crossing borders to into blue states at gunpoint in the name of protecting the life of the unborn baby.
I think the worrying part is that they get away after doing that on a technicality (although a bit far fetched but probably not impossible).Maybe I'm being naive but there isn't anyone stupid enough to think killing the person that has a baby in their womb will somehow save said baby's life, is there?
At that stage it's just someone that was hellbent on killing someone