Atletico Madrid refusing to play Antoine Griezmann more than 30 minutes/Resolved!/smashing it for France.

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,173
Location
Targaryen loyalist
Would you not just bench him and move on if they're not going to buy him?

Taking the piss out of a player like that will likely result him in taking the piss when he does get subbed on. Why would he try hard if they're intentionally messing him about? Even if he is a twat.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,110
Anything that forces Barcelona to suffer the consequences for their reckless and arrogant behaviour can only be applauded
 

Munkehboi

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,050
Location
Luke Shaw's bum
This is fantastic if true. Only Athletico can muster up something so petty as this! It's great to see.

As others have said before. Anything to feck over Barce is a plus in my book!
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Antoine Griezmann transfer clause sees furious Barcelona 'swindled out of £50million'

So apparently there's a clause in his contract that if he plays more than 30 minutes a game they have to make the deal permanent and so far atleti have made sure to give him no more than 29 minutes.

Is this true, if so it's genuinely one of the most bizarre and comedic things around :lol:.
This is actually beautiful to see! :lol:

Basically they can play him for less than 30 minutes for 2 games and then a full game every 3rd game. As long as he doesn’t play 30+ mins in 50% or more games.

At the moment he’s on 0 out of 2 games. :lol:
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,399
A transfer tug-of-war except both clubs want rid of him.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,620
Location
Sydney
there's nothing in that article about it being 30 mins a game

the clause is 50% of game-time...

so Atleti are just being cautious by bringing him on with 30m to go
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,539
Supports
Mejbri
I think it's bad faith.
Sure. But Barca are saying that to their own players about their signed contracts. Atletico would be mad to trigger them paying Barca 50m + for him. Not sure if Atletico would be happy to terminate the loan, but there is no chance Barca would accept that and having to cover his wages. If it were two different parties you could make a case for a termination of the loan.
 

Kasper

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
3,582
Supports
Hansa Rostock / Bradford City
there's nothing in that article about it being 30 mins a game

the clause is 50% of game-time...

so Atleti are just being cautious by bringing him on with 30m to go
There is?

The contractual situation is a complex one, but broken down to its simplest form Atletico would have to pay the aforementioned figure providing Griezmann plays more than 30 minutes of football in 50 per-cent of games this season - hence the reason the France international has been introduced in the 62nd minute of both fixtures so far this term.
 

Niemans

New Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2021
Messages
1,641
Supports
Barcelona, Celta de Vigo
This is actually beautiful to see! :lol:

Basically they can play him for less than 30 minutes for 2 games and then a full game every 3rd game. As long as he doesn’t play 30+ mins in 50% or more games.

At the moment he’s on 0 out of 2 games. :lol:
At the moment he is 30 of 39. That's 76%.
- 30 out of 37 last season.
- 0 of 2 this season.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Unethical, clubs will think twice before making these kind of deals with Atletico.
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,575
Does Lionel Hutz draw up these contracts for Barcelona?
Lionel Hutz won a surprising amount of cases in the Simpsons, despite his wild incompetence.

This is a absolutely wild loophole though. "First year paralegal would spot this loophole "
 

Bluelion7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2021
Messages
1,192
Supports
Chelsea
Unethical, clubs will think twice before making these kind of deals with Atletico.
ARE there other clubs stupid enough to make this kind of deal with Athletico?

Problem with political organizations: PR points vs Reality. Barca pushed through a badly crafted deal so they could tell their voting members and supporters “we got x amount of millions. We iz jeanuses”. Then reality sets in. Athletico sees they don’t want to be on the hook for the player, and the contract gives them a way to accomplish that.

Meanwhile Barca probably has no plan for not getting that money.
 

Monks_United

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
202
You love to see it ! Couldn't have happened between a two nicer clubs and for a nicer player :D