Anthony Elanga image 36

Anthony Elanga Sweden flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

4.9 Season Average Rating
Appearances
26
Goals
0
Assists
2
Yellow cards
0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Santoryo

ripping the reward
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
6,302
Elanga is another average United youngster who's been promoted to the first team thanks to our lack of personnel the past few years and whom people overestimate his ability just because he lucked out into becoming a United first teamer. The fact people are saying he's even a squad level player is hilarious to me. Go down and look at bottom 5 teams and they'll show you better player than Elanga.

Kid doesn't do anything particularly well, he has no technical qualities, utterly poor on the ball. Gives us nothing as an option forward, every time he gets the ball in advanced positions he just squanders it due to poor control, inability to pass properly and general inability to keep the ball. He's lucky he somehow made it in the first team last season otherwise, coming into the club with him ye to be promoted, Ten Hag wouldn't have looked at him twice.

I'm fed up of seeing us persisting with these average United academy products whom no matter how many years and chances they get given, they remain average or mediocre. Enough of your Lingard, Cleverley, McTomminay, etc. Hopefully we don't follow the same route with Elanga, an obviously mediocre talent being persistently given chances after chances to perpetually stink up the place for years.
 

Trequarista10

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2020
Messages
2,540
He's obviously not good enough but I understand why he's playing. He offers some directness, pace and work rate, which the team and particularly forward line is lacking. I hope we bring in Antony or another, and that in time Diallo or Garnacho get opportunities ahead of Elanga.

However It's completely understandable Garnacho isn't playing just yet, he's young, has some developing to do, hasn't even been training with the first team all that long, and with the team still finding its feet its risky to both us and the kid to throw him in. Elanga is a safer option in the here and now.

Diallo, I'm less sure why he isn't playing. We made a big investment in him, he has actually done well when he has had a few opportunities, and is clearly ahead in terms of technique, and he's a couple years older than Diallo. It may just be he's seen as someone who will be ready later due to his physique, or it may be that he hasn't impressed enough I suppose.

Either way, I hope in the coming months we are stronger as a team, having more control of possession and being resolute defensively, the team in winning form, at which point you can see opportunities being given to the younger, more flair options in Garnacho or Diallo chance.
 

SATA

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
15,203
Location
We all love United
He’s good for games against the top two in the league, abit like Ji Sung Park. That’s no criticism of him but I think he’ll be playing for Everton or Southampton in a couple of years when United have better players
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
I can't stand how easily he goes down. And he never gets the decisions. Yet he persist with it. Baffling.

I don't mind him being the 4th/5th choice for the wings because he's a good lad but he's not good enough for anything higher
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,108
Location
...
His best game for a long while, but I think it’s apparent he’s not of the standard. I’m not sure we can have a player in our front 3 to provide ‘industry’ in the current game. Of course, we’ve been on our knees of late so he can get in just to help us avoid being destroyed by at least being able to compete - but it’s not enough.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,435
He’s good for games against the top two in the league, abit like Ji Sung Park. That’s no criticism of him but I think he’ll be playing for Everton or Southampton in a couple of years when United have better players
Ji Sung was a menace, wish we had someone like him now
 

Frank Grimes

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,639
Location
Newbies 15/16 FPL Champion.
I think he did ok today. He did well for the series of chances we missed when Eriksen missed the sitter in the first half and he played a big part in our goal. He also did well for our goal v Liverpool.

He can still play a role this season and improve further.
 

Reiver

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
2,535
Location
Near Glasgow
Did alright. One thing I like about him is his willingness to take on his man although it didn't work out for him today.
We could definitely do with an upgrade but I think there's a place in the squad for him.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,690
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
As an attacker in todays game you either have to offer some sort of chance creation or direct threat on goal. Elanga offers neither so it ends up looking like a busy performance that never actually did anything. The chance when he was put through by Bruno and didnt get a shot off was infuriating
 

Faetheshire86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
349
In a tight game, where we didn't create too much, Elanga was involved in almost every decent moment we had. Does he deserve any praise for his industry, movement, pace, work rate? Or do you just say right place right time, call him a headless chicken and move on?

That said, if the rest of his game was so poor then maybe that's why he comes in for so much flack?

Involvement in the goal aside where he did well, you really need to watch an all touch compilation or something if it's available. His unsuccessful passes/dribble stat must be shocking. Not hyperbole, it was probably 50/50 bad or worse.
Elanga's touches to lost possession percentage was around 70/30. Using the front six for comparison, that was the same as Eriksen, Fernandez and Rashford. Sancho 75/25. McTominay 80/20.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not oblivious to his short comings. His final pass, shot, touch... well everything... is poor. He clearly lacks composure and he may never develop it. But he is also only 20 years old and it really isn't his fault that 3 games into the season, we are still only one injury away from him being a starter. If you want to be angry at anyone for that, look a bit higher up in the club structure.
 

criticalanalysis

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
6,103
You really should change your name here to lackofcriticalanalysis.
Feel free to provide it rather than a two worded response to the initial post. The majority of people here agree he's not at a high level or even promising level based on what he's shown so far.

Elanga's touches to lost possession percentage was around 70/30. Using the front six for comparison, that was the same as Eriksen, Fernandez and Rashford. Sancho 75/25. McTominay 80/20.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not oblivious to his short comings. His final pass, shot, touch... well everything... is poor. He clearly lacks composure and he may never develop it. But he is also only 20 years old and it really isn't his fault that 3 games into the season, we are still only one injury away from him being a starter. If you want to be angry at anyone for that, look a bit higher up in the club structure.
Not sure about others but I don't have any personal hate or anger towards players. I just try to objectively critique their game as much as I can and I try to give leeway as much as possible.

In Elanga's case, whilst he does have surprising (and to his credit, it may be an ability/trait) clutch moments like getting to the end of the chance against Liverpool etc his bottom level is so so poor. I would love to see an all touch compilation but most of his ball losses were from low-risk percentage situations imo e.g ball received in space, or in transition where he had time to stop fully and recycle possession i.e not times where he had to go for a higher-risk outcome. Maybe it's just me but even his involvement in the goal, when I was watching it in real time, I thought he had a loose touch and the Southampton was going to easily intercept/block it but for some reason he wasn't paying attention and dallied.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,276
Location
NYC
Feel free to provide it rather than a two worded response to the initial post. The majority of people here agree he's not at a high level or even promising level based on what he's shown so far.



Not sure about others but I don't have any personal hate or anger towards players. I just try to objectively critique their game as much as I can and I try to give leeway as much as possible.

In Elanga's case, whilst he does have surprising (and to his credit, it may be an ability/trait) clutch moments like getting to the end of the chance against Liverpool etc his bottom level is so so poor. I would love to see an all touch compilation but most of his ball losses were from low-risk percentage situations imo e.g ball received in space, or in transition where he had time to stop fully and recycle possession i.e not times where he had to go for a higher-risk outcome. Maybe it's just me but even his involvement in the goal, when I was watching it in real time, I thought he had a loose touch and the Southampton was going to easily intercept/block it but for some reason he wasn't paying attention and dallied.
Most of what you talked are garbage. Therefore, nothing is worth to specifically pointing out.
Critical thinking needs at least consideration of context and circumstances. You apparently lack of that.
when you say “majority”, you are already fooled by yourself.
 

Faetheshire86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
349
Not sure about others but I don't have any personal hate or anger towards players. I just try to objectively critique their game as much as I can and I try to give leeway as much as possible.

Of course not, just to be clear, I was merely using your quote as some context of the general perception of his all round game, everything after wasn't directed at you in particular.


In Elanga's case, whilst he does have surprising (and to his credit, it may be an ability/trait) clutch moments like getting to the end of the chance against Liverpool etc his bottom level is so so poor. I would love to see an all touch compilation but most of his ball losses were from low-risk percentage situations imo e.g ball received in space, or in transition where he had time to stop fully and recycle possession i.e not times where he had to go for a higher-risk outcome. Maybe it's just me but even his involvement in the goal, when I was watching it in real time, I thought he had a loose touch and the Southampton was going to easily intercept/block it but for some reason he wasn't paying attention and dallied.

I mean maybe his possession losses were more egregious than the others (I'm not sure I believe that entirely, but I do remember a few frustrating ones), the point I am making is that even with his deficiencies he still managed to be more involved in our big moments than our other attackers. I also wouldn't classify it as him being "clutch", to me that suggests someone who has the ability to raise their game for big moments, I think the good things he is involved in comes down to pure industry and persistence.

Put it this way, we have Ronaldo sitting on the bench who without any hyperbole is probably better than Elanga at every skill or technique with a football you could imagine. However if Ronaldo starts that game over him, are we still confident we win it 1-0?
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,015
We should be trying to sell whilst he is viewed as a solid Premier league player and on wages mid table clubs can afford, we could easily get 20 -30 million for him.

It's the same with garner, at the very least both could bring in 40 million which would help towards buying a first team player
 

criticalanalysis

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
6,103
Most of what you talked are garbage. Therefore, nothing is worth to specifically pointing out.
Critical thinking needs at least consideration of context and circumstances. You apparently lack of that.
when you say “majority”, you are already fooled by yourself.
You're taking this very personally and again you've added nothing to this discussion.

Of course not, just to be clear, I was merely using your quote as some context of the general perception of his all round game, everything after wasn't directed at you in particular.

I mean maybe his possession losses were more egregious than the others (I'm not sure I believe that entirely, but I do remember a few frustrating ones), the point I am making is that even with his deficiencies he still managed to be more involved in our big moments than our other attackers. I also wouldn't classify it as him being "clutch", to me that suggests someone who has the ability to raise their game for big moments, I think the good things he is involved in comes down to pure industry and persistence.

Put it this way, we have Ronaldo sitting on the bench who without any hyperbole is probably better than Elanga at every skill or technique with a football you could imagine. However if Ronaldo starts that game over him, are we still confident we win it 1-0?
Apart from Rashford, is that true though? Sancho in the first half was our 'best' outlet and whilst he didn't exactly take on his full back, was progressing the ball with little to no support. He and Elanga probably 'lost' it the same amount of times but the former was in tight situations, trying to create space in low-risk situations. Elanga got to the end of a shot, which he should have done better (again like against Liverpool). In the second half, he started the dribble, which led to Sancho playing the quick touch and pass for Dalot to cross for Bruno's opener.

All attackers were poor and sort of 'equally' involved and not imo but Elanga's bottom level was much lower and in low-risk situations, which is my basis of analysing his game. As for the last line, Rashford would have been playing as LW and Ronaldo up front so I'd be inclined to say yes with the way the game turned out but who knows. Anyways, I'm not blaming him for being first choice, I'm just simply saying he's not showing good enough ability. Rating his output and effectiveness is bit of a misnomer, like McTominay's (being there for height) performance.
 

RedOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Messages
1,124
He assisted the first goal against Liverpool and made the run with the ball into the box followed by a dummy run for the Soton goal. He'll keep getting playing time because he's doing everything the manager asks him to.
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
We should be trying to sell whilst he is viewed as a solid Premier league player and on wages mid table clubs can afford, we could easily get 20 -30 million for him.

It's the same with garner, at the very least both could bring in 40 million which would help towards buying a first team player
I doubt anyone is giving us that much for him. They're watching our matches too.

He's a useful squad player and he can still improve because he's young. With Antony coming in we won't have to start him so often now and he can be used in games were we're up and looking to counter and work hard.

I do think a lot of the trouble with his play(bad touch and technique and head down running) stems from nervousness and that should calm down the more used to senior football he gets.
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,298
Location
Manchester
He works hard and he is fit and available to play almost every game. That is rare for Utd attackers.

He ultimately isn't good enough for Utd in my opinion but I can see why managers have been picking him.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,561
Location
india
He assisted the first goal against Liverpool and made the run with the ball into the box followed by a dummy run for the Soton goal. He'll keep getting playing time because he's doing everything the manager asks him to.
I think that's the issue. If he want to dominate games you can't have players having two three good moments per game. To play fluid and dominant football the attackers have to consistently contribute towards things like retaining possesion, advancing the move etc otherwise well get pinned back like against STH.

I like that elanga works very hard but quality wise he's not really up to the mark right how.
 

RedOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Messages
1,124
I think that's the issue. If he want to dominate games you can't have players having two three good moments per game. To play fluid and dominant football the attackers have to consistently contribute towards things like retaining possesion, advancing the move etc otherwise well get pinned back like against STH.

I like that elanga works very hard but quality wise he's not really up to the mark right how.
The ability and willingness to run and follow the instructions of the manager and play in a variety of different roles, even at only a decent level is a very useful skillset. It means that player can provide cover for multiple positions and allows for tactical flexibility based on the opponent. He won't be starting many games but if Elanga can press effectively, track back and participate in attacking moves like he's shown then he'll be a useful squad player.

Also I think it's worth mentioning that he's 20 and actually has shown some decent skill at times. He nutmegged that Liverpool defender to get Sancho the ball on the first goal against Liverpool. He works hard and gets to where he's supposed to be on the pitch. He's got some time to improve his technical skill to get past players and finish chances.
 

kunal18

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
462
Location
Bengaluru
The ability to not loose possession while also being able to create chances or beat your man is what separates a mediocre attacking player from the really good ones. The little that I've seen of Garnacho he excels at this, while unfortunately Elanga does not. He does have the raw abilities but he needs to stop loosing possession if he wants to have a career at the Premier League level.
 

FromTheBench

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
10,478
He works hard.

Still is young, good squad player but not someone who u see as a future regular.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,195
Hopefully, this is it for him.

He needs to be sold in the next transfer window.
 

ManRed

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
2,078
Location
London
His pace gave us good gaps in the first half but other than that he does nothing in front. Thankfully we got a brazilian coming to show us some dribbling magic we missing for years.
 

SirScholes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
6,188
He’s just a bit shit sadly

no end product, no real skill. “Works hard” seems to be the only thing you can say but that is what’s expected. He doesn’t even work harder than most others either
Times up
 

AjaxCunian

vexingwijsneus
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
4,239
Supports
Ajax & United
Not the truth, but can never fault him for effort.

Just don't want to see him start, ever. It is a signal for negative football at this club, where your winger exclusively excels in defensive duties.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
Put the kid out of his misery already. He's clearly out of his depth playing as a starter for a team like Man United, just spare him the flak and let him return to the bench.
 

Santoryo

ripping the reward
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
6,302
Shouldn't be starting any game let alone 3 in a row. Heck he shouldn't even be on the bench, I see no quality in this kid, not even flashes. Normally with talented kid, you don't expect consistency and you expect them to disappear in games but what they give you are flashes which Elanga doesn't give at all.
 

kundalini

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
5,750
Only positive was when he sprinted onto Rashford's pass and then put in an ordinary cross that was defended. Still loses the physical battle almost every time.
 

ForeverRed1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
5,413
Location
England UK!
Perfect player to bring on for the last 10/15 minutes of a game as he’s super fit and has lots of energy, can press like mad when teams are tiring. Shouldn’t be a starter and shouldn’t be playing 60 minutes. Has a place In the squad though imo. We always seem to flag later in games so he would be a good answer to the lack of energy problem we seem to have.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,568
He was worse than Rashford. Simply doesn’t belong here, not enough ability and footballing intelligence.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,097
Same work rate of Lingard with a tiny fraction of the ability.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,080
Terrible, but he won't play much when Antony starts playing and hopefully Martial stays fit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.