Finally. Light at the end of the tunnel!
Glazers / Woodward out! (One down)
- Thread starter Icemav
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran hold a long overdue conversation about United's awful league form with 1 win in 7. They discuss a disappointing draw at Bournemouth, a not so disappointing draw against Liverpool and a crushing defeat at Chelsea - Is time nearly over for Erik Ten Hag?
Then in a special second half of the pod, Nik welcomes Natalie ( https://twitter.com/natalie_17) to discuss the fortunes of Manchester United Women as they booked a place in the FA Cup Final after a historic first ever win vs. Chelsea.
I know that what Glazers did to us is all legal. But this is one seriously sick financial system leveraged buyout.
Robbers only rob you once or the most twice. Then you can move on with your life. But Glazers have been robbing us for 17 years while also ruining the football side of things and neglecting the facilities.
This is what is wrong in the world nowadays. The greed, the sick financial systems, the systems are favoring the rich and powerful.
Robbers only rob you once or the most twice. Then you can move on with your life. But Glazers have been robbing us for 17 years while also ruining the football side of things and neglecting the facilities.
This is what is wrong in the world nowadays. The greed, the sick financial systems, the systems are favoring the rich and powerful.
The thing is, after us, PL/FA rules were changed to stop it happening
I know but the rules still allowing them to keep robbing us for 17 years. Why can't they do something about it since it's not allowed now. They are cowards to face their mistake.
If we were a West London club in the area where the Tories and their rich mates live, rather than the unprioritised North, perhaps it would be addressed.
Ok I'm seeing loads of positive stuff in terms of the scumbags selling on at st a minority with potential to be full.
I am not clued in on buyout stuff so I have a question. Who's to say Jim Ratcliffe doesn't take over and do something similar?
Would debts be repaid as part of it?
Someone give me the positive stuff other than the fact those rotten scumbags would be gone
I am not clued in on buyout stuff so I have a question. Who's to say Jim Ratcliffe doesn't take over and do something similar?
Would debts be repaid as part of it?
Someone give me the positive stuff other than the fact those rotten scumbags would be gone
I would love to believe it too, but I wouldn't go nuts putting two and two together to make five. We've not thrown any money around in the market yet, there's been speculation in the papers which as we've learned often means nothing. I really hope it's true but I wouldn't jump to connect the wild transfer rumors with this.
Yeah that's the part which makes me so annoyed
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I hope the parasites scums of the earth feck off
This Tom McDermott is highly sus, where does he get this from?
My ultimate dream is bringing back Edwin as our CEO -THIS IS THE RIGHT TIME!
That's sounds great but who or what is this Tom comenchero
Seriously though now this is the moment to email, message and send anti glazer messages to sponsors and affiliates. I just sent Team Viewer a quote request for my company. (Glazers Out, G G MU , Thieves Lane, Tampa).
Last edited:
Why did you bother responding?
The problem with Musk is that he has already gotten into trouble with the SEC for making untrue remarks about taking Tesla private and is now being sued by Twitter. I’d be very careful getting into any transaction process with him.
DGD DGD
It shouldn't be legal. And either it should not be permitted by the regulations. I still havent gotten over the fact that they saddled us with their personal debt and it's 17 years.
I sometimes with Sir Alex would call them out tbh. He doesn't need a seat at the board at this stage. We'd all back him.
This. I don't want that treacherous piece of human trash anywhere near my football club.
Very quiet in here lately after a couple of wins...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
OUT
I don't get this paranoia about Sky not covering the protest. They did . They didn't dedicate the entirety of their pre match coverage to it but is this evidence the club lobbied them to downplay it?
Not exactly. People are aware that those feckers have blatantly tried to silence the dissenting voices by altering the sound from Casemiro's presentation to the crowd and by requesting Sky to say little about the protests. Sky should have told the Glazers to eat shit for the sake of freedom of speech.
What the Glazers do is banana republic-like shit. But again, it is not surprising at all when we all know that they support both one of the worst Apartheid-like regimes in the world and the most anti-democratic entity in North America. Those cnuts don't deserve to live in a democracy if they can't even respect free speech nor take criticism like responsible adults.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
With due respect, genuinely, the 1958 aren’t going to risk their reputation and standing in the fanbase by saying that if it’s not true. The downside of being found out, far outweighs the benefit of including that if it’s not true, given the entire fanbase would get around them without it even coming up anyway.
The club changing the audio of the casemiro signing, is censorship. It’s laughable, and will do more harm than good. Same with removing flags without justification. Expecting the stand to be filled with flags for Arsenal, and the chants to only ramp up, particularly away games, as a result.
More ineptitude from the rats. Hope they rot.
More ineptitude from the rats. Hope they rot.
Is there a GoFundMe where we can pitch in some bucks to have a plane flyby with GlazersOUT every home game?
Those cnuts are outright supporters of an Apartheid-like regime and they donate money to some of the most anti-democratic elements in the US. I just don't see anything with the Glazers that is "better" than the Saudis at Newcastle. More instances in the media and MPs representing Manchester should be calling the Glazers out just for what they ordered and then did relative to the Liverpool game.
We want #GlazersOut We want #GlazersOut !
We want #GlazersOut We want #GlazersOut !
We want #GlazersOut We want #GlazersOut !
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm pretty sure I've heard Laurie be negative towards the Glazers plenty of times. However, it is unusual for Glazers to allow so much expenditure, whilst looking to sell a stake in the club.
Agree, but they did up the money by an extra 100 million, but they had to!! Let's see where Laurie heads after this.
Speculate to accumulate. Always been their way. It was evident investment was needed for top four money/spin-offs.
Must keep up with the protests to help get rid of these leeches. Keep up the good work and good luck to all involved.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Glad we've got the views of Robbie Williams in this thread finally, can always rely on you to post the important stuff.
Good news! Would have been awkward had he forsaken us. I'm loving Glazers instead.
Has anything come out from the Glazers yet about noy wanting to sell or dismissing rumours of people bidding for the club?