Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,524
I don't know what that's supposed to mean, but Italy was obviously a worthy finalist.the 2 Baggios literally dragged Italy to the final.
I don't know what that's supposed to mean, but Italy was obviously a worthy finalist.the 2 Baggios literally dragged Italy to the final.
Kim Jong-Un’s burnermay I ask the reason for disliking 2002 ? it it because of south korea ?
You mean "lost" as in "morally lost"?A cruel reversal of fate from 1982 where perhaps the better Italian team actually lost while beating the superior Brazilan side(best Brazilian side ever?) 12 years prior.
Bollocks.1994 final was one of the worst games of football ever seen in a world cup this side of Italy '90, come on.
I'm with you on this. Along with 98 are the two I would say were great. I was too young to remember 86 although I'd have loved to have watched that one. Since 98 though I don't think any World Cup has been particularly good.Unpopular pick, but Italia ‘90.
It was an ugly game played at a snail's pace between a team with little quality that attacked by putting in croses and/or hoping Romario made something from nothing, and a team that could barely stand straight but had the best pure defender in history to throw at Romario. It could only ever end on penalties after 120 minutes of nothing much happening, and that's what happenedBollocks.
Actually didn't mind them going far. But the weird referee decisions completely marred the tournament for me. Not just in their games with Italy and Spain, the ones everyone remembers. But also in other games like Brazil-Belgium, USA-Germany and so on.may I ask the reason for disliking 2002 ? it it because of south korea ?
Again - bollocks.It was an ugly game played at a snail's pace between a team with little quality that attacked by putting in croses and/or hoping Romario made something from nothing, and a team that could barely stand straight but had the best pure defender in history to throw at Romario. It could only ever end on penalties after 120 minutes of nothing much happening, and that's what happened
Then we have to agree to disagree, im no authority on Brazilian teams pre 1970 but considering that most seem to hold that team as the best ever I feel comfortable in saying 1982 is very very close to their level had they actually won im sure they would have been ranked higher .You mean "lost" as in "morally lost"?
Brazil '82 is terribly overrated. I loved that team as a kid - and I still have a huge soft spot for it.
It obviously is not the best Brazilian team ever, though. It had major weaknesses (and was punished for it).
Maybe the purest in its will to entertain but certainly not the best.A cruel reversal of fate from 1982 where perhaps the better Italian team actually lost while beating the superior Brazilan side(best Brazilian side ever?) 12 years prior.
Yeah, of course. Most people do.they really like their 1982 team even more than the triumphantly 1994 one
I'm a big Maradona fan boy if it's not obvious by now and that as you've said easily makes up for the lack of star quality, easily the best footballing performance I've seen and nothing close to it has been replicated since.Also near the top, although the final, as usual, was not the best thing about it — there's Maradona's journey, Danish Dynamite's Icarus-esque campaign, Brazil vs France (albeit with both Zico and Platini being a bit past it and the former even starting the game on the bench) and Argentina vs England in the quarter-finals, USSR vs Belgium in the Round of 16 (ridiculous drama even though it was decided by a set of poor refereeing decisions).
It loses a bit when we consider star quality though — it was in-between two amazing generations, Zico/Platini/Rummenigge etc. from the early 80's were already getting older and the younger guys like Gullit/van Basten (Netherland not even featuring)/Matthäus etc. not yet fully hitting their peak*. But Maradona performing at the, perhaps, highest individual peak ever, kinda makes up for it.
* when you look at the Ballon d'Or list of that year it looks a bit bare, although it's important to note that South Americans weren't eligible at the time:
Belanov, the eventual winner, had a one-off season (and he wasn't even the best USSR player that season)
Lineker was a very prolific but a bit limited poacher
Butragueño, Elkjær, Amoros, Zavarov — all great players but when you look at the list overall it doesn't quite wow you immediately.
Yeah the one before it was easily worse. 1990 WC final was one of the worst elite finals in any competition.Eh? Because it ended 0-0?
That's nonsense. It was a very tight and edgy final with two genuinely great teams failing to score in regular (or extra) time.
By far the best music.Unpopular pick, but Italia ‘90.
I'd prefer the cagey high-stakes of the 1994 final over, for instance, the slight anti-climactic farce of the 1998 and 2018 finals where there were players on the park evidently unfit to be there.Eh? Because it ended 0-0?
That's nonsense. It was a very tight and edgy final with two genuinely great teams failing to score in regular (or extra) time.
Yes that’s why 98 is my favourite. I didn’t particularly like the next one either.I've heard that the first one you really remember often is your favourite.
Spot on - yes.I'd prefer the cagey high-stakes of the 1994 final over, for instance, the slight anti-climactic farce of the 1998 and 2018 finals where there were players on the park evidently unfit to be there.
I have to disagree, and I know it didn't happen but let's say they had gone on to win the tournament after beating Italy in an alternative universe, certainly they would have been considered the best in that scenario.Maybe the purest in its will to entertain but certainly not the best.
Yeah I'm probably being a bit sentimental here but it's really hard not to like that team and they seem to have had that effect on their countrymen as well, they lived them over there, shame how it didn't pan out for them.Yeah, of course. Most people do.
That's largely - let's say - sentimental. In retrospect - that's all it is.
It's a very likeable team, very charming.
They obviously aren't the best Brazilian team ever, though.