Best world cup ever

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,489
Supports
Real Madrid
1994 final was one of the worst games of football ever seen in a world cup this side of Italy '90, come on. Brazil were a functional team that got dragged to the final by their supernova striker. Italy were a team of great players playing below its potential who were dragged to final by their supernova forward - who then got injured in the semifinal because that's how his career went...Italy were shattered after the ridiculous Nigeria and Spain games and the injury to Baggio against Bulgaria, and then the final was played in a sauna...

Tournament was actually pretty good though, quality of football wasn't high but most games were filled with drama and entertaining
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,524
A cruel reversal of fate from 1982 where perhaps the better Italian team actually lost while beating the superior Brazilan side(best Brazilian side ever?) 12 years prior.
You mean "lost" as in "morally lost"?

Brazil '82 is terribly overrated. I loved that team as a kid - and I still have a huge soft spot for it.

It obviously is not the best Brazilian team ever, though. It had major weaknesses (and was punished for it).
 

CassiusClaymore

Is it Gaizka Mendieta?
Scout
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
35,772
Location
None of your business mate
Supports
The greatest team in history
Obviously be a lot of nostalgia in these picks and rightly so, so Italia 90 for me. Iconic theme song, England heartbreak, Milla, Valderama, Matheus, Gazza crying, jumpers for goal posts....
 

mikeyt

Full Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
783
Unpopular pick, but Italia ‘90.
I'm with you on this. Along with 98 are the two I would say were great. I was too young to remember 86 although I'd have loved to have watched that one. Since 98 though I don't think any World Cup has been particularly good.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,565
98 for me . People like to moan but the scale of it and only happening every 4 years really does give it prestige. 2010 was only OK but it usually delivers
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,489
Supports
Real Madrid
Bollocks.
It was an ugly game played at a snail's pace between a team with little quality that attacked by putting in croses and/or hoping Romario made something from nothing, and a team that could barely stand straight but had the best pure defender in history to throw at Romario. It could only ever end on penalties after 120 minutes of nothing much happening, and that's what happened
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
19,930
Location
England
2006. Italy’s iconic players winning the World Cup.

Zidane’s performance against Brazil and Spain.
Australias reaching the knockouts.
Graham Poll giving Simunic 3 yellow cards
Zidane’s panenka penalty
Zidane’s headbutt
Rooney/C.Ronaldo incident
Ronaldo scoring his 15th World Cup
Goal.
Maxi Rodriguez’s stunner against Mexico
Argentinas team goal
Messi’s first World Cup goal
Battle of Nuremberg
Italy v Germany semi final
 

Ramos

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
762
may I ask the reason for disliking 2002 ? it it because of south korea ?

:lol:
Actually didn't mind them going far. But the weird referee decisions completely marred the tournament for me. Not just in their games with Italy and Spain, the ones everyone remembers. But also in other games like Brazil-Belgium, USA-Germany and so on.

Also it really had no memorable clashes between big countries that other tournaments always have, besides maybe the Brazil-England QF. Even the final wasn't one with Germany being below par. Compare this to 1998 that had that crazy Argentina-England R16 and the Argentina-Netherlands QF.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,524
It was an ugly game played at a snail's pace between a team with little quality that attacked by putting in croses and/or hoping Romario made something from nothing, and a team that could barely stand straight but had the best pure defender in history to throw at Romario. It could only ever end on penalties after 120 minutes of nothing much happening, and that's what happened
Again - bollocks.
 

SirReginald

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
2,295
Supports
Chelsea
I remember 2002 onwards and none of them have been particularly amazing. It’s just nice to see teams you rarely compete against.
 

Red the Bear

Something less generic
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
9,127
You mean "lost" as in "morally lost"?

Brazil '82 is terribly overrated. I loved that team as a kid - and I still have a huge soft spot for it.

It obviously is not the best Brazilian team ever, though. It had major weaknesses (and was punished for it).
Then we have to agree to disagree, im no authority on Brazilian teams pre 1970 but considering that most seem to hold that team as the best ever I feel comfortable in saying 1982 is very very close to their level had they actually won im sure they would have been ranked higher .

They were obviously not perfect , 2 major defensive errors caused them big time and they were far from solid in the backline but otherwise they steamrolled throughout opposition like no other and no one had been as dominance as they been, it was seriously impressive and has not been repeated since and the italy game could have easily been a one off(let's not forget that Italy side itself has claim to be one of the best international sides ever) and it seems most Brazilians agree with me (although an appeal to authority is not a good argument it's usually the impression I get from the Brazilians whom I talked to, they really like their 1982 team even more than the triumphant 1994 one).
 
Last edited:

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,009
Location
Moscow
A cruel reversal of fate from 1982 where perhaps the better Italian team actually lost while beating the superior Brazilan side(best Brazilian side ever?) 12 years prior.
Maybe the purest in its will to entertain but certainly not the best.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,524
they really like their 1982 team even more than the triumphantly 1994 one
Yeah, of course. Most people do.

That's largely - let's say - sentimental. In retrospect - that's all it is.

It's a very likeable team, very charming.

They obviously aren't the best Brazilian team ever, though.
 

Red the Bear

Something less generic
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
9,127
Also near the top, although the final, as usual, was not the best thing about it — there's Maradona's journey, Danish Dynamite's Icarus-esque campaign, Brazil vs France (albeit with both Zico and Platini being a bit past it and the former even starting the game on the bench) and Argentina vs England in the quarter-finals, USSR vs Belgium in the Round of 16 (ridiculous drama even though it was decided by a set of poor refereeing decisions).

It loses a bit when we consider star quality though — it was in-between two amazing generations, Zico/Platini/Rummenigge etc. from the early 80's were already getting older and the younger guys like Gullit/van Basten (Netherland not even featuring)/Matthäus etc. not yet fully hitting their peak*. But Maradona performing at the, perhaps, highest individual peak ever, kinda makes up for it.

* when you look at the Ballon d'Or list of that year it looks a bit bare, although it's important to note that South Americans weren't eligible at the time:
Belanov, the eventual winner, had a one-off season (and he wasn't even the best USSR player that season)
Lineker was a very prolific but a bit limited poacher
Butragueño, Elkjær, Amoros, Zavarov — all great players but when you look at the list overall it doesn't quite wow you immediately.
I'm a big Maradona fan boy if it's not obvious by now and that as you've said easily makes up for the lack of star quality, easily the best footballing performance I've seen and nothing close to it has been replicated since.

Most of the games were very fun to watch as well so there's that too while we got some of the cool matchups to go with it , some probably a bit too late but still(Brazil France).

The fun thing about 1986 is that it's quite atypical of how football was usually played around that time frame, it was a lot more attacking and a ton more space was afforded to the attacking players than it used to, perhaps an after effect of the high altitude but I'm no expert on that, ironically the much scorned 1990 edition was much closed to how football was actually played bqck then but that's irrelevant.
 
Last edited:

Ollie Derbyshire

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
2,208
Italia 90 for me, had so many great games, England were actually a good team (I think! memory a bit poor). Italian football was on a high, stadiums looked great, Cameroon v Argentina in the first game iirc, quality!
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,204
2006 was the best one quality-wise of the five World Cups I've seen.

I love 2002 more though because I was obsessed with Brazil and especially Ronaldo.
 

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,023
Eh? Because it ended 0-0?

That's nonsense. It was a very tight and edgy final with two genuinely great teams failing to score in regular (or extra) time.
Yeah the one before it was easily worse. 1990 WC final was one of the worst elite finals in any competition.
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,246
1990 clear winner for me, Nessun Dorma, Gazza, "have a word with him", Platt vs Belgium, Schillaci scoring for fun - was brilliant. I was 14 at the time, so remembered 86 very well and had vague memories of 82 as well.
1994 was probably the worst I can remember, with 2010 running it pretty close.
 

Giggsy13

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2016
Messages
4,313
Location
Toronto
Italia 90 was brilliant. So much drama in tbe semi finals, maradona becoming a villain in Italy and Gazza’a tears. Brazil 2014 also incredible when you consider the impact of Germany mauling the hosts in the SF, the iconic diving RVP header to finish off a dominating Dutch win over Spain and a worthy final of Germany vs Argentina. 2018 also should get some mention just because of the brilliance of Modric and that Croatian team coming so close to winning it.
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,666
Argentina 1978 easily.

Incredible atmosphere in the Argentina v Holland final.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,327
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
I'd put them in tiers along these lines:

Top tier:

1970 - Combination of drama and quality. Massive legacy with Brazil.
1982 - Lots of drama with the odd second group stage format pitching big countries head-to-head.
1986 - Plenty of drama and injections of high quality in the Mexico heat. Like Brazil in 1970, Maradona's performances
1998 - Scores well from every angle. Just about every big country turned up and clashed in the knockout stages to produce high-octane games.
2014 - Great host. Lots of fresh attacking football combined with the implosions of Spain and Brazil will live long in the memory.

Middle tier:

1974 - two legendary European teams in a head-to-head for the ages, but without the beat of the South Americans, it didn't quite come together the way a World Cup normally brings together the best from both sides.
1990 - low on quality and attacking football, but one of the highest on drama and enduring iconography.
1994 - loads of good games in the knockout stages, but quite a lot of stodge enforced by the heat and silly kick-off times.
2006 - plenty of tension from the big countries who turned up clashing at the business end of the tournament
2018 - first half of the tournament threatened to explode with goals and drama all over the place, but it petered out in the knockout stages where there very few memorable games.

Bottom tier:

1978 - aside from the two finalists, there wasn't much top-end quality and many contenders underwhelmed. Whole junta vibe didn't help.
2002 - should have been so much better, but so many top players arrived injured or fatigued. Among the contenders, only Brazil truly turned up. Some of the refereeing sapped enthusiasm for the tournament.
2010 - had much of the negative football that marked 1990, but without the same drama. Even an all-time great side like Spain strangled rather than twatted teams aside.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,327
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
Eh? Because it ended 0-0?

That's nonsense. It was a very tight and edgy final with two genuinely great teams failing to score in regular (or extra) time.
I'd prefer the cagey high-stakes of the 1994 final over, for instance, the slight anti-climactic farce of the 1998 and 2018 finals where there were players on the park evidently unfit to be there.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,917
Location
Canada
2014 world cup by far for me. Was too young to remember 1998, born in 1994, so 02 was the first I remember. 2014 was Bosnia's first, had fantastic games, big upsets, great atmosphere (especially after the constant buzzing noise of 2010)... Loved it.
 

matsdf

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
600
I've heard that the first one you really remember often is your favourite.
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,869
Location
Wales
I've heard that the first one you really remember often is your favourite.
Yes that’s why 98 is my favourite. I didn’t particularly like the next one either.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,524
I'd prefer the cagey high-stakes of the 1994 final over, for instance, the slight anti-climactic farce of the 1998 and 2018 finals where there were players on the park evidently unfit to be there.
Spot on - yes.
 

Bertie Wooster

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
2,923
I'd say 1986 or 1990.

They're the first two world cups I really remember - I'd have been 8 and 12 then. And they were before the times of PL and CL on Sky, etc, so getting to see the 'foreign based' players from different continents had that excited air of mystery and novelty - rather than most being players I've seen regularly and with negative associations of playing for rival English / top European clubs.
 

Red the Bear

Something less generic
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
9,127
Maybe the purest in its will to entertain but certainly not the best.
I have to disagree, and I know it didn't happen but let's say they had gone on to win the tournament after beating Italy in an alternative universe, certainly they would have been considered the best in that scenario.

Again I'm not well versed on brazil pre 1970 but after that time frame only the 1970 team reaches anything resembling their attacking quality and simply ranks above due to the virtue of actually winning it.
Yeah, of course. Most people do.

That's largely - let's say - sentimental. In retrospect - that's all it is.

It's a very likeable team, very charming.

They obviously aren't the best Brazilian team ever, though.
Yeah I'm probably being a bit sentimental here but it's really hard not to like that team and they seem to have had that effect on their countrymen as well, they lived them over there, shame how it didn't pan out for them.
 

Poborksy96

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 16, 2022
Messages
21
98 for me. Yet another world cup where we promised so much, but as usual the god's were against us. What made it worse was I had a bet on Sol Campbell scoring the winning goal against the Argies at a ridiculous 80/1 and pushed a whole table of beers over in the pub when I thought he'd scored, only to see it get ruled out
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,049
Location
Glazers Out
1994 but that's easy. It was my first World Cup and my country (Bulgaria) did alright.

2010 easily the worst. All I remember is noise. (and Robben missing sitters). I've a soft spot for the Netherlands and will always hate Robben for those misses.