England Discussion

Matt851

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
2,126
100%

England have nobody else other than Rice in midfield. The question is who will partner Bellingham and Rice.

Mount is probably the favorite and then 2nd likeliest option is either:
A) Foden in midfield as a 10 since Iran will look to defend deep
B) Just 2 of Bellingham and Rice and 3 at the back being used.

Personally, my guess is Mount, but I think Southgate bringing Maddison means he's open to using a 10 and so Foden could just start there with the idea being Kane should be in the box rather than dropping deep if Iran's backline is going to be incredibly deep anyways.

I'm thinking either 1-0 England with a late goal, or maybe 2-1 England. I'd back Quieroz to get a draw with this much time to prepare but it doesn't look like Iran have the quality in midfield to deal with Bellingham and either Foden or Mount for 90 minutes. Could be a good game for Grealish or Alexander-Arnold to come on in the 2nd half and make the difference.
I really wouldn't be surprised of Phillips started instead of Bellingham given how Gareth is with his favourites
 

SirReginald

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
2,295
Supports
Chelsea
I really wouldn't be surprised of Phillips started instead of Bellingham given how Gareth is with his favourites
Can totally see him starting Phillips and Walker would have played if he was fit. My guess at the starting 11.
Pickford
TAA White Dier Maguire Trippier
Phillips Rice
Mount Kane Foden
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,402
I really wouldn't be surprised of Phillips started instead of Bellingham given how Gareth is with his favourites
Even if he thinks England's best chance in the knockouts is Phillips and Rice deeper in midfield freeing up Bellingham to play in the attacking 8/10 role Lampard was good at and Pogba sort of played (Matuidi wider than Phillips but provided the legs and Foden or Mount could do a passable Griezmann impression), I think that means Phillips off the bench and maybe starting against Wales or the Americans, not against Iran. He's only played 40 minutes of football in the last 2 months and Iran will sit deep anyways.
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
Thank you for your measured response. Just wanted to clarify a few things:

I think the anger towards the "Team Melli" stems mostly from how other sport teams have been much clearer in their support so far, and that's without having a global access to 6 billion people (World Cup). No other Iranian sports team also met with the Butchers, bowed down to them, or gave bootlicking speeches in their support. It was so bad that the club coach of some of the players called out the players and has been fined 20% of his annual salary as a result.

People expect the players to be their voice.In a country where everyday is a teenager's funeral, no one no longer cares if you do a rebona or score a bicycle kick. It's about using the platform to let the world know what's going on in Iran now and nothing is normal.I don't say weep like Zinchenko, but at least have some common decency with your poses and clown show. I posted this on the Iran Revolution thread, it's from 18 hours ago...you think people really care about football when their city gets invaded at night like this?


As for the flag. This flag and the crap sign in middle of it is solely the Islamic Republic flag. That symbol in the middle didn't even exists until 43 years ago. Hence it's purely the regime flag and not the 2400 year-old normal Iranian flag, that's why when we were in Russia 4 years ago for the World Cup, many of us either took the traditional flag or whiteouted the crab sign in the middle.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Anyways, some more updates of chaos from Iran's camp:

Our second best ever football player, Ali Karimi, has called for mass protests today in support of the city that's being invaded by IRGC in the clip below. He tagged all national team players to say something yesterday, but to no response, he's asked for people to unfollow them and call the team "Regime team" and "a team without dignity, luckily I never played with you cowards". The comments section below the national team players page is full of curse and vulgarity from angry fans. The regime had to stage a pro-football team rally today !!! which has completely re-ignited the contrast of this team being Islamic Republic national team and not Iran.

Call for mass protests been made for after the game tomorrow also regardless of the result, but from my timeline, space and pretty much people I know inside, almost 80-90% are cheering for England tomorrow and want a global humiliation for this team.

Of course, it could all change if we see an act of remarkable courage by them tomorrow to show the world what's going on. Going by evidence so far, those chances are 10% at best, I'd say.

The situation is very tense. I predict possible chaos pre-game, with some Iran fans not allowed to stadiums in case they have the old flags, in-fighting between Iran fans, and massive booing of the Islamic Republic national anthem pre-match.
Thank you very much for all that information - really appreciate it. I know we`re supposed to be talking about football and England playing Iran in this thread but I will just say that while it is horrifying to find out the details of the response to the Iranian people`s uprising, it is incredibly moving that so many are willing to literally put their lives on the line to be treated as human beings worthy of dignity and a future in their own country.

I am not anti-USA but I pray that the govt there doesn`t decide to help `liberate` Iran the way they `did in Iraq`, the evil aftermath which is still being felt. The Iranians need their own military to turn on the government - they can`t free themselves without that factor. Not the same situation but slightly similar is North Korea. I lived in South Korea for a while and found out a lot more than the media in SK and the west tell us in their version of what goes on there. The privileged class in NK are not so uniformly in support of the regime there but unless the military decides on a regime change, there is nothing they can do.
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
I think it's going to take us losing to Iran, USA or Wales to get people into this tournament.
All very possible.
I agree. I remember a few articles a while ago claiming England were lucky with a relatively `easy` group which I don`t see. Iran might very well fizzle out but I expect them to be happy to shut up shop and then possibly get a draw goal-less or otherwise.

The USA seems widely underestimated and that is at everybody`s peril. For at least 2 decades, `soccer` has been a very popular alternative to the wrestlefest and just about zero ball kicking skills of gridiron except for a designated team kicker - and I should say I like gridiron and watch it but it aint football. Soccer has also been the popular alternative to basketball which mostly selects for height.

American football has also benefited tremendously from the immigrant communities in the USA and because of its success among school students generally and those communities, USA football is able to choose its players from a much wider demographic than it has ever done. I think the USA is much better placed to get out of the group stage than we think. I especially don`t like England`s chances against the USA strikers if Harry Maguire plays - and we have seen the stupidity of a defender who hasn`t played much for his own team chosen over others who have.

As for Wales, they are looking good and Gareth may not have those legs anymore but he`s crafty and always a goal poaching threat.
 
Last edited:

432JuanMata

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
3,097
Location
Dublin
As I stated in the match thread Southgate is so clueless that media and fans aren’t expecting much from England yet with the likes of Kane, Sake, Jude, Foden, Rashford etc I don’t see many teams better.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,789
Location
Trondheim
As I stated in the match thread Southgate is so clueless that media and fans aren’t expecting much from England yet with the likes of Kane, Sake, Jude, Foden, Rashford etc I don’t see many teams better.
If they win the WC will he still be clueless?
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,402
The USA seems widely underestimated and that is at everybody`s peril. For at least 2 decades, `soccer` has been a very popular alternative to the wrestlefest and just about zero ball kicking skills of gridiron except for a designated team kicker - and I should say I like gridiron and watch it but it aint football. Soccer has also been the popular alternative to basketball which mostly selects for height.

American football has also benefited tremendously from the immigrant communities in the USA and because of its success among school students generally and those communities, USA football is able to choose its players from a much wider demographic than it has ever done.
You're not wrong, but as Jesse March said recently, their 2026 squad is when they should rep the benefits. They have the 2nd youngest squad here and lots of players who should peak in 2026, and they literally can't be weaker at striker.

Ages in 2026:
Pepi, 23 Ferreira 25 Sargeant 26
Reyna 24 Pulisic 28 Aaronson 26 Weah, 26 Tillman 24
Adams 27 McKennie 28 Musah 23
Dest 26 Robinson 29 Scally, 23
Robinson (first choice CB but injured) 29 Sands 26, Chris Richards 26

and their keepers won't be too old and they always have decent keepers anyways.

Ream is the only player expected to start who won't be at a better age in the 2026 world cup

And obviously they'll develop more players. But that midfield should be really strong and they'll probably attract/pick a better manager too.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,677
As I stated in the match thread Southgate is so clueless that media and fans aren’t expecting much from England yet with the likes of Kane, Sake, Jude, Foden, Rashford etc I don’t see many teams better.
Just wish he could utilise them properly
 

Klopper76

"Did you see Fabinho against Red Star & Cardiff?"
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
19,855
Location
Victoria, BC
Supports
Liverpool
Can totally see him starting Phillips and Walker would have played if he was fit. My guess at the starting 11.
Pickford
TAA White Dier Maguire Trippier
Phillips Rice
Mount Kane Foden
It’ll be interesting to see how TAA does in a back five if that is the starting XI. Kane, Foden, Rice, White and Trippier are the automatic starters for me. Saka and Walker if fit as well. I’d prefer Ramsdale over Pickford.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Good start for ye this. Nice to see Saka and Rashford starting off with some goals too given the abuse they got after the Euros.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,255
The upgrade from Phillips or Henderson to Bellingham could be the biggest advantage England have in this World Cup.
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,328
Good start for ye this. Nice to see Saka and Rashford starting off with some goals too given the abuse they got after the Euros.
Will Southgate get any praise for this. Its been 3 toournaments now watching England do more than I've seen them do under any other manager. Sure its not quite impressive outside the tournaments, but you have to admit he takes care of easier teams than managers before him.
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
8,996
It’s coming home, I can’t see how it possibly wouldn’t at this point.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,391
Shaw, Bellingham, Maguire, Saka, Rashford, Rice all very good.

Trippier and Stones were shocking.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Let's be honest, I think England is very strong. So much depth on the bench too.
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,309
Location
Ireland
Straight through to the final, I'd say. Easy enough route unless one of the bigger teams fumbles or England somehow come second in this group.
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,536
Will Southgate get any praise for this. Its been 3 toournaments now watching England do more than I've seen them do under any other manager. Sure its not quite impressive outside the tournaments, but you have to admit he takes care of easier teams than managers before him.
This is also the best and most balanced England team we've had in a looong time.
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
Bellingham is everything Paul Pogba thinks he is. Probably the most complete midfielder in a long time.
 

Lecland07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2021
Messages
2,835
I was expecting that game to be a complete bore fest, to be honest.

Was good to watch. Some very good goals.
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,781
Good start, Southgate let the handbrake off there was some good football and they got up the pitch and pressed Iran high alot.

Be interesting to see if we know stick with the 4-3-3 or will Southgate resort to the back 5 if we get through and play some better sides.

If we stick with 4-3-3 and play with the bravery we saw today, we have a real chance at this world cup, if though we resort to the defensive drab stuff I think better sides will just pick us off.

Best form of defensive is a good offence and we have plenty of talent and depth in that area.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,995
Location
Canada
Can’t they meet Arge in quarters?
Unlikely. It'll be Senegal or Ecuador in ro16 (should be easy), France or Denmark in quarters (whoever tops group, not easy but easier than Arge/Brazil/Netherlands/Germany/Spain IMO), and then it'll be Spain/Germany (whoever finishes 2nd, or Portugal) in the semi.

So easy route to quarters at least.
 

Coxy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
3,225
Location
Derby
Will Southgate get any praise for this. Its been 3 toournaments now watching England do more than I've seen them do under any other manager. Sure its not quite impressive outside the tournaments, but you have to admit he takes care of easier teams than managers before him.
As soon as we're up against a top team though - we'll go all defensive again.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,995
Location
Canada
It won't happen but Rashford on the left would really be their best option IMO. At least he took his chance today and will probably get more sub time!
 

Djemba-Djemba

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
21,366
Location
Manchester
I thought Trippier was poor as was Stones and Mount did his usual complete nothing performance for England.

Very good going forward though.

Iran were rubbish but we've struggled badly against rubbish teams plenty of times, like Scotland for example.