The centre-forward market...

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,327
Would go all in for Osimhen then rotate Eriksen and permanently signed Sabitzer as Casa partner, in regards to other options I would take a Ramos/Kolo-Muani IF (huge one) Benzema could be persuaded by the Real Madrid secret agents to join us for a season which looks an impossible ask.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,340
I wonder if a dark horse like Shick or Morata might be more likely than discussed here.

Shick is having a down year (not his first) but he's a big rangy, technically good #9 who could play up top or in the role Weghorst has been playing as a 9/10 type with Rashford the highest player on the pitch a good chunk of the time. We'd probably want to sign a healthier more reliable forward type with him since he isn't an ironman type like a Bruno, and move on from Martial and Weghorst, like if we got Marcus Thuram on a free then a high risk, good fit like this makes more sense.

Morata is just a straight 7.5/10 plan F option if we can't get Kane, Osimhen, Ramos, Vlahovic or Kolo Muani, but there's really no guarantee we actually get any of our targets, if say Ramos and Kolo Muani are priced at 90M, which is not out of the realm of possibilities, the striker market has felt insane since Newcastle paid 30M for a 31 year old Chris Wood (there's other examples, I know they were desperate to avoid even a hint of relegation).
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
Sometimes I can’t help myself, but honestly, if we signed Kai Havertz somewhat cheap from CFC, I would be pretty excited…
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,577
Location
Canada
The improvement in our team with even an average top 6 striker would be ridiculous
 

Bojan Djordjic

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
1,649
The improvement in our team with even an average top 6 striker would be ridiculous
The improvement in our team with WW over Ronaldo is already ridiculous. His pressing and tackling in advanced areas combined with reasonably good build up play has outweighed the negative of him being probably the worst finisher and slowest player I've ever seen play for the club.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Sometimes I can’t help myself, but honestly, if we signed Kai Havertz somewhat cheap from CFC, I would be pretty excited…
Good lord, I don't understand sometimes how we can watch the same game as fans and.have such differing opinions on a player!

Personally I think he offers sweet FA and playing him up top is a large reason Chelsea score feck all.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,400
The improvement in our team with WW over Ronaldo is already ridiculous. His pressing and tackling in advanced areas combined with reasonably good build up play has outweighed the negative of him being probably the worst finisher and slowest player I've ever seen play for the club.
Today's game has convinced me to chose Osihmen. He runs non stop too, pressing and always makes runs in behind.

If he was our striker today, no doubt it would have been 6
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
Good lord, I don't understand sometimes how we can watch the same game as fans and.have such differing opinions on a player!

Personally I think he offers sweet FA and playing him up top is a large reason Chelsea score feck all.
Yeah, haha, thing is, we score pretty much too with WW on top who also don’t score.

Seriously though, I was mostly joking with Kai Havertz. But the thing is, if you look around Europe for strikers that (a) have some size, (b) have a lot of quality on the ball, is good on the linkup, (c) have the smarts to play in an advanced system and (d) might be available — the list isn’t that long.

Like of course you take Osimehn or Kane or Sesko — and I would actually like Toney — but there are no guarantees.
*Napoli might not sell Osimehn. Napoli might go to the final of the CL and want another shot at it next season, could they tell Osimehn, ‘we will sell you, but only next summer’? I don’t know, but it’s not like I would fall of a chair in surprise if it happened.
*Is Harry Kane available? Maybe. Probably. But again, it’s basically never guaranteed that a top player of a top 5 PL club will be sold. They would never sell him for money reasons, will he force himself out?
*Will Leipzig sell Sesko before he played one game for them? I think it makes sense, and I would pay through the nose to get him. But they aren’t in desperate need for cash either. Leipzig could litterary sell 3 players for well over 300m in Sesko, Gvardiol and Nkunku. They can’t be desperate to cash in all at once.
*Toney? Maybe he won’t be considered due to the betting issues.

There are of course other options.

BUT, I clearly remember a young Robin Van Persie having the exact same rep as Havertz have now (albeit at a bit younger age). RVP just could not score for Arsenal his first two years. Great team. A ton of chances. And 5 goals in 26 games. His second year, 5 goals in 24 games. And then for like 4 season, he didn’t score much, 9-10 goals. RVP didn’t score more than 11 goals in the PL before he was 28, then the year after he had 30 goals, we bought him, and he had 26.

Havertz do remind me a bit of a RVP in his early 20s. Is he a top “x” option, haha, nah, but like let’s say Boehly had to sell players for FFP reasons and we can’t get our top options, I wouldn’t mind buying low, could definitely see him come here and break out.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,501
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
Good lord, I don't understand sometimes how we can watch the same game as fans and.have such differing opinions on a player!

Personally I think he offers sweet FA and playing him up top is a large reason Chelsea score feck all.
Chelsea fans would gladly sell him to us, which should tell anyone who doesn't watch him all they need to know.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,501
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
Today's game has convinced me to chose Osihmen. He runs non stop too, pressing and always makes runs in behind.

If he was our striker today, no doubt it would have been 6
Yep, it's the single reason I prefer him to Kane. Sure Kane will bully his way to numbers, but Osimhen is a more natural fit for how we look to press and play.
 

Fer

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
2,784
Sometimes I can’t help myself, but honestly, if we signed Kai Havertz somewhat cheap from CFC, I would be pretty excited…
He would be a good signing because he is versatile. Havertz could play as CAM, RW, false 9 and ST. He would rotate with Bruno, Antony and hopefully Osimhen.
 

CM10

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,275
He would be a good signing because he is versatile. Havertz could play as CAM, RW, false 9 and ST. He would rotate with Bruno, Antony and hopefully Osimhen.
If we did sign Osimhen, Havertz could play any of those positions and still not improve us in any!
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,340
Sometimes I can’t help myself, but honestly, if we signed Kai Havertz somewhat cheap from CFC, I would be pretty excited…
I'm with you, but we're probably wrong. This makes sense to me as plans A and B in attack:

Plan A:
-----------------Striker---------------
Rashford------------------Antony
------------------Bruno------------------

Plan B:
Rashford----------------------------
---------------Havertz-------Antony
------------------Bruno------------------

so basically what we've seen this year with Havertz as the Weghorst figure faciliating Rashford, but a proper #9 instead of Martial/Ronaldo.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,327
Ideally we could have a Haaland & Alvarez situation with either Kane/Osimhen and a backup capable of still offering threat
 

Erik the Red

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2022
Messages
707
Ideally we could have a Haaland & Alvarez situation with either Kane/Osimhen and a backup capable of still offering threat
Ideally three strikers with the amount of games we are going to play, and the likelihood of subbing on a striker every game, either to replace the striker, or to change formation if we are chasing the game. I've started to cool on both Kane and Osimhen. The "leaks" from Tottenham of £100m valuation are clear signals that they won't sell unless they get a ridiculous offer. Osimhen is brilliant at some things, pressing, heading, speed and strength, but his style is probably not what ETH is trying to implement. I think they will both be stupidly expensive and not worth the risk. Martial will still be here next season as nobody will buy him or agree to pay his current wages, and when fit (say 30% of the time) he is actually a very good striker and is perfect for our set up. Beyond that, Weghorst, while a genuine, good character and top professional, is not good enough. I can see us bringing in a cheap solution like Benzema or Thuram, along with a couple of young players with a lot of potential, maybe Hojlund initially and Ferguson being loaned straight back to Brighton until Martial's contract is up.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
13,615
Kane Kane and Evan Ferguson.

And since we can't sell him, Martial as a third option behind Rashford/Garnacho and behind Kane/Ferguson.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Kane Kane and Evan Ferguson.

And since we can't sell him, Martial as a third option behind Rashford/Garnacho and behind Kane/Ferguson.
Why would Evan Ferguson ever come as a back up to Kane? That's one way to ruin a burgeoning career.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,327
Ideally three strikers with the amount of games we are going to play, and the likelihood of subbing on a striker every game, either to replace the striker, or to change formation if we are chasing the game. I've started to cool on both Kane and Osimhen. The "leaks" from Tottenham of £100m valuation are clear signals that they won't sell unless they get a ridiculous offer. Osimhen is brilliant at some things, pressing, heading, speed and strength, but his style is probably not what ETH is trying to implement. I think they will both be stupidly expensive and not worth the risk. Martial will still be here next season as nobody will buy him or agree to pay his current wages, and when fit (say 30% of the time) he is actually a very good striker and is perfect for our set up. Beyond that, Weghorst, while a genuine, good character and top professional, is not good enough. I can see us bringing in a cheap solution like Benzema or Thuram, along with a couple of young players with a lot of potential, maybe Hojlund initially and Ferguson being loaned straight back to Brighton until Martial's contract is up.
Benzema with a talented backup could work but despite having agents Rapha and Casa I still don't think he would come
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
13,615
Why would Evan Ferguson ever come as a back up to Kane? That's one way to ruin a burgeoning career.
A highly debatable concern. So let's debate it!

Evan Ferguson will still be 18 (but 19 in October) when the new season starts, not exactly an age when one's career is threated with ruin .
There is no top club* on the planet which would instantly make Ferguson an automatic regular starter. None.
Ferguson might reasonably expect to start o a regular basis for a top club when he's 21, but not as a teenager.
Kane is on the back end of his career now, probably having only 2 stellar seasons left in him.
Kane and ETH, both being aware of the need to manage Kane's minutes, will be delighted to use Ferguson quite often during these transitional years from by to man.
Ferguson would benefit immensely by going to a top club but not having the weight of the world on his shoulders to deliver immediately.
Ferguson will outgrow Brighton quickly.

*By "top club" I mean the following in no particular order:

United
City
Arsenal
Liverpool
Chelsea
Real
Barcelona
Bayern
Dortmund
PSG**
(Brighton is not a "top club"...although I've just checked this week's 538 world ranking of top clubs and Brighton, incredibly, comes in 10th! https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/soccer-predictions/global-club-rankings/)

**I hate to include PSG as they've won fukkall, but let's include them anyway.
 

mariko48

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
88
Location
Vietnam
Buy both Ferguson and Kane, let Brighton keep Ferguson for 2 seasons. He'll be ready when Kane starts declining.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,215
Location
NYC
Evan Ferguson is an interesting, rare talent. He plays in a way naturally and instinctively efficient. At 18, no one knows if he ends up a high-yield goal scorer one day, but his play can already make big impact even without goals. We should go for him.
 

KikiDaKats

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
2,607
Location
Salford
Supports
His Liverpool supporting wife
There are lots of good strikers out there to make us a better team than Kane or Osimhen will but they won’t cause the buzz. It’s getting to a strange level where people accepting price for ability. I believe Kane to be a better striker than Osimhen will ever be but I don’t think he will be a great signing.
We don’t only need a top striker, we need one that will allow us to dominate games and those don’t come with exceptional goal count.
Our scouting department should start doing their job and get the manager what he needs, instead of social of listening to the social media brigade.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,327
I wonder if a dark horse like Shick or Morata might be more likely than discussed here.

Shick is having a down year (not his first) but he's a big rangy, technically good #9 who could play up top or in the role Weghorst has been playing as a 9/10 type with Rashford the highest player on the pitch a good chunk of the time. We'd probably want to sign a healthier more reliable forward type with him since he isn't an ironman type like a Bruno, and move on from Martial and Weghorst, like if we got Marcus Thuram on a free then a high risk, good fit like this makes more sense.

Morata is just a straight 7.5/10 plan F option if we can't get Kane, Osimhen, Ramos, Vlahovic or Kolo Muani, but there's really no guarantee we actually get any of our targets, if say Ramos and Kolo Muani are priced at 90M, which is not out of the realm of possibilities, the striker market has felt insane since Newcastle paid 30M for a 31 year old Chris Wood (there's other examples, I know they were desperate to avoid even a hint of relegation).
We can't get any of them it's a total shambles and shows we haven't much pull
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Grew up as a United fan. Bit more palatable if hes coming off the bench for United
He's literally just established himself as a first team player for Brighton. It would be incredible stupid to come and be a backup/rotation to one of the best strikers in the league.
A highly debatable concern. So let's debate it!

Evan Ferguson will still be 18 (but 19 in October) when the new season starts, not exactly an age when one's career is threated with ruin .
There is no top club* on the planet which would instantly make Ferguson an automatic regular starter. None.
Ferguson might reasonably expect to start o a regular basis for a top club when he's 21, but not as a teenager.
Kane is on the back end of his career now, probably having only 2 stellar seasons left in him.
Kane and ETH, both being aware of the need to manage Kane's minutes, will be delighted to use Ferguson quite often during these transitional years from by to man.
Ferguson would benefit immensely by going to a top club but not having the weight of the world on his shoulders to deliver immediately.
Ferguson will outgrow Brighton quickly.

*By "top club" I mean the following in no particular order:

United
City
Arsenal
Liverpool
Chelsea
Real
Barcelona
Bayern
Dortmund
PSG**
(Brighton is not a "top club"...although I've just checked this week's 538 world ranking of top clubs and Brighton, incredibly, comes in 10th! https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/soccer-predictions/global-club-rankings/)

**I hate to include PSG as they've won fukkall, but let's include them anyway.
But he is starting for a very decent club now. It is far better for him to develop his game, playing regularly than given limited game time at us. I say limited game time as well, because if we are purchasing Kane, he should be the first name on the team sheet and should be pretty impossible for a 18/19 to dislodge one of the prem's top goalscorers of all time.

The bolded makes my case for me! Why move then?

I disagree he would benefit immensely by going to a top club, he would benefit immensely from a couple of good seasons at Brighton way more.

I don't disagree he'll outgrow Brighton quickly, but that does not make the decision to go come and be backup to Kane, a good one.
 

scottser

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 23, 2022
Messages
569
Whoever buys Ferguson should send him straight back to Brighton on loan.
 

Bojan Djordjic

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
1,649
Whoever buys Ferguson should send him straight back to Brighton on loan.
Think there's more chance of Brighton doing what they did with Caicedo and offering him a new more lucrative contract which reflects his progress. They might even add a release clause that is high but not unattainable which would give him some control over his future should he outgrow the club in the medium term.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Luckhurst didn't even know this Danish lad existed two weeks ago. His tweets should be banned from this forum. He is an absolute chancer and hasn't got a clue about anything.
 

UTAretro

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2022
Messages
436
Supports
Brighton
Think there's more chance of Brighton doing what they did with Caicedo and offering him a new more lucrative contract which reflects his progress. They might even add a release clause that is high but not unattainable which would give him some control over his future should he outgrow the club in the medium term.
Hiya - just a slight correction. Brighton as a club don’t do release clauses under Tony Bloom’s ownership. Paul Barber has spoken about this in fan forums over the years and made the club policy very clear. Barber has stated that Tony believes having a release clause of any kind - even a very high one - is never beneficial to the club. The thinking is that if a player wants to move, and the fee is right, the club won’t stand in their way in a summer transfer window. So having a release clause is actually a hindrance to negotiating a sale, given all our most valuable players are already signed to long term contracts.

Potter didn’t have a “release clause”, De Zerbi doesn’t have one (despite what Fabrizio Romano claims on Twitter - a guy who is something like 0-6 in Brighton transfer predictions) and none of our players have one. What they have is a very strong negotiating position and some superb businessmen running the club.

For the sake of completeness, there has been one “release clause” activated during Tony Bloom’s 14 years as Chairman. Aaron Mooy was allowed to move to a Chinese Super League team, due to his family situation, which was non-negotiable to allow us to sign him.

Evan Ferguson renewed his contract until June 2026 in October 2022, so while another new contract in the summer is possible, it’s not that likely as the club won’t keep giving new contracts to players with three years already remaining, solely on the basis of half a good season and internet rumours of transfer interest.

I personally think a move for Ferguson is very unlikely yet, but if it should happen this summer the fee would be enormous, as I opined in the other thread about the lad.
 

captaincantona

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,609
Hojlund is the one - I have just decided. Kane too old ; Osimhen too expensive; Ferguson too slow; Vlahovic = average; Sesko too raw; Toney too much of a gamble…; )…Ramos too expensive and looks average;

Hojlund is our next Great Dane.
 

Bojan Djordjic

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
1,649
Hiya - just a slight correction. Brighton as a club don’t do release clauses under Tony Bloom’s ownership. Paul Barber has spoken about this in fan forums over the years and made the club policy very clear. Barber has stated that Tony believes having a release clause of any kind - even a very high one - is never beneficial to the club. The thinking is that if a player wants to move, and the fee is right, the club won’t stand in their way in a summer transfer window. So having a release clause is actually a hindrance to negotiating a sale, given all our most valuable players are already signed to long term contracts.

Potter didn’t have a “release clause”, De Zerbi doesn’t have one (despite what Fabrizio Romano claims on Twitter - a guy who is something like 0-6 in Brighton transfer predictions) and none of our players have one. What they have is a very strong negotiating position and some superb businessmen running the club.

For the sake of completeness, there has been one “release clause” activated during Tony Bloom’s 14 years as Chairman. Aaron Mooy was allowed to move to a Chinese Super League team, due to his family situation, which was non-negotiable to allow us to sign him.

Evan Ferguson renewed his contract until June 2026 in October 2022, so while another new contract in the summer is possible, it’s not that likely as the club won’t keep giving new contracts to players with three years already remaining, solely on the basis of half a good season and internet rumours of transfer interest.

I personally think a move for Ferguson is very unlikely yet, but if it should happen this summer the fee would be enormous, as I opined in the other thread about the lad.
No worries, I was just speculating about the transfer release clause but fair enough if they don't do them at Brighton although not quite sure what motivated someone like Caicedo to stay and sign a new contract when he seemed so adamant to leave to Arsenal in the summer (or was it January). Perhaps he just wanted a fair deal.

Hadn't realised Ferguson had his contract renewed. Fbref uses capology for contract data and it still has him on a 3k/w contract until Jun 2023 which is clearly not up to date (I should have put two and two together over that in fairness or else he'd be a freebie for the highest bidder this summer). However, there is a story in the S*n today saying Brighton would be offering him a bumper new deal despite re-signing in October.