Squeaky Bumtime
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
- Messages
- 1,306
Yes. Definitely.@Squeaky Bumtime for real right now!
Yes. Definitely.@Squeaky Bumtime for real right now!
It didn’t look to bad tbf and he wanted to play on so here’s hopingThing is, he hasn’t really played much so maybe just lacks match sharpness.
The hope is shaw has just rolled his ankle. If it’s ligaments, he’s done for this season
Let’s be honest, we only scored through individual brilliance and our best two chances came from the same. It’s what wins games like this but Soton executed their game plan better than ours. We should have gone like for like in the second half but our front 3 don’t tend to defend or drop back as much, and we don’t play with one up front.They were decent and lucky. They didn't deserve two goals but that's how it goes.
Wrong side of the defender. He made some badly judged passes in the first half too that helped Southamptons pressure. We need better from someone in his position.Wasn’t Lindelöf fault. Was just an amazing corner kick and virtually indefensible
Well I can't see them all losing all 3 remaining games so they will take points off Chelsea and Leicester.We had alot of fortune this weekend and bummed it. I wouldn't hold your breath.
And the goals continue to flow, 48 scored in that run.18 games undefeated, be proud fellow Reds.
Is it that many? Even more impressive. What's the P W D L F A over the unbeaten sequence?And the goals continue to flow, 48 scored in that run.
W13 D5 L0 F48 A8.Is it that many? Even more impressive. What's the P W D L F A over the unbeaten sequence?
He was marking three men on his ownGot bullied at the back post.
He market no one. Absolutely criminal to let their man in front and hold him off. He has qualities but weakness is not something you want in a CB. Not the first time his weak play has cost us points. The guy actually moved towards him he should have be manhandled behind the cb long before the ball came in.He was marking three men on his own
You can only make changes in three periods, or something along those lines. We'd used all ours so there wasn't an option to use anotherCan anyone explain why we never replaced Williams when he came off?
I'm pretty sure we only used 4 subs. Am I missing something?
The substitutions process was badly managed by the United bench. Always leave a window in case of emergency, like if a keeper is sent off, or in case of injury as happened yesterday. The bench could have easily made four subs in two windows.You can only make changes in three periods, or something along those lines. We'd used all ours so there wasn't an option to use another
Cheers, mighty impressive, right i'm off to the "Let's get rid of Ole and replace him with that Argentinian geezer that was at Tottenham while we still can" thread.W13 D5 L0 F48 A8.
I can see Chelsea losing at least 1 or 2 of theirs.Remaking fixtures
Chelsea: Norwich, Liverpool and Wolves
Leicester: Spurs, Sheffield Utd and us.
Utd: palace, West Ham and Leicester
Apart from Norwich I don’t see any foregone conclusions.
it’s going to the wire
Can this be plastered somewhere? pPSA
YOU ARE ALLOWED 5 SUBS PER GAME BUT ONLY IN THREE BLOCKS.
WE DIDN’T MAKE 5 SUBS BUT WE DID MAKE SUBS ON 3 SEPARATE OCCASIONS
YOU CAN STOP ASKING THIS QUESTION NOW OR IN THE VERY LEAST READ THE POST BEFORE YOURS WHERE SOMEONE ASKS THE SAME QUESTION.
Chris Kavanagh