FA Premier League

Manchester United 4:0 West Ham United

Old Trafford

Kick-off
Sun, 13 August 2017 @ 4:00pm BST
Status

Closed

Discussion Your Lineup Prediction

  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Shuriken

    New Member
    Joined
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages
    714
    Would like to see;

    ----------------------------DDG------------------------------
    --------------Bailly------Smalling------Jones-------------
    Valencia------------------Matic------------------Darmian
    -----------------Herrera----------Pogba-------------------
    ----------------------------Mhiki-----------------------------
    ----------------Lukaku------------Martial------------------

    Obviously LWB is still an issue. Rose would be perfect.
    Starting eleven. Not starting twelve. ;)
     

    WhoDaGOAT

    New Member
    Joined
    Oct 28, 2015
    Messages
    3,719
    Would like to see;

    ----------------------------DDG------------------------------
    --------------Bailly------Smalling------Jones-------------
    Valencia------------------Matic------------------Darmian
    -----------------Herrera----------Pogba-------------------
    ----------------------------Mhiki-----------------------------
    ----------------Lukaku------------Martial------------------

    Obviously LWB is still an issue. Rose would be perfect.
    I know Mkhi looks small, but I'm not sure we'll get away with him as our 12th man. :lol:
     

    podurban2

    Full Member
    Joined
    Nov 30, 2010
    Messages
    5,842
    We'll win 2-0 I think. Goals from Lukaku and Mata or Martial off the bench.

    DDG Valencia Bailly Lindelof Darmian Herrera Matic Pogba Mkhtaryan Rashford Lukaku
    I'll go with this line-up. Also zero chance of Martial starting ahead of Rashford.
     

    Shuriken

    New Member
    Joined
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages
    714
    Don't like this whole 3-at-the-back too much. It's nice being flexible and adapting to it for certain matches or match scenarios on the fly.

    However, I perceive it as more about the fact that Chelsea had success with it last season, and now all of the sudden everyone else should do it too. Like a trend somehow. Too much focus on formations.

    The type of successes we may or may not achieve isn't dependent on the formation…
     

    SkeppyRed

    Lineups Game Winner 2012/13
    Joined
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages
    4,064
    Don't like this whole 3-at-the-back too much. It's nice being flexible and adapting to it for certain matches or match scenarios on the fly.

    However, I perceive it as more about the fact that Chelsea had success with it last season, and now all of the sudden everyone else should do it too. Like a trend somehow. Too much focus on formations.

    The type of successes we may or may not achieve isn't dependent on the formation…
    I was thinking more that we would benefit from two up front and still control the midfield whilst having width. We have no natural wingers but three talented Strikers and and plenty of central midfielders.
     

    Shuriken

    New Member
    Joined
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages
    714
    I was thinking more that we would benefit from two up front and still control the midfield whilst having width. We have no natural wingers but three talented Strikers and and plenty of central midfielders.
    I wasn't talking about your prediction, specifically. Sorry for the misunderstanding. :)

    Some form of 3-at-the-back delusional mass-hysteria going on amongst the supporters around the football world right now, in general. The magic isn't in the formation, so to speak.

    Chelsea had a one-off season with that formation and everything aligned correctly for them over the course of those 38 matches, including lack of injuries and a smaller fixture schedule, making it easier to maintain form.

    Anyway, regarding 3-at-the-back: We shouldn't be utilising that setup with a 5-3-2 (which at times looked more like a 8-1-1 against Real, hehe) – I'd prefer we'd rather go with a 5-2-3 or a 3-4-3, where the two outside forwards in the front three can tuck inside.

    For the West Ham match I hope and think that we'll go with the more traditional 4-3-3 and Matic or Carrick as the defensive mid. In the end though, it's all dynamic and it can change during play, it's just the nature of the sport, that's really the gist of my point.
     
    Last edited:

    LoneStar

    Full Member
    Joined
    Jun 25, 2017
    Messages
    3,558
    want to see this side

    ----------------de gea----------------------
    valencia---bailly---smalling-------darmian
    -----------pogba-----matic----------------
    ----rashford-----mkhi-----------martial---
    ----------------lukaku---------------------

    love if we start going gung-ho for our home matches this season.
    Yup, I'm hoping for this. Except Jones instead of Smalling. It's a game at Old Trafford, so I hope we dominate the game and get off to a good start.

    I'm going with 2-0. Lukaku and Mikhi to score.
     

    Havak

    Pokemon master
    Joined
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages
    7,626
    Location
    Salford, Manchester
    de Gea
    Valencia Bailly Smalling Darmian
    Matic
    Herrera Pogba
    Mkhitaryan Lukaku Rashford
    ---
    Romero; Lindelof, Blind; Carrick, Mata, Lingard; Martial​

    4-1.
     

    haram

    New Member
    Joined
    May 28, 2017
    Messages
    12,921
    At striker no, on the wing yes.
    In EITHER position, Rashford should be starting ahead of Martial. Rashford instead of Martial coming on for Lingard in the super cup is a very good sign.
     

    Canagel

    Full Member
    Joined
    May 26, 2016
    Messages
    13,888
    It'll finish 1-1 with us scoring early and then Hernandez levelling it up during the last 10 minutes. You heard it here first.
     

    Mr Smith

    Full Member
    Joined
    Oct 4, 2015
    Messages
    4,020
    Location
    Australia
    Don't like this whole 3-at-the-back too much. It's nice being flexible and adapting to it for certain matches or match scenarios on the fly.

    However, I perceive it as more about the fact that Chelsea had success with it last season, and now all of the sudden everyone else should do it too. Like a trend somehow. Too much focus on formations.

    The type of successes we may or may not achieve isn't dependent on the formation…
    Sometimes I wonder if people post opinions like this just to be controversial. Either that, or its the classic old English opinion that's out of step with the modern game. Of course the formation and the system is a crucial factor in success. What formation you use affects your ability to maximise particular player attributes, the relationships between particular players, and most importantly the use of space, which is the single most crucial concept in football. Tactics are crucial in modern football, and can turn a match, or a season, on a knife-edge. Chelsea if anything have proved this. So did Leicester. So did Atletico. So did Mourinho during his first spell at Chelsea when his industrious midfield 3 completely overran all other premier league midfields. Formation and shape is crucial, and to suggest otherwise is terribly naive.

    Personally, I'd really like us to play 4-3-3, but there are a lot of advantages to 3-5-2. See this video on the virtues of that system for our key players.
     

    Kant-ona

    Full Member
    Joined
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages
    980
    It would be so wonderful and weird to start with a convincing win with three or more goals. Will not happen though. Expect a slow 1:0 or 0:0 with "It's just the first match of the season, we aren't in full match modus" comments.
     

    Cnaiür urs Skiötha

    Full Member
    Joined
    Jul 25, 2013
    Messages
    2,983
    What I hope we'll see:
    De Gea
    Valencia Bailly Lindelof Darmian
    Matic
    Pogba Mkhitaryan
    Rashford Lukaku Martial
    Expect to see Herrera in as the 3 man midfield though which is fine, but Martial is the one who will miss out which isn't what I want to see. Looking forward to getting things started though, we have a good opening run of fixtures so we need to get a good start and start off with a nice home win.
    I think that would be our most exciting line-up. As much as I like Herrera he and Pogba just do not seem to have such a great understanding so I would prefer to see us playing with a 10 instead.
     

    KirkDuyt

    Full Member
    Joined
    Nov 25, 2015
    Messages
    24,524
    Location
    Dutchland
    Supports
    Feyenoord
    |Let's get of to a good start and brush them aside 4-0. Fellaini hattrick.
     

    Scarecrow

    Having a week off
    Joined
    Feb 6, 2012
    Messages
    12,299
    Anything but a win would be a massive failure. We need a strong start this season.
     

    JoaquinJoaquin

    Full Member
    Joined
    Aug 7, 2014
    Messages
    8,597
    Lingard was invisible against RM, so there is some hope for Martial starting.
    No different to 90% of games he plays in, But then he starts the next match. I honestly can't see Martial starting much at all this season, Jose clearly has an issue with him and I can see it being his last season here if Jose stays in charge next season (which should be the case).
     

    Kapardin

    New Member
    Joined
    Jul 6, 2017
    Messages
    9,917
    Location
    Chennai, India
    Regardless of poor transfer window/expectations etc, I am so excited for the start of the season. We should be solid at the back with Matic shielding our defense. Our preseason has been good and hopefully some of our erratic forwards hit form. Should maintain or improve our already excellent defensive record but need more goals.

    For the game, I'd go with the Pogba-Herrera-Matic midfield. But if we are confident about our defense, I'd be tempted to start Mata ahead of Herrera in a 4-2-3-1 for added goal threat.
     

    SirFergie

    Full Member
    Joined
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages
    4,149
    Location
    Blackley, Manc
    No different to 90% of games he plays in, But then he starts the next match. I honestly can't see Martial starting much at all this season, Jose clearly has an issue with him and I can see it being his last season here if Jose stays in charge next season (which should be the case).
    Lingard was invisible against RM, so there is some hope for Martial starting.
    That's a bit unfair considering he was put in a LWB role having to watch Isco and Bale all night. He wasn't given the chance to attack other than the counter-attack that Pogba fecked up on.
     

    Wednesday at Stoke

    Full Member
    Joined
    Feb 11, 2014
    Messages
    21,674
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Supports
    Time Travel
    deGea
    Valencia Bailly Jones Blind
    Carrick
    Mata Herrera Pogba Martial
    Lukaku

    Subs: Matic | Romero | Rashford | Darmian | Smalling | Mkhitaryan​
     

    snk123

    New Member
    Joined
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages
    2,733
    In EITHER position, Rashford should be starting ahead of Martial. Rashford instead of Martial coming on for Lingard in the super cup is a very good sign.
    In EITHER position, Martial is a way better player and should be starting over Rashford
     

    Trigg

    aka Trippin_Stoned
    Joined
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages
    5,946
    Location
    Sowerby Bridge
    De Gea
    Valencia Bailly Lindellof Darmian
    Matic
    Herrera Pogba
    Mkhitaryan Lukaku Martial
    ---
    Romero; Smalling, Blind; Carrick, Mata, Felli, Rashford
    Mata to replace a midfielder if we're struggling to create which will allow he or Mkhitaryan to play behind the striker.
     

    Canagel

    Full Member
    Joined
    May 26, 2016
    Messages
    13,888
    There is no need for Herrera in a match like this where we'll dominate for large periods. We need as many goal threats as possible so Pogba and Matic are enough. The front four should be Mata, Miki, Martial and Lukaku.
     

    sunama

    Baghdad Bob
    Joined
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages
    16,836
    Mkhi and Mata have both scored plenty of goals in the past for us. Pogba is set to break the woodwork curse, Matic has decent strike on him, as does Lingard.

    That's without mentioning Martial and Rashford.

    Oh and Felli
    Is their white text missing?
    Let us remind ourselves of the "plenty" of goals which were scored by:
    Mata - 6
    Rashford - 5
    Martial - 4
    Miki - 4

    Those are the sort of goal counts, which I'd expect of attackers in a team near the bottom of the league.
    As a comparison, Lallana was Liverpools lowest goal scoring attacker. He finished on 8.
     

    Shuriken

    New Member
    Joined
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages
    714
    Sometimes I wonder if people post opinions like this just to be controversial. Either that, or its the classic old English opinion that's out of step with the modern game. Of course the formation and the system is a crucial factor in success. What formation you use affects your ability to maximise particular player attributes, the relationships between particular players, and most importantly the use of space, which is the single most crucial concept in football. Tactics are crucial in modern football, and can turn a match, or a season, on a knife-edge. Chelsea if anything have proved this. So did Leicester. So did Atletico. So did Mourinho during his first spell at Chelsea when his industrious midfield 3 completely overran all other premier league midfields. Formation and shape is crucial, and to suggest otherwise is terribly naive.

    Personally, I'd really like us to play 4-3-3, but there are a lot of advantages to 3-5-2. See this video on the virtues of that system for our key players.
    Controversial? :)

    Formations' successes or failures have more to do with the players involved in the system rather than the formations themselves. Each and every formation have strengths and weaknesses, there is no one true way.

    Adapt formations to fit the players, not the other way around. Of course formations and tactics are a crucial factor, but they are also different things. For example, you can play a high press with a 4-3-3 or a 3-5-2, or sit deep and go on the counter with the exact same formations. Or tiki-taka your way out of it, or play aerial/long balls… or whatever style of play prefer to play.

    And yes, I'm aware that the use of space is what makes football truly tick. Alongside Carl Sagan, there is another God (ironic statement, I know) I admire, and that's his genius football counterpart, Johan Cruyff: "If you have the ball you must make the field as big as possible, and if you don’t have the ball you must make it as small as possible." – the man was much more defensive-minded than perceived.

    Thanks for the links, interesting stuff! I'll go ahead and share this then too:

     

    Minimalist

    New Member
    Joined
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages
    15,091
    I simply can't ignore the fact that I feel West Ham are a really shite side.

    This really should be a comfortable 3-0 type win. Anything else and I'm going to be a bit worried going forward.

    If that makes me sound entitled so be it.
     

    whatwha

    Sniffs Erricksson’s diarrhea
    Joined
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages
    7,612
    Location
    Norway
    Awwww shiiiiit, only two days to go before our season starts! :eek:

    This summer has just flown by. Feels like only a few weeks ago since last season ended.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
Post-match discussion

Man of the Match

Nemanja Matic image Nemanja Matic 66% of 1271 votes

Runners-up

Player Ratings

7.4 Total Average Rating

Highest Rated Player

Lowest Rated Player

Compiled from 1051 ratings.

Score Predictions

729,12,50
  • Man Utd win
  • West Ham win
  • Draw

Detailed Results

  • 31% Man Utd 2:0 West Ham
  • 19% Man Utd 3:0 West Ham
  • 16% Man Utd 3:1 West Ham
  • 14% Man Utd 2:1 West Ham
  • 5% Man Utd 1:0 West Ham
  • 4% Man Utd 1:1 West Ham
  • 2% Man Utd 4:0 West Ham
  • 2% Man Utd 4:1 West Ham
  • 2% Man Utd 5:0 West Ham
  • 1% Man Utd 0:0 West Ham
  • 1% Man Utd 2:2 West Ham
  • 1% Man Utd 1:2 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 5:1 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 3:2 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 0:2 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 1:3 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 0:1 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 0:5 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 4:2 West Ham
  • 0% Man Utd 4:3 West Ham
Compiled from 791 predictions.
Show more results Score Predictions League Table

Match Stats

  1. Man Utd
  2. West Ham
Possession
55% 45%
Shots
21 9
Shots on Target
5 1
Corners
11 1
Fouls
19 7

Referee

Martin Atkinson