Recent content by Kentonio

You mean apart from the fact that basically all of us would watch it, just to talk shite about the players from other clubs? ;)

You don't turn down the huge jobs when they come along. You could then end up having a couple of rocky seasons at your current club (perhaps even for reasons outside your control) and the big job never comes around again.

Feck...

Expecting great football after the amount of transfers we saw in this window is just wildly optimistic. Let's see how things are going in the next few months before jumping to any premature conclusions.

Ah yes, the 'we're too important to fail' take. Not surprising view for a Barca fan.

If they're not careful they're going to find out what 'not existing' actually means.

He absolutely deserved to go. He was acting like a petulant child by the end.

History is one of those things that people talk about a lot, but rarely actually define. Chelsea started becoming successful in 1996 with the FA Cup win, followed in close succession by League Cup, Cup Winners Cup, Super Cup and another FA Cup. Then in comes Roman and we know what happens then...

It's kind of ridiculous though, at the start of last season your squad looked good enough to challenge for the title, let alone top 4. It feels like your issues are much more institutional rather than based on some failure to bring in good enough talent.

We are talking about the same City right? When have they ever cared about having too many players for the same positions?

A mistake to choose a CL winning manager over an Eredivisie winning manager?

Definitely used to blind opposing goalkeepers during penalties.

This probably. Thought the league was probably over the minute City bought him.

Gallagher is like bringing in a quality new signing.

The answer for Chelsea is always peak Hazard.