Recent content by SalfordRed1960

Nice result. Have some exceptional attacking talent and should focus on that more. No standout players, but thought Periera, Fred were very good. Disjointed once subs came on.

You free to define it how you want, as I did. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_fascism

Short answer Yes. If you believe fascism is total state control that suppresses and oppresses it's people, particularly the opposition, then I think far left and far right groups aspire to that. It is their way or the highway and power is more important than serving the people. The controlling...

@langster Guys, I am not wumming you up. You intepret things your way. When I read your comments it comes across as "guilty until proven innocent", rather than 'innocent until proven guilty'. As some other poster said Trump does not deserve any benefit of the doubt. That is reflected in any...

Actually I was just going through them all. Most post the same position. So what I gather is Duke was a republican who wanted to challenge another republican so rather than be an independent he ran as a democrat, but he actually wasn't a democrat. OK, get that, strange, but if that is fact I...

If you are referring to Giddy's question I answered it.

Try wikipedia, a democrat candidate in 1980.

No. sorry if I gave that perception. Never heard of him either. Do not tend to follow extremists, but was quite shocked when I heard both. Didn't realise David Duke was a democrat candidate in 1980. Just thought it was strange that he got labeled republican.

6/10. I still believe on paper we have a very good side. IMO the issue is more tactical than players. Lukaku, Martial, Sanchez, Rashford, Lingard, Fred, Pogba, Periera is one hell of a lot of attacking talent that needs to be put to use. Still have hopes that Shaw will wake up. Our central...

That is not what the footage says. He said "Get him out of here, don't hurt him, if you do I will cover your court costs". Very different to saying beat the shit out of him and I will cover your court costs. Also very different to saying go and beat up non republicans when you see them which is...

No I do not go to the rallies. I only watch the rallies after the event if there is something news worthy. They all seem the same to me. Fake news, dems are obstructing, exaggeration of progress, witch hunt, slag off opponent, react to Mueller ...repeat. They are very different to what is...

I could quite easily counter that with BS. Trump does wind the audience up, but not to attack other voters. His rallies are comical to an extent, but he does not tell voters to seek out dem voters or suggest people should be vigilantes. Sure he goes on about Fake news and they go crazy, He...

The very first paragraph implied that just because people go to a rally does not mean they will vote for him. There are lots of republicans who chose not to vote or voted against the republican. Hardly the cult that some people make out. They may all get up, clap and sing CNN sucks doesn't mean...

You need to expand The people you interact with. You only had to hear the exit polls last night to hear angry republicans giving reasons for voting democrat. Many republicans do not like the rhetoric of Trump, but they are just as mad about the lefts rhetoric. The hate and rhetoric from the...

The debate was whether he had done any good. Pretty open ended. So I gave a list of things that currently are not bad. Seems that those who oppose Trump just see everything as bad. So highlight it, be specific, just because you hate the guy, are deep into some ideology, doesn't mean everything...