Board vs Jose

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,359
Location
Birmingham
If that's true and if they indeed intend to give him 100 million in January then that is a pretty strong indicator he'll be here next season as well.
It's really isn't.
Pretty sure the club would like to buy someone like Skrinnar regardless of who the manager is.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
Would be a classic Woodward move, who has said many times that he prefers to bide his time and not rush things, which can easily turn into complacency.

We'll probably pay a premium in January as well, for players that we could have probably pushed hard for in the Summer. It's not as if Skriniar was at the world cup.
 

jem

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
9,308
Location
Toronto
It’s classic Jamie Jackson: “it’s understood that money might be available if there is potential for possibly upgrading the squad, provided that the manager has the board’s approval, which in itself is no guarantee. This has led to some disquiet, with the board said to be unhappy with the club’s current position in the table. It is understood, according to sources, that this discussion might be revisited in January. Luke Shaw is said to be bemused by this current turn of events...”
 

MuFc_1992

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
1,212
They were good not world class, they developed into world class players.
Aguero scored 27 goals in his last season at athletico and people were raving about Silva at Valencia. They were definitely considered better than the players we were signing.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Aguero scored 27 goals in his last season at athletico and people were raving about Silva at Valencia. They were definitely considered better than the players we were signing.
I wanted Augero to replace Carlos Tevez and David Silva, it was a disappointment when our bid go rejected but to say they was any more higher in talent than say singing Mata or getting Lukaku.. I’d have to disagree.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,204
Aguero scored 27 goals in his last season at athletico and people were raving about Silva at Valencia. They were definitely considered better than the players we were signing.
I didnt dispute that. Again they were good and not world class then
 

Class of 63

Sourness
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
9,028
Location
Going through the Desert on a Horse with no Name
I wanted Augero to replace Carlos Tevez and David Silva, it was a disappointment when our bid go rejected but to say they was any more higher in talent than say singing Mata or getting Lukaku.. I’d have to disagree.
We just couldn't compete with City on the wages they offered Aguero(and Yaya)at the time, and decided that Silva hadn't got back up to the level he was at before his serious ankle injury and would have been a massive gamble bringing him to a more physical league, City gambled and it paid off, but they could afford to get it wrong, United couldn't.
 

tieunhilang

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 22, 2018
Messages
250
We just couldn't compete with City on the wages they offered Aguero(and Yaya)at the time, and decided that Silva hadn't got back up to the level he was at before his serious ankle injury and would have been a massive gamble bringing him to a more physical league, City gambled and it paid off, but they could afford to get it wrong, United couldn't.
And people got offended at the idea of another oil billionaire buying us from the Glazer. It surprises me. Having a rich owner like them would make us no longer humiliated like that when City brought the likes of Yaya, Silva, Aguero...etc when we were satisfied with the likes of Bebe, Anderson, Owen, Valencia, Young... Last summer was one of the greatest disgrace we ever had with not being able to bring home a single defender while City brought in Laporte last winter with no hesitation, despite having loads of options in defense already. I just don't understand...
 

MuFc_1992

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
1,212
I wanted Augero to replace Carlos Tevez and David Silva, it was a disappointment when our bid go rejected but to say they was any more higher in talent than say singing Mata or getting Lukaku.. I’d have to disagree.
We weren't signing Mata and Lukaku back then though. Also, Lukaku is poor technically and comparable to the likes of Darren Bent not technically superior players like Aguero.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,809
They were good not world class, they developed into world class players.
Aguero used to terrorize La Liga single handedly, he was as much of a sure thing to become world class as you will ever see. We really should not have let him go to city.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
We weren't signing Mata and Lukaku back then though. Also, Lukaku is poor technically and comparable to the likes of Darren Bent not technically superior players like Aguero.
@Ekeke would tell us all the time Mata was better than Silva. I disagreed but he was definitely at the same level so that’s a non argument. Lukaku not a wonderkid like Aguero for his age in terms of what he could do, but he was very highly rated. He would have been a massive investment. Everyone had him done as the new Drogba.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,235
Location
Hope, We Lose
@Ekeke would tell us all the time Mata was better than Silva. I disagreed but he was definitely at the same level so that’s a non argument. Lukaku not a wonderkid like Aguero for his age in terms of what he could do, but he was very highly rated. He would have been a massive investment. Everyone had him done as the new Drogba.
I said Mata was more of a leader for the team when watching Valencia every week. It was him and Villa, while Silva got into good positions and finished poorly.

As soon as he went to City he had much better end product and wasnt fluffing his lines as much as at Valencia. Still a few poor finishes, but not as many.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,204
Aguero used to terrorize La Liga single handedly, he was as much of a sure thing to become world class as you will ever see. We really should not have let him go to city.
Look I didn't say he didn't have world class potential or look like he could become world class. Martial also looked the same in his first season here, the thing is he wasn't yet a world class player when they signed him.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Look I didn't say he didn't have world class potential or look like he could become world class. Martial also looked the same in his first season here, the thing is he wasn't yet a world class player when they signed him.
Aguero was absolutely quality at Atletico. He proceeded to hit 20 league goals (30 in all comps) in his first season at City and was widely considered one of the top strikers in the game. If he wasn't world class then you're being so restrictive with your application of the term to make it absolutely meaningless.

Oh, and he was far further along (as was Silva) than Martial was.
 

Joeace2020

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
439
Location
Nigeria
Well this

Jose Mourinho Left 'Fuming' as Ed Woodward Cancels January Transfer Summit at Last Minute
Chris Deeley30 OCT 2018

Jose Mourinho has been left 'fuming' after Manchester United chief executive Ed Woodward cancelled a meeting the pair had planned to discuss January transfer targets and potential plans to install a director of football at Old Trafford.

The summer transfer window saw only two arrivals intended for first team action, with backup goalkeeper Lee Grant joining Fred and Diogo Dalot on the signing list between seasons – while Mourinho was hoping to bring in a high-profile defender, with Toby Alderweireld and Jerome Boateng in mind.

The Sun report that Mourinho, who asked for the meeting last week, was told that Woodward would be unable to attend, dealing another blow to Mourinho in a month laden with frustrations.

Speaking after United's defeat to Juventus in the Champions League last week, Mourinho disclosed details of a conversation he had with Juve owner Andrea Agnelli, who he said was aiming to win ten consecutive Serie A titles.

Mourinho said: "So they won seven in a row, but they bought Cristiano and Bonucci and Can and Cancelo, so they always want more and more and more. I think the objective of the club is happiness related to football results. They are going to chase that treble. If it is not this year, they are going to chase it next year. If it is not next year, they are going to chase it in the other years.”

Asked why United are failing to match last season's runners-up spot in the Premier League, Mourinho added: “My belief is that you did not take me seriously when I said that the second position last season was a phenomenal position for us and that this season was going to be difficult. In football now, every team is getting really powerful and is ready to invest millions.”
 

MuFc_1992

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
1,212
@Ekeke would tell us all the time Mata was better than Silva. I disagreed but he was definitely at the same level so that’s a non argument. Lukaku not a wonderkid like Aguero for his age in terms of what he could do, but he was very highly rated. He would have been a massive investment. Everyone had him done as the new Drogba.
The initial point was that we weren't signing anyone at the time City signed those players. Mata etc. were signed later.
 

Water Melon

Guest
Well this
The end is close it seems, if this story is true. No big money from Woody, no top 4 from Jose. Jose leaves at the end of the season, Woody keeps his pay out. The only problem is that we are going to lose big money-wise without CL next season. However, arrival of a new manager may reignite the squad and convince certain players to renew their contracts with us.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,396
The end is close it seems, if this story is true. No big money from Woody, no top 4 from Jose. Jose leaves at the end of the season, Woody keeps his pay out. The only problem is that we are going to lose big money-wise without CL next season. However, arrival of a new manager may reignite the squad and convince certain players to renew their contracts with us.
Wouldn't make sense. Top 4 prize money + Champions League rights and player attraction for transfers next season is greater than Jose's payout no?
 

Water Melon

Guest
Wouldn't make sense. Top 4 prize money + Champions League rights and player attraction for transfers next season is greater than Jose's payout no?
Possibly, but then, even if Woody gives Jose 100 mil in Jan and he still fails (which is likely), then there would be no CL, more money wasted more players that a new manager may not want. It seems that Woody has made up his mind, Jose knows this too, so the main task for both parties is damage limitation.
 

Class of 63

Sourness
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
9,028
Location
Going through the Desert on a Horse with no Name
And people got offended at the idea of another oil billionaire buying us from the Glazer. It surprises me. Having a rich owner like them would make us no longer humiliated like that when City brought the likes of Yaya, Silva, Aguero...etc when we were satisfied with the likes of Bebe, Anderson, Owen, Valencia, Young... Last summer was one of the greatest disgrace we ever had with not being able to bring home a single defender while City brought in Laporte last winter with no hesitation, despite having loads of options in defense already. I just don't understand...
That was then, but now thanks to the tireless work of the oft maligned Ed Woodward and his team we can now not only compete with City on fees and wages but totally blow them out of the water if need be, with Alexis a prime example, and i'm sure if Mourinho had gone to Ed W and said get me Laporte he would've done
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,836
If that's true and if they indeed intend to give him 100 million in January then that is a pretty strong indicator he'll be here next season as well.
It's really isn't.
Pretty sure the club would like to buy someone like Skrinnar regardless of who the manager is.
Good answer.
It doesn't matter who the manager is, the club will buy the players who can take the club forward (both on the pitch and in financial terms). For example, if Neymar was brought in (we know that Woodward is desperate for a Galactico signing), this would happen regardless of who the manager was. Conversely, if the manager asks for a player who is not marketable OR has a low resale value, Woodward is unlikely to oblige.

Edit: oh God, another 'Warchest' article
:lol:
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,836
In fairness, you could tell Aguero would be WC all the way back at Independiente, let alone at Atlético. Our record with Argies is pretty awful though so understand it. SAF always preferred a solid British core and managed to get the best out of that so I have absolutely zero issues with it.
I think that SAF preferred EPL proven, regardless of nationality.
He got Cantona (EPL proven).
Yorke (EPL proven).
RvP
Tevez
Valencia

It just so happened that a lot of the time he bought a EPL proven player, he happened to be English.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,396
Possibly, but then, even if Woody gives Jose 100 mil in Jan and he still fails (which is likely), then there would be no CL, more money wasted more players that a new manager may not want. It seems that Woody has made up his mind, Jose knows this too, so the main task for both parties is damage limitation.
A lot of inflated assumptions in that. One that Jose wastes 100m when he knows defenders best. Another that he fails top 4 which is far from a foregone conclusion at this point in the season. The final that his signings don't suit the next manager, which given reported targets, would be extremely unlikely as they're potential stars.

Yeah we can go "he wasted money on Lindelof and Bailey" but I don't think either of them should be written off. Lindelof is building a case now, in fact. Problem is he needs a budget more than 35m eur on a CB to get that extra quality beyond them.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
The initial point was that we weren't signing anyone at the time City signed those players. Mata etc. were signed later.
Yeah. Quite clearly we never had the money. No Center midfielders for years kind of proved that.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,204
Aguero was absolutely quality at Atletico. He proceeded to hit 20 league goals (30 in all comps) in his first season at City and was widely considered one of the top strikers in the game. If he wasn't world class then you're being so restrictive with your application of the term to make it absolutely meaningless.

Oh, and he was far further along (as was Silva) than Martial was.
No shit. Its an example someone can look like they are potentially but they still have to prove it. Everyones definition is varied but hindsight isnt an option

At the time when he was at Athletico he wasn’t lablled world class, although he was someone who many thought would go on to become world class.

Him firing City to titles and scoring the goals he has in the UCL is what has earned him that label
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,777
Location
London
If Jose knows defenders best, why has he bought two stinkers for us?
Lindelof has performed really well in the last few weeks in games against top opposition so your opinion is quite harsh. Bailly, well feck knows what's wrong him - talented but far too aggressive. Neither have been rubbish signings.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
Depressing thought.
Indeed.

Thankfully it’s only Jamie Jackson reporting it.
Yeah.

If we don't make the top 4 he's gone anyway.
Idk tbh.

It's really isn't.
Pretty sure the club would like to buy someone like Skrinnar regardless of who the manager is.
Good answer.
It doesn't matter who the manager is, the club will buy the players who can take the club forward (both on the pitch and in financial terms). For example, if Neymar was brought in (we know that Woodward is desperate for a Galactico signing), this would happen regardless of who the manager was. Conversely, if the manager asks for a player who is not marketable OR has a low resale value, Woodward is unlikely to oblige.
You don't give your current manager that much money in January unless you intend to keep him, unless you're giving current manager money to buy CB for the next manager, which would be stupid but not unlike Woodward.

Especially with current manager's track record at the club when it comes to buying CB's.
 

Beachryan

More helpful with spreadsheets than Phurry
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
11,605
Personally I'm reading this as Jose's people leaked the 100m, Ed simply said no.

At least I hope that's what happened.