ICC Cricket World Cup 2019

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,777
Location
London
Honestly?

I doubt it. Cricket has an enthusiastic and keen fanbase but outside of that nobody cares. The ECB have almost entirely killed the sport in the 15 years from 2005.
Yeah, of course. In fairness, it would an incredible achievement.
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,686
Location
C-137
If England beat India I imagine you'll get a few more watching the do-or-die game against New Zealand. And then more still watching the semi-final and final.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,777
Location
London
Many, many reasons, but the main reason has been that it has been behind the paywall on Sky for 15 years. Nobody sees it other than people who specifically pay money to do so.
Good point. The 2005 Ashes being on channel 4 helped a tonne. What a summer that was.
 

Ayush_reddevil

Éire Abú
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
10,751
Many, many reasons, but the main reason has been that it has been behind the paywall on Sky for 15 years. Nobody sees it other than people who specifically pay money to do so.
It's not so straight forward unfortunately. Cricket as a sport is struggling outside the sub continent and it is very hard for the ECB to survive without sky money . Yeah in the ideal world it would be FTA but it is very hard to sustain
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
It's not so straight forward unfortunately. Cricket as a sport is struggling outside the sub continent and it is very hard for the ECB to survive without sky money . Yeah in the ideal world it would be FTA but it is very hard to sustain
Yes, and it's struggling here because nobody can watch it.

No doubt having shedloads of cash (this was never about 'survival' it was about getting filthy, stinking rich in the short term) has had its benefits, but they're massively outweighed by the downsides that come with acquiring it in this case.

Those downsides might also have been mitigated if the ECB had actually spent the money on things it was supposed to, but the grassroots has seen feck all of it. They've bankrupt counties with their insane bidding system for internationals, and they've pissed most of it away in recent years on a stupid 100 ball format that nobody cares about and ... nobody can watch because it's still mostly on fecking Sky.

550,000 people are watching on average this World Cup.
 

Ayush_reddevil

Éire Abú
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
10,751
Yes, and it's struggling here because nobody can watch it.

No doubt having shedloads of cash (this was never about 'survival' it was about getting filthy, stinking rich in the short term) has had its benefits, but they're massively outweighed by the downsides that come with acquiring it in this case.

Those downsides might also have been mitigated if the ECB had actually spent the money on things it was supposed to, but the grassroots has seen feck all of it. They've bankrupt counties with their insane bidding system for internationals, and they've pissed most of it away in recent years on a stupid 100 ball format that nobody cares about and ... nobody can watch because it's still mostly on fecking Sky.

550,000 people are watching on average this World Cup.
Again you are blaming them for not spending the money rightly but how would not having the money have solved that . Cricket is a very niche sport here and it's hardly like it was in a much better state when it was on FTA .
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,440
England have everything in their own hands at this juncture, they win both of their games and they are through. If they muck one of the games then it gets trickier. Ideally, they would want Bangladesh to beat Pakistan and lose to India to be safe.

Sunday is an absolutely massive fixture.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
Again you are blaming them for not spending the money rightly but how would not having the money have solved that . Cricket is a very niche sport here and it's hardly like it was in a much better state when it was on FTA .
I tell you what. Instead of wasting my time on this anymore why don't you pick anybody that covers English cricket (perhaps the yearly Wisden annal might be a good start, but Dobell is probably more accessible) and come back and tell me what they think of the ECB, huh?

This might come across as rude, but the only possible way you can think they've been good custodians of the game in this country over the past decade or so is if you haven't the slightest clue what they've been doing in that time. Actually, I think Death of a Gentleman covers it in good enough depth if I remember rightly; you could watch that too.
 

Ayush_reddevil

Éire Abú
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
10,751
I tell you what. Instead of wasting my time on this anymore why don't you pick anybody that covers English cricket (perhaps the yearly Wisden annal might be a good start, but Dobell is probably more accessible) and come back and tell me what they think of the ECB, huh?

This might come across as rude, but the only possible way you can think they've been good custodians of the game in this country over the past decade or so is if you haven't the slightest clue what they've been doing in that time. Actually, I think Death of a Gentleman covers it in good enough depth if I remember rightly; you could watch that too.
That's fair enough. I am not saying that they have done a great job . I just asked how you thought they had killed cricket and you said no FTA which is just not right imo
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,600
No many cared about rugby yet there was a lot of coverage for that win.
Largely because it was on terrestrial TV and so it was easy for the entire country to get behind it. The tabs follow the country's mood for coverage.

For what it's worth I think the same issue is probably happening with F1 since it has gone behind a paywall, think the interest has waned despite the fact that Lewis has won 4 of 5.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
That's fair enough. I am not saying that they have done a great job . I just asked how you thought they had killed cricket and you said no FTA which is just not right imo
Nah, I said it's the main reason. They've been equally awful in plenty of other areas too, but it's difficult to to look past trading the long term health of the game for short term profits. Even if you were to argue that some sort of deal with Sky was necessary (as the ECB did at the time) they could have done more to assure that some cricket was on FTA be it a home Ashes series (which was a protected event until the ECB removed it as one in 1999), ODIs or T20 Blast games.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
If shrilanka beat south Africa tomorrow its going to be hell of a race for 4th spot.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
It'll come down to Pak vs Ban on penultimate day....or if SL beats Ind on final day.
Probably, i expect the same, but still lots of variables.

England have it in their hands, srilanka if they win next two games. Lots of run rates involved as well if they end up with same points.

Don't know if weather gets involved as well.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
I believe the hysteria surrounding the world cup being shit after a couple of washouts has died down now? Been a series of excellent contests with a quality race for semi qualification on the cards and what people thought would be dead rubber games in the end are straight up deciders.

Been brilliant so far overall.
 

MJJ

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2009
Messages
28,954
Location
sunderland(1)-Derby(1)
I believe the hysteria surrounding the world cup being shit after a couple of washouts has died down now? Been a series of excellent contests with a quality race for semi qualification on the cards and what people thought would be dead rubber games in the end are straight up deciders.

Been brilliant so far overall.
The rain going away helped massively!
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,425
Location
Oslo, Norway
Probably, i expect the same, but still lots of variables.

England have it in their hands, srilanka if they win next two games. Lots of run rates involved as well if they end up with same points.

Don't know if weather gets involved as well.
No. If they end up level England will finish ahead because of more wins.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,408
If shrilanka beat south Africa tomorrow its going to be hell of a race for 4th spot.
It'll come down to Pak vs Ban on penultimate day....or if SL beats Ind on final day.
I think the crucial one for SL is the Windies match. With them playing India in their final group match, by which point the Indians would have already qualified, I could see a situation where the Indians either subconsciously or tactically take their foot off the pedal and SL sneak the win, as I'm sure they would rather face the known quantity of the Sri Lankans as opposed to Pak.

The Windies need to win to keep their albeit extremely slim hopes for the semis alive, and like Pak, you just never know which version of them will turn up, so it could be a cracker of a match.

While the Saffers are most likely already on the beach and just want the nightmare of this world cup to end.
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,187
Location
Interweb
It's their own fault for demanding the post IPL rest so they started the tournament late.
It wasn't a demand. SC of India has laid down some rules for BCCI which mandated a gap between when IPL ends and international cricket starts. ICC accommodated the same. But yeah we have now like 4 matches in a week's time.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,777
Location
London
I like how we've gone from being bullied by the short ball to maybe the best pullers and hookers in the game.
 

Di Maria's angel

Captain of Moanchester United
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
14,777
Location
London
Has to the best the worst decision using DRS. It was so obvious that the pad fecking moved but the blind umpire couldn't see that?