100%, people love to jump on board a winner, not that it happens to English teams in anything everTrue. However, if England win I imagine many would celebrate.
100%, people love to jump on board a winner, not that it happens to English teams in anything everTrue. However, if England win I imagine many would celebrate.
Honestly?True. However, if England win I imagine many would celebrate.
Yeah, of course. In fairness, it would an incredible achievement.Honestly?
I doubt it. Cricket has an enthusiastic and keen fanbase but outside of that nobody cares. The ECB have almost entirely killed the sport in the 15 years from 2005.
Dunno. Who really cares about cricket honestly? The Fifa womens world cup is getting more coverage.True. However, if England win I imagine many would celebrate.
Hopefully their women get eliminated tomorrow.Dunno. Who really cares about cricket honestly? The Fifa womens world cup is getting more coverage.
Why do you think that ECB has killed the sport ?Honestly?
I doubt it. Cricket has an enthusiastic and keen fanbase but outside of that nobody cares. The ECB have almost entirely killed the sport in the 15 years from 2005.
No many cared about rugby yet there was a lot of coverage for that win.Dunno. Who really cares about cricket honestly? The Fifa womens world cup is getting more coverage.
Wont help.Hopefully their women get eliminated tomorrow.
Many, many reasons, but the main reason has been that it has been behind the paywall on Sky for 15 years. Nobody sees it other than people who specifically pay money to do so.Why do you think that ECB has killed the sport ?
That's a very good point.Wont help.
This tournament needed to be on BBC. on Sky, it dies.
Good point. The 2005 Ashes being on channel 4 helped a tonne. What a summer that was.Many, many reasons, but the main reason has been that it has been behind the paywall on Sky for 15 years. Nobody sees it other than people who specifically pay money to do so.
It's not so straight forward unfortunately. Cricket as a sport is struggling outside the sub continent and it is very hard for the ECB to survive without sky money . Yeah in the ideal world it would be FTA but it is very hard to sustainMany, many reasons, but the main reason has been that it has been behind the paywall on Sky for 15 years. Nobody sees it other than people who specifically pay money to do so.
Yes, and it's struggling here because nobody can watch it.It's not so straight forward unfortunately. Cricket as a sport is struggling outside the sub continent and it is very hard for the ECB to survive without sky money . Yeah in the ideal world it would be FTA but it is very hard to sustain
Again you are blaming them for not spending the money rightly but how would not having the money have solved that . Cricket is a very niche sport here and it's hardly like it was in a much better state when it was on FTA .Yes, and it's struggling here because nobody can watch it.
No doubt having shedloads of cash (this was never about 'survival' it was about getting filthy, stinking rich in the short term) has had its benefits, but they're massively outweighed by the downsides that come with acquiring it in this case.
Those downsides might also have been mitigated if the ECB had actually spent the money on things it was supposed to, but the grassroots has seen feck all of it. They've bankrupt counties with their insane bidding system for internationals, and they've pissed most of it away in recent years on a stupid 100 ball format that nobody cares about and ... nobody can watch because it's still mostly on fecking Sky.
550,000 people are watching on average this World Cup.
I tell you what. Instead of wasting my time on this anymore why don't you pick anybody that covers English cricket (perhaps the yearly Wisden annal might be a good start, but Dobell is probably more accessible) and come back and tell me what they think of the ECB, huh?Again you are blaming them for not spending the money rightly but how would not having the money have solved that . Cricket is a very niche sport here and it's hardly like it was in a much better state when it was on FTA .
That's fair enough. I am not saying that they have done a great job . I just asked how you thought they had killed cricket and you said no FTA which is just not right imoI tell you what. Instead of wasting my time on this anymore why don't you pick anybody that covers English cricket (perhaps the yearly Wisden annal might be a good start, but Dobell is probably more accessible) and come back and tell me what they think of the ECB, huh?
This might come across as rude, but the only possible way you can think they've been good custodians of the game in this country over the past decade or so is if you haven't the slightest clue what they've been doing in that time. Actually, I think Death of a Gentleman covers it in good enough depth if I remember rightly; you could watch that too.
Largely because it was on terrestrial TV and so it was easy for the entire country to get behind it. The tabs follow the country's mood for coverage.No many cared about rugby yet there was a lot of coverage for that win.
Nah, I said it's the main reason. They've been equally awful in plenty of other areas too, but it's difficult to to look past trading the long term health of the game for short term profits. Even if you were to argue that some sort of deal with Sky was necessary (as the ECB did at the time) they could have done more to assure that some cricket was on FTA be it a home Ashes series (which was a protected event until the ECB removed it as one in 1999), ODIs or T20 Blast games.That's fair enough. I am not saying that they have done a great job . I just asked how you thought they had killed cricket and you said no FTA which is just not right imo
It'll come down to Pak vs Ban on penultimate day....or if SL beats Ind on final day.If shrilanka beat south Africa tomorrow its going to be hell of a race for 4th spot.
Probably, i expect the same, but still lots of variables.It'll come down to Pak vs Ban on penultimate day....or if SL beats Ind on final day.
The rain going away helped massively!I believe the hysteria surrounding the world cup being shit after a couple of washouts has died down now? Been a series of excellent contests with a quality race for semi qualification on the cards and what people thought would be dead rubber games in the end are straight up deciders.
Been brilliant so far overall.
No. If they end up level England will finish ahead because of more wins.Probably, i expect the same, but still lots of variables.
England have it in their hands, srilanka if they win next two games. Lots of run rates involved as well if they end up with same points.
Don't know if weather gets involved as well.
If shrilanka beat south Africa tomorrow its going to be hell of a race for 4th spot.
I think the crucial one for SL is the Windies match. With them playing India in their final group match, by which point the Indians would have already qualified, I could see a situation where the Indians either subconsciously or tactically take their foot off the pedal and SL sneak the win, as I'm sure they would rather face the known quantity of the Sri Lankans as opposed to Pak.It'll come down to Pak vs Ban on penultimate day....or if SL beats Ind on final day.
It's their own fault for demanding the post IPL rest so they started the tournament late.Feck sake, India playing again today? Do they ever rest?!
It wasn't a demand. SC of India has laid down some rules for BCCI which mandated a gap between when IPL ends and international cricket starts. ICC accommodated the same. But yeah we have now like 4 matches in a week's time.It's their own fault for demanding the post IPL rest so they started the tournament late.