Balance - back to 532 again?

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,563
Supports
Mejbri
7 centre backs
3 #10s
4 midfielders
2 forwards
1 winger

This squad (youngster aside - most people say Garner is not ready fwiw) looks more suited to 532 than 433 or 4231.

Those 4 midfielders will have an enormous task on their hands this season.
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,313
Location
playa del carmen
7 centre backs
3 #10s
4 midfielders
2 forwards
1 winger

This squad (youngster aside - most people say Garner is not ready fwiw) looks more suited to 532 than 433 or 4231.

Those 4 midfielders will have an enormous task on their hands this season.
Where is Mata in all this ? Edit. Sorry saw 10s up high.

We are clearly light in cm and don't seem to be addressing it. My guess would be that between this summer and next ole would like to fill the 10 and 7 positions and leave lingard as a rotation option and Mata as a pure squad player. I'm not sure where sanchez comes into this either but I would guess he will play a role this season before we try to shift him for any price next year.
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
We've got 5 midfielders which is more than enough for 2 spaces in a 4-2-3-1.

Think a lot of the people complaining about not having enough midfielders and haven't replaced Herrera and Fellaini believe we are going to play 4-3-3 again. Which won't be the case based on pre-season.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,240
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
I'd say its more like this (assuming Lukaku leaves):

5 midfielders (Matic, Pogba, Mctom, Pereira, Fred)
3 #10s (Mata, Lingard, Gomes)
3 wingers (James, Sanchez, Chong)
3 forwards (Greenwood, Rashford, Martial)

Having to rely on kids to flesh out the squad though. I'd normally have Martial as a winger but seems clear we're using him as a forward this season given his pre season.
 

Mr Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
4,020
Location
Australia
When its laid out like that, I do feel nervous about our lack of firepower in attack.
 

LeftyBlaster

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
7,014
Location
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
We've got 5 midfielders which is more than enough for 2 spaces in a 4-2-3-1.

Think a lot of the people complaining about not having enough midfielders and haven't replaced Herrera and Fellaini believe we are going to play 4-3-3 again. Which won't be the case based on pre-season.
The numbers don't tell the story my guy. Of those midfielders, only Pogba is top class. The rest? Matic in decline, McTominay can step in but surely needs to be rotated over an entire season. Fred has potential but hasn't convinced. Pereira only shines in pre-season. We need quality desperately here. It's as if you've got one modern fighter jet and 4 pretty sub-standard ones and yet are boasting you've got an air force.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,563
Supports
Mejbri
We’ve pursued the 4231 in pre-season (my preferred formation when the options are there) but does anyone feel confident about Pereira in a midfield two? He’s not a midfielder. And Fred has some enormous improving to do.

It’s a shame that of all the youngsters coming through, midfielders are least ready.
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,503
It's laughable. By far the worst I - and I guess the older guys here - have seen United have.
You don't believe in Rashford and Martial's potential to step up this season? Not a loaded question, some players make that leap, others don't.
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
You don't believe in Rashford and Martial's potential to step up this season? Not a loaded question, some players make that leap, others don't.
I think Rashford will improve and may get something around 20 goals but I seriously doubt Martial's development. His application is just not there when he plays. Hard to even call it lazy, it's just non-existent. Frustrating as he's got all the talent in the world.

Constantly counting on Rashford and especially Martial to step up big time is a bit naive and even if you do - that's 2 players. What about the rest? They should be an addition to ready-made world-class attack, not the only source of goals (bar Pogba).


That saying I'll be reay happy to be proved wrong if two of them carry us throughout the season.
 

Mr Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
4,020
Location
Australia
You don't believe in Rashford and Martial's potential to step up this season? Not a loaded question, some players make that leap, others don't.
I'd say I'm hovering between scepticism and very cautious optimism. I've backed Martial in particular to step up previous seasons and it hasn't happened, or at least not to the extent I expected. I do think moving Martial back up top is probably the right move though, and I'm excited to see how he goes.

Rashford for me has immense talent but still some very obvious flaws in his game, especially in terms of decision making, and I'd be very pleasantly surprised if he got more than 15 goals this season.

I just wish we'd picked up Mandzukic as a just in case...
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
By saying the attack is the worst I've seen at United I didn't intend to belittle Rashford and Martial but point out that we always had the best strikers in the world (and cover).
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
7 centre backs
3 #10s
4 midfielders
2 forwards
1 winger

This squad (youngster aside - most people say Garner is not ready fwiw) looks more suited to 532 than 433 or 4231.

Those 4 midfielders will have an enormous task on their hands this season.
I wouldn't say so. 4 midfielders for 2 positions, 3 #10's for one position. Suits 4231 better to me.
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,503
I'd say I'm hovering between scepticism and very cautious optimism. I've backed Martial in particular to step up previous seasons and it hasn't happened, or at least not to the extent I expected. I do think moving Martial back up top is probably the right move though, and I'm excited to see how he goes.

Rashford for me has immense talent but still some very obvious flaws in his game, especially in terms of decision making, and I'd be very pleasantly surprised if he got more than 15 goals this season.

I just wish we'd picked up Mandzukic as a just in case...
Martial anywhere other than centre forward makes no sense to me, and it's frustrating at United that young attackers tend to be stuck on the wings, even if their ultimate position will be central. I just don't understand it, they're different positions which require learning different skills. Of the two of them, Rashford certainly does a better job as a *wide forward* but he too should be started centrally and just told to work channels as appropriate.

Mandzukic as a signing would confuse me - I almost consider him a defensive forward, and his work rate must be diminishing now he's 33. He certainly doesn't guarantee goals!
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,503
I think Rashford will improve and may get something around 20 goals but I seriously doubt Martial's development. His application is just not there when he plays. Hard to even call it lazy, it's just non-existent. Frustrating as he's got all the talent in the world.

Constantly counting on Rashford and especially Martial to step up big time is a bit naive and even if you do - that's 2 players. What about the rest? They should be an addition to ready-made world-class attack, not the only source of goals (bar Pogba).


That saying I'll be reay happy to be proved wrong if two of them carry us throughout the season.
I agree I'd feel a lot better if we had a central player with a great goal record as a safety net.... I guess Sanchez is meant to be that, but anytime he's on the pitch it feels like a Special Guest Appearance in a sitcom.
 

Mr Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
4,020
Location
Australia
Martial anywhere other than centre forward makes no sense to me, and it's frustrating at United that young attackers tend to be stuck on the wings, even if their ultimate position will be central. I just don't understand it, they're different positions which require learning different skills. Of the two of them, Rashford certainly does a better job as a *wide forward* but he too should be started centrally and just told to work channels as appropriate.

Mandzukic as a signing would confuse me - I almost consider him a defensive forward, and his work rate must be diminishing now he's 33. He certainly doesn't guarantee goals!
I agree it's frustrating that our young forwards get pushed out wide so much, and it's also resulted in us not signing any wingers for the past 5 years.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,605
I'd say its more like this (assuming Lukaku leaves):

5 midfielders (Matic, Pogba, Mctom, Pereira, Fred)
3 #10s (Mata, Lingard, Gomes)
3 wingers (James, Sanchez, Chong)
3 forwards (Greenwood, Rashford, Martial)

Having to rely on kids to flesh out the squad though. I'd normally have Martial as a winger but seems clear we're using him as a forward this season given his pre season.
I'd say that's at least in line with the United way.
 

Tomuś

Nani is crap, I tell you!
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
6,177
Location
Świdnik
I agree I'd feel a lot better if we had a central player with a great goal record as a safety net.... I guess Sanchez is meant to be that, but anytime he's on the pitch it feels like a interlude in family guy.
more like
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,240
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
I'd say that's at least in line with the United way.
I wouldn't have an issue with it as long as the senior players were top quality. They aren't, so that in itself is a big concern. I do agree with Ole though, we can't rebuild everything in one Summer, but not bringing in another midfielder seems like negligence to me.
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,503
I agree it's frustrating that our young forwards get pushed out wide so much, and it's also resulted in us not signing any wingers for the past 5 years.
Is James genuinely going to get match time on the right wing? There's going to be an all-out assault for Sancho next summer for sure, but CL football is the bare minimum for that to be successful.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,563
Supports
Mejbri
I wouldn't say so. 4 midfielders for 2 positions, 3 #10's for one position. Suits 4231 better to me.
It’s the quality of those 4. There is hardly a combination of two that really compliments each other. And then there are other complexities, like Matic can’t play when Mata is playing (and vice versa).
We have one top quality midfielder wanting out, one on a pretty steep decline, one young and progressing and the fourth having been anonymous in his first season. So many question marks and so little certainty.

But I do prefer 4231 when the personnel allows for it.
 

Momochiru

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
1,989
Location
マンチェスター·ユナイテッド
I'd say its more like this (assuming Lukaku leaves):

5 midfielders (Matic, Pogba, Mctom, Pereira, Fred)
5 midfielders for 2 spots is not that bad, plus we have Garner as a backup. He can provide cover for some LC and EL games, where even Gomes might be an option.
3 #10s (Mata, Lingard, Gomes)
Not worried about #10, Sanchez, Pereira, Greenwood can all play there. Even Pogba and Mctom can be used there - we have plenty of bodies for one position.
3 wingers (James, Sanchez, Chong)
Mata, Lingard, Gomes, Greenwood, Rashford, Martial and Pereira can all play there, not to mention Dalot or even Young. So plenty of bodies for 2 positions.
3 forwards (Greenwood, Rashford, Martial)
Sanchez can do a job there, even James can be used, so for one position that's plenty of cover.

Having to rely on kids to flesh out the squad though. I'd normally have Martial as a winger but seems clear we're using him as a forward this season given his pre season.
Overall I'm not concerned - we are not going to challenge for the title this year, so my main source of enjoyment would be to see the youth given a lot of playing time, so I'm happy with what we got. I'm actually concerned that we got too many players for some positions, especially central defense.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,563
Supports
Mejbri
If we were to play 532 due to some midfield crisis, we've got two decent backline options IMV

---------AWB---Maguire---Lindelof
Dalot-----------------------------Shaw

or, preferably

----Lindelof---Tuanzebe---Maguire
AWB------------------------------Shaw

Tuanzebe's pace can cover both ball playing centre backs who in turn can help circulate the ball and look for openings in midfield. This of course limits width going forward but with a 4231, having two ball playing centre backs with limited pace might leave us exposed if we're overrun in midfield. I just hope somehow our midfield starts producing performances and finds chemistry.
 

DannyCAFC

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
2,424
Supports
Charlton Athletic
Those mentioning 4-2-3-1 - I know Ole has played this in pre-season and it looks likely, but how can that be the most suitable formation for this side? Pogba is by far and away your most - if not only - creative outlet, and you're playing him in a double-pivot.
 

witchtrials

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
1,059
Think a lot of the people complaining about not having enough midfielders and haven't replaced Herrera and Fellaini believe we are going to play 4-3-3 again. Which won't be the case based on pre-season.
It's true that we've played with two in the centre for all of pre-season, but if we've left ourselves relatively light the on the basis that a formation has worked OK in pre-season then it's a big gamble. It's one thing beating up on chumps in friendles playing for made up trophies, but the reality of Premier League football is quite another, and there's a fair chance that formation won't stand up on contact with the latter. If that happens and we have to switch to a midfield 3 when we're not playing Leeds reserves then we have left ourselves very short. One or two injuries or suspensions, especially to Pogba, and we could be in big trouble.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,563
Supports
Mejbri
Those mentioning 4-2-3-1 - I know Ole has played this in pre-season and it looks likely, but how can that be the most suitable formation for this side? Pogba is by far and away your most - if not only - creative outlet, and you're playing him in a double-pivot.
I think 433 is more likely (than 4231) against stronger midfields given the options, but that puts quite a strain on a squad that has 4 midfielders. I assume Ole believes he can overwhelm weaker teams with a relentless attack. But of course, our midfield will have to be better than theirs. So maybe in 60% of games we'll go with that. We'll know soon enough, coming up against a pretty solid Chelsea midfield and then away to Wolves who dominated us in midfield last season.

But if he wants to go for a double pivot, Pogba is still the best option there alongside a mobile McTominay IMV.
 

MrSingh2002

New Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
4,408
Best I can manage. 5212, 433 and 4231.

De Gea
Tuanzebe Maguire Lindelof
AWB Fred McTominay Shaw
Pogba
Rashford Martial

De Gea
AWB Maguire Lindelof Shaw
Pogba McTominay Fred
James Rashford Martial.

De Gea
AWB Maguire Lindelof Shaw
Pogba McTominay
James Lingard Martial
Rashford​
 

DannyCAFC

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
2,424
Supports
Charlton Athletic
Best I can manage. 5212, 433 and 4231.

De Gea
Tuanzebe Maguire Lindelof
AWB Fred McTominay Shaw
Pogba
Rashford Martial

De Gea
AWB Maguire Lindelof Shaw
Pogba McTominay Fred
James Rashford Martial.

De Gea
AWB Maguire Lindelof Shaw
Pogba McTominay
James Lingard Martial
Rashford​
Don't think the top formation would have enough quality going forward, AWB and Shaw can bomb forward and provide support and width, but don't have the ability to help carve out consistent changes.

I suspect United will start out with the latter 4-2-3-1, as this seems to be the preferred formation from pre-season, but eventually with the lack of creative quality, they've probably revert to a 4-3-3, put Fred in alongside McTominay and push Pogba further forward and rely on him to be the sole creator once again.
 

King Andow

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,172
Location
Brazil
------------------Grant
---------Jones-Smalling-Rojo
------Darmian-Fred-Matic--Young
-----------------Pereira
-------------Lingard--Sanchez
 

bonothom

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
843
Lack of firepower? Going into season 15/16 we had Rooney(past his prime), Martial(young and very raw) and Depay(shit to be honest) then Rashford came from nowhere mid season. Hoping Greenwood will do a Rashford.
 

::sonny::

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
17,868
Location
Milan
De gea

AWB Lindelof Maguire Rojo Shaw

McT

Matic Pogba

Rashford Martial
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,995
Location
Canada
It's a 4231. Ignore numbers and look at players we'll actually use (I.e., ignore bailly cause hes injured for half a year, rojo and Darmian because they never play anyway). The formation we used in every single pre season game is going to be what we use in the season.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,656
Don't think the top formation would have enough quality going forward, AWB and Shaw can bomb forward and provide support and width, but don't have the ability to help carve out consistent changes.

I suspect United will start out with the latter 4-2-3-1, as this seems to be the preferred formation from pre-season, but eventually with the lack of creative quality, they've probably revert to a 4-3-3, put Fred in alongside McTominay and push Pogba further forward and rely on him to be the sole creator once again.
This is inevitable there is no way we can cope with just Pogba and Mctominay in a 2 especially when bang average players like Lingard and Mata will be the number 10. Change might even come as early as first game.

I really hope 5-3-2 is dead and gone, we’re not suited to playing that formation and we’ve just spent 50m on a player who isn’t a wingback.