I'm lagging. Is it serious? Likely to start vs Chelsea?I think the only reason Matic played today was because Pogba got injured. If we sign Dybala I doubt Mata even gets into every match day squad.
I'm lagging. Is it serious? Likely to start vs Chelsea?I think the only reason Matic played today was because Pogba got injured. If we sign Dybala I doubt Mata even gets into every match day squad.
I agree pace isn't everything but that doesn't make Mata faster than SilvaI'm not. Silva is slow these days. And still a top player. This obsession with pace is getting really silly. Let's sign sprinters then and make them footballers. Pace, pace, pace. The ball can move faster than any player, as Cruyff was fond to repeat.
No to the first question, Ole said it's a precaution as he doesn't want to risk anything before the Chelsea game.I'm lagging. Is it serious? Likely to start vs Chelsea?
When Mata had 20 goals and 20 assists for Chelsea, Silva didn't look so much better, did he?It's not just about pace, Silva has always been twice the player Mata is.
cheersNo to the first question, Ole said it's a precaution as he doesn't want to risk anything before the Chelsea game.
Not sure, just said he had a back injury.I'm lagging. Is it serious? Likely to start vs Chelsea?
Reasons:I think the only reason Matic played today was because Pogba got injured. If we sign Dybala I doubt Mata even gets into every match day squad.
Mata isn't faster than Silva and isn't as good also but our problems go much deeper than Mata's pace, imo.I agree pace isn't everything but that doesn't make Mata faster than Silva
That's only one season where you could say Mata was arguably better than Silva. The latter has consistently been the best or one of the best City players since they've signed him.When Mata had 20 goals and 20 assists for Chelsea, Silva didn't look so much better, did he?
My point is that to blame the lack of structure in our game on Mata's absence of pace is exaggerated.
I don't think Mata would look great for Liverpool either and would definitely hinder City's game. He's got great technique and solid fundamentals but he's not creative enough nor productive enough to justify having him as a #10Mata isn't faster than Silva and isn't as good also but our problems go much deeper than Mata's pace, imo.
It would certainly help if they didn't often take needless extra touches for a simple pass. You make a good point, this is why we aren't close to the best european teams. The pace at which we move the ball, with acres of space even, is too slow.It's not so much a lack of pace, but both Matic and Mata are clearly both past it and look old and slow out there. It's one thing being physically slow, another thing just looking slow and constantly a step off pace on the pitch. That's the issue with Matic, Mata, Sanchez, was the case with Lukaku, often times the case with Young in how he gets himself in trouble. Fred and Pereira as well are similar in terms of their mental decision making. They process everything far too slowly for the premier league and need way more space than they actually get. Whenever any of those 6 or 7 players play, we have the same problem. For some it's the speed of thought that lags behind, the other is a bit of everything when you are just past that physical prime.
The thing is he has never been that player at Utd. Silva has been much better than him since he has been here, played in the right position or not.When Mata had 20 goals and 20 assists for Chelsea, Silva didn't look so much better, did he?
My point is that to blame the lack of structure in our game on Mata's absence of pace is exaggerated.
You are correctBoth need to be gone next summer and have very limited game time this season.
I fear neither will come true.
Good post, I agree with thisWe can get away with Mata if everyone else is pressing hard and fast. It's still not ideal but in that situation his movement between the lines (no matter how slow) and passing ability can sometimes be quite useful. In saying that I want pretty much all of his minutes going to Gomes.
Matic - I tend to think that he's finished. He's been terrible for 18 months now. He's not capable of being a part of a high press, and his defensive positioning is far too poor to be able to compensate. Unlike Mata, I can't see any system or combination where he's going to be a good option.
This won't change until the youngsters start being integrated and we sign Sancho to go along with that. If Rashford was our least technical player of our top half of the side, we'd be one of the most technical sides in football.Even more worrying is the clear lack of quality on the ball. Even if we replace them with faster players it doesn't mean anything. All the pace, energy and pressing in the world is no use if we can't hold the ball for more than 5 seconds after we regained it.
The whinging on those two has started since last season. Give it a bit of more time and you will join.Matic did very well for our first goal today, and Mata had a huge part in both our winning goals for our previous two friendlies... But yeah, let's just be negative before the season has even started and we don't really know what our first XI will look like or anything like that, because that's fun.
Seriously, this whinging on this place before a ball has been even kicked this season has been something else.
I definitely think Silva has better acceleration at least. Even if not, he excels in other ways which Mata doesn't.I'd be surprised if David Silva is quicker than Mata. Was Scholes quick? People are getting silly with this pace, pace, pace...
Why does not buying any new players mean he's forced to play Mata and Matic?If anything the second half of yesterdays game once Fred replaced Matic and Gomes was introduced into a quick front 4(Gomes,Lingard,James and Greenwood) will hopefully steer Ole away from the two M's.we are not going to get any more new players this season. Ole looked despondent during the game. He knew the jig was up.