pascell
Full Member
Well who else scored the goals apart from Hazard to get you top 4?Didn't watch us last season then.
Well who else scored the goals apart from Hazard to get you top 4?Didn't watch us last season then.
Second top scorer was Pedro, third was RLC.Well who else scored the goals apart from Hazard to get you top 4?
No wonder Abraham is getting the nod then, still think you'll have a good season. Once you get Willian and Hudson-Odoi back fit you'll be fine.Second top scorer was Pedro, third was RLC.
Higuain, Giroud and Morata were trash for us last season.
But the window is closed and they have a transfer ban?Lampard has influenced Chelsea to play a better brand of football than any of what Solskjaer showed even in the 11 game undefeated run. He's not going to get sacked so long as he's consistent with the performances. The results will come more abundantly when he gets his own players especially clinical forwards.
I don't see why anything thinks Chelsea won't challenge top four.
Yes next season hence I mentioned the consistency in performances. If Chelsea finish 5th / 6th I don't see why Lampard should be sacked. It's not exactly a balanced team he's adopted.But the window is closed and they have a transfer ban?
It doesn't reek of 'loser'. They've sold their talisman and are banned from buying players. If Lampard keeps impressing in the fluitity and cohesion of chelsea's football, develops the players they do have but finishes 5th/6th, they'd be fools to sell him. I think they will challenge for top 4 but the point is that in a season like this, where the manager hasn't been give much, you have to consider the other metrics as well. So far, I've been impressed in terms of those.Is it possible that Chelsea 19/20 is one of those teams that "plays better" yet cannot win?
Because that reeks of "loser".
What's the point? 5th-6th and UCL Round of 16 but we played better? The sack in May it is.
Tbh if that midfield is given an extended run together it could be second best in the league. Very strange to see a Chelsea squad lacking in depth though but injuries have played a part.Literally the only thing that could get Lamps the sack this season is if we are in the relegation zone for an extended period. Not happening.
Very, very encouraged by the improvement of some of our lads. Also clear that the midfield 3 we used today is the way to go against top teams. All 3 of Kante, Jorginho, and Kovacic were great.
This side desperately needs 2-3 additions and we're good to go. A dynamic, clinical striker is obviously top priority.
Tbh if that midfield is given an extended run together it could be second best in the league. Very strange to see a Chelsea squad lacking in depth though but injuries have played a part.
He's a great talent. I have been impressed with him. Why he's getting slated is beyond me.He's championship quality dogshit according to a fair few in here!
Yes but they look completely different under Lampard than they did with Sarri.Wasn't that their midfield 3 for nearly all of last season?
Its an excellent midfield for big games as shown last night and at home to City and Liverpool last season. Could help us surprise a few in the CL (very much doubt we'll win in but wouldn't rule out a deep run).Tbh if that midfield is given an extended run together it could be second best in the league. Very strange to see a Chelsea squad lacking in depth though but injuries have played a part.
Tammy Abraham, in his thread everyone was bashing him beyond belief.Yes but they look completely different under Lampard than they did with Sarri.
I was really impressed with Chelsea in both games. As everyone else has said, they will struggle without a top striker and maybe in defence too, but that kid who came on yesterday looked pretty decent. It might be a blessing long term that’s the likes of him and Mount get game time.
No, the defender.Tammy Abraham, in his thread everyone was bashing him beyond belief.
Tomori. Lampard had him on loan at Derby last season (where he won their player of the season).No, the defender.
I've said this from last season that Lampard is a better coach then Ole. Chelsea are poor defensively because they have poor individuals covering those positions. I'd much rather have Chelsea's issues from a tactical standpoint than the ones we currently have at United.Very early days for Lamard as Chelsea manager. But I'm extremely impressed by A) the instant imprint he's made on the team in their work on the ball. They look like a team that is very well coached going forward and B) how he seems to getting some kids playing at the highest level. They could be crushed by the pressure but are getting on with confidently and performing.
Of course he has much to prove. They look careless and weak defensively. Whether that'll improve, who knows. Is the fluidity in attack lampard or the new manager bump as we got with ole for a few games. How is he in the transfer market. How will he handle big names.
But there are some good signs.
Yeah. I know nothing about him though. Seemed from what little I saw that he had some potential though.Tomori. Lampard had him on loan at Derby last season (where he won their player of the season).
I'd have to watch mode games but based on the sample size I so far agree. He's got kids playing swashbuckling cohesive football. Very impressed.I've said this from last season that Lampard is a better coach then Ole. Chelsea are poor defensively because they have poor individuals covering those positions. I'd much rather have Chelsea's issues from a tactical standpoint than the ones we currently have at United.
He's on another level to Ole from a 'coaching' perspective and drilling the players. Whether that will in time make him a more effective points getter than Ole, time will tell but I think if he had the same budget as Ole, and all things being equal he's going to have the better managerial career long term.I'd have to watch mode games but based on the sample size I so far agree. He's got kids playing swashbuckling cohesive football. Very impressed.
Yep agreed.We can have sack watch threads all we want - plain fact is he's got a squad that's arguably worse than ours unarguably playing better, more attractive football.