Paul Scholes' United XI

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,494
Presumably what you'd do is remove RVN for Scholes and have Rooney and Ronaldo up front.
 

DRM

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 8, 2017
Messages
4,227
Interesting midfield, personally I'd swap Beckham for Scholes and Cantona for Ruud.
 

Nico87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
883
Location
Manchester
Thanks I’m a sucker for these type of videos. Found it weird that he’s talking about Rio and Stam not really gelling as a partnership, when Stam left a year before Rio arrived.
 

AndersB

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2016
Messages
717
Thanks I’m a sucker for these type of videos. Found it weird that he’s talking about Rio and Stam not really gelling as a partnership, when Stam left a year before Rio arrived.
He also misspells Stam's name. Should've just gone with Vidic.
 

red woppit

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
2,232
Location
Buchebi
Supports
Northampton Town
Thanks I’m a sucker for these type of videos. Found it weird that he’s talking about Rio and Stam not really gelling as a partnership, when Stam left a year before Rio arrived.
He's right then, they didn't gel.
 

Physiocrat

Has No Mates
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
8,969
What was his full side? I don't have time to watch the vid at the moment
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,255
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
What was his full side? I don't have time to watch the vid at the moment
Ronaldo Van Nistelrooy Rooney
Giggs ---Keane--- Beckham
Irwin Stam Ferdinand Neville
Schmeichel
* Dream XI of Scholes' team-mates...hence no Best, Charlton, Law etc.
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,714
Struggling to improve that tbh. If he can't pick himself.

Maybe cantona for ruud.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,472
I agree with Schmeichel, Rio and Stam being there. I don't think Vidic was as good as either despite being a world class beast himself. That's just how good I thought Rio and Stam were rather than a slight on Vidic.

I'm not surprised he picked Ruud. Scholes as sort of a shadow striker in 02/03 was absolutely deadly alongside him. Their partnership ahead of Keane and Butt/Veron, flanked by Giggs and Beckham (for some of the season anyway) made for one of my favourite United teams of all time despite the lack of success.
 

Physiocrat

Has No Mates
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
8,969
Ronaldo Van Nistelrooy Rooney
Giggs ---Keane--- Beckham
Irwin Stam Ferdinand Neville
Schmeichel
* Dream XI of Scholes' team-mates...hence no Best, Charlton, Law etc.
Schmeichel
Neville - Rio - Stam - Irwin
Beckham - Keane - Giggs
Rooney - RVN - Ronaldo
Thanks both.

It's an interesting side. I'm just not sure if Giggs was ever adept enough to play an LCM role like Di Maria did for Real. If he did this could work like a charm (of course it does limit Keane but he can do a great job there)
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,009
Location
Moscow
Thanks I’m a sucker for these type of videos. Found it weird that he’s talking about Rio and Stam not really gelling as a partnership, when Stam left a year before Rio arrived.
I think he meant that they probably won’t play as well together in his theoretical team. Hence his remark that if he was picking a partnership, he’d pick Vidić, but he had picked 2 best individuals.
 

DoomSlayer

New Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
4,875
Location
Bulgaria
Thanks both.

It's an interesting side. I'm just not sure if Giggs was ever adept enough to play an LCM role like Di Maria did for Real. If he did this could work like a charm (of course it does limit Keane but he can do a great job there)
I think both Beckham and Giggs have a very high work-rate due to playing mostly in a old school 4-4-2, so they were never like the modern inside forwards, who don't like to cover much ground in midfield. Beckham in a midfield 3 would be particularly good, in my opinion, due to his incredible passing ability.

I'd only swap RVN for RVP or Cantona, because they would both give a lot more in terms of link-up play and assisting Ronaldo or Rooney.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,009
Location
Moscow
Thanks both.

It's an interesting side. I'm just not sure if Giggs was ever adept enough to play an LCM role like Di Maria did for Real. If he did this could work like a charm (of course it does limit Keane but he can do a great job there)
He said (perhaps jokingly) that he would’ve loved that team to be a 4-4-2, but the template was 4-3-3. So the players he had picked in midfield were more suited for that formation.
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,289
That's a back four that can play. I watched an old game from 99-00 season the other day and I always forget how comfortable Stam was with the ball at his feet and bringing the ball out from the back.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,641
Didn't Giggs plat CM a bit in his later years and do a good job there? It's getting to be a quite a few years ago now so my memory of it might be wrong
 

Physiocrat

Has No Mates
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
8,969
He said (perhaps jokingly) that he would’ve loved that team to be a 4-4-2, but the template was 4-3-3. So the players he had picked in midfield were more suited for that formation.
Ah, ok that makes more sense. I reckon Carrick might have made an appearance in a 442 alongside Keane. The only other option would probably been Nicky Butt.
 

Falcow

New Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2019
Messages
1,338
Location
Dublin
That's a back four that can play. I watched an old game from 99-00 season the other day and I always forget how comfortable Stam was with the ball at his feet and bringing the ball out from the back.
I'd probably have Irwin right back(he was a right back after all it's just that he was so good that he could play left as well) and then Evra at left back. Also I thought Ed was probably overall better keeper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,289
Didn't Giggs plat CM a bit in his later years and do a good job there? It's getting to be a quite a few years ago now so my memory of it might be wrong
Yup. Played a lot in 08-09 there, also alternated a lot between CM and LM in the latter years too. Excellent chance creator from the centre but could be a bit reckless in possession at times.
 

MrPooni

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
2,423
RVN + CR didn't work.

Giggs in midfield is wasted.

Do not like.
Ronaldo was still developing when he played with Ruud. It took him the full season after RVN's departure to start approaching his peak for us.
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,260
Hard to deny any of those players in that team. But, that midfield just doesn't look right to me. Giggs as part of a midfield 3? Not sure I could see that working.
 

Stobzilla

Official Team Perv
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
21,923
Location
Grove Street, home.
RVN + CR didn't work.

Giggs in midfield is wasted.

Do not like.
Disagree.

I feel like his potential was never fully realised as a result of playing on the wing, if he had gone to Italy they would have moved him inside either straight away or much sooner. Individually speaking, him replacing Cantona would have gotten more out of him. As it stands, it was best for the team for him to be out wide.
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,464
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
Thing is, that team can change shape easily, which is good. With Ronaldo pulling out to the right wing, Giggs to the left, and Beckham in a midfield two with Keane - and Rooney behind Ruud. It's very flexible. And fantastic.
 

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,107
Location
Cardiff
Disagree.

I feel like his potential was never fully realised as a result of playing on the wing, if he had gone to Italy they would have moved him inside either straight away or much sooner. Individually speaking, him replacing Cantona would have gotten more out of him. As it stands, it was best for the team for him to be out wide.
It might not be a popular opinion but I agree with you. His ability to pick a pass, especially under pressure was second to none. He had many great games for us in that CM position even though he was in his mid 30s when he moved there. His work rate throughout his career was also top notch and I think he would have been a more than decent player if played through the middle.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,328
Disagree.

I feel like his potential was never fully realised as a result of playing on the wing, if he had gone to Italy they would have moved him inside either straight away or much sooner. Individually speaking, him replacing Cantona would have gotten more out of him. As it stands, it was best for the team for him to be out wide.
Agreed but he was the perfect 442 winger.

I think both him and Beckham would of been CMs if they came through nowadays (Beckham arguably a right back ala Trent).
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,472
Giggs played as a CAM a few times in the early 00s if I remember correctly.

I do remember one game - away to Deportivo in 01 maybe - where Sir Alex played him just behind Ruud with Scholes actually on the left and he was just magnificent.
 

MVBDX

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
782
Supports
Real Madrid
That's one hell of a team, always like his comments as he keeps it real, and says what's on his mind.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,625
My team (Sir Alex reign)

GK: Schmeichel

RB: Gaz
CB: Stam
CB: Rio
LB: Irwin

DM: Keane
MC: Scholes

AMR: Beckham
AML: Giggs

FWD: Rooney
STK: Ronaldo

RVN is a better striker then Ronaldo was for us. However if I had to stake my life on a United's team then that would be the formation and the team I would rely upon.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
At their most mature, Beckham, Keane and Giggs would be an unbelievable midfield three in today’s game. Energy, grit, passing ability, dribbling. It has it all.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,009
Location
Moscow
Regarding Beckham and Giggs in midfield three. I was just about to watch Man United - Porto from the 1996/97 season and I couldn't not post the line up:

 

TRUERED89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
2,366
Location
England
Agreed but he was the perfect 442 winger.

I think both him and Beckham would of been CMs if they came through nowadays (Beckham arguably a right back ala Trent).
Beckham a RB? Come on, way to good in the final third to waste him as a RB.. NO THANKS! Even if he came through the ranks today, the moment he'd score from the halfway line, any manager would be like, HELL NO this guy is no defender :lol:.
 

Ikon

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
2,414
I'm not sure that Van Nistelrooy would have been necessary between Rooney & Ronaldo.
Perhaps Cantona or even Scholes himself playing behind those two...
Actually, how can Scholes not be in the team anyway..??


...........Ronaldo........Rooney.......
.....................Cantona...............
...Giggs......Keane.......Beckham...
....Irwin...Rio.......Stam...Neville....
................Schmeichel.................