I doubt the Glazers even know what an Everton is.
Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter KM
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran hold a long overdue conversation about United's awful league form with 1 win in 7. They discuss a disappointing draw at Bournemouth, a not so disappointing draw against Liverpool and a crushing defeat at Chelsea - Is time nearly over for Erik Ten Hag?
Then in a special second half of the pod, Nik welcomes Natalie ( https://twitter.com/natalie_17) to discuss the fortunes of Manchester United Women as they booked a place in the FA Cup Final after a historic first ever win vs. Chelsea.
- Status
Stop it! It's not funny!
Or that we have a player named Rojo
I'm calling absolute bullshit on this one.
I mean Rojo could only have weakened them. What's the fecking point of this tweet?
that's absurd.. loan with obligation to buy and we reject that.. nonsense.
It would have helped, you morons!
Even if it isn't true
Don't believe it for a second.
Surely this is rubbish.
It must be rubbish but at this point nothing surprises me anymore
That's too dumb to actually be true.
Well, at least it’s better than Abramovic who loves to strengthen direct rivals.
There's about zero chance that Glazers get involved with the football side of the club.
Everton might well be a threat to the top 4 spot but Rojo wasn't going to be a difference maker.
The Glazers dont know Everton. Even if they know, they have no clue about their top 4 chances. All of that seems unlikely, but with an obligation to buy, we would have sold him, Everton or whoever else, he would be gone. So this one smells like utter BS to me. Rojo is not even in a matchday squad most of the time for us, getting rid of him for a decent fee is not something the Glazers or Ed would block.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
So they would pay us a loan fee but we would still continue to pay half of his wages which would be a higher amount than the loan fee. Why wouldn't they just pay a higher percentage of the wages and disregard the fee?
Suuuuurree
Nonsense.
The Glazers care so little about the day to day goings on at the club, they aren't suddenly going to get on the blower and block the transfer of our 6th choice CB when we're desperate to get people off the payroll.
Plus I doubt they're even fully aware of who our direct rivals are nowadays.
The Glazers care so little about the day to day goings on at the club, they aren't suddenly going to get on the blower and block the transfer of our 6th choice CB when we're desperate to get people off the payroll.
Plus I doubt they're even fully aware of who our direct rivals are nowadays.
What a joke we are with these bloodsuckers owning the club
No, they blocked the move because they see Rojo as possibly the next Pele.
Thought that was Zouma?
Yeah, he turned up as QPR's training ground, hoping a move from West Brom would go through.
https://www.skysports.com/football/...-infamous-failed-deadline-day-transfer-to-qpr
Close but no cigar. Should have gone with Woodward, if they wanted this to be even a bit believable. The Glazers do not care about anything but the bottom line, doubt they have a clue about football and the quality of players.
No white text?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Pretty insane to see how readily the fans replying to the Tweet are ready to lap it up, it's obviously not true.
Cool, so Bailly can leave on a free in 4 years instead time instead of next year.
sureHe should be sold in January. He’s useless.
Nonsense, we have option to extend the contract for 2 years.
No wonder he's smiling.
I think he’s good. But so injury prone. You expect him to leave the field after 10 mins, like when we had Hargreaves
Who's going to buy him? He's shit and injury prone.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That has to be bullshit, surely?
The fact that he has an extension option in his contract is just another reason the mail and other outlets like it should probably not be posted. Just annoying headlines from them
- Status