He has massive support on here. Most think he’s a good player. Even a very good player. However, if you compare the feedback he gets to that of Andreas Pereira, another young central midfielder of similar age and United experience, Pereira’s name is very often followed on this forum by ‘he’s just not very good’, or ‘he’s a bit shit to be fair’. He’s clearly (clear to me anyway), of superior talent to Scott McTominay. He has better technical ability, is a better passer, dribbler and shooter. And is very two-footed. Most would not hear a suggestion that Scott ‘just isn’t that good’.
I’m unsure if this comes down to cliché stereotypes, given the contrasting profiles of both players. Pereira isn’t even a Brazilian midfielder with blonde highlights who can be accused of not ‘running around’. But in general, the difference in consensus is stark, and I can’t see why Scott McTominay is seen as a bigger talent. Both are quite average in my opinion, for the record.